Over-simplification and mis-portrayal of concepts such as hygiene, probiotics, and microbiota
Assumption that the readership cannot understand complex concepts
Promotion of breast feeding is lacking in precise rationale for modern women. Breast-feeding mothers need to know they are promoting a lifelong healthy microbiota for their offspring. Since the neonate acquires its microbiome primarily from its mother, greater attention needs to be paid to the mother’s diet, faecal and vaginal microbiome. Increasing awareness of the importance of the microbiome and the factors which sustain or disrupt it should be part of antenatal education.
Microbiome science already provides a glimpse of how the microbiota may be preserved or restored, including development of smart antibiotics, 107 non-antibiotic anti-microbials, microbial transplants, microbial consortia or single strains, and use of personalised biomarkers of disease risk prediction. 108 , 109 Restoration of the microbiome by vaginal microbiota transplants in C-section infants has been demonstrated, 110 albeit of unproven long-term benefit and controversial. 111 In addition, the molecular basis by which bifidobacteria engage with the host immune system is emerging; 112 , 113 this is important because such organisms are a predominant component of the microbiota in neonates.
Because of the multiplicity of factors involved, strategies to preserve or manipulate the microbiota will probably require a personalised approach tailored to individual genetics and lifestyle factors. 109
Over the last 20 years or so, for reasons outlined above, there has not only been a revival of concern about infection and the role of hygiene 10 , 114 but also a realisation that the ‘scrupulous cleanliness’ approach advocated by Florence Nightingale 115 is no longer appropriate. If, as this review suggests, allergic diseases are not the price we have to pay for protection against infection, this is good news for hygiene. However, if we are to maximise protection against infection while at the same time sustaining exposure to essential microbes, we need a revised approach to hygiene based on current scientific evidence.
The International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene (IFH) ( http://www.ifh-homehygiene.org ) was established in 1997 with the aim of developing and promoting a more effective approach to hygiene, based on scientific principles and the growing database of evidence about pathogen transmission. 116 To achieve this, IFH adopted the principle of targeted hygiene. 117 Targeted Hygiene is based on a four-step risk assessment requiring identification of the sources and reservoirs of pathogens, the routes of transmission, the critical control points, and appropriate hygiene interventions.
Targeted hygiene is based on the chain of infection transmission ( Figure 2 ) which shows that pathogenic organisms are continually shed into the environment from sources such as human occupants, pets and raw foods. 118
The chain of infection transmission in the home
To get from an infected source to another individual, pathogens use well defined routes. Sampling studies record the presence of non-pathogenic bacteria and bacteria and viruses of medical interest on environmental surfaces in home and community settings, and laboratory and field studies have evaluated the rates of transfer of viral and bacterial pathogens via hands and common touch surfaces. 116 These demonstrate that the critical control points for transmission of infection are the hands, hand contact surfaces, food contact surfaces, and cleaning utensils and that these present the highest risk of transmission ( Figure 3 ).
Ranking of sites and surfaces based on risk of transmission of infection
Equally important considerations are the interventions used to eliminate pathogens from critical control points before they spread further. This is important since inadequate procedures can increase transmission. 119 – 123 Hygienic (as opposed to visible) cleaning of hands, surfaces, fabrics and so on can be achieved by the following:
While it is difficult to quantify the impact, evidence suggests that targeted hygiene reduces spread of infection. A review of evidence published between 1980 and 2001 concluded that the strength of the association between hygiene in the community and infections, as measured by the relative reduction in risk of illness by one or more hygiene measures (including handwashing), was generally greater than 20%. 125 A meta-analysis of community studies showed that improvements in hand hygiene alone resulted in reductions in gastrointestinal and respiratory illness of 31% and 21%, respectively. 126
Changing hygiene behaviour, however, requires changing public perceptions about hygiene, most particularly that hygiene is different from cleanliness, that is, more than just absence of dirt. Hygiene is what we do in the places and at the times that matter (hand, food, toilet and respiratory hygiene, health care, etc.) to protect against infection.
Communication and social marketing campaigns are now being evaluated and used as a means to achieve behaviour change mainly (but not exclusively) in relation to food and respiratory hygiene. These campaigns, however, focus on changing behaviours rather than changing understanding and dispelling misconceptions. 13 , 127 – 130 The e-bug project is a Europe-wide initiative aimed at ensuring all children leave school with an understanding of targeted hygiene. 131 An important feature of this teaching resource is that it is based on understanding infection and how it is transmitted.
The evidence reviewed in this study reflects the significant shift in thinking in the last 25 years. It shows that the interaction of the OF microbes which inhabit the natural environment and human microbiome with our immune system plays an essential role in immune regulation, promoting a tolerising milieu for the immune system which may impact against the development of allergic disease. Changes in lifestyle and environment, along with rapid urbanisation, have all contributed to changes in our exposure to essential microbes. 132 In addition, altered diet and excessive antibiotic use have also sustained detrimental effects on the content and diversity of the human microbiome. Together, these factors have had profound effects on the immune system, which are likely to have contributed to the onset of allergic disease.
By contrast, the public idea that obsessive hygiene and cleanliness is the root cause of the rise in allergies is no longer supported. Data show that relevant microbial exposures are almost entirely unrelated to hygiene as the public understands it. This is partly because sustaining the human microbiome through diet and avoiding excessive antibiotic usage are factors entirely unrelated to hygiene.
As far as understanding strategies which may reduce the risk of allergic disease, work is progressing fast, but there is still a long way to go. The multiple factors involved (including those not directly associated with microbiome interactions (allergen exposure, genetic, pollution, etc.)) make it impossible to assess the contribution of each factor. It is likely that success will only be achieved through combined effects of lifestyle changes, together with improved diet and reduced antibiotic prescribing. Nevertheless, data are now strong enough to encourage changes, such as encouraging natural childbirth, physical interaction between siblings and non-siblings, more sport and other outdoor activities (including babies in prams), and less time spent indoors, and reduced antibiotic consumption.
This review further supports the view that the term ‘hygiene hypothesis’ is a misleading and dangerous misnomer which needs to be abandoned in favour of a more appropriate term such as the OF Mechanism. However, in order to tackle both allergy and infection issues we also need to develop a smarter approach to hygiene. Although targeted hygiene was developed to optimise protection against infection, it provides a framework for maximising protection against pathogen exposure but, at the same time, minimising disturbance of the indoor microbiome and spread of essential microbes between family members.
As summarised in Table 1 , if we want to take advantage of these new findings, we first have to change public, public health and professional perceptions about the microbiome and about hygiene. Unstructured and conflicting advice and vague health warnings in the consumer and professional media must be replaced with simple clear mechanistic explanations and consistent messages using consistent terminology which avoids the use of the term ‘hygiene hypothesis’ to define the concept of a link between microbial exposure and allergies. Recent media articles which promote unsubstantiated suggestions that reduced handwashing could be a means to build and sustain a diverse gut microbiome are in direct conflict with public health agency advice on handwashing which is identified as probably the most important ‘critical control point’ for preventing spread of infection in all settings. 133 , 134
An underlying problem that needs addressing is that, both nationally and internationally there are no lead agencies which take ownership of hygiene promotion, looking at it from the point of view of the public at large and what they need to understand and know. Campaigns targeting food or respiratory, pet or health-care hygiene are developed by different agencies, often with conflicting messages. They also do little to address public misunderstandings about how infections are transmitted, the difference between hygiene, cleanliness and dirt, the widespread misuse of the term ‘germs’, and the hygiene hypothesis misnomer. 135
The imperative to understand and reverse the epidemiologic trends in allergic and immune-mediated disorders relates not solely to the personal suffering and health-care burden in the developed world. Without urgent effective intervention, such trends will be replicated around the globe as societies undergo socio-economic development. 105
Funding: P.J.T. holds a Clinician Scientist Award from the UK Medical Research Council (reference MR/K010468/1) and is supported through the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)/Imperial Biomedical Research Centre. F.S. is a founder shareholder in Atlantia Food Clinical Trials, Tucana Health, and Alimentary Health Ltd. He is director of the APC Microbiome Institute, a research centre funded in part by Science Foundation Ireland (APC/SFI/12/RC/2273) and which has recently been in receipt of research grants from the following companies: Abbvie, Alimentary Health Ltd, Cremo, Danone, General Mills, Friesland Campina, Janssen, Kerry, MeadJohnson, Nutricia, 4D Pharma plc, Second Genome, and Sigmoid pharma. The authors received an honorarium from the International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene for their time in preparation of this manuscript.
Sally F Bloomfield, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene, The Old Dairy Cottage, Montacute, Somerset TA15 6XL, UK.
Graham AW Rook, Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of Infection, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Elizabeth A Scott, Center for Hygiene and Health, Department of Biology, Simmons College, Boston, MA, USA.
Fergus Shanahan, APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork – National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Rosalind Stanwell-Smith, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Paul Turner, Section of Paediatrics (Allergy & Infectious Diseases) and MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK; Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
The idea of a link between parasite infection and immune disorders was first suggested in 1968 [13] before the advent of large scale DNA sequencing techniques.The original formulation of the hygiene hypothesis dates from 1989, when David Strachan proposed that lower incidence of infection in early childhood could be an explanation for the rise in allergic diseases such as asthma and hay fever ...
In 1989, Strachan proposed the hygiene hypothesis of allergic disease after observing that hay fever was less common among children with older siblings. 8 He reasoned that children growing up in larger families may experience increased exposure to microbes in early childhood due to inevitable unhygienic contact with older siblings or prenatal exposure from the mother infected by similar ...
Discussion of the hygiene hypothesis and the implications for hygiene practice. The link between atopy, and microbial exposure and infection. In the first part of this paper the evidence for a causal link between the sharp rise in atopy over the past 30 years and the possibility of a reduction in our level of exposure to microbes was reviewed.
Introduction. Throughout its history, the Hygiene Hypothesis has shown itself to be adaptable and flexible whenever it has been challenged by innovation in science ().A number of new findings need to be considered in this ongoing revisiting process: The originally proposed Th1/Th2 paradigm is challenged by currently elucidated new classes of effector and regulating immune cells pointing out to ...
The hygiene hypothesis was proposed almost three decades ago. Nevertheless, its mechanism still remains with relevant controversies. Some studies defend that early exposures during childhood to microbes and parasites are key determinants to prevent allergies and autoimmune diseases; however, other studies demonstrated that these early exposures can even potentiate the clinical scenario of the ...
The old friends hypothesis, proposed by Rook et al, notes the co-evolution of microorganisms and macroorganisms, such as parasitic helminths, with the development of the human immune system. Citation 22 Similar to the hygiene hypothesis, it suggests that these organisms are required for normal immune system development.
The hygiene hypothesis proposes that as living environment is improved, children become less exposed to infectious agents, which leads to inadequate maturation of their immune systems. This hypothesis suggests that early exposure to pathogens may enhance the immune responses of those children, thereby suppressing autoimmune reactions involved ...
The "h ygiene h ypothesis", proposed by Strachan in 1 989, aimed to explain this peculiar genera. tional rise in immune dysre gulation. Ho wev er, research o ver the past 1 0 years provides ...
The hygiene hypothesis postulates that an increased frequency of infections contributes to a decrease in autoimmune and allergic diseases. ... the protective effect of the original environment ...
The Hygiene Hypothesis comprise immunological, microbiological and evolutionary aspects. Thus, the original postulate developed into a holistic model that explains the impact of post-modern life-style on humans, who initially evolved in close proximity to a more natural environment. Focusing on diet and the microbiome as the most prominent ...
The Hygiene Hypothesis comprise immunological, microbiological and evolutionary aspects. Thus, the original postulate developed into a holistic model that explains the impact of post-modern life-style on humans, who initially evolved in close proximity to a more natural environment.
They decided the name has to go ( 15 ). "The trouble is, as soon as you use the words 'hygiene hypothesis,' the word hygiene prejudges what the cause is," says Bloomfield. To the public, "hygiene" is interpreted as personal cleanliness: washing hands, keeping food clean and fresh, sanitizing the home.
The Hygiene Hypothesis comprise immunological, microbiological and evolutionary aspects. Thus, the original postulate developed into a holistic model that explains the impact of post-modern life-style on humans, who initially evolved in close proximity to a more natural environment. Focusing on diet and the microbiome as the most prominent ...
The model in Fig. 1 outlines the process by which microbial diversity is lost. Gut microbial richness results from a balance of the acquisition and the loss of microbial species. The original hygiene hypothesis, first framed by David Strachan (), has evolved into new, more complex and explicit hypotheses that capture many of the processes that influence gut microbial establishment and ...
As mentioned previously, the first description of the hygiene hypothesis was made on the observation that siblings, with increased exposure to infectious disease through contact with other children, suffer less from allergies (Strachan 1989).Since then, these results were supported by a large number of studies (Strachan et al. 1997a, b; Ball et al. 2000; Bodner et al. 1998).
The hygiene hypothesis is the idea that kids need to be exposed to germs in order to develop healthy immune systems. We know that many common viruses did not circulate as widely during the pandemic, thanks to social distancing, masking, and other COVID mitigation measures. Are there downsides to those missed infections? In this Q&A, Caitlin ...
The original hygiene hypothesis proposed that certain diseases derive from low levels of early-life microbial exposure. Since then, the hypothesis has been applied to numerous inflammatory, autoimmune, and allergic conditions. The changes in hygiene linked to these diseases include numerous changes in biotic exposure and lifestyle. To this end, some scholars have called for abandonment of the ...
The "hygiene hypothesis" In 1989 Strachan published a paper entitled "Hay fever, hygiene and household size", in which he observed that increasing family size was associated with a reduced risk of developing hay fever ().Using data from a British 1958 birth cohort (the 1958 National Child Development Study) he found that the prevalence of hay fever at both 11 (parent-reported) and 23 ...
Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to affect the human microbiome in infected and uninfected individuals, having a substantial impact on human health over the long term. This pandemic intersects with a decades-long decline in microbial diversity and ancestral microbes due to hygiene, antibiotics, and urban living (the hygiene ...
Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. - PMC. As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. BMJ. 1989 Nov 18; 299 (6710): 1259-1260.
Please note: your email address is provided to the journal, which may use this information for marketing purposes.
The old friends hypothesis: parasitic helminths The old friends hypothesis, proposed by Rook et al, notes the co-evolution of microorganisms and macroorganisms, such as parasitic helminths, with the development of the human immune system.22 Similar to the hygiene hypothesis, it sug-gests that these organisms are required for normal immune
These were analysed and key themes were integrated into a paper which was made available online to all authors for review. This included further questions soliciting the author's views. After further rounds of questions and revision, a consensus position was obtained. ... a number of refinements to the original hygiene hypothesis now seem to ...