| | | Chapter 22: Ten theses on the museum in society The foundation for this chapter was laid in 2000, a year significant not because of its symbolic value but because this is the year I was part of a museological network that discussed the relationship between authentic objects, society and communication. I contributed to a clarification of the topic by introducing the idea of focusing more on visitors and users, pointing out how essential establishing communication with and between them is for museums to play a role in society. The following list summarises the concepts introduced: The ten theses on this list are central. Collecting, documenting, preserving, disseminating etc. are important activities for museums to engage in, but it is also important to look at the museum’s role in society from a dissemination perspective. For casual visitors, this means the museum must consider them not only as a consumer to be satisfied, but particularly as a partner in dialogue. And even more so as partner to be respected and taken seriously. Below, I will briefly expand on each of the ten theses statements to further clarify the museum’s role in society. I have chosen to focus on history museums, which covers everything from small local ones and the National Museum of Denmark to ‘non-museums’ such as the Land of Legends Lejre, where archaeological experiments are conducted. The term is tricky. On the one hand, it is used to describe unique objects, their correct provenience and age; for example the highly valuable Nordic Bronze Age Trundholm sun chariot. Danish museum inspector Annette Vasström (1999) extends the notion of focusing on objects alone to cover what she calls an . Defining ‘authentic’ as value-free is problematic as it is often bound to a material culture, which means that other cultures may have a completely different idea of what matters. It is not the objects themselves that are authentic, but that which can be repeated. Shinto temples in Japan are razed every 20 years only to be rebuilt and the new buildings are as authentic as the old ones. Their authenticity lies in using traditional building techniques and maintaining ancient skills. The Danish scenographer and exhibition designer Anne Sofie Becker (1990) makes a distinction between presentative and discursive exhibitions. objects are exhibited as they are with many ‘empty spaces’ that need to be completed by the visitor. The type establishes “… homogeneous orders, coherent closed systems, which individual parts must always obey and comply with the whole ...” (1990:81). The concept of the presentative/discursive dichotomy creates both clarity and confusion. Discursive exhibitions are not solely limited to one order or system, but can possibly contain narratives told in many different ways and with a variety of intentions. Although objects are what make museums unique, it is also crucial that they can tell stories. Objects are the crown jewel of museums. Even if visitors put emphasis on tests and images, they still primarily expect to see objects. Just the fact that the objects there is a gesture of kindness (Gjedde & Ingemann 2008). Regardless of whether it is a utilitarian or cult object, a cultural object has a life of its own. It can be used differently than was originally intended and be placed in a new time and in a new setting and also be given a new function. Michael Baxendall (1991:34) describes how three cultures come together in an exhibition. First there are the ideas, values and intentions inherent in the culture in which the artefact was created. Second there is the combination of ideas, values and intentions inherent in the culture and the curator who organised the exhibition. Finally there is the beholder, who possesses distinct cultural baggage comprising a set of unsystematic ideas, values and intentions. Baxendall presents an example in which a Mbulu Ngulu mask presumably inspired Picasso’s 1907 painting . He stresses that, “… the effect of visual similarity is to accent difference” (Braxendall 1991:40). Susan Vogel underlines that, “Almost nothing displayed in museums was made to be seen in them. Museums provide an experience of most of the world’s art and artefacts that does not bear even the remotest resemblance to what their makers intended” (1991:191). She believes that most museum visitors are totally unaware of this fact but that this is an issue museum professionals should focus on. In 1917 Marcel Duchamp tried to exhibit his now famous , a mass-produced urinal signed ‘R. Mutt ‘, in a gallery. This subversive action initiated a discussion of whether the work was original and authentic or whether it was the context that determined whether what was being exhibited was to be seen as authentic art. Of particular interest is the fact that he did not get the idea by looking at a urinal in use, but from a J. L. Mott Ironworks display window on Fifth Avenue in New York. The issue here is the change in context for the item exhibited. Even in the Mott’s display window the urinal had been lifted out of the context it was designed to be used in. The initial processing of any exhibition takes place on a purely aesthetic level. This means that the exhibition paves the way for an aesthetic gaze and not just the object as it does not necessarily possesses the power to be read aesthetically. How the object is staged determines the level at which the aesthetic gaze comes into play. The aesthetic gaze is a quest to see e.g. what is beautiful, pleasing, peculiar, picturesque, tasteful and flattering – as well as a to experience a sense of recognition – in the manner described by Danish sculptor and theoretician Willy Ørskov (1966:67). The Swedish art historian Peter Cornell writes in his book, [ ], that the museum is the laboratory of visibility. As a zone of visibility, the museum encourages ferocious yet affectionate contemplation. In the encounter with the object in the museum, rich, detailed languages are provided. While the visitor stands outside, the museum is curiously silent towards the lifeworld of everyday things as if their form and presence are irrelevant and meaningless. Cornell believes that it is through the eyes of the philosopher, poet and artist, or through the eyes of a child, that things become visible again. They get the objects to speak and they get us to talk about things, e.g. wax tablecloths, kitchen utensils, laundry, clocks, stairs or a glass of water (1993:10). I think however that Peter Cornell is overly friendly; even objects in a museum can be experienced as irrelevant and meaningless and require an open gaze to make them visible again - or visible for the first time. The authentic object is seen as a contrast to imitations, copies, fakes. Authentic objects are inextricably tied to their physicality, production, materials and use. Sociologist Dean MacCannell believes that non-authentic objects create a unifying consciousness that defines the modern spirit. The quest for authenticity consequently depends on the sense of instability and non-authenticity which characterises the modern consciousness. MacCannell has changed the criterion of authenticity away from the object itself to the way it is experienced! In other words, having an authentic experience is as equally important as the artefacts being properly presented and having the correct provenience. From this perspective, no distinction should be made between imitation and reality. The truth lies somewhere in between in what can be called simulation. The American museologist Lisa C. Roberts asks the question, “… if the experience is properly simulated - in other words, if the correct effect is reproduced in the lived body - does it matter that the props are ‘faked’?” (1997:99). Roberts’ deliberations touch on the semiotic landscape and narrative. The significance lies not in the object itself, but in what the external signs add to the object, a stance that further supports MacCannell’s view of authenticity and objects. The viewer can experience the object, but what determines authenticity is not solely the object or even the viewer, but also the setting in which the viewer experiences the object. An aesthetic experience is however something far more comprehensive than just the concept of beauty and comprises four fields of experience: values, emotions, knowledge and action. In order for something to support the aesthetic experience of visitors it must affirm the insights these four fields of experience offer, as well as something that challenges visitors and then adds something new and surprising (Gjedde & Ingemann 2008:115-120). The four fields of experience can be activated but how they are activated is also highly dependent on the visitors’ goals, i.e. are they seeking pure entertainment, to pass the time or informal learning. The museum has responsibility for planning and activating one or more of the fields of experience. Stanley Fish (1980) believes ‘texts’ (i.e., objects, spaces, images, written texts) simply do not exist, while Edwina Taborsky (1990) believes that ‘text’ is constructed in a social context. When the visitor meets the exhibition as text meaning is created. 5. Objects represent artistic expression, a narrative Aesthetics is perhaps a simple, easy bridge between objects and the visitor, but it is also a fairly small bridge if the museum wants to convey something that can access the unconscious of visitors and encourage them to talk about their insights. For objects to be talked about the museum must contextualise them in a way that makes reading the objects, space, course, and texts as a conscious narrative possible. A story must contain six elements and answer certain questions: a summary: What is it all about?; an introduction: Who, What, Where and When?; development: What happened next?; an evaluation: What is the value?; and a solution: What happened in the end? A narrative structure is involved, but there is also the use of images and emotive language (Gjedde & Ingemann 2008:36). A narrative is more than just part of the ‘text’; people intrinsically translate experiences and understand them as internal narratives. This means that even when a text lacks a narrative structure we have a tendency to talk about our personal experience in a narrative structure (Gjedde & Ingemann 2008:36). The Museum of Copenhagen has a showcase displaying a roadkill hedgehog, a cell phone, a credit card and a set of car keys. This somewhat absurd combination of objects from daily life on the highway is accompanied by a dry, laconic text that declares, “Nature must give way to roads. The distance between work and home is becoming bigger”. The designer has attempted to create a narrative that contains ‘empty spaces’ to be filled in by the visitor while simultaneously bringing into play values, emotions and knowledge that the visitor will recognise and agree or disagree with, thus representing a significant creative activity. Objects and texts create mental images as internal images for the visitor. The aforementioned display at the Museum of Copenhagen is one way of creating mental images. The individual parts function as a metonym for something bigger, and the ironic distance in the text combined with the objects creates a complex mental image. All of the elements are concurrently used symbolically to tell a certain story. The precondition for creating mental images is an emphasis on narrative and applying language techniques drawn from fiction. A collision must occur between objects and texts to create a total mental image. The Worker’s Museum in Copenhagen has an exhibition on the 1950s depicting the living conditions of a working class family in the years after World War II. There are authentic material objects from a specific time and culture. Although genuine, the objects are also used to create a myth about progress and prosperity. The French semiotician Roland Barthes likens the shift between seeing things in themselves and seeing the myth to looking out the window at the landscape while driving a car. One’s eyes can look at the landscape or they can rest on the window. The glass can be the focus of one’s attention, causing the landscape to recede into the distance or the glass can be transparent, causing the landscape to tread into the foreground. Altering one’s gaze between the two is constant. The glass is at once present and then suddenly empty and meaningless, while the landscape takes on depth only to suddenly become unreal (Barthes 1957/1972:124). Myths are stories a culture uses to explain and understand aspects of reality or nature. Primitive myths are often about life and death, gods and good and evil. Modern sophisticated myths are about e.g. masculinity and femininity, family, success, time and science. 7.3) The Museum of Copenhagen’s 1950s exhibition expresses a myth telling a story about speed and time and is a symbolic expression of self-centred values and the desire to have vs. to be (Fromm 1976/1981). No culture has universal myths, though some myths are dominant. Contra-myths and the transformation of myths undergo an evolutionary process in which related parts or concepts are displaced and others are added. Jung sees traditional myths (e.g. Oedipus, Orpheus and Eurydice) as mythological motifs, finding myths with many corresponding features in various cultures. Jung discusses the importance of myths as analogies and in his theory of the collective unconscious and archetypes explains that, “They are without known origin; and they can reproduce themselves in any time and any place of the world” (Jung 1994:69). Society’s stories are highly complexity, which means multiple narratives are possible. Small local history museums can have a close relationship with visitors, thus allowing them to disseminate information and construct history in a manner that is exceedingly visitor-focused. At major museums, which are in principle meant for everyone, this strategy is perhaps not possible. They can however be authoritative and sender-focused, which means they must create community narratives. Society’s stories are created in a complicated dance between writers, the mass media and researchers. Since museum professionals, of which there are 600 in Denmark, cannot create or construct the right stories alone, they must find and recruit zealous yet sensitive people to point out the main aspects of the history of society that looks at the new and the familiar and especially the balance between them. The introduction to this chapter states that the ten theses statements cannot cover all museums, for example art museums. After reconsideration, the ten statements are relevant to art museums but would require some rewriting and additional discussion as they are not as innocent or neutral as they may appear. The American museologist Elaine Heumann Gurian believes that in the future museums will not be defined by their objects, but by the setting and “... storytelling in tangible sensory form, ... where citizenry can congregate in a spirit of cross-generational inclusivity and inquiry into memory of our past, a forum for our present, and aspirations for our future” (1999:65). 9.3) The British museologist Davis Anderson believes the museum’s role is to teach visitors how to tap into their ability to feel and think. To support his argument, he quotes the 1994 Swedish parliamentary commission for museums: The American museologist John Falk sees the museum in the highly individualised world of lifelong learning, stating that “... as free-choice learning comes to represent an ever greater percentage of the total learning an individual does in his or her lifetime, museums promise to become ever more important and ever more accepted as vital links within the educational infrastructure of the community” (1999:273). Whether this happens will depend on how the museum chooses to play this role. A central goal for example at the Worker’s Museum is to create . The visitor must be able to recognise objects and settings as their own. Thus and are part of the central museum’s objectives (Floris & Vasström 1999). The American philosopher Albert William Levi (1995:344) lists the different institutional roles of the museum as: Can the community find aspects of its reality represented in the museum? This is the case in a direct way at e.g. the Worker’s Museum. Is this also possible at the National Museum of Denmark, where the distance between the visitor’s personal reality and the museum’s presentation of reality is perhaps so great that nostalgia and recognition should not be a driving force? Because the goals and purpose of museums can vary, it is important that the personal reality of visitors can be connected to something greater than just recognising objects and spaces. It is essential that visitors relate to relevant, understandable symbols and myths. When society is defocused and individualised and values are relative, it directly affects the culture and subsequently the museum. Perhaps telling one universal story is not possible, but telling many minor stories is a valid alternative. A discursive approach means following more than just one coherent narrative. Like the postmodern media, the museum can also create personalised, interactive narratives. One prerequisite for doing so is to activate the whole field of experience and incorporate minor narratives that generate recognition and comprise emotive language and mental pictures that draw on powerful symbols and myths. | Chapter from the book: Ingemann, Bruno (2012): Present on Site. Transforming Exhibitions and Museums , Lejre: Visual Memory Press. 396 pages, 147 illustration, printed in colour. Visiting Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion?You must join the virtual exhibition queue when you arrive. If capacity has been reached for the day, the queue will close early. Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History EssaysSaint petersburg. Ewer and basin (lavabo set)Probably made at Chisinau Court Workshop Andrei Nikiforovich Voronikhin Alexander Danilovich Menshikov (1673–1729)Unknown Artist, Swiss, Austrian, or German, active Russia ca. 1703–4 Samuel Margas Jr. The Empress Elizabeth of Russia (1709–1762) on Horseback, Attended by a PageAttributed to Georg Christoph Grooth Table snuffboxNiello scenes after a print entitled Naufrage (Shipwreck) by Jacques de Lajoüe , published in Paris 1736 Voltaire (François-Marie Arouet) (1694–1778)Jean Antoine Houdon Imperial Porcelain Manufactory, St. Petersburg Cup with cover and saucerTwo bottle coolersZacharias Deichman the Elder Catherine II The Great, Empress of RussiaJean-Baptiste Nini Coffee serviceJohan Henrik Blom Tureen with coverTureen with cover and standJacques-Nicolas Roettiers Possibly by Pierre-François-Mathis de Beaulieu (for Jean Georges) Pair of scallop-shell dishesSugar bowl (from a tea service)Workshop of David Roentgen Beaker and saucerDavid Roentgen and Company in Saint PetersburgJohann Friedrich Anthing Drop-front desk (secrétaire à abattant or secrétaire en cabinet)Attributed to Martin Carlin Pair of Flintlock Pistols of Empress Catherine the Great (1729–1796)Johan Adolph Grecke Gardner Manufactory Center tableImperial Armory, Tula (south of Moscow), Russia Female ShamanPair of vasesNikolai Stepanovich Vereshchagin Jugate busts of Czarevitch Paul and Maria Feodorovna of RussiaJames Tassie Wolfram Koeppe Department of European Sculpture and Decorative Arts, The Metropolitan Museum of Art October 2003 The Birth of Saint Petersburg Russia, or “Muscovy” as it was often called, had rarely been considered a part of Europe before the reign of Czar Peter I (Piotr Alexeievich), known as Peter the Great (r. 1682–1725). His supremacy marked the beginning of the country’s “Westernization,” whereby the political, economic, and cultural norms of the western European monarchies would become the basis for “civilizing” Russia. A radical transformation was needed to launch Russia into the modern world, a transformation later called the Petrine Revolution. The young czar, feeling oppressed by the medieval traditions and ecclesiastical patriarchy of seventeenth-century Moscow, wanted to Westernize Russia in a hurry, defying the sluggish pace of history. Saint Petersburg was born on May 16, 1703 (May 5 by the old Julian Russian calendar). On that day, on a small island on the north bank of the Neva River, Peter cut two pieces of turf and placed them cross-wise. The setting was inauspicious. The area was a swamp that remained frozen from early November to March, with an annual average of 104 days of rain and 74 days of snow. The army, under the command of Alexander Menshikov ( 1996.7 ), had conquered the region shortly before. To show his gratitude, the czar later appointed Menshikov the first governor-general of Saint Petersburg. The fortification of the territory kept the Swedish enemy at bay and secured for Russia permanent access to the Baltic Sea. The partially ice-free harbor would be crucial to further economic development. All buildings on the site were erected on wooden poles driven into the marshy, unstable ground. Stones were a rare commodity in Russia, and about as valuable as precious metals. The Dutch name “Piterburkh” (later changed to the German version, “Petersburg”) embodied the czar’s fascination with Holland and its small-scale urban architecture. He disliked patriarchal court ceremony and felt at ease in the bourgeois domestic life that he experienced during his travels throughout Europe on “the Great Embassy” (1697–98). However, the primary purpose of this voyage was to acquire firsthand knowledge of shipbuilding—his personal passion—and to learn about progressive techniques and Western ideas. The victory over the Swedish army at Poltava in June 1709 elevated Russia to the rank of a European power, no longer to be ignored. Peter triumphed: “Now with God’s help the final stone in the foundation of Saint Petersburg has been laid.” By 1717, the city’s population of about 8,000 had tripled, and grew to around 40,000 by the time of Peter’s death in 1725. Saint Petersburg had become the commercial, industrial, administrative, and residential “metropolis” of Russia. By the 1790s, it had surpassed Moscow as the empire’s largest urban vicinity and was hailed as the “Venice of the North,” an allusion to the waterway system around the local “Grand Canal,” the Neva River. Peter the Great’s Successors The short reign of Peter’s second wife, Empress Catherine I (r. 1725–27), who depended on her long-time favorite Menshikov, saw the reinstatement of the luxurious habits of the former imperial household. The archaic and ostentatious court display in the Byzantine tradition that Peter had so despised was now to be restored under the pretext of glorifying his legacy. Enormous sums of money were lavished on foreign luxury items, demonstrating the court’s new international status and its observance of western European manners ( 68.141.133 ). During the reigns of Empress Anna Ioannovna (r. 1730–40), niece of Peter I ( 1982.60.330a,b ), and her successor Elizabeth (Elizaveta Petrovna, r. 1741–62; 1978.554.2 ), Peter’s daughter, Saint Petersburg was transformed into a Baroque extravaganza through the talents of architect Bartolomeo Francesco Rastrelli (1700–1771) and other Western and Russian artisans. Foreign powers began to recognize Russia’s importance and competed for closer diplomatic relations. Foreign immigrants increased much faster than the local population, as scholars, craftsmen, artisans, and specialists of all kinds flocked to the country, and especially to Saint Petersburg ( 65.47 ; 1982.60.172,.173 ; 1995.327 ). Catherine the Great (r. 1762–96) In a coup d’état assisted by the five Orloff brothers ( 33.165.2a–c ; 48.187.386,.387 ), Catherine II overthrew her husband, the ill-fated Peter III (r. 1762) and became empress. Catherine saw herself as the political heir of Peter the Great. A German-born princess of Anhalt-Zerbst who, after her marriage, became more Russian than any native, Catherine aimed at completing Peter’s legacy ( 52.189.11 ; 48.73.1 ). Having lived in isolation in the shadow of Elizabeth I since her marriage to the grand duke in 1745, the time had come to satisfy her thirst for life and her insatiable quest for culture and international recognition. An admirer of the Enlightenment and devoted aficionada of Voltaire’s writings, Catherine stimulated his cult in Russia ( 1972.61 ). In response, the French philosopher dedicated a poem to the czarina; her reply, dated October 15, 1763, initiated a correspondence that influenced the empress on many matters until Voltaire’s death in 1778. The hothouse cultural climate of Saint Petersburg during Catherine’s reign can be compared to the artistic and intellectual ferment in New York City in the second half of the twentieth century. Catherine’s desire to enhance her fame and her claim to the throne was immortalized by her own witty play on words in Latin: “Petro Primo / Catharina Secunda” (To Peter the First / from Catherine the Second). This she had inscribed on the vast lump of granite in the form of a wave supporting the Bronze Horseman on the banks of the Neva in front of Saint Isaac’s Cathedral in Saint Petersburg. This triple-lifesize equestrian figure of Peter the Great took the French sculptor Falconet twelve years to complete, until it was finally cast—after three attempts—in 1782. Catherine had military expansion plans for Russia and a cultural vision for its capital Saint Petersburg. Above all, she knew how to attract devoted supporters. Only nine days after the overthrow of her husband, Catherine wrote to Denis Diderot, offering to print his famous Encyclopédie , which had been banned in France. Catherine recognized the power of art to demonstrate political and social maturity. She acquired entire collections of painting ( Watteau , for example), sculpture, and objects. The empress avoided anything that could be called mediocre or small. With the help of sophisticated advisors, such as Prince Dmitrii Golitsyn, her ambassador in Paris, Denis Diderot, Falconet, and the illustrious Baron Friedrich Melchior von Grimm, the empress assembled the core of today’s State Hermitage Museum. Catherine favored luxury goods from all over Europe ( 33.165.2a–c ; 48.187.386,.387 ; 17.190.1158 ). She commissioned Sèvres porcelain and Wedgwood pottery as well as hundreds of pieces of ingeniously conceived furniture from the German manufactory of David Roentgen in Neuwied ( 48.73.1 ). Furthermore, she encouraged and supported Russian enterprises and craftsmen, like local silversmiths ( 47.51.1–.5 ; 1981.367.1,.2 ) and the Imperial Porcelain Manufactory ( 1982.60.171 ; 1982.60.177,.178 ; 1982.60.175 ), as well as privately owned manufactories ( 1982.60.158 ). Catherine especially liked the sparkling decorative products of the Tula armory steel workshop ( 2002.115 ), genuine Russian art forms with a fairy-tale-like appearance, and in 1775 merged her large collection of Tula objects with the imperial crown jewels in a newly constructed gallery at the Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg. Catherine’s son and successor Paul I (Pavel Petrovich, r. 1796–1801) disliked his mother and her aesthetic sensibility ( 1998.13.1,.2 ). As grand duke, he had spent most of his time with his second wife Maria Feodorovna ( 1999.525 ) outside of Saint Petersburg, in Gatchina Palace and Pavlovsk Palace. These they transformed into the finest Neoclassical architectural gems in Europe ( 1976.155.110 ; 2002.115 ). Koeppe, Wolfram. “Saint Petersburg.” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History . New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/stpt/hd_stpt.htm (October 2003) Further ReadingCracraft, James. The Petrine Revolution in Russian Imagery . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997. Koeppe, Wolfram, and Marina Nudel. "An Unsuspected Bust of Alexander Menshikov." Metropolitan Museum Journal 35 (2000), pp. 161–77. Shvidkovsky, Dmitri, and Alexander Orloff. St. Petersburg: Architecture of the Tsars . New York: Abbeville, 1995. Additional Essays by Wolfram Koeppe- Koeppe, Wolfram. “ Abraham and David Roentgen .” (June 2013)
- Koeppe, Wolfram. “ Hungarian Silver .” (February 2016)
- Koeppe, Wolfram. “ Collecting for the Kunstkammer .” (October 2002)
Related Essays- Byzantium (ca. 330–1453)
- Sèvres Porcelain in the Nineteenth Century
- Abraham and David Roentgen
- Antoine Watteau (1684–1721)
- The Decoration of Arms and Armor
- East and West: Chinese Export Porcelain
- Edward Lycett (1833–1910)
- Empire Style, 1800–1815
- European Tapestry Production and Patronage, 1600–1800
- French Porcelain in the Eighteenth Century
- French Silver in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries
- From Italy to France: Gardens in the Court of Louis XIV and After
- German and Austrian Porcelain in the Eighteenth Century
- James McNeill Whistler (1834–1903)
- James McNeill Whistler (1834–1903) as Etcher
- The Neoclassical Temple
- Neoclassicism
- Northwest Coast Indians Musical Instruments
- Venice in the Eighteenth Century
List of Rulers- List of Rulers of Europe
- Central Europe (including Germany), 1600–1800 A.D.
- Eastern Europe and Scandinavia, 1600–1800 A.D.
- France, 1600–1800 A.D.
- Iran, 1600–1800 A.D.
- Low Countries, 1600–1800 A.D.
- 17th Century A.D.
- 18th Century A.D.
- Architecture
- Baroque Art
- Eastern Europe
- French Literature / Poetry
- Gilt Silver
- Scandinavia
Artist or Maker- Anthing, Johann Friedrich
- Beaulieu, Pierre-François-Mathis de
- Blom, Johan Henrik
- Bouillat, Edme François, I
- Carlin, Martin
- Chisinau Court Workshop
- Deichman, Zacharias, the Elder
- Feodorovna, Maria
- Gardner Factory
- Grecke, Johan Adolph
- Grooth, Georg Christoph
- Houdon, Jean Antoine
- Imperial Armory, Tula
- Imperial Porcelain Manufactory
- Lajoüe, Jacques de
- Margas, Samuel, Jr.
- Nini, Jean-Baptiste
- Prudhomme, Elie
- Roentgen, David
- Roettiers, Jacques-Nicolas
- Rotari, Pietro
- Sèvres Manufactory
- Tassie, James
- Vereshchagin, Nikolai Stepanovich
- Voronikhin, Andrei N.
- Watteau, Antoine
Online Features- 82nd & Fifth: “Curls” by Wolfram Koeppe
- Quick Facts
- Sights & Attractions
- Tsarskoe Selo
- Oranienbaum
- Foreign St. Petersburg
- Restaurants & Bars
- Accommodation Guide
- St. Petersburg Hotels
- Serviced Apartments
- Bed and Breakfasts
- Private & Group Transfers
- Airport Transfers
- Concierge Service
- Russian Visa Guide
- Request Visa Support
- Walking Tours
- River Entertainment
- Public Transportation
- Travel Cards
- Essential Shopping Selection
- Business Directory
- Photo Gallery
- Video Gallery
- 360° Panoramas
- Moscow Hotels
- Moscow.Info
- Museums of History and Politics
- Peter and Paul Fortress
Museums and exhibitions at the Peter and Paul FortressAs well as being one of St. Petersburg's most striking historic landmarks, the Peter and Paul Fortress is the main site of the State Museum of the History of St. Petersburg. This large umbrella organization manages several historic buildings and monuments in St. Petersburg and the surrounding region, and uses various premises in the Peter and Paul Fortress to house permanent exhibitions chronicling different aspects of the history of the city and of the fortress itself. Visitors can currently buy a single ticket valid for all exhibitions over a two-day period, or separate tickets for individual exhibitions. Ticket offices are located in the Boathouse and Ioannovskiy Ravelin. All exhibitions are open daily from 10am to 6pm (to 5pm on Tuesdays). Closed on Wednesdays. We can help you make the right choice from hundreds of St. Petersburg hotels and hostels. Live like a local in self-catering apartments at convenient locations in St. Petersburg. Comprehensive solutions for those who relocate to St. Petersburg to live, work or study. Maximize your time in St. Petersburg with tours expertly tailored to your interests. Get around in comfort with a chauffeured car or van to suit your budget and requirements. Book a comfortable, well-maintained bus or a van with professional driver for your group. Navigate St. Petersburg’s dining scene and find restaurants to remember. Need tickets for the Mariinsky, the Hermitage, a football game or any event? We can help. Get our help and advice choosing services and options to plan a prefect train journey. Let our meeting and events experts help you organize a superb event in St. Petersburg. We can find you a suitable interpreter for your negotiations, research or other needs. Get translations for all purposes from recommended professional translators. |
IMAGES
COMMENTS
sity of Arizona Museum of Art is prepared for the University of Arizona. This program has been chosen to be part of the research of A. chitectural Expressions in Museum Architecture as the Master's Report.The research begins with the literature study and ends with the special design case: Museum of Art Building University of Arizona Museum of ...
90 Pages. In this thesis, the digital museum experience is researched in the context of a development project for EMMA — Espoo Museum of Modern Art. The purpose of the case project was to design a concept for a digital museum service, which operates as an online platform that publishes content about contemporary art.
Museum Experience Erhan İlhan Eastern Mediterranean University July 2021 Gazimağusa, North Cyprus. ... Supervisor I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Interior Architecture. We certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate in
English Because it is chiefly a "place of meeting" of architecture with the other forms of art, the museum participates necessarily in the elaboration of an architecture that goes beyond the usual concern for "habitable" space--a functionalism derived from western civilization's pragmatism. The concept of the museum has provoked profound changes in the cultural significance of what it ...
This study investigates the transformative potential of contemporary museum architecture, emphasizing the intricate relationship between management requirements and spatial design. Contemporary museum practice must adapt to diverse visitor preferences and secure operational funding beyond public sources by increasing ticket sales through personalized visitor pathways. This necessity has led to ...
This thesis explores the potential of modern and contemporary art museums to work through critical curatorial practices for the benefit of the communities they exist for by inciting social change ...
This paper attempts to be a new vision to design an important building in such sensitive places, for example, designing a museum in a historical context. The methodology of the study is a qualitative method based on a theoretical foundation.
Develop editing skills. Develop skills in writing analytical essays. Develop skills in conceptualizing and organizing the research and writing of a scholarly research paper on a museum studies topic. Get to know and work with peers who are interested in the museum field and Harvard's Museum Studies Program!
This study examines the experience of blind people in science and art museums. It is important for two reasons. First, museums have the potential to become hotbeds for the development of inclusive technology and practices. Second, improving the experience for a small section of society with special needs, blind visitors in this case, can lead ...
This thesis examines the notion of productive multisensory experiences in museums of modern and contemporary art, as well as the pedagogy of current olfactory curatorial strategies and fruitful conceptual tools for such future strategies in art museums. It sets out to develop a theoretical framework for understanding immersive, multisensory art museum experiences as meaningful and educative ...
Museum directors— Max Hollein, Melissa Chiu, Rebecca Rabinow, more—discuss their doctoral research and how it informs their thinking today.
Abstract Cultural tourism has been approached from both positive and negative perspectives. In a city with the rich cultural background, the city's growth is mainly considered as a result of the ...
This study integrates three main game elements—goals, stories, and role-playing—into museum visits to design a Gamified Learning Activity (GLA). To verify the effectiveness of the GLA, we ...
This volume collects fifteen essays debating the value of museums, the ontology and epistemology of exhibited objects, and museum ethics. The essays stem from talks originally given at a conference at the University of Glasgow in 2013 by philosophers working both within and outside the analytic tradition, museum scholars, and museum practitioners.
The unfolding of 21st century museum architecture stands within the nexus of art appreciation, cultural experience and environmental occurrence. Visual and spa…
List of dissertations / theses on the topic 'Museum architecture'. Scholarly publications with full text pdf download. Related research topic ideas.
This research takes these into consideration and investigates the design approaches of archaeological museums, within adaptive re-use of historical buildings, with an effective focus on contemporary display and the approaches towards achieving this goal. In the first chapter the problem definition, aim, methodology, and limitations of study are ...
This document is a thesis report that proposes the design of a National Museum of Architecture. It discusses the need for such a museum to showcase India's architectural heritage and promote public understanding of the subject. The report covers various aspects of planning the museum, including proposed building location, architectural style, exhibition galleries, outdoor spaces and ...
Ten theses on the museum in society The foundation for this chapter was laid in 2000, a year significant not because of its symbolic value but because this is the year I was part of a museological network that discussed the relationship between authentic objects, society and communication. I contributed to a clarification of the topic by introducing the idea of focusing more on visitors and ...
The young czar, feeling oppressed by the medieval traditions and ecclesiastical patriarchy of seventeenth-century Moscow, wanted to Westernize Russia in a hurry, defying the sluggish pace of history.
List All Museums. Essential information on the twenty most popular and celebrated museums in and near St. Petersburg. Full list of museums in the centre of St. Petersburg, with essential information including opening hours, accessibility, contact details and links to further information.
Museums and exhibitions at the Peter and Paul Fortress As well as being one of St. Petersburg's most striking historic landmarks, the Peter and Paul Fortress is the main site of the State Museum of the History of St. Petersburg. This large umbrella organization manages several historic buildings and monuments in St. Petersburg and the surrounding region, and uses various premises in the Peter ...