] ]. ]
More . More .
] ] ]In terms of biodiversity, adaptable species with wide geographic ranges—such as white-tailed deer and feral hogs—are likely to continue to thrive. But those species that depend on particular habitats—polar and alpine species, coral reefs, coldwater fishes—are vulnerable, as are the communities that depend on them culturally and economically. ] According to the Fourth National Climate Assessment, “[S]pecies, including many iconic species, may disappear from regions where they have been prevalent or become extinct, altering some regions so much that their mix of plant and animal life will become almost unrecognizable.” ]
Food and forage production will decline in agricultural regions experiencing increased frequency and duration of drought. Even without drought, higher temperatures will increase evaporation of soil moisture, increasing crop stress and water demand—further stressing U.S. surface and groundwater supplies used for irrigation. And even with irrigation, many commodity crops are likely to experience declines in average yield as temperatures rise beyond their preferred heat tolerance range. Milder winters and shifts in precipitation are likely to increase the incidence of pests and diseases for crops and livestock, while extreme heat—especially nighttime heat—will reduce livestock productivity. Impacts will vary from region to region, depending on the extent of warming and the level of adaptation. ]
.
] and the trend is likely to continue as many extreme events become more frequent and severe. The economic impacts of extreme events include not just the direct damages, but also the loss of productivity and interruption of essential services and supply chains that can reach deep into the national economy. ]In many parts of the country, existing infrastructure—septic and stormwater systems, roads, bridges, the energy grid—was not designed to cope with current and future sea level and climate extremes, and current levels of investment aren’t enough to cover necessary repairs and upgrades. ] ]
Beyond extreme events, human-caused climate change is likely to disrupt many sectors of the U.S. economy and the communities that depend on them, including commercial and recreational fisheries, tourism and recreation, and agriculture. ] ] ]
In the short term, farmers in some regions may benefit from the earlier onset of spring and from a longer warm season that is suitable for growing crops. Also, studies show that, up to a certain point, crops and other plants grow better in the presence of higher carbon dioxide levels and seem to be more drought-tolerant. ] But this benefit is a two-edged sword: weeds, many invasive plant species, and insect pests will also thrive in a warmer world. Water availability will be impacted in drier agricultural areas that need irrigation. At some point, the benefits to crops of increased carbon dioxide will likely be overwhelmed by the negative impacts of heat stress and drought.
In the long term, shipping commerce will benefit from the opening of the Northwest Passage for longer periods of the year due to the loss of Arctic sea ice. However, in the long run, if a "business as usual" approach to emitting heat-trapping gases is maintained at the present rate, or faster, then the negative costs and impacts of global warming are very likely to far outweigh the benefits over the course of this century, with increased potential for catastrophic impacts from more extreme events. ] In part, this is because any substantial change, whether warmer or colder, would challenge the societal infrastructure that has developed under the current climate.
If all human emissions of heat-trapping gases were to stop today, Earth’s temperature would continue to rise for a few decades as ocean currents bring excess heat stored in the deep ocean back to the surface. Once this excess heat radiated out to space, Earth’s temperature would stabilize. Experts think the additional warming from this “hidden” heat is unlikely to exceed 0.9° Fahrenheit (0.5°Celsius). ] With no further human influence, natural processes would begin to slowly remove the excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and global temperatures would gradually begin to decline.
It’s true that without dramatic action in the next couple of decades, we are unlikely to keep global warming in this century below 2.7° Fahrenheit (1.5° Celsius) compared to pre-industrial temperatures—a threshold that experts say offers a lower risk of serious negative impacts. ] But the more we overshoot that threshold, the more serious and widespread the negative impacts will be, which means that it is never “too late” to take action.
it is likely many strategies working together will be needed. Generally speaking, here are some examples of mitigation strategies we can use to slow or stop the human-caused global warming ( ): techniques.Note that NOAA doesn’t advocate for or against particular climate policies. Instead, NOAA’s role is to provide data and scientific information about climate, including how it has changed and is likely to change in the future depending on different climate policies or actions society may or may not take. Learn more and .
):Note that NOAA doesn’t advocate for or against particular climate policies. Instead, NOAA’s role is to provide data and scientific information about climate, including how it has changed and is likely to change in the future depending on different climate policies or actions society may or may not take. Learn more and .
NOAA is helping to improve the nation’s resilience to changes in climate and weather. Specifically, NOAA is working to…
Help us improve our content
News & features, climate change: atmospheric carbon dioxide, does it matter how much the united states reduces its carbon dioxide emissions if china doesn't do the same, how much will earth warm if carbon dioxide doubles pre-industrial levels, maps & data, air - atmospheric climate variables, what environmental data are relevant to the study of infectious diseases like covid-19, how do scientists classify different types of climate, teaching climate, toolbox for teaching climate & energy, white house climate education and literacy initiative, climate youth engagement, climate resilience toolkit, annual greenhouse gas index, food safety and nutrition, arctic oceans, sea ice, and coasts.
The signs of global warming are everywhere, and are more complex than just climbing temperatures.
Our planet is getting hotter. Since the Industrial Revolution—an event that spurred the use of fossil fuels in everything from power plants to transportation—Earth has warmed by 1 degree Celsius, about 2 degrees Fahrenheit.
That may sound insignificant, but 2023 was the hottest year on record , and all 10 of the hottest years on record have occurred in the past decade.
Global warming and climate change are often used interchangeably as synonyms, but scientists prefer to use “climate change” when describing the complex shifts now affecting our planet’s weather and climate systems.
Climate change encompasses not only rising average temperatures but also natural disasters, shifting wildlife habitats, rising seas , and a range of other impacts. All of these changes are emerging as humans continue to add heat-trapping greenhouse gases , like carbon dioxide and methane, to the atmosphere.
When fossil fuel emissions are pumped into the atmosphere, they change the chemistry of our atmosphere, allowing sunlight to reach the Earth but preventing heat from being released into space. This keeps Earth warm, like a greenhouse, and this warming is known as the greenhouse effect .
Carbon dioxide is the most commonly found greenhouse gas and about 75 percent of all the climate warming pollution in the atmosphere. This gas is a product of producing and burning oil, gas, and coal. About a quarter of Carbon dioxide also results from land cleared for timber or agriculture.
Methane is another common greenhouse gas. Although it makes up only about 16 percent of emissions, it's roughly 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide and dissipates more quickly. That means methane can cause a large spark in warming, but ending methane pollution can also quickly limit the amount of atmospheric warming. Sources of this gas include agriculture (mostly livestock), leaks from oil and gas production, and waste from landfills.
One of the most concerning impacts of global warming is the effect warmer temperatures will have on Earth's polar regions and mountain glaciers. The Arctic is warming four times faster than the rest of the planet. This warming reduces critical ice habitat and it disrupts the flow of the jet stream, creating more unpredictable weather patterns around the globe.
( Learn more about the jet stream. )
A warmer planet doesn't just raise temperatures. Precipitation is becoming more extreme as the planet heats. For every degree your thermometer rises, the air holds about seven percent more moisture. This increase in moisture in the atmosphere can produce flash floods, more destructive hurricanes, and even paradoxically, stronger snow storms.
The world's leading scientists regularly gather to review the latest research on how the planet is changing. The results of this review is synthesized in regularly published reports known as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports.
A recent report outlines how disruptive a global rise in temperature can be:
Limiting the rising in global warming is theoretically achievable, but politically, socially, and economically difficult.
Those same sources of greenhouse gas emissions must be limited to reduce warming. For example, oil and gas used to generate electricity or power industrial manufacturing will need to be replaced by net zero emission technology like wind and solar power. Transportation, another major source of emissions, will need to integrate more electric vehicles, public transportation, and innovative urban design, such as safe bike lanes and walkable cities.
( Learn more about solutions to limit global warming. )
One global warming solution that was once considered far fetched is now being taken more seriously: geoengineering. This type of technology relies on manipulating the Earth's atmosphere to physically block the warming rays of the sun or by sucking carbon dioxide straight out of the sky.
Restoring nature may also help limit warming. Trees, oceans, wetlands, and other ecosystems help absorb excess carbon—but when they're lost, so too is their potential to fight climate change.
Ultimately, we'll need to adapt to warming temperatures, building homes to withstand sea level rise for example, or more efficiently cooling homes during heat waves.
Copyright © 1996-2015 National Geographic Society Copyright © 2015-2024 National Geographic Partners, LLC. All rights reserved
Learn about the causes and effects of global warming.
global warming , Increase in the global average surface temperature resulting from enhancement of the greenhouse effect, primarily by air pollution . In 2007 the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change forecast that by 2100 global average surface temperatures would increase 3.2–7.2 °F (1.8–4.0 °C), depending on a range of scenarios for greenhouse gas emissions, and stated that it was now 90 percent certain that most of the warming observed over the previous half century could be attributed to greenhouse gas emissions produced by human activities (i.e., industrial processes and transportation). Many scientists predict that such an increase in temperature would cause polar ice caps and mountain glaciers to melt rapidly, significantly raising the levels of coastal waters, and would produce new patterns and extremes of drought and rainfall, seriously disrupting food production in certain regions. Other scientists maintain that such predictions are overstated. The 1992 Earth Summit and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change attempted to address the issue of global warming, but in both cases the efforts were hindered by conflicting national economic agendas and disputes between developed and developing nations over the cost and consequences of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.
Climate Matters • November 25, 2020
Key concepts:.
Climate Central unveils Our Changing Climate —an informative and customizable climate change presentation that meteorologists, journalists, and others can use for educational outreach and/or a personal Climate 101 tool.
The presentation follows a ”Simple, Serious, Solvable” framework, inspired by climate scientist Scott Denning. This allows the presenter to comfortably explain, and the viewers to easily understand, the causes (Simple), impacts (Serious), and solutions (Solvable) of climate change.
Our Changing Climate is a revamped version of our 2016 climate presentation, and includes the following updates and features:
Up-to-date graphics and topics
Local data and graphics
Fully editable slides (add, remove, customize)
Presenter notes, background information, and references for each slide
Supplementary and bonus slides
Download Outline (PDF, 110KB)
Download Full Presentation (PPT, 148MB)
Updated: April 2021
Climate Central is presenting a new outreach and education resource for meteorologists, journalists, and others—a climate change presentation, Our Changing Climate . This 55-slide presentation is a guide through the basics of climate change, outlining its causes, impacts, and solutions. This climate change overview is unique because it includes an array of local graphics from our ever-expanding media library. By providing these local angles, the presenter can demonstrate that climate change is not only happening at a global-scale, but in our backyards.
This presentation was designed to support your climate change storytelling, but can also double as a great Climate 101 tool for journalists or educators who want to understand climate change better. Every slide contains main points along with background information, so people that are interested can learn at their own pace or utilize graphics for their own content.
In addition to those features, it follows the “Simple, Serious, Solvable” framework inspired by Scott Denning, a climate scientist and professor of atmospheric science at Colorado State University (and a good friend of the program). These three S’s help create the presentation storyline and outline the causes (Simple), impacts (Serious), and solutions (Solvable) of climate change.
Simple. It is simple—burning fossil fuels is heating up the Earth. This section outlines the well-understood science that goes back to the 1800s, presenting local and global evidence that our climate is warming due to human activities.
Serious. More extreme weather, rising sea levels, and increased health and economic risks—the consequences of climate change. In this section, well, we get serious. Climate change impacts are already being felt around the world, and they will continue to intensify until we cut greenhouse gas emissions.
Solvable. With such a daunting crisis like climate change, it is easy to get wrapped up in the negative impacts. This section explains how we can curb climate change and lists the main pathways and solutions to achieving this goal.
With the rollout of our new climate change presentation, we at Climate Central would value any feedback on this presentation. Feel free to reach out to us about how the presentation worked for you, how your audience reacted, or any ideas or topics you would like to see included.
Climate Central would like to acknowledge Paul Gross at WDIV-TV in Detroit and the AMS Station Science Committee for the original version of the climate presentation, Climate Change Outreach Presentation , that was created in 2016. We would also like to give special thanks to Scott Denning, professor of atmospheric science at Colorado State University and a member of our NSF advisory board, for allowing us to use this “Simple, Serious, Solvable” framework in this presentation resource.
Facebook Twitter Print Email
News stories about the climate crisis often contain mentions of greenhouse gases, and the greenhouse effect. Whilst most will find the analogy easy to understand, what exactly are these gases, and why are they contributing to the warming of the Earth?
In a greenhouse, sunlight enters, and heat is retained. The greenhouse effect describes a similar phenomenon on a planetary scale but, instead of the glass of a greenhouse, certain gases are increasingly raising global temperatures.
The surface of the Earth absorbs just under half of the sun’s energy, while the atmosphere absorbs 23 per cent, and the rest is reflected back into space. Natural processes ensure that the amount of incoming and outgoing energy is equal, keeping the planet’s temperature stable.
However, human activity is resulting in the increased emission of so-called greenhouse gases (GHGs) which, unlike other atmospheric gases such as oxygen and nitrogen, becomes trapped in the atmosphere, unable to escape the planet. This energy returns to the surface, where it is reabsorbed.
Because more energy enters than exits the planet, surface temperatures increase until a new balance is achieved.
This temperature increase has long-term, adverse effects on the climate, and affects a myriad of natural systems. Effects include increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events – including flooding, droughts, wildfires and hurricanes – that affect millions of people and cause trillions in economic losses.
“Human-caused greenhouse gas emissions endanger human and environmental health,” says Mark Radka, Chief of the UN Environment Programme’s ( UNEP ) Energy and Climate Branch. “And the impacts will become more widespread and severe without strong climate action.”
GHG emissions are critical to understanding and addressing the climate crisis: despite an initial dip due to COVID-19 , the latest UNEP Emissions Gap Report shows a rebound, and forecasts a disastrous global temperature rise of at least 2.7 degrees this century, unless countries make much greater efforts to reduce emissions.
The report found that GHG emissions need to be halved by 2030, if we are to limit global warming to 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels by the end of the century.
Water vapour is the biggest overall contributor to the greenhouse effect. However, almost all the water vapour in the atmosphere comes from natural processes.
Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane and nitrous oxide are the major GHGs to worry about. CO2 stays in the atmosphere for up to 1,000 years, methane for around a decade, and nitrous oxide for approximately 120 years.
Measured over a 20-year period, methane is 80 times more potent than CO2 in causing global warming, while nitrous oxide is 280 times more potent.
4. How is human activity producing these greenhouse gases?
Coal, oil, and natural gas continue to power many parts of the world. Carbon is the main element in these fuels and, when they’re burned to generate electricity, power transportation, or provide heat, they produce CO2.
Oil and gas extraction, coal mining, and waste landfills account for 55 per cent of human-caused methane emissions. Approximately 32 per cent of human-caused methane emissions are attributable to cows, sheep and other ruminants that ferment food in their stomachs. Manure decomposition is another agricultural source of the gas, as is rice cultivation.
Human-caused nitrous oxide emissions largely arise from agriculture practices. Bacteria in soil and water naturally convert nitrogen into nitrous oxide, but fertilizer use and run-off add to this process by putting more nitrogen into the environment.
Fluorinated gases – such as hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride – are GHGs that do not occur naturally. Hydrofluorocarbons are refrigerants used as alternatives to chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which, having depleted the ozone layer,were phased out thanks to the Montreal Protocol. The others have industrial and commercial uses.
While fluorinated gases are far less prevalent than other GHGs and do not deplete the ozone layer like CFCs, they are still very powerful. Over a 20-year period, the global warming potential of some fluorinated gases is up to 16,300 times greater than that of CO2.
Shifting to renewable energy, putting a price on carbon, and phasing out coal are all important elements in reducing GHG emissions. Ultimately, stronger emission-reduction targets are necessary for the preservation of long-term human and environmental health.
“We need to implement strong policies that back the raised ambitions,” says Mr. Radka. “We cannot continue down the same path and expect better results. Action is needed now.”
During COP26, the European Union and the United States launched the Global Methane Pledge, which will see over 100 countries aim to reduce 30 per cent of methane emissions in the fuel, agriculture and waste sectors by 2030.
Despite the challenges, there is reason to be positive. From 2010 to 2021, policies were put in place to lower annual emissions by 11 gigatons by 2030 compared to what would have otherwise happened. Individuals can also join the UN’s #ActNow campaign for ideas to take climate-positive actions.
By making choices that have less harmful effects on the environment, everyone can be a part of the solution and influence change. Speaking up is one way to multiply impact and create change on a much bigger scale.
A newer edition of this book is available.
The ‘Conclusion’ confirms that global warming is the major challenge for our global society. There is very little doubt that global warming will change our climate in the next century. So what are the solutions to global warming? First, there must be an international political solution. Second, funding for developing cheap and clean energy production must be increased, as all economic development is based on increasing energy usage. We must not pin all our hopes on global politics and clean energy technology, so we must prepare for the worst and adapt. If implemented now, a lot of the costs and damage that could be caused by changing climate can be mitigated.
Sign in with a library card.
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Click the account icon in the top right to:
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.
Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 8 |
November 2022 | 2 |
December 2022 | 4 |
January 2023 | 2 |
February 2023 | 4 |
March 2023 | 6 |
April 2023 | 2 |
May 2023 | 3 |
June 2023 | 3 |
July 2023 | 2 |
August 2023 | 2 |
September 2023 | 2 |
October 2023 | 3 |
November 2023 | 2 |
December 2023 | 2 |
January 2024 | 8 |
February 2024 | 1 |
March 2024 | 10 |
April 2024 | 2 |
May 2024 | 3 |
June 2024 | 4 |
July 2024 | 2 |
August 2024 | 3 |
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide
Sign In or Create an Account
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
Introduction.
To understand global warming, it helps to understand the greenhouse effect . A greenhouse is a glass house where plants grow. Glass lets light in and keeps heat from escaping. This trapped heat keeps the plants warm even when it is cold outside.
Likewise, Earth’s atmosphere traps energy from the Sun. Carbon dioxide and other gases—called greenhouse gases—in the air do this trapping. Without these gases too much heat would go back into space, and living things could not survive. However, as more greenhouse gases get into the air, they also trap more heat. This leads to global warming.
For much of Earth’s history, greenhouse gases were not a problem. This situation changed as people came to depend on fossil fuels (oil, gas, and coal). People burn fossil fuels to power factories, run cars, produce electricity, and heat houses. As fossil fuels burn, they release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Also, people have cut down many forests. Trees use carbon dioxide when they make their own food. Fewer trees mean that less carbon dioxide is being taken out of the atmosphere.
Scientists cannot tell how warm Earth may get over time. Some guess an increase between 3.2° F and 7.2° F (1.8° C and 4° C) by the year 2100. The warmer weather could harm living things. It also could cause polar ice caps to melt. This would cause sea levels to rise. Plants, animals, and buildings along coastlines would be in danger.
Global warming is a worldwide concern. Governments are trying to find ways to limit the amount of greenhouse gases put into the air. Individual people can help by driving less. They also can save energy by turning off unneeded lights and other electrical devices.
We’ve been busy, working hard to bring you new features and an updated design. We hope you and your family enjoy the NEW Britannica Kids. Take a minute to check out all the enhancements!
To share with more than one person, separate addresses with a comma
Choose a language from the menu above to view a computer-translated version of this page. Please note: Text within images is not translated, some features may not work properly after translation, and the translation may not accurately convey the intended meaning. Britannica does not review the converted text.
After translating an article, all tools except font up/font down will be disabled. To re-enable the tools or to convert back to English, click "view original" on the Google Translate toolbar.
What are the causes of climate change, how is climate change being tackled, key insights.
Detailed statistics
Global land and ocean temperature anomalies 1880-2023
Global mean steric sea height growth 2005-2023
Northern Hemisphere's sea ice extent in December 1980-2023
Climate Change
Northern Hemisphere sea ice extent per month 1980-2024
Environmental Technology & Greentech
Number and status of commercial CCS facilities worldwide 2024, by region
Fixed Income
Value of green bonds issued worldwide 2014-2023
Annual anomalies in global land and ocean surface temperature from 1880 to 2023, based on temperature departure (in degrees Celsius)
Northern Hemisphere's sea ice extent in December 1980-2023
Extent of sea ice in December in the Northern Hemisphere from 1980 to 2023 (in million square kilometers)
Steric sea surface height variation worldwide from 2005 to 2023 (in millimeters)
People who agree that the impact of climate change is far in the future to worry 2024
Share of respondents who agree that the negative impact of climate change is too far off in the future to worry about in 2024, by country
Global economic losses from natural disasters 2023, by type
Economic loss from natural disaster events worldwide in 2023, by peril (in billion U.S. dollars)
Global greenhouse gas emissions 1970-2022
Annual greenhouse gas emissions worldwide from 1970 to 2022 (in billion metric tons of CO₂ equivalent)
Global annual GHG emissions shares 2022, by country
Distribution of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide in 2022, by major emitter
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions 2022, by gas
Distribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worldwide in 2022, by type of gas
Annual global emissions of carbon dioxide 1940-2023
Annual carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions worldwide from 1940 to 2023 (in billion metric tons)
Largest global emitters of carbon dioxide 2022, by country
Distribution of carbon dioxide emissions worldwide in 2022, by select country
Annual methane emissions worldwide 1970-2022
Annual methane (CH4) emissions worldwide from 1970 to 2022 (in million metric tons of CO₂ equivalent)
Annual nitrous oxide emissions worldwide 1990-2022
Annual nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions worldwide from 1990 to 2022 (in million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent)
Global land temperature anomalies 1880-2023
Annual anomalies in global land surface temperature from 1880 to 2023, based on temperature departure (in degrees Celsius)
Global ocean temperature anomalies 1880-2023
Annual anomalies in global ocean surface temperature from 1880 to 2023, based on temperature departure (in degrees Celsius)
Change in ocean heat content worldwide 1955-2023
Change in ocean heat content worldwide from 1955 to 2023 (in 10²² joules)
Average monthly sea ice extent in the Northern Hemisphere from January 1980 to June 2024 (in million square kilometers)
Southern Hemisphere sea ice extent per month 1980-2024
Average monthly sea ice extent in the Southern Hemisphere from January 1980 to June 2024 (in million square kilometers)
Global rainfall anomaly 1901-2021
Precipitation anomaly worldwide from 1901 to 2021 (in inches)
Number of people affected by drought worldwide 1990-2023
Number of people affected by drought worldwide from 1990 to 2023 (in millions)
Global number of people affected by floods 1990-2023
Number of people affected by floods worldwide from 1990 to 2023 (in millions)
Global forest cover loss by wildfires 2001-2023
Loss of tree cover due to wildfires worldwide from 2001 to 2023 (in million hectares)
Share of NDCs covered under Paris agreement 2023, by sector
Sectoral distribution of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) covered by countries as of September 2023
Worldwide investment in renewable energy 2004-2022
New investment in renewable energy worldwide from 2004 to 2022 (in billion U.S. dollars)
Global clean energy investment growth rate 2005-2023
Annual growth rate in clean energy investments worldwide from 2005 to 2023
Global renewable energy consumption 2000-2023
Renewable energy consumption worldwide from 2000 to 2023 (in exajoules)
Leading countries for sovereign green bonds worldwide 2022
Leading countries for sovereign green bonds worldwide as of December 31, 2022, by value (in billion U.S. dollars)
Global capacity of operational commercial CCS projects 2010-2023
Capture capacity of operational commercial carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities worldwide from 2010 to 2023 (in million metric tons per year)
Estimated change in global surface temperature 2021-2100, by scenario
Estimated changes in surface temperatures worldwide between 2021 and 2100, by scenario (in degrees Celsius)
Estimated change in global sea level 2050-2100, by scenario
Projected changes in sea level worldwide in 2050 and 2100, by scenario (in centimeters)
Global GDP at risk due to climate change 2050, by hazard and region
Annual GDP at risk due to climate hazards under a slow transition without adaptation scenario worldwide in 2050, by region and type
Required DAC+S emissions removal to reach global net-zero 2020-2050
Forecast direct air capture and storage (DAC+S) capacity needed for net-zero emissions from 2020 to 2050 (in million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent)
Required BECCS emissions removal to reach global net-zero 2030-2050
Forecast bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) capacity needed for net-zero emissions from 2030 to 2050 (in million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent)
Get the best reports to understand your industry.
Mon - Fri, 9am - 6pm (EST)
Mon - Fri, 9am - 5pm (SGT)
Mon - Fri, 10:00am - 6:00pm (JST)
Mon - Fri, 9:30am - 5pm (GMT)
Explore presentations and videos related to the report. for more outreach videos, videos of past events, and information on upcoming events, please visit the ipcc outreach calendar ., presentations.
Press Conference Slides | Download |
Figure SPM.1 Presentation | Download |
Figure SPM.3 Presentation | Download |
Figure SPM.5 Presentation | Download |
Figure SPM.7 Presentation | Download |
Figure SPM.9 Presentation | Download |
Basic Slide Pack with Figures | Download |
Figure SPM.2 Presentation | Download |
Figure SPM.4 Presentation | Download |
Figure SPM.6 Presentation | Download |
Figure SPM.8 Presentation | Download |
Figure SPM.10 Presentation | Download |
Infographic about the IPCC assessment process | Download |
Full video of Climate Change 2022: The Physical Science Basis
Other languages
A video trailer of Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, the Working Group I contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report
IPCC Working Group I authors explain climate science topics in their own words.
Press conference for Climate Change 2021: the Physical Science Basis, the Working Group I contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report
Find the headline statements from the Summary for Policymakers.
FAQs explain important processes and aspects that are relevant to the whole report for a broad audience
Find all report file downloads including Summary for Policymakers.
Global Warming
And how it’s killing us from our insides out
We’ve all heard about Global Warming. We get that it’s bad, but really? How is the world getting a little warmer bad anyway?
What is Global Warming? Agriculture Polar Melting Sea Level Rise Economic
What is Global Warming?
Global Warming is the gradual heating of Earth's surface, oceans and atmosphere. Scientists have documented the rise in average temperatures worldwide since the late 1800s. Earth's average temperature has risen by 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degrees Celsius) over the past century, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Temperatures are projected to rise another 2 to 11.5 degrees Fahrenheit (1.133 to 6.42 degrees Celsius) over the next 100 years.
Agriculture Problems
All agriculture depends also on steady water supplies, and Global Warming is likely to disrupt those supplies through floods and droughts. It has been suggested that higher latitudes – Siberia, for example – may become productive due to Global Warming, but the soil in Arctic and bordering territories is very poor, and the amount of sunlight reaching the ground in summer will not change because it is governed by the tilt of the earth. Agriculture can also be disrupted by wildfires and changes in seasonal periodicity, which is already taking place, and changes to grasslands and water supplies could impact grazing and welfare of domestic livestock. Increased warming may also have a greater effect on countries whose climate is already near or at a temperature limit over which yields reduce or crops fail – in the tropics or sub-Sahara, for example.
Polar Melting
While the opening of a year-round ice free Arctic passage between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans would confer some commercial benefits, these are considerably outweighed by the negatives. Detrimental effects include loss of polar bear habitat and increased mobile ice hazards to shipping. The loss of ice albedo (the reflection of heat), causing the ocean to absorb more heat, is also a positive feedback; the warming waters increase glacier and Greenland ice cap melt, as well as raising the temperature of Arctic tundra, which then releases methane, a very potent greenhouse gas (methane is also released from the sea-bed, where it is trapped in ice-crystals called clathrates). Melting of the Antarctic ice shelves is predicted to add further to sea-level rise with no benefits accruing.
Sea Level Rise
Many parts of the world are low-lying and will be severely affected by modest sea rises. Rice paddies are being inundated with salt water, which destroys the crops. Seawater is contaminating rivers as it mixes with fresh water further upstream, and aquifers are becoming polluted. Given that the IPCC did not include melt-water from the Greenland and Antarctic ice-caps due to uncertainties at that time, estimates of sea-level rise are feared to considerably underestimate the scale of the problem. There are no proposed benefits to sea-level rise.
Islands being destroyed by sea level rise
Economic Problems
The economic impacts of climate change may be catastrophic, while there have been very few benefits projected at all. The Stern report made clear the overall pattern of economic distress, and while the specific numbers may be contested, the costs of climate change were far in excess of the costs of preventing it. Certain scenarios projected in the IPCC AR4 report would witness massive migration as low-lying countries were flooded. Disruptions to global trade, transport, energy supplies and labour markets, banking and finance, investment and insurance, would all wreak havoc on the stability of both developed and developing nations. Markets would endure increased volatility and institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies would experience considerable difficulty.
Developing countries, some of which are already embroiled in military conflict, may be drawn into larger and more protracted disputes over water, energy supplies or food, all of which may disrupt economic growth at a time when developing countries are beset by more egregious manifestations of climate change. It is widely accepted that the detrimental effects of climate change will be visited largely on the countries least equipped to adapt, socially or economically.
So what can we do to help?
Learn More About Global Warming And How To Stop It
http://planetsave.com/2008/11/28/five-ways-to-prevent-global-warming-that-big-media-wont-tell-you/
http://globalwarming-facts.info/50-tips/?single page=1
https://www.nrdc.org/stories/how-you-can-stop-global-warming
http://www.conserve-energy-future.com/StopGlobalWarming.php
http://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/global-warming/solutions/global-warming-solutions-reduce-emissions#.WEDoebIrIq
Make A Difference
So Let’s Make A Difference. Our Generation May Be Humanity's Last Hope.
Drop a comment if you’re in!
Search archive.
Receive a Daily or Weekly summary of the most important articles direct to your inbox, just enter your email below. By entering your email address you agree for your data to be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy .
A scientific briefing that UK prime minister Boris Johnson says changed his mind about global warming has been made public for the first time, following a freedom-of-information (FOI) request by Carbon Brief.
Last year, on the eve of the UK hosting COP26 in Glasgow, Johnson described tackling climate change as the country’s “ number one international priority ”. He also published a net-zero strategy and told other countries at the UN General Assembly to “ grow up ” when it comes to global warming.
However, just a few years earlier, Johnson was publicly doubting established climate science. For example, in a Daily Telegraph column published in 2015 he claimed unusual winter heat had “ nothing to do with global warming ”. And, in 2013, he said he had an “ open mind ” to the idea that the Earth was heading for a mini ice-age.
Last year, acknowledging his past climate scepticism, Johnson told journalists that he had now changed his mind, largely due to a scientific briefing he received shortly after becoming prime minister in 2019.
Johnson admitted he had been on a “road to Damascus” when it comes to climate science:
“I got them [government scientists] to run through it all and, if you look at the almost vertical kink upward in the temperature graph, the anthropogenic climate change, it’s very hard to dispute. That was a very important moment for me.”
The Sunday Times later reported that this briefing had been given by Sir Patrick Vallance , the government’s chief scientific advisor, and, according to one of the prime minister’s close allies, it “had a huge impact”. Using a FOI request submitted to the UK’s Government Office for Science (“GO-Science”), Carbon Brief has now obtained the contents of this pivotal scientific briefing, which took place on 28 January 2020 inside 10 Downing Street.
Below, Carbon Brief reveals the 11 slides that were used to “teach” Johnson about climate change, as well as the email correspondence exchanged between leading scientists and advisors as they prepared the prime minister’s briefing. [ Jump straight to see the 11 slides used in the presentation. ]
The emails suggest that some No 10 advisors were suspicious of important aspects of climate science – for example, asking whether UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports were “worth taking note of”.
The exchange of emails begins on 23 January 2020 when someone in the office of the government’s chief scientific adviser , Sir Patrick Vallance, emails Met Office chief scientist Prof Stephen Belcher and Prof Gideon Henderson , the chief scientific adviser at the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). (See Carbon Brief’s in-depth interview with Belcher published in April 2018.)
The message describes plans for a climate change-themed “teach in” involving the two scientists which will be attended by a selection of No 10 staff, including some redacted names and “SpAds” (special advisors). Munira Mirza has been the director of the “No10 policy unit”, which is referred to in the email, since Johnson became prime minister in 2019. (See the note at the end of the article about the reasoning given by GO-Science for redacting some names.)
Also copied into the email is Dr Stuart Wainwright , who is the director of GO-Science and, therefore, works under Vallance.
Henderson responds, noting that “we’ll need to prioritise this when we hear the time”.
The next day, an email is sent “on behalf of” Dominic Cummings , then the prime minister’s chief adviser, inviting the scientists to an event on 28 January in the Cabinet Room at No 10.
Shortly afterwards, Wainwright contacts Belcher outlining what they want to cover in the briefing. The plan focuses on what could be described as the basics of climate science, including evidence for human-caused climate change and the formation of scientific consensus. There is a notable focus on “uncertainty”.
This is followed by an email from Vallance’s office to a number of people, including Cummings, reiterating these three priority areas and indicating that Belcher has “previously discussed an idea of how to structure the session” with the chief scientific adviser.
They indicate that Belcher should “liaise with academic colleagues on pulling something together”, to which he replies: “Will do.” (The Met Office has confirmed to Carbon Brief that its senior climate scientists Prof Richard Betts and Prof Peter Stott both assisted Belcher in preparing for the briefing.)
An email from Wainwright follows explaining that the planned climate change session is “part of a broader set of teach in’s [sic] on various policy, economic, science aspects that will inform advice to the PM”.
At this point, Johnson had been in No 10 for six months, after taking over as Conservative leader in July 2019 and winning a general election in December.
The next email is from Chris Pook , a deputy director in GO-Science working under Wainwright and Vallance.
He invites Richard Barker , head of energy and environment at National Physical Laboratory , to participate in the meeting as an expert, saying they need someone who can discuss uncertainty in climate measurements and help understand “what this means for decision-making”.
Two days later, on 26 January, Belcher emails the government scientists explaining that he has been working on a series of slides. Topics he mentions include the “need for quantitative advice on carbon budgets to achieve targets” and “current challenges” on tipping points and future impacts and extremes .
He also says they could discuss the concept of scientific peer review, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Berkeley Earth , a US-based institution that analyses land temperature data, “as an example of a new group coming in as independent tests”.
Additionally, he suggests a selection of five experts who could contribute to the session. The names of all but one – Baroness Brown , chair of the Climate Change Committee’s (CCC) adaptation committee – are redacted. One is proposed with the caveat that “she has done lots of media work, quite campaigning”. Another is described as an “excellent communicator on impacts”. A further suggestion comes with the remark: “I appreciate Stuart you thought she might appear too close? She is excellent.”
On 27 January, the day before the meeting, Vallance’s office contacts Belcher confirming that Barker and another individual whose name has been redacted will be invited to the event. They mention that they have been delayed due to “trying to juggle the response to Wuhan coronavirus”. (The first cases of Covid-19 in the UK were confirmed four days later.)
This email builds on the three priority areas previously mentioned, adding some more specific questions that No 10 would like the experts to address. These questions indicate a degree of scepticism about some of the key processes underlying climate science:
“No10 will want an answer to the question ‘why are the numbers so round’ eg 2050 target, and 1.5 degree etc. They also mentioned the IPCC reports and authors – ‘scientists or not’ – and are the reports worth taking note off!!! [sic]”
The “2050 target” likely refers to the UK’s legally binding goal for achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, established during the final days in office of Johnson’s predecessor, Theresa May. The mention of “1.5 degree” references the Paris Agreement’s stretch goal of limiting warming to 1.5C, which scientists think would limit some of the worst impacts of climate change.
The IPCC is a UN body that is regarded internationally as the authority on climate change. Its landmark assessment reports, assembled by hundreds of leading scientists every seven years or so, present comprehensive overviews of the state of knowledge on the topic.
This email is followed later that day by an internal message between GO-Science staff indicating that Belcher will lead the session and reiterating some key points from the session plan.
Again, this message highlights a focus on “what’s clear, what’s unsettled”, how scientific consensus is reached, “convenient numbers” and whether the IPCC process is “actually science”.
It also asks: “…should we be worried that [the] range of uncertainty hasn’t changed (climate sensitivities)?” This references the point that estimates of climate sensitivity – a measure of how much the planet is expected to warm in response to rising CO2 levels – had not been narrowed for decades. While this is no longer the case following new research captured in last year’s IPCC sixth assessment report (AR6), this information had not yet been published at the time.
The final line of the email mentions a “Koonin red-teaming exercise” – presumably a reference to Dr Steven Koonin , a US physicist who has worked for both BP and the Obama administration, and who has more recently been accused of downplaying the severity of climate change.
During the years of the Trump administration in the US, Koonin advocated for a “ red team ” methodology to “test assumptions and analyses, identify risks, and reduce – or at least understand – uncertainties” around climate science. The approach saw some support within the Trump administration, but was dismissed by other scientists as inappropriate for assessing climate science. No such exercise ever ended up taking place.
It is notable that Dominic Cummings has also been a prominent supporter of the “red-team” approach in various fields as a means of combating what he describes as “groupthink and normal cognitive biases”. (Carbon Brief has approached Cummings for comment, but, upon publication, had not received a response.)
As the meeting approaches, the participants arrange a 45-minute “pre-meet” before heading to No 10. At this point, Belcher, Henderson, Vallance and Barker are listed as attending the meeting, along with one more redacted name. Another redacted name is unable to come as “she is in France”.
On the morning of 28 January, Belcher sends over his slides – which he describes as “reasonably vanilla” – to “guide discussion later today”. Among other things, he emphasises that the “goal is to stabilise climate, which requires net-zero emissions”. He asks for feedback from the others.
Henderson responds with some last-minute changes to the presentation. He notes that it largely misses out impacts of sea-level rise, including on the UK and its flood defences, something that is “perhaps more important than arctic [sic] sea ice for HMG [the government]”. He adds that, “personally, I would put more focus on C cycle [carbon cycle] as cause of problem, important feedbacks, and the bit we need to act on”.
There is another, lengthy, response to Belcher from a redacted email address. It suggests adding a chart showing the long-term record of carbon dioxide (CO2), as well as various climate impacts taken from the IPCC, including huge losses for coral reefs, impacts on crop production and increased spread of various diseases. The writer stresses that “it may be worth pointing out that to achieve 1.5C (and perhaps 2C) requires net *negative* emissions ”.
They also attach the chart below as an example of one that could be added to the presentation, noting that a “striking thing to show” would be “the long-term record of CO2”. They note that they cannot find a suitable chart from the IPCC’s fifth assessment report (AR5), published in 2013, and so include one from the fourth assessment (AR4), from 2007. The emailer notes that “it’s out of date, of course – CO2 is now up to 400 ppm [parts per million]”.
The chart, or a more recent version of it, does not make it into the final presentation.
Barker also responds to Belcher’s call for suggestions with a “rather basic question” around the conclusion they want to present to No 10:
“My assumption is that we want this meeting to establish the big opportunity for us to take a big step forward.”
While Belcher says he will leave Vallance to “comment on the overall purpose of the meeting”, there is no email from the chief scientific adviser clarifying this point in the released documents. His office does note again at this point that they are “currently quite immersed in coronavirus”.
Finally, as the meeting approaches, the final slides are sent out to GO-Science with a request for 15 hard copies to be printed, possibly indicating the final number of attendees at the event.
(Carbon Brief has learned that Boris Johnson received at least one further science briefing on climate change following this January 2020 presentation. In March 2021, for example, he was specifically briefed about, among other topics, the projected climate impacts at 2C and 4C of global warming. The information about these impacts was prepared by Prof Richard Betts from the Met Office and the University of Exeter using findings from the EU-funded HELIX project . Prof Betts also provided UK examples from the Technical Report of the Third UK Climate Change Risk Assessment, often known as CCRA3 . Carbon Brief also understands that, even though Sir Patrick Vallance led the briefing at No 10 Downing Street on 28 January 2020, the 11 slides themselves were presented by Prof Belcher.)
Below, with explanation by Carbon Brief, are the 11 slides shown to the prime minister on the evening of 28 January 2020 in the Cabinet Room at No 10 Downing Street.
The three charts come from the Met Office Hadley Centre ’s Climate Dashboard – a website that brings together “the key indicators of climate change”. The site features graphs such as temperature change, sea level change and atmospheric CO2 change over time – drawing on data produced by “respected institutes and research groups around the world”.
The graph in the top left is known as a Keeling Curve , and shows the increase in atmospheric CO2 levels over 1960-2020, measured in parts per million. The graph uses data from three sources – the Mauna Loa observation centre (blue), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (yellow) and the World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases (red).
The graph in the bottom left shows the increase in global temperatures over 1850-2020, compared to the 1850-1900 average. The coloured lines indicate different datasets, including the Met Office HadCRUT (black) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAAGlobalTemp (yellow).
The graph in the bottom right shows global sea level from 1993 to 2020, compared to the 1993-2010 average, in mm. The graph uses satellite datasets from organisations including the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (pink) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (light blue).
The map in the top right shows warming over 2009-19, compared to the 1961-90 average. The graph is similar in appearance to one used on the Met Office HadObs website .
The two charts on the left are from FAQ 10.1 in chapter 10 of the Working Group I report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ’s (IPCC) fifth assessment report (AR5), published in 2013. This chapter focuses on “detection and attribution” of climate change.
The black lines show observations of global temperature since 1860, based on datasets including the Met Office HadCRUT4 dataset, while the red and blue lines show model results. The upper chart shows model simulations excluding the influence of human activity on global temperature results. Conversely, models in the lower chart include human influence on global temperatures. While the upper chart shows a clear departure between model runs and observations from the 1960s, the lower chart shows close agreement between the models and observations. This shows how “human forcing” plays a key role in observed temperature trends .
The map in the top right is a repeat of the one shown in the first slide. The map below it shows the equivalent data from climate model output (taken as an average across a number of models).
The large graphic was produced by the Met Office’s “Knowledge Integration” team – a group responsible for communicating climate science produced at the Met Office Hadley Centre to the general public and government. The map compares Arctic sea ice extent in 1980 and 2019. Meanwhile, the text states that over this time, September Arctic sea ice extent declined by 12% on average – resulting in an overall loss of almost 3.5m km2.
The smaller insert is from the Met Office Climate Dashboard , and shows the decline in Arctic sea ice over 1980-2019, compared to the 1981-2020 average. The plot uses datasets from the Copernicus Climate Change Service , the Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility and the National Snow and Ice Data Center .
The slide is titled “a tipping point”, but as a scientist in the email chain (with their name redacted) points out, the decline in Arctic sea ice is not strictly a tipping point. They write: “To me, that means sudden rapid change (through some unstable feedback) or irreversibility. There isn’t evidence for the former, as far as I know, and there are model studies that show that sea-ice comes back if you cool down the climate, so it’s not an irreversibility like ice-sheet loss could be.” For more on this, see the final section of Carbon Brief ’s tipping points explainer.
These figures were produced using the HadEX3 dataset . This dataset uses daily observations of both variables, taken at thousands of locations across the globe over 1901-2018, to produce “indices” of extreme temperature and precipitation.
The figures on the left show the change in extreme temperatures over 1950-2018. The top left map shows the regional pattern – where red indicates an increase in temperature extremes, blue indicates a decrease and grey denotes areas in which there was no data. The line plot below shows the number of days per year, over 1901-2018, that the global average temperature crossed a given threshold. The line plot compares the more recent dataset (HadEX3, black) with similar, older datasets.
The figures on the right use the same format for changes in extreme rainfall. The map shows the change in extreme rainfall over 1950-2018, where blue indicates an increase in rainfall extremes and brown indicates a decrease. The line plot shows the number of days per year global rainfall crossed a given threshold, for each year between 1901-2018.
The graphics show that while temperature extremes have increased across the globe since the 1970s, the signal for rainfall is less clear.
This slide features a range of images, maps and graphics showing the impacts of climate change. These are grouped under four subheadings – “flooding and sea level rise”, “heatwaves, health and disease”, “wildfires” and “biodiversity”.
For example, the blue graphic in the “flooding and sea level rise” category states that in the UK, “extended periods of extreme winter rainfall are now seven times more likely”. The graphic has previously been displayed on a section of the Met Office website detailing the impacts of climate change , both in the UK and globally. These pages have since been restructured.
This figure comes from the IPCC AR5 synthesis report , published in 2014. It shows the relationship between accumulating atmospheric CO2, rising global temperatures and climate change risks. (More up-to-date versions are available in the IPCC’s special report on 1.5C , published in 2018.)
Panel a) illustrates the five “Reasons For Concern” – also known as a “ burning embers ” chart – which summarise five key categories of risk around climate change. The colour of the shading – from white to purple – indicates an increasing level of risk with higher levels of warming.
Panel b) shows the relationship between cumulative CO2 emissions and global average surface temperature increase. The ellipses show expected total human-caused warming in 2100 expected from each level of cumulative emissions, plotted as a function of that total from 1870 to 2100. The filled black ellipses show observed emissions to 2005 and observed temperatures in the decade 2000-09, and the equivalent for 2017. The latter appears to have been added retrospectively to the IPCC chart for this presentation.
According to the credit on the image, this figure was created by Dr Erich Fischer , a senior scientist and lecturer in the Department of Environmental Systems Science at ETH Zurich . It was created using the Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool), which “allows for routine comparison of single or multiple models, either against predecessor versions or against observations”.
The figure shows observations (black lines) and climate model projections (coloured lines) of global average surface temperature change from 1850 to 2100. The left-hand chart shows the projections from the sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) under five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). The right-hand chart shows the equivalent projections from CMIP5 using the Representative Concentration Pathways – the predecessors to CMIP6 and the SSPs, respectively. The right-hand chart has been flipped to allow a direct comparison between the two. The shading indicates the range in the projections under each scenario.
The figure on the left is a repeat of the sea level rise chart shown in the first slide.
The figure on the right is taken from the UK Climate Projections 2018 (UKCP18), produced by the Met Office. The charts on the left show UK average sea level rise from 2000 to 2100 under a scenario that likely keeps warming below 2C by 2100 ( RCP2.6 ) and a scenario of very high global emissions ( RCP8.5 ). The solid line and shaded regions represent the central estimate and ranges for each scenario, while the dashed lines indicate the overall range across RCP scenarios. The maps on the right show projected sea level rise in 2100 around the UK coastline under the central estimate of each RCP. The original figure (pdf) also includes an intermediate RCP4.5 scenario. All data are relative to a baseline period of 1981-2000.
This chart shows the Met Office decadal forecast for global temperatures, issued in January 2021. The forecast suggests that annual global average temperatures during 2021-25 are very likely to be between 0.91C and 1.61C above pre-industrial levels. In the chart, the black lines show observed data (from the Met Office, NASA and NOAA ), the blue shading shows the latest prediction, and the red shading shows previous predictions at five-year intervals starting from November 1960 and through to 2010. In addition, 22 model simulations from CMIP5 – that have not been initialised with observations – are shown in green. In all cases, the data is shown as rolling 12-month averages and the shading represents the probable range, such that the observations are expected to lie within the shading 90% of the time.
This figure was produced by Climate Action Tracker (CAT), an independent group that tracks government climate action towards the Paris Agreement goals. The chart was part of its December 2019 global update (pdf), although it does not appear to still be on the CAT website (there have been a number of updates since). The same chart is referenced in a June 2020 article by S&P Global .
The chart shows the expected global temperature increase by the end of the century compared to pre-industrial levels implied by global emissions pathways in six scenarios: Baseline emissions, emissions compatible with warming of 1.5C and 2C, respectively, and the three scenarios resulting from aggregation of 32 country assessments: Pledges & targets, Current policies and an optimistic scenario. The shaded ranges indicate uncertainty in emissions projections and the dotted lines indicate median (50%) levels.
This table identifies a number of climate “ tipping points ” – thresholds beyond which a system can be pushed into a completely new state – and their potential impacts globally and for the UK. The table divides tipping points into three categories: the carbon cycle and other biogeochemical cycles, the cryosphere and sea level, and ocean/atmosphere circulation. The source of the table is not clear, though it could have been created specifically for the presentation.
All 38 emails released under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 by GO-Science to Carbon Brief can be viewed as a PDF . An earlier version of the presentation, which was discussed and shared in the emails, can also be viewed as a PDF , as well as the final version shown to the prime minister, also available as a PDF .
In responding to Carbon Brief’s FOI request, GO-Science provided the following explanation for why it delayed the release for more than a month to conduct a “public interest” test, as well as why some names in the emails were redacted:
“The requested information engaged Section 35(1)(a) – information related to the formulation of government policy; because of this we have carried out a public interest test. In this instance the information is in relation to factual background information and scientific consensus on climate science, provided to inform policy decisions regarding climate change. There is a high public interest in climate change-related policies, which have and will have a significant impact on the public. Given the public interest in transparency regarding the scientific information provided to government in this context, we have determined that it is in the public interest to disclose the information held, and we have not applied this exemption. We are refusing some of this information (redacted in the annexes) under: Section 40(2) – Personal information. We have withheld personal information if disclosure would breach one or more of the principles of the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) or Data Protection Act 2018 .
Carbon Brief also submitted an FOI request to the Cabinet Office asking for the same information about the 28 January 2020 briefing, but it responded – inaccurately, as GO-Science’s release of files proves – saying: “Searches of our records have not identified any information in scope of your request under the Act.”
Expert analysis direct to your inbox.
Get a round-up of all the important articles and papers selected by Carbon Brief by email. Find out more about our newsletters here .
Skip to Content
Last year was another record year for carbon pollution, global temperatures, sea level rise and natural disasters, according to the latest international report on the world’s climate published Thursday.
More than a dozen CU Boulder researchers contributed to the 34th annual State of the Climate report , led by scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
According to the report, the concentrations of Earth’s main greenhouse gases—carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide—reached record highs last year. The increase from 2022 was one of the highest on record despite global commitments to cut emissions.
“We are definitely not on the right path to limit global warming,” said Xin Lindsay Lan , the report’s co-author and a researcher at the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at CU Boulder. “The planet is already warming rapidly, so it’s a critical time to reduce those greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere. Instead, we are seeing a rapid increase.”
The report, published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, also revealed that 2023 was the hottest year on record. Global mean sea level reached a record high for the 12th consecutive year. Heatwaves, storms and droughts also plagued the planet, while catastrophic wildfires pumped more emissions into the atmosphere.
CU Boulder Today sat down with Lan, who led the reporting of global greenhouse gas levels, to discuss the importance of emission reduction.
Xin Lindsay Lan
It is very concerning, because we are already at pretty high levels of global warming. The global average warming in the last decade is about 1.1°C above pre-industrial levels. Climate scientists like me are concerned that if global warming exceeds 1.5 °C, we could be facing some severe climate crises. So it’s very important that we try our best to limit greenhouse gas emissions and avoid crossing that threshold.
Although there have been many efforts to cut emissions globally, our data shows that global greenhouse gas concentrations remain at very high levels. If emissions had decreased significantly, we would have seen a slowdown in the rise of global CO₂ levels, but there's no evidence of that. In fact, the increase in CO₂ from 2022 to 2023 was the fourth largest in recorded history.
Many countries pledged to reach net zero emission by around 2050, so we may see the global CO₂ emissions continue to increase at a fast pace until then.
CO₂ is the most important greenhouse gas, and the main source of global carbon emissions is fossil fuel use. It contributes to about 66% of the global radiative energy increase, which directly leads to global warming.
While methane has a greater warming power than CO₂ per molecule, it has a shorter lifespan in the atmosphere after it’s released. When CO₂ is emitted, it can stay in the air for thousands of years, and it will continue to trap heat. A lot of the CO₂ in the air now has been there since the industrial era. Even if we stop emitting CO₂ today, we will continue to see warming effects from the CO₂ we’ve been putting into the air.
The fires certainly contributed to our emissions last year. In addition to the fires and burning of fossil fuels, 2023 was a year of El Niño, which is a climate pattern characterized by warmer than normal ocean temperatures that release large amounts of heat into the atmosphere.
In warm years like 2023, a lot of forests may be under stress, which would reduce their CO₂ uptake. A warmer ocean may also absorb less CO₂ than normal.
One critical thing that we need is global collaboration. Greenhouse gasses, given their long lifespans in the atmosphere, do not respect state boundaries. We need to work together as a global community to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions.
It’s important for individuals to believe they can make a difference in changing the course of climate change. One of the most critical things we can do is to limit our energy use, because the energy sector is the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions. We can try to use renewable energy for our commutes to work. We can try to take public transportation when possible. We can reduce methane emissions by limiting food waste that goes to the landfill.
In addition to reducing our own carbon footprints, I would encourage individuals to vote and talk to your representative about your concerns on global warming.
CU Boulder Today regularly publishes Q&As with our faculty members weighing in on news topics through the lens of their scholarly expertise and research/creative work. The responses here reflect the knowledge and interpretations of the expert and should not be considered the university position on the issue. All publication content is subject to edits for clarity, brevity and university style guidelines.
Related articles.
Subscribe to CUBT
Sign up for Alerts
Administrative eMemos
Buff Bulletin Board
Events Calendar
Advertisement
Supported by
Global warming is putting the continent’s ice at risk of destruction in many forms. But one especially calamitous scenario might be a less pressing concern, a new study found.
By Raymond Zhong
For almost a decade, climate scientists have been trying to get their heads around a particularly disastrous scenario for how West Antarctica’s gigantic ice sheet might break apart, bringing catastrophe to the world’s coasts.
It goes like this: Once enough of the ice sheet’s floating edges melt away, what remains are immense, sheer cliffs of ice facing the sea. These cliffs will be so tall and steep that they are unstable. Great chunks of ice start breaking away from them, exposing even taller, even more-unstable cliffs. Soon, these start crumbling too, and before long you have runaway collapse.
As all this ice tumbles into the ocean, and assuming that nations’ emissions of heat-trapping gases climb to extremely high levels, Antarctica could contribute more than a foot to worldwide sea-level rise before the end of the century.
This calamitous chain of events is still hypothetical, yet scientists have taken it seriously enough to include it as a “low-likelihood, high-impact” possibility in the United Nations’ latest assessment of future sea-level increase.
Now, though, a group of researchers has put forth evidence that the prospect may be more remote than previously thought. As humans burn fossil fuels and heat the planet, West Antarctica’s ice remains vulnerable to destruction in many forms. But this particular form, in which ice cliffs collapse one after the other, looks less likely, according to the scientists’ computer simulations.
“We’re not saying that we’re safe,” said Mathieu Morlighem, a professor of earth science at Dartmouth College who led the research. “The Antarctic ice sheet is going to disappear; this is going to happen. The question is how fast.”
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
The claim: image shows flowering plants in antarctica due to global warming.
A Sept. 21 Instagram post ( direct l i nk , archive link ) shows flowering plants growing on land with icebergs floating on water in the background.
"Flowers are now staring (sic) to bloom in Antarctica and experts say this is not good news," reads text around the image. "This would be the first evidence of accelerated ecosystem response in Antarctica that is directly associated as a consequence of global warming, according to Nicoletta Cannone, a professor of ecology at the University of Insubria."
The post garnered more than 2,000 likes in two weeks.
Follow us on Facebook! Like our page to get updates throughout the day on our latest debunks
While a 2022 study did find a global warming-related expansion in the range of two Antarctic flowering plants, the photo does not show those plant species. The photo is labeled as being captured in Greenland on a stock photo website.
The photo in the social media post appears on the stock photo website Alamy , where it is labeled, "Iceberg floating in the water off the coast of Greenland. Flowers on the shore. Nature and landscapes of Greenland."
A spokesperson for the British Antarctic Survey told USA TODAY the photo "most definitely does not show Antarctic plants."
"The purple flower looks very much like Saxifraga oppositifolia − Purple saxifrage − which is frequent in the Arctic," the spokesperson said.
Skip Walker , director of the Alaska Geobotany Center, also told USA TODAY the plants in the photo are likely from the Arctic.
"I can't identify the plants with certainty, but they all look like Arctic plants," he said in an email.
Matt Davey , an ecologist at the Scottish Association for Marine Science, told USA TODAY there are only two species of flowering plants in Antarctica: Colobanthus quitensis and Deschampsia antarctica .
"The flowers in (the) photo are definitely not the two Antarctic flowering plants," he said in an email.
Fact check : Greenland's Petermann Glacier is shrinking; movement doesn't mean it's growing
The text associated with the image seems to loosely quote a 2022 paper co-authored by Nicoletta Cannone, an ecology professor at the University of Insubria in Italy.
While the photo in the post does not show Antarctic plants, Cannone's paper does document a global warming-related expansion in the range of both Colobanthus quitensis and Deschampsia antarctica on the continent's Signy Island.
Global warming has also caused the retreat of ice shelves on the Antarctic Peninsula, according to Discovering Antarctica , a website created by various U.K. government and research entities.
USA TODAY reached out to the Instagram user who shared the post for comment but did not immediately receive a response.
AFP also debunked the claim.
Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or e-newspaper here .
Our fact-check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.
Sign up here.
Reporting by Gavin Jones; Editing by Aurora Ellis
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab
Police detained a teenager, while the perpetrator was still at large.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Global warming, the phenomenon of rising average air temperatures near Earth's surface over the past 100 to 200 years. Although Earth's climate has been evolving since the dawn of geologic time, human activities since the Industrial Revolution have a growing influence over the pace and extent of climate change.
Global warming is the long-term warming of the planet's overall temperature. Though this warming trend has been going on for a long time, its pace has significantly increased in the last hundred years due to the burning of fossil fuels.As the human population has increased, so has the volume of . fossil fuels burned.. Fossil fuels include coal, oil, and natural gas, and burning them causes ...
A: Global warming occurs when carbon dioxide (CO 2) and other air pollutants collect in the atmosphere and absorb sunlight and solar radiation that have bounced off the earth's surface.Normally ...
What is global warming, explained. The planet is heating up—and fast. Glaciers are melting, sea levels are rising, cloud forests are dying, and wildlife is scrambling to keep pace. It has become ...
Full story. We know this warming is largely caused by human activities because the key role that carbon dioxide plays in maintaining Earth's natural greenhouse effect has been understood since the mid-1800s. Unless it is offset by some equally large cooling influence, more atmospheric carbon dioxide will lead to warmer surface temperatures.
Climate change is a long-term change in the average weather patterns that have come to define Earth's local, regional and global climates. These changes have a broad range of observed effects that are synonymous with the term. Changes observed in Earth's climate since the mid-20th century are driven by human activities, particularly fossil fuel burning, […]
Both phrases can have slightly different meanings in different contexts, but these days, global warming generally refers to the long-term increase in global average temperature as a result of human activity. Climate change is a much broader term that covers changes in multiple parts of the climate system, from temperature to precipitation to wind patterns.
The average temperature of the Earth is rising at nearly twice the rate it was 50 years ago. This rapid warming trend cannot be explained by natural cycles alone, scientists have concluded.
What are the effects of global warming? One of the most concerning impacts of global warming is the effect warmer temperatures will have on Earth's polar regions and mountain glaciers. The Arctic ...
global warming, Increase in the global average surface temperature resulting from enhancement of the greenhouse effect, primarily by air pollution.In 2007 the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change forecast that by 2100 global average surface temperatures would increase 3.2-7.2 °F (1.8-4.0 °C), depending on a range of scenarios for greenhouse gas emissions, and stated that it was ...
The report projects that in the coming decades climate changes will increase in all regions. For 1.5°C of global warming, there will be increasing heat waves, longer warm seasons and shorter cold seasons. At 2°C of global warming, heat extremes would more often reach critical tolerance thresholds for agriculture and health, the report shows ...
Download Full Presentation (PPT, 148MB) Updated: April 2021. Climate Central is presenting a new outreach and education resource for meteorologists, journalists, and others—a climate change ...
The report found that GHG emissions need to be halved by 2030, if we are to limit global warming to 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels by the end of the century. Unsplash/Johannes Plenio. Carbon dioxide levels continue at record levels, despite the economic slowdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. 3.
CLAIM Today's global warming is no different from previous warming periods in Earth's past. FINDING FALSE. Natural changes in the Sun and Earth cannot explain today's global warming. Human activities are causing Earth to heat up in ways that are different from warm periods in the past.
What else should I be reading about global warming? Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all ...
While Global Warming is sometimes what we hear about, what is usually stressed are 'catastrophic' or emotionally affecting alleged consequences of warming. Geneva (Reuters) - Obesity contributes to global warming, too. May 15, 2008. ScienceDaily - Global Warming may lead to increase in kidney stones disease.
Global warming is one of the few scientific theories that makes us examine the whole basis of modern society. It is a theory that has politicians arguing, sets nations against each other, queries individual choices of lifestyle, and ultimately asks questions about humanity's relationship with the rest of the planet. There is very little doubt ...
The average surface temperature on Earth is slowly increasing. This trend is known as global warming.
Worldwide. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, human activities have been the main driver of the current change in the climate. In 2023, the Earth's land and ocean surface ...
French. Russian. Spanish. Climate Change explained: Water Cycle. 1/19. Climate change • Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. Human activities have been the main driver of climate change, primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas. Watch on.
Global warming is the increase in the world's average temperature, believed to be the result from the release of carbon dioxide and other gases into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels. . This increase in greenhouse gases is causing an increase in the rate of the greenhouse effect. The Greenhouse Effect. The earth is warming rather like ...
What is Global Warming? Global Warming is the gradual heating of Earth's surface, oceans and atmosphere. Scientists have documented the rise in average temperatures worldwide since the late 1800s. Earth's average temperature has risen by 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degrees Celsius) over the past century, according to the Environmental ...
A scientific briefing that UK prime minister Boris Johnson says changed his mind about global warming has been made public for the first time, following a freedom-of-information (FOI) request by Carbon Brief. Last year, on the eve of the UK hosting COP26 in Glasgow, Johnson described tackling climate change as the country's " number one ...
It contributes to about 66% of the global radiative energy increase, which directly leads to global warming. While methane has a greater warming power than CO₂ per molecule, it has a shorter lifespan in the atmosphere after it's released. When CO₂ is emitted, it can stay in the air for thousands of years, and it will continue to trap heat.
Global warming is putting the continent's ice at risk of destruction in many forms. But one especially calamitous scenario might be a less pressing concern, a new study found.
For nearly a year, climate specialists have been speculating that carbon dioxide (CO 2) emissions from China—the world's largest emitter—may have peaked in 2023, well before a government goal to halt emissions growth by 2030.Supporting evidence emerged earlier this month, when a new analysis from the Asia Society Policy Institute showed that China's increasing reliance on renewable ...
Global warming has also caused the retreat of ice shelves on the Antarctic Peninsula, according to Discovering Antarctica, a website created by various U.K. government and research entities.
As the need for effective global climate action becomes ever more urgent, a "first-of-its-kind" analysis has identified policies around the world that have done the most to rein in planet ...
Research shows "higher global average temperatures are making wider geographic areas more suitable for transmission" of dengue, malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases, according to the U.N ...
Global warming may have contributed to the freak storm that sank a luxury British-flagged yacht off the coast of Sicily on Monday, Italian climatologist Luca Mercalli told Reuters.