(Mark 72)
(Mark 75)
(Mark 91)
(Mark 85)
(Mark 85)
(Mark 85)
(Mark 91)
(Mark 85)
(Mark 75)
This dissertation achieved a mark of 84:
.
LUBS5530 Enterprise
|
MSc Sustainability
|
|
|
. |
The following outstanding dissertation example PDFs have their marks denoted in brackets. (Mark 70) (Mark 78) |
20,000+ Professional Language Experts Ready to Help. Expertise in a variety of Niches.
API Solutions
Unmatched expertise at affordable rates tailored for your needs. Our services empower you to boost your productivity.
GoTranscript is the chosen service for top media organizations, universities, and Fortune 50 companies.
One of the Largest Online Transcription and Translation Agencies in the World. Founded in 2005.
Speaker 1: Hey guys, welcome to Grad Coach TV, where we demystify and simplify the oftentimes confusing world of academic research. My name's David, and today I'm chatting to one of our trusted coaches, Alexandra, about five common mistakes students make during their qualitative research analysis. This discussion is based on one of the many, many articles over at the Grad Coach blog. So, if you'd like to learn more about qualitative research analysis, head over to gradcoach.com forward slash blog. Also, if you're looking for a helping hand with your dissertation, thesis or research project, be sure to check out our one-on-one private coaching service, where we hold your hand throughout the research journey, step-by-step. For more information and to book a free consultation, head over to gradcoach.com. Hey, Alexandra, welcome back to the CoachCast. It's really great to have you back on board.
Speaker 2: Hey, David. always a pleasure to be here and happy to talk with you today. So today we are talking about
Speaker 1: five common mistakes students make about qualitative research analysis, and let us just dive into it. The first one that comes up quite frequently is a lack of alignment between the analysis and the golden thread. Alexandra, what am I getting at with this? Yes, so this idea
Speaker 2: of the golden thread, you will hear it in all walks of research, whether it is quantitative, mixed methods and qualitative so really what you want to do and consider for this golden thread are these three fundamental we'll call them puzzle pieces of the research aims the research objectives and the research questions so these are kind of the foundation of your qualitative research study and so how you consider these and you know what you're trying to do and answer and how you're going to do it will then help you determine what methodology you should choose that would be the most appropriate or suitable to answer those questions and this is not particularly easy because there are several different kinds of qualitative methodologies out there but it can have some some positive outcomes or some negative consequences depending on which methodology you choose to answer those aims objectives and questions of your golden thread so that's
Speaker 1: really helpful alexandra maybe you can give us an example or two of where there's alignment or a
Speaker 2: lack of alignment sure so two of the most common methodologies in qualitative research that we see at grad coach or elsewhere are case studies versus grounded theory and so the first thing to keep in mind with any study is that your the methodology that you choose should be the most suitable one to answer those golden thread notions of the aims objectives research questions not the other way around and so for example with the case study the case study should be used if in your golden thread ideas of the aims objectives and research questions you already have some sort of working knowledge of a group or an event and so you're using this case study methodology because it will appropriately answer those foundational aspects of the golden thread on the other hand let's say your research aims or objectives or questions are about something that you really have limited knowledge about or there's scarce research out there and you're wanting to kind of build up a framework or a theory in that case using a methodology like grounded theory would be more suitable. So you can see there with those two examples of case study versus grounded theory, these two methodology should be applied to answer different golden thread foundational aspects.
Speaker 1: That is really helpful, Alexandra. And I know it can seem a little bit overwhelming to think about getting this alignment right. In cases like this, do not necessarily just rely on your own judgment. It can be really helpful to get a friend or someone from your cohort just to take a look through and read of what you are working on. They will be able to help you identify where there is a lack of alignment. For instance, if you ask them to sort of give you the elevator pitch back of what you set out to do, and it is not lining up with your thinking, then maybe it is a good point to sort of identify where those lack of alignments are, and use that to help you sort of address that. But try and do this earlier rather than later. It's definitely going to make your life easier. So our second mistake is making use of a transcription program software without checking the transcripts. Alexandra, why is this such a problem? Yes. So first of all, you know, there
Speaker 2: are programs, an increasing number out there that are cost effective, mostly free, and for the most part accurate things like zoom transcription software otter ai atlas ti and these certainly have a lot of benefits for convenience sake and cost effectiveness however um that's not to say that these programs are perfect because with a lot of ai and other kinds of automated software it does lose that human element that can miss some of the more nuanced or minute pieces of information that are important. So for instance, in my own dissertation research, I had about 100 participants who all verbally reacted to a stimulus. And half of my participants were doing this in English and the other half in French. And each of these were about 30 minutes long, each participant 30 minutes now with qualitative research you know you have to have something to analyze and it's difficult to do that directly from the audio files so what you have to do is transcribe these from audio to text and so i was going through and i was doing these manually myself from about participant 80 i was beyond exhausted and so i decided to use one of these outside services or programs to kind of expedite this, kind of help me. And of course it was convenient. However, when I got the transcripts back, I noticed as I was going through the first few of them, some errors to content, to spelling, different words were showing up where other words had been said actually in the audio files. And as I was going along through the rest of them, I noticed that pretty much all 20 or so of these outside transcribed files had errors. So I ended up having to go back myself regardless and going through them again and fixing them. So this is all to kind of say that even though these programs can be very convenient and cost effective, there are some drawbacks. most of that has to do with kind of content, the words that they miss, spelling, punctuation, grammar, et cetera, et cetera. And you'll oftentimes definitely actually still have to go in and check these for quality and accuracy. This is why it's very important to kind of think about, even though these programs might be convenient, they're never going to replace kind of that human element of being able to really read and understand what's going on, make sure that it matches what was said in the audio files. And so one of the things that you can do if it's not yourself, you should check it yourself, but even go beyond that and ask someone else to check these transcripts for accuracy. Because either if you've used an outside service or program, or if you've done all the transcriptions by yourself, sometimes we miss things. Having someone else, an outside person, an actual person look at these and kind of make sure that they're accurate will not only help you catch potential errors, but in doing so, it kind of promotes the credibility of the transcripts because they're accurate, they're clear, they're actually what was said in the audio files and so sometimes what might be happen if you don't do this having that like human element it can diminish the credibility of the rest of your transcripts if they are accurate because the reader or your marker might say well this one was not accurate so maybe there's some flaws in the other ones as well but beyond that I mean other than the marking your transcriptions this is your this is really your raw data in qualitative analysis and so if you have errors or missing information in your transcripts that were there in the audio files this makes the coding and analysis flawed this puts things in misalignment and as such there's kind of a domino effect of repercussions that can happen if these things aren't transcribed
Speaker 1: accurately. I think that in the same way that in quantitative research your actual data is key to your analysis, it is the same for qualitative. So we really want to make sure we are doing due diligence to assess the quality of the work. That is not to say you cannot use services to help out. It will depend on your type of research as well. For instance, from a business perspective, you might be less interested in the specific nuance of how someone presented an idea compared to a language study. So in cases like that, there is a bit of a cost benefit to consider, but regardless of whether you are using a service or not, getting a second run through of it can be super helpful. And there are a range of services out there that you can use, both in terms of software or human run services. If you are interested in it, we even do it here at Grad Coach. So do take a look for the link down below. So our third mistake that frequently comes up is not specifying what type of coding you are doing in advance of actually jumping into the analysis. Alexandra, why do we need to be aware of what coding type we are using so early in the process?
Speaker 2: This goes back to the idea of making sure that all steps of your research align with the previous one and are justifiable in terms of it makes sense. There's a reason why you're doing what you're doing in the order that you're doing it. And coding is no exception to this. So the reason why coding is so important in qualitative research is that qualitative research is inherently kind of subjective. There is this inherent human interpretation that can happen. And so one of the reasons why it is so important to do coding appropriately is to kind of add the systematicity and the academic rigor to your research that is inherently not there. And so to kind of ensure this increased objectivity of something that is inherently subjective, doing this coding, you need to consider which kind of coding will be the most appropriate to answer your research goals that you've outlined prior, going back to that notion of the golden thread. And coding inherently kind of falls into two camps. There is inductive coding and deductive coding. So on the one hand, inductive coding is an approach where you are going into your data analysis and you are kind of, you're letting the themes and the codes emerge from the data. You don't have any preconceived notions, no existing ideas of what to expect. You're really letting the data, whether it comes from interviews or focus groups, you're letting the data from those transcripts emerge into these codes. And this is best for studies such as grounded theory approaches where you don't really have any idea of what to expect or anticipate. And you're really kind of trying to explore what is out there. You're letting these codes emerge directly from the data. On the other hand, deductive coding is another coding approach where you are actually, you have some ideas about what is out there, what you're looking for, what you hope your final findings to be. And for this coding approach, it's top down where prior to even collect the data, the interviews, focus groups what have you you have developed an initial set of codes into a code book whether you've put this in say Microsoft Excel or Microsoft Word or Google Sheets etc and you have kind of looked through the existing literature on your research topic and seen what what are the potential codes out there what are the themes you're looking for And then once you have collected your data and transcribed it, you're assigning pieces of that data to those codes that you've already created in advance. And you are not looking for new codes to emerge like you did in inductive. So all codes should go into something from your codebook.
Speaker 1: I think deductive coding is most commonly used where you have a theoretical framework that you're working within or a field that is really, really well researched. There, you're not going to be starting something new. Similarly, it's also become really popular to use a mixed approach of inductive and deductive. This is primarily starting deductively with a codebook and using that codebook to lead your coding and then develop further from that with an inductive approach. It is worth noting this is a fairly new way to go about coding, and so it is important that if you are choosing to go this way, that you can justify why it is appropriate and why it is useful relative to that golden thread, those research aims, objectives, and questions. Because you You don't want to be overcomplicating things or stepping too far out of your comfort zone just because it's novel. Rather, make sure it is what you need to do, where you need to do it.
Speaker 2: That's great advice, because sometimes as graduate students, we have this urge to do something novel or do it a different way. And that should not be your motivation or your justification to do something. So even though this this kind of new way is developing and coming and becoming increasingly popular, that doesn't mean that it's right for your study. So how you know it's right for your study is going back to that notion of the golden thread. And this idea extends even beyond inductive and deductive coding, because those are kind of your your starting idea of how you're going to code. Beyond that, there are additional specific approaches that you will use for your initial or your first set of coding versus your second set of coding. As an aside here, you should absolutely do more than one round of coding. Again, this will increase the systematicity, the rigor, and kind of the credibility, so to speak, of your data analysis. and so there are many different specific coding approaches but some of the the most common ones we'll name here are starting with your open coding and so for this one this kind of approach it's very loose it's very tentative as indicated from its name it's open and so this is more suitable when you're starting out other common approaches are things like in vivo coding and so with in vivo coding, this is actually using the participants own words in your analysis, not putting your interpretation of what they said or suggesting what they meant, but actually letting the participants own words do the talking, so to speak. And so this is typically most suitable to things where you're really interested in the perspectives or points of view or experiences of your participants and then the last one we'll mention but there are still plenty more is structural coding and so we use structural coding specifically well not specifically but commonly in cases where you say have conducted an interview or focus group discussion and you want to use those questions that you posed in the interview or the focus group kind of as headings all of the codes that go under one specific column for instance should be related to one specific question that was asked in the data collection and so this is really best if you are kind of looking for specific answers or codes or themes in response to one of your interview questions so or focus group questions so again there are still plenty more out there but these are some of the more common coding approaches.
Speaker 1: That's really helpful, Alexandra. And it can feel a little overwhelming that there are so many options to choose from. Don't worry, there are a ton of resources out there. Definitely take a look at any of your methodological textbooks from a qualitative perspective. You can take a look at methodology papers that have been published, YouTube tutorials, blog posts, you name it, it's out there. We even have some videos and some content about coding as well on the Grad Coach blog. Links to that will be down in the description below. But importantly, when you are considering these coding decisions, it is important to realize again what you are using them for. So look for that alignment, make sure it is on track, and then it will flow much smoother going forward as well. So our fourth common mistake is students downplay the importance of organization during both coding and analysis. How important is organization, Alexandra? It is so important. The reason why
Speaker 2: this is so important is that oftentimes we kind of assume that qualitative research and qualitative data cannot be structured. Of course, it's not as black and white or objective as quantitative research. And so what you need to do as a qualitative research is to kind of apply a framework that yourself that will promote this kind of objectivity, systematicity. And part of this relies on organization. And organization is important not only for the coding, but also the analysis. So part of the difficulty, but the importance of organizing is that sometimes the codes that you end up with after you've transcribed and done your, let's say, initial round of coding, you can end up with very high numbers of codes. For instance, I've seen some where it's upwards of 1000 codes. And so this number is very overwhelming, very large. and some of the ways to tackle this large amount of codes is one to make sure that you're organizing all of your codes in a spreadsheet of sorts whether it's excel or google sheets having them all in one place will then further facilitate you doing additional rounds of coding which we recommended previously and in doing so having these additional rounds of coding on your codes that are organized in one place, it will help you kind of whittle down these codes to the point where you have the codes that you need. There's none that are kind of superfluous or repeated, but it's very important to keep these organized in one place and to go through multiple rounds of coding. And this will make your life a whole lot easier and make sure that you have only the
Speaker 1: codes that you need and can justify. I think that's super helpful. It's also worth emphasizing that coding and organization it's a back and forth you're going to be moving from one to the next and back again and that's a good thing to do it enriches your analysis but it also allows your organization to inform your coding and your coding to inform your organizational structure and through that iterative process you're really going to develop the analysis so don't think I've coded it once, I'm done and dusted. Sorry to say it's a multiple approach. In terms of organization helping analysis, Alexandra, why is it also important to keep a track in that Google document
Speaker 2: or sheet of all your codes? Yeah, so this goes back to that notion we've repeated several times of the golden thread. So if you think of dominoes, for instance, you need to have your dominoes set up in such a way that if you knock one down, the rest go down. We can think of that, our qualitative research in such a way. And so if in the coding stage, everything has aligned with that golden thread and we move on to the analysis, the analysis will be further aligned with the coding, the transcription, the data collection, going back to the research questions, aims and objectives. And so having our codes organized in a sheet will then allow us to start to analyze our codes in a way that we can see themes and patterns emerging that are aligned with the codes, which will then add this rigor and systematicity of your study by having analysis that you know is based on very organized, solid foundations of your coding and your transcription. And so through this analysis, if we have our analysis organized, we can keep track of our patterns, our themes, and then going beyond that, actually, when we get to the point where we're writing our findings chapter, we have this set organization that will then kind of allow us to know how we're going to present these results because everything has been organized and justified up to that point.
Speaker 1: I think that's really helpful. It's also worth noting that having your codebook organized can be really helpful in sort of preventing you from getting stuck with your analysis or feeling like you're unsure of how to code because, you know, things are feeling uncertain. If you have an Excel sheet that you've developed before you start your coding process, you have it organized by the different rounds and you start bringing it from a large number of codes to the specific codes you are going to be using, that organization really helps make that process move forward. And it can be kind of cathartic to really work through that process, get it from a hundred transcripts of 30 minutes each down to some key findings. So our fifth and final mistake that we're covering today is not considering your researcher influence on your analysis. Alexandra, how do we affect our analysis and why is this something that we need to even think about?
Speaker 2: Yeah, so this kind of just goes back to the innate nature of qualitative research. It relies a lot on interpretation. It is subjective. It's not inherently black and white, such as quantitative research. And so the ways that this is kind of mitigated is through things like positionality and reflexivity. So these two concepts are becoming much more prominent and required in qualitative dissertations and theses. And so what these essentially mean is that you have your positionality, which are the underlying kind of beliefs, judgments, opinions, perceptions, all of those things that kind of make you you, the human elements. And so the way that you think about things might be different than the way someone else thinks about them. And so why we need to state our positionality in qualitative research is that it can impact our interpretation of the data, which then impacts the findings. And so, for example, in an example study where someone is exploring the perceptions of the tech industry of men versus women, a researcher who kind of identifies as a feminist versus one who identifies as more conservative or traditional, they might have underlying beliefs or assumptions about gender when it comes to the workplace or just in general. and so acknowledging that that you have these kind of underlying preferences or perspectives what have you it's important to acknowledge that because like i said it can have consequences for your analysis and your findings taking this a step further typically now we also have to to talk about our reflexivity in qualitative research and so essentially what this refers to is how our positionality affects our kind of interpretation so whereas positionality has to do more with the underlying assumptions reflexivity is taking those underlying assumptions and acknowledging how they might actually impact our interpretation and our findings and so the reason oftentimes why these are required now in qualitative studies is that this idea of you know validity and reliability we don't really use those in qualitative research we use more of these ideas of trustworthiness and that connects to our positionality and our reflexivity this reflexivity how it can impact you know it can impact the coding of your data the themes that you pull from the coding how you interpret it how you present it so in my example of the researcher who has more feminist underlying beliefs versus more traditional conservatives even if they're exploring the same phenomenon they can have vastly different interpretations and so acknowledging your positionality and indicating with your reflexivity how it might impact those steps of the research analysis can lend more credibility and more kind of trustworthiness to your your
Speaker 1: findings and ultimately your study. So that's really helpful to think about these aspects because we do need to consider how our positionality and our reflexivity might affect how we proceed with our analysis. There are potential opportunities for bias and if we're engaging in these behaviors we are able to a mitigate them during the analysis and in cases where you cannot mitigate it you can at least acknowledge it so other researchers can interpret that going forward but bias goes a little bit beyond just your positionality and reflexivity so Alexandra what other biases can come up because of research effect yes this idea of bias so going
Speaker 2: further beyond positionality and reflexivity it can be very easy to have biased interpretations and there are a few ways this can manifest so for instance spending too much time presenting the the findings from one particular participant in your study and neglecting those of the others and so one reason why this might happen is either you as the researcher totally agree personally with their perspective or even totally disagree and you want to to present that in um in some for some sort of reason um so it's very important to kind of mitigate that bias by presenting a balanced approach of all participants on the other hand there's also things like spending a lot of time presenting on one particular theme that emerged from your qualitative analysis and you know, kind of avoiding or neglecting the other ones. So this can happen where you found a theme that emerged from your analysis that was particularly interesting to you, whether it was novel, whether it confirmed what you thought, or even aligned with your personal beliefs. It's very important to make sure that you are giving enough attention to all the different themes that have emerged. And a third common bias that we see is that sometimes it can be easy to make claims or assumptions such as this means that or people should do this. So for instance, in my example of the tech industry and gender norms, making claims in your writing such as women in the tech industry felt that, or the way that the women in the tech industry talked means that, or the tech industry should do that. So making those kinds of grand sweeping claims that your qualitative findings mean some sort of big, big thing. We really have to try to avoid that in qualitative writing, despite it being tempting, especially if it aligns with our personal perspective. So, those are some common biases we see.
Speaker 1: I think that is super helpful to think through, particularly because biases are inherent to us. So, it is important to take that step back, to think about how you might interpret, interact with things, and then engage with that. One way to really go back to this is take a look at the data. We do not want to be making statements or assumptions that do not have support in the data. that is just gonna undermine your argument and your position as the researcher. So wherever possible, if you don't have data to support it, maybe consider not including it. If you do have data to support it, maybe just confirm with a second opinion, your supervisor or someone else, just to make sure that there's not bias coming in. But I think the most important part here is to think about the fact that we do have biases. And so as long as we're considering this, we're doing our due diligence as researchers.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and so one of the ways that you can also make sure that you are kind of following what you said you were going to do from the get-go is not to step out of your codes and your themes that you've established. The reason why this might be tempting to do, again, is going back to that fact that maybe you found something super interesting to you and you want to present it. What I would caution you towards is making sure that any findings that you're presenting fit or align with what your objectives, aims, and research questions were. Another reason why this might happen is because the dissertation or the thesis is such a long process, sometimes we can kind of get away from our original intent of our study. And so presenting these things that are outside of our codes or our themes, we think we can get away with but in reality this kind of minimizes the the rigor of of your findings and so even though you might find something very interesting like you said David be really careful make sure that you're still kind of staying within your codes within your themes and following that golden thread that you've been establishing throughout yeah you've
Speaker 1: probably heard it so much today but golden thread is key we want to make sure that we're maintaining alignment with our research. It is only going to improve the impact. So Alexandra, thank you so much for joining us today. It has been really great. There are some great insights here and thank you again for joining us on the CoachCasts. Always a pleasure, David. Thanks so much for
Speaker 2: having me and letting me kind of chat about these qualitative foibles.
Speaker 1: Alright, so that pretty much wraps up this episode of Grad Coach TV. Remember, if you are looking for more information about qualitative research analysis, be sure to check out our blog at gradcoach.com forward slash blog. There you can also get access to our free dissertation and thesis writing mini course that'll give you all the information you need to get started with your research journey. Also, if you're looking for a helping hand with your dissertation, thesis or research project, be sure to check out our one-on-one private coaching service where you can work with one of our friendly coaches, just like Alexandra. For more information and to book a free consultation, head over to gradcoach.com.
33 Accesses
Explore all metrics
Digital sweatshops represent exploitative digital workplaces where individuals are compelled to work long hours under high demands for minimal compensation. This study employs in-depth, semi-structured interviews with digital workers to explore digital sweatshop operations’ challenges and adverse aspects, mainly focusing on ethical considerations. The collected data were transcribed and analyzed using grounded theory methodology. The findings highlight three key themes: conditions mitigating factors, organisational factors, and work environment factors, all of which contribute to the persistence of digital sweatshops. The study advocates for comprehensive labour laws, education and advocacy for digital employees, mental health support, transparency and accountability, skill development, career advancement, and ethical business practices. These recommendations are intended to help governments and organizations create a fair and ethical digital workplace, prioritizing workers’ rights and well-being.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Digital occupational health systems: what do employees think about it, explore related subjects.
Data will be made available on request from authors.
Alam, S., Adnan, Z. H., Baten, M. A., & Bag, S. (2022). Assessing the vulnerability of informal floating workers in Bangladesh before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-method analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29 (5), 1677–1702. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2021-0329
Alam, S. L., & Sun, R. (2023). The role of system-use practices for sustaining motivation in crowdsourcing: A technology-in-practice perspective. Information Systems Journal, 33 (4), 758–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12423
Article Google Scholar
Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2022). Essential jobs, remote work, and digital surveillance: Addressing the COVID-19 pandemic panopticon. International Labour Review, 161 (2), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12219
Anner, M. (2022). The governance challenges of social upgrading in apparel global value chains in the context of a sourcing squeeze and the COVID-19 pandemic. Economic and social upgrading in global value chains: Comparative analyses, macroeconomic effects, the role of institutions and strategies for the global south , (pp. 361–384). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87320-2_14
Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13 (2), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313215
Aßländer, M. S. (2021). Sweated labor as a social phenomenon lessons from the 19th century sweatshop discussion. Journal of Business Ethics, 170 , 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04293-7
Bair, J., Anner, M., & Blasi, J. (2020). The political economy of private and public regulation in post-Rana Plaza Bangladesh. ilr Review, 73 (4), 969–994. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920925424
Bender, D. E., Clawson, M., Harlan, C., & Lopez, R. (2004). Improving access for Latino immigrants: Evaluation of language training adapted to the needs of health professionals. Journal of Immigrant Health, 6 , 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIH.0000045257.83419.75
Berkey, B. (2021). Sweatshops, structural injustice, and the wrong of exploitation: Why multinational corporations have positive duties to the global poor. Journal of Business Ethics, 169 , 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04299-1
Bernhardt, A., Kresge, L., & Suleiman, R. (2023). The data-driven workplace and the case for worker technology rights. ILR Review, 76 (1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939221131558
Blustein, D. L. (2011). A relational theory of working. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79 (1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.10.004
Boersma, M., & Nolan, J. (2022). Modern slavery and the employment relationship: Exploring the continuum of exploitation. Journal of Industrial Relations, 64 (2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856211069238
Brogan, R. (2022). The digital sweatshop: Why heightened labor protections must be implemented before crunch causes the backbone of the video game industry to collapse. Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law, 23 , 1.
Google Scholar
Bruttel, O. (2019). The effects of the new statutory minimum wage in Germany: A first assessment of the evidence. Journal for Labour Market Research, 53 (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-019-0258-z
Bucher, E., Fieseler, C., Lutz, C., & Buhmann, A. (2024). Professionals, purpose-seekers, and passers-through: How microworkers reconcile alienation and platform commitment through identity work. new media & society, 26 (1), 190–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211056863
Bunjak, A., Černe, M., & Popovič, A. (2021). Absorbed in technology but digitally overloaded: Interplay effects on gig workers’ burnout and creativity. Information & Management, 58 (8), 103533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103533
Caruana, R., Crane, A., Gold, S., & LeBaron, G. (2021). Modern slavery in business: The sad and sorry state of a non-field. Business & Society, 60 (2), 251–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320930417
Casilli, A. A. (2017). Global digital culture| Digital labor studies go global: Toward a digital decolonial turn. International Journal of Communication, 11 , 21.
Cherry, M. A. (2015). Beyond misclassification: The digital transformation of work. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37 , 577.
Chew, M. M. T. (2022). Chinese gold-farming in the 2000s: Worker empowerment and local development through video games-based digital labor. Games and Culture , 15554120221134459. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221134459
Cockayne, D. G. (2016). Entrepreneurial affect: Attachment to work practice in San Francisco’s digital media sector. Environment and Planning d: Society and Space, 34 (3), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815618399
Cohen, N. S. (2015). From pink slips to pink slime: Transforming media labor in a digital age. The Communication Review, 18 (2), 98–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.1031996
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13 (1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2007). Technical call centres: Beyond ‘electronic sweatshops’ and ‘assembly lines in the head.’ Global Business Review, 8 (1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215090600800104
D’Cruz, P., Du, S., Noronha, E., Parboteeah, K. P., Trittin-Ulbrich, H., & Whelan, G. (2022). Technology, megatrends and work: Thoughts on the future of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 180 (3), 879–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05240-9
Daniel, C. (1990). Do high profits imply low wages? Atlantic Economic Journal, 18 , 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02316934
Davis, G. F., & DeWitt, T. (2021). Organization theory and the resource-based view of the firm: The great divide. Journal of Management, 47 (7), 1684–1697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320982650
De Vaujany, F. X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., Munro, I., Nama, Y., & Holt, R. (2021). Control and surveillance in work practice: Cultivating paradox in ‘new’ modes of organizing. Organization Studies, 42 (5), 675–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406211010988
Deng, X. N., & Joshi, K. D. (2016). Why individuals participate in micro-task crowdsourcing work environment: Revealing crowdworkers’ perceptions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17 (10), 3. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00441
Deng, X., Joshi, K. D., & Galliers, R. D. (2016). The duality of empowerment and marginalization in microtask crowdsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 40 (2), 279–302. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26628907
Dex, S., Willis, J., Paterson, R., & Sheppard, E. (2000). Freelance workers and contract uncertainty: The effects of contractual changes in the television industry. Work, Employment and Society, 14 (2), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170022118419
Du, S., Babalola, M., D’cruz, P., Doci, E., Garcia-Lorenzo, L., Hassan, L., ... & van Gils, S. (2024). The ethical, societal, and global implications of crowdsourcing research. Journal of Business Ethics , 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05604-9
Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30 (1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258
Dumbe, Y., & Mutaru, A. (2022). Moral discourses on internet fraud: Perspectives from Nalerigu community of northeastern Ghana. Journal of Indigenous and Shamanic Studies, 3 (1), 1–14. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-jiss_v3_n1_a3
Elbanna, A., & Idowu, A. (2022). Crowdwork, digital liminality and the enactment of culturally recognised alternatives to Western precarity: Beyond epistemological terra nullius. European Journal of Information Systems, 31 (1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1981779
Ettlinger, N. (2017). Paradoxes, problems, and potentialities of online work platforms. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 11 (2), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.11.2.0021
Fehrenbacher, A. E., & Patel, D. (2020). Translating the theory of intersectionality into quantitative and mixed methods for empirical gender transformative research on health. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 22 (sup1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1671494
Felstiner, A. (2011). Working the crowd: Employment and labor law in the crowdsourcing industry. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 32 , 143.
Fine, J., & Bartley, T. (2019). Raising the floor: New directions in public and private enforcement of labor standards in the United States. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61 (2), 252–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185618784100
Fish, A., & Srinivasan, R. (2012). Digital labor is the new killer app. New Media & Society, 14 (1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811412159
Fowler, C., Jiao, J., & Pitts, M. (2023). Frustration and ennui among Amazon MTurk workers. Behavior Research Methods, 55 (6), 3009–3025. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01955-9
Freeman, G., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & McNeese, N. (2020). Mitigating exploitation: Indie game developers’ reconfigurations of labor in technology. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4 (CSCW1), 1–23.
Friedlander, B. (1987). A passive localization algorithm and its accuracy analysis. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 12 (1), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.1987.1145216
Gandini, A. (2021). Digital labour: An empty signifier? Media, Culture & Society, 43 (2), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720948018
Gilbert, D. U., & Huber, K. (2023). Labor rights in global supply chains. Corporate Responsibility, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3517235
Giousmpasoglou, C., Ladkin, A., & Marinakou, E. (2023). Worker exploitation in the gig economy: The case of dark kitchens. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights , (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-10-2022-0477
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206
Gol, E. S., Stein, M. K., & Avital, M. (2019). Crowdwork platform governance toward organizational value creation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28 (2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.001
Gold, M., & Mustafa, M. (2013). ‘Work always wins’: Client colonisation, time management and the anxieties of connected freelancers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 28 (3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12017
Gouda, F. (1995). Poverty and political culture: The rhetoric of social welfare in the Netherlands and France, 1815–1854 . Rowman & Littlefield.
Book Google Scholar
Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23 (2), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
Graham, M., Woodcock, J., Heeks, R., Mungai, P., Van Belle, J. P., du Toit, D., ... & Silberman, S. M. (2020). The Fairwork Foundation: Strategies for improving platform work in a global context. Geoforum, 112 , 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.023
Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass . Eamon Dolan Books.
Gregson, S., & Quinlan, M. (2020). Subcontracting and low pay kill: Lessons from the health and safety consequences of sweated labor in the garment industry, 1880–1920. Labor History, 61 (5–6), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2020.1818712
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18 (1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 15 (5), e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
Gundert, S., & Leschke, J. (2023). Challenges and potentials of evaluating platform work against established job-quality measures. Economic and Industrial Democracy , 0143831X231199891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X231199891
Haines, S., Fares, O.H., Mohan, M. & Lee, S. H. (M). (2023). "Social media fashion influencer eWOM communications: Understanding the trajectory of sustainable fashion conversations on YouTube fashion haul videos". Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-02-2022-0029
Hajiheydari, N., & Delgosha, M. S. (2024). Investigating engagement and burnout of gig-workers in the age of algorithms: An empirical study in digital labor platforms. Information Technology & People . https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-11-2022-0873
Handfield, R., Sun, H., & Rothenberg, L. (2020). Assessing supply chain risk for apparel production in low cost countries using newsfeed analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25 (6), 803–821. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2019-0423
Heberle, A. E., Obus, E. A., & Gray, S. A. (2020). An intersectional perspective on the intergenerational transmission of trauma and state-perpetrated violence. Journal of Social Issues, 76 (4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12404
Heeks, R., Graham, M., Mungai, P., Van Belle, J. P., & Woodcock, J. (2021). Systematic evaluation of gig work against decent work standards: The development and application of the Fairwork framework. The Information Society, 37 (5), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1942356
Hendershott, A., & Wright, S. (1993). Bringing the sociological perspective into the interdisciplinary classroom through literature. Teaching Sociology , 325–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/1319081
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292 , 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Hickok, M., & Maslej, N. (2023). A policy primer and roadmap on AI worker surveillance and productivity scoring tools. AI and Ethics , 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00275-8
Howson, K., Johnston, H., Cole, M., Ferrari, F., Ustek-Spilda, F., & Graham, M. (2022). Unpaid labour and territorial extraction in digital value networks. Global Networks . https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12407
Ibourk, A., & Elouaourti, Z. (2023). Revitalizing women's labor force participation in North Africa: An exploration of novel empowerment pathways. International Economic Journal , 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2023.2227161
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2012). Supporting worker with family responsibilities. Retrieved from: https://webapps.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---integration/documents/publication/wcms_217181.pdf . Accessed 15 June 2023
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2021). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2021. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/@publ/documents/publication/wcms_771749.pdf . Accessed 5 Aug 2023
Jasrotia, S. S., Darda, P., & Pandey, S. (2023). Changing values of millennials and centennials towards responsible consumption and sustainable society. Society and Business Review, 18 (2), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-01-2022-0013
Jasrotia, S. S., Mishra, H. G., & Koul, S. (2019). Brick or click? Channel choice disruptions in the travel industry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 15 (1–2), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X19829308
Kadfak, A., Wilhelm, M., & Oskarsson, P. (2023). Thai Labour NGOs during the ‘Modern Slavery’ Reforms: NGO transitions in a post-aid world. Development and Change, 54 (3), 570–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12761
Kamila, M. K., & Jasrotia, S. S. (2023). "Ethical issues in the development of artificial intelligence: Recognizing the risks", International Journal of Ethics and Systems . ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2023-0107
Kassem, S. (2023). Instrumentalizing technology: Digital solidarity with and among MTurk workers. In S Kassem (Ed.), Work and alienation in the platform economy (pp. 118–135). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781529226577.ch009
Kates, M. (2019). Sweatshops, exploitation, and the case for a fair wage. Journal of Political Philosophy, 27 (1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12155
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14 (1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
Landsbergis, P. A., Grzywacz, J. G., & LaMontagne, A. D. (2014). Work organization, job insecurity, and occupational health disparities. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 57 (5), 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22126
LeBaron, G. (2021). The role of supply chains in the global business of forced labor. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 57 (2), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12258
Lloyd, A., Antonopoulos, G. A., & Papanicolaou, G. (2020). ‘Illegal labour practices, trafficking and exploitation’: An introduction to the special issue. Trends in Organized Crime, 23 , 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-020-09379-7
Locke, K. (2002). The grounded theory approach to qualitative research. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 17–43). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
Maharawal, M. M. (2022). Tech-colonialism: Gentrification, resistance, and belonging in San Francisco’s colonial present. Anthropological Quarterly, 95 (4), 785–813. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2022.0045
Malik, F., Heeks, R., Masiero, S., & Nicholson, B. (2021). Digital labour platforms in Pakistan: Institutional voids and solidarity networks. Information Technology & People, 34 (7), 1819–1839. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2020-0218
Malterud, K., & Bjorkman, M. (2016). The invisible work of closeting: A qualitative study about strategies used by lesbian and gay persons to conceal their sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 63 (10), 1339–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1157995
Marsden, S., Tucker, E., & Vosko, L. F. (2021). Flawed by design? A case study of federal enforcement of migrant workers’ labor rights in Canada. Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal, 23 , 71.
Martin, D., O’Neill, J., Gupta, N., & Hanrahan, B. V. (2016). Turking in a global labour market. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 25 , 39–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9241-6
Melé, D. (2014). “Human quality treatment”: Five organizational levels. Journal of Business Ethics, 120 , 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1999-1
Mezzadri, A. (2022). Social reproduction and pandemic neoliberalism: Planetary crises and the reorganisation of life, work and death. Organization, 29 (3), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221074042
Mieruch, Y., & McFarlane, D. (2022). Gig economy riders on social media in Thailand: Contested identities and emergent civil society organisations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00547-7
Min, J., Kim, Y., Lee, S., Jang, T. W., Kim, I., & Song, J. (2019). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and its impact on occupational health and safety, worker’s compensation, and labor conditions. Safety and Health at Work, 10 (4), 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.09.005
Möhlmann, M., Zalmanson, L., Henfridsson, O., & Gregory, R. W. (2021). Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. MIS Quarterly, 45 (4). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15333
Montiel, I., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Park, J., Antolín-López, R., & Husted, B. W. (2021). Implementing the United Nations’ sustainable development goals in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 52 (5), 999–1030. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00445-y
Nazzal, A., Stringfellow, L., & Maclean, M. (2024). Webs of oppression: An intersectional analysis of inequalities facing women activists in Palestine. Human Relations, 77 (2), 265–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221144904
Norbäck, M., & Styhre, A. (2019). Making it work in free agent work: The coping practices of Swedish freelance journalists. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35 (4), 101076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101076
OECD. (2022). Regulatory policy - OECD , Regulatory policy the world has changed and so must rule making . Available at: https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/ . Accessed: 05 June 2024.
Outhwaite, O., & Martin-Ortega, O. (2019). Worker-driven monitoring–Redefining supply chain monitoring to improve labor rights in global supply chains. Competition & Change, 23 (4), 378–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529419865690
Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Opening universities in a digital era. New England Journal of Higher Education, 23 (1), 22–24.
Palpacuer, F. (2008). Bringing the social context back in: Governance and wealth distribution in global commodity chains. Economy and Society, 37 (3), 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140802172698
Papadopoulos, O., & Ioannou, G. (2023). Working in hospitality and catering in Greece and the UK: Do trade union membership and collective bargaining still matter? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 29 (2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801221104943
Petkovski, A., & Rexhepi, H. (2023). Implementation of provisions on paying for overtime work to employees in the Ministry of Interior Affairs of Republic of North Macedonia. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 10 (2), 27–27. https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv10n204
Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2014). Theoretical overview: Theories of international migration and immigrant adaptation. UC Irvine. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1gc0413m
Powell, B., & Zwolinski, M. (2012). The ethical and economic case against sweatshop labor: A critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 107 , 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1058-8
Preiss, J. (2014). Global labor justice and the limits of economic analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24 (1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20141272
Rani, U., & Furrer, M. (2021). Digital labour platforms and new forms of flexible work in developing countries: Algorithmic management of work and workers. Competition & Change, 25 (2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420905187
Ransbotham, S., Fichman, R. G., Gopal, R., & Gupta, A. (2016). Special section introduction—Ubiquitous IT and digital vulnerabilities. Information Systems Research, 27 (4), 834–847.
Richard, S. (2023). Wage exploitation as disequilibrium price. Business Ethics Quarterly, 33 (2), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.45
Robinson, G., & Morley, C. (2007). Running the electronic sweatshop: Call center managers’ views on call centers. Journal of Management & Organization, 13 (3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2007.13.3.249
Selwyn, B., Musiolek, B., & Ijarja, A. (2020). Making a global poverty chain: Export footwear production and gendered labor exploitation in Eastern and Central Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 27 (2), 377–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1640124
Shepherd, H. A., Evans, T., Gupta, S., McDonough, M. H., Doyle-Baker, P., Belton, K. L., ... Black, A. M. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on high school student-athlete experiences with physical activity, mental health, and social connection. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (7), 3515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073515
Shipman, K., Burrell, D. N., & Huff Mac Pherson, A. (2023). An organizational analysis of how managers must understand the mental health impact of teleworking during COVID-19 on employees. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31 (4), 1081–1104. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2021-2685
Siddiqi, D. M. (2020). Logics of sedition: Re-signifying insurgent labour in Bangladesh’s garment factories. Journal of South Asian Development, 15 (3), 371–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973174120983955
Smith, J. P. (2006). Immigrants and the labor market. Journal of Labor Economics, 24 (2), 203–233.
Snyder, L. A., Krauss, A. D., Chen, P. Y., Finlinson, S., & Huang, Y. H. (2008). Occupational safety: Application of the job demand–control-support model. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40 (5), 1713–1723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.008
Soriano, C. R., & Cabañes, J. V. (2019). Between “world class work” and “proletarianized labor”: Digital labor imaginaries in the global south. In E. Polson, L. S. Clark, R. Gajjala (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media and class (pp. 213–226). Routledge.
Soriano, C. R. R. (2021). Digital labour in the Philippines: Emerging forms of brokerage. Media International Australia, 179 (1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X21993114
Sovacool, B. K. (2021). When subterranean slavery supports sustainability transitions? Power, patriarchy, and child labor in artisanal Congolese cobalt mining. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8 (1), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.11.018
Spencer, D. (2017). Work in and beyond the Second Machine Age: The politics of production and digital technologies. Work, Employment and Society, 31 (1), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017016645716
Takaki, R. (2009). The myth of the Asian-American ‘‘model minority’’ has been challenged. In C. E. James & A. Shadd (Eds.), American Identities: An Introductory Textbook (pp. 309). Oxford University Press
Thompson, P., & Vincent, S. (2010). Labor process theory and critical realism. In P. Thompson & C. Smith (Eds.), Working life: Renewing labour process analysis (pp. 47–69). Palgrave Macmillan.
Ticona, J. (2022). Red flags, sob stories, and scams: The contested meaning of governance on carework labor platforms. New Media & Society, 24 (7), 1548–1566. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099233
Tubaro, P., & Casilli, A. A. (2019). Micro-work, artificial intelligence and the automotive industry. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46 , 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-019-00121-1
Umair, A., Conboy, K., & Whelan, E. (2023). Examining technostress and its impact on worker well-being in the digital gig economy. Internet Research, 33 (7), 206–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2022-0214
Vallas, S. P., Johnston, H., & Mommadova, Y. (2022). Prime suspect: Mechanisms of labor control at Amazon’s warehouses. Work and Occupations, 49 (4), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884221106922
Vallois, N. (2022). Non-proletarianization theories of the Jewish worker (1902 to 1939). Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 44 (4), 527–555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837221000419
Van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20 (6), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194
Waldkirch, M., Bucher, E., Schou, P. K., & Grünwald, E. (2021). Controlled by the algorithm, coached by the crowd–how HRM activities take shape on digital work platforms in the gig economy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32 (12), 2643–2682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1914129
Wallis, C. (2013). Technology and/as governmentality: The production of young rural women as low-tech laboring subjects in China. Communication and Critical/cultural Studies, 10 (4), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2013.840386
Weiler, A. M., Sexsmith, K., & Minkoff-Zern, L. A. (2020). Parallel precarity: A comparison of US and Canadian agricultural guestworker programs. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 26 (2). https://doi.org/10.48416/ijsaf.v26i2.57
Wickramasingha, S., & Coe, N. M. (2022). Conceptualizing labor regimes in global production networks: Uneven outcomes across the Bangladeshi and Sri Lankan apparel industries. Economic Geography, 98 (1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2021.1987879
Wilson, C. A. (2021). Trauma or trapped: Conceptualizing moral suffering and the impact of occupational stigma (Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University).
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Networked but commodified: The (dis) embeddedness of digital labor in the gig economy. Sociology, 53 (5), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519828906
Wood, A. J., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2021). Antagonism beyond employment: How the ‘subordinated agency’ of labour platforms generates conflict in the remote gig economy. Socio-Economic Review, 19 (4), 1369–1396. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab016
Wu, B., & Sheehan, J. (2011). Globalization and vulnerability of Chinese migrant workers in Italy: Empirical evidence on working conditions and their consequences. Journal of Contemporary China, 20 (68), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2011.520852
Wu, Q. (2023). Employment precarity, COVID-19 risk, and workers’ well-being during the pandemic in Europe. Work and Occupations, 50 (2), 188–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884221126415
Wyatt, T. R., Johnson, M., & Zaidi, Z. (2022). Intersectionality: A means for centering power and oppression in research. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27 (3), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10110-0
Xie, H., Checco, A., & Zamani, E. D. (2023). The unintended consequences of automated scripts in crowdwork platforms: A simulation study in MTurk. Information Systems Frontiers , 1–17. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/oai_id/oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:34413 . Acessed 7 Aug 2023
Zwolinski, M. (2007). Sweatshops, choice, and exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17 (4), 689–727. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20071745
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Jaipuria Institute of Management, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
Manoj Kumar Kamila & Pooja Singh Kushwaha
Area of Marketing, International Management Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Sahil Singh Jasrotia
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
All authors whose names appear on the submission.
1) made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work;
2) drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content;
3) approved the version to be published; and
4) agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropariately investigated and resolved.
Correspondence to Manoj Kumar Kamila .
Ethical approval.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Kamila, M.K., Jasrotia, S. . & Kushwaha, P.S. Understanding digital sweatshops: A qualitative investigation of workers’ perspectives. Asian J Bus Ethics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-024-00210-y
Download citation
Received : 25 September 2023
Accepted : 09 August 2024
Published : 26 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-024-00210-y
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
This article presents a list of 130-plus qualitative research topic ideas to help learners that struggle to get titles for their papers. It is helpful because many learners have difficulties picking titles that will make their essays impressive to educators. But before presenting the topics, this article defines qualitative research.
Qualitative Research Topics. Qualitative Research Topics are as follows: Understanding the lived experiences of first-generation college students. Exploring the impact of social media on self-esteem among adolescents. Investigating the effects of mindfulness meditation on stress reduction. Analyzing the perceptions of employees regarding ...
Anthropology. Political science. Psychology. Business management. History. Social science. The main goal of qualitative research is to help you understand the topic of your assignment by identifying the most important aspects of your topic and gathering enough information to provide an in-depth analysis of the topic at hand and provide the ...
Qualitative research draws from interpretivist and constructivist paradigms, ... Several research topics and questions indicate a case study as an appropriate approach. The key criterion is the bounded system, so any research situation where the bounded system is central is a candidate for case study. ... Writing a Successful Thesis or ...
What makes qualitative research 'qualitative'? Before we look at alternative thesis structures, let's take a step backand consider the fundamental differences between qualitative and quantitative research: Qualitative researching is exciting and important. It is a highly rewarding activity because it engages us
Here are fantastic examples of qualitative research titles: Female harm: how it is influenced by culture. The socioeconomic impacts of free education. The link between food insecurity and poor performance in schools. Alcoholism among college students: a critical study. How to mitigate child labor in our society.
Revised on 30 January 2023. Qualitative research involves collecting and analysing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research. Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research, which ...
Qualitative research involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research. Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research, which involves collecting and ...
Undertaking an MSc dissertation in Evidence-Based Health Care (EBHC) may be your first hands-on experience of doing qualitative research. I chatted to Dr. Veronika Williams, an experienced qualitative researcher, and tutor on the EBHC programme, to find out her top tips for producing a high-quality qualitative EBHC thesis.
In this section on Qualitative Research you can find out about: Developing a theoretical framework; Reflecting on your position; Extended literature reviews; Presenting qualitative data; You might also want to consult our other sections on Planning your research, Quantitative research and Writing up research, and check out the Additional resources.
Updated 27 Jun 2024. Qualitative research is a method of inquiry employed in various academic disciplines, traditionally in the social sciences, but also in market research and further contexts. This type of research is designed to provide a deep understanding of human behavior and the reasons that govern such behavior.
Find the perfect research topic for your dissertation or thesis. Get the FREE list of 1000+ research ideas plus our proposal template! ... When evaluating potential research topics, it is important to consider the factors that make for a strong topic (we discussed these earlier). ... Qualitative 101 Quantitative 101. About Us. Reviews Pricing
qualitative research professor. I was positive that I would design a quantitative research study but the qualitative courses in the program highlighted the merits of qualitative research. Dr. Cozza and Ms. Rosaria Cimino, thanks for the advisement support. To all the Ed.D. candidates that I encountered on my academic journey, especially my
A comprehensive list of research topics and ideas in education, along with a list of existing dissertations & theses covering education. ... I f you're just starting out exploring education-related topics for your dissertation, thesis or research project, you've come to the right place. ... a qualitative study of two mid-size universities ...
Step 3: Look for books and articles. Step 4: Find a niche. Step 5: Consider the type of research. Step 6: Determine the relevance. Step 7: Make sure it's plausible. Step 8: Get your topic approved. Other interesting articles. Frequently asked questions about dissertation topics.
The results chapter in a dissertation or thesis (or any formal academic research piece) is where you objectively and neutrally present the findings of your qualitative analysis (or analyses if you used multiple qualitative analysis methods ). This chapter can sometimes be combined with the discussion chapter (where you interpret the data and ...
This program provides a practical overview of a variety of qualitative research methodologies and their applications. ... Topics in Psychology. Explore how scientific research by psychologists can inform our professional lives, family and community relationships, emotional wellness, and more.
Strong thesis statement: ... Selection of qualitative research topics: Qualitative research is completely based on their topics and while performing the studies, it is very important to pick the right topic. This phase could be challenging and would be helping you explore more fields. Before choosing a topic, ensure to check the following factors,
Top 70 Qualitative Research Topics To Ace 2022. November 16, 2020. There is no denying it; qualitative research topics are not as easy as ABC. To some, statistics is an enthralling subject while others may opt to clean the sea rather than sit in a statistics class. Millions of students around the globe face this crossroad.
lens of one doctoral student's qualitative dissertation. Using Ravitch and Carl's (2021) conceptual framework guide, each key component is explored, using my own dissertation as an ... introduced to the basic concepts needed to turn my own research ideas into actionable research questions. While this was not the only source to guide me on ...
When a qualitative methodology is chosen, research questions should be exploratory and focused on the actual phenomenon under study. From the Dissertation Center, Chapter 1: Research Question Overview, there are several considerations when forming a qualitative research question. Qualitative research questions should . Below is an example of a ...
Approaches to Measuring Non-Fatal Health Outcomes: Disability at the Iganga-Mayuge Demographic Surveillance System in Uganda. A National Burden of Disease Study for The United Arab Emirates (UAE): Quantifying Health Differentials Between Nationals and Migrants. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Dissertation examples. Listed below are some of the best examples of research projects and dissertations from undergraduate and taught postgraduate students at the University of Leeds We have not been able to gather examples from all schools. The module requirements for research projects may have changed since these examples were written.
Join David and Alexandra on Grad Coach TV as they discuss the five most common mistakes students make during qualitative research analysis. Learn how to maintain alignment with your golden thread, the importance of transcription accuracy, and the necessity of choosing the right coding method. Perfect for anyone working on a dissertation, thesis, or research project.
Through qualitative research, the current study seeks to promote global employee ethics and ultimately help to eliminate sweatshop labour practices. ... The study's results highlight several topics that need more investigation. ... Conceptualizing moral suffering and the impact of occupational stigma (Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University ...