Reviewed papers and their subject fields
Number of papers/Year | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject fields | No. of journals | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Total no. of papers | % of papers |
Marketing | 14 | 16 | 23 | 34 | 36 | 23 | 26 | 76 | 234 | 24.8 |
General management | 12 | 18 | 32 | 20 | 33 | 27 | 43 | 47 | 220 | 23.3 |
Information management | 13 | 8 | 6 | 13 | 14 | 21 | 13 | 20 | 95 | 10.1 |
Operations, technology and management | 8 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 11 | 19 | 83 | 8.8 |
Strategic management | 2 | 25 | 8 | 3 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 19 | 82 | 8.7 |
Innovation | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 55 | 5.8 |
Entrepreneurship and small business management | 6 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 53 | 5.6 |
Business ethics and governance | 2 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 44 | 4.7 |
Business and area studies | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 26 | 2.8 |
Operations research and management science | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 25 | 2.7 |
Organisation studies | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 1.7 |
Human resources management and employment studies | 2 | 2 | – | 1 | 3 | – | 1 | 2 | 9 | 1.0 |
International business and area studies | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0.1 |
Total | 76 | 111 | 102 | 103 | 151 | 124 | 130 | 222 | 943 | 100.0 |
Source of our sample
Journals | Number of papers | Weighting (%) |
---|---|---|
42 | 19.2 | |
28 | 12.8 | |
21 | 9.6 | |
16 | 7.3 | |
15 | 6.8 | |
11 | 5.0 | |
10 | 4.6 | |
8 | 3.7 | |
6 | 2.7 | |
Others | 62 | 28.3 |
Total | 219 | 100 |
Business model innovation areas and elements
Areas of innovation | Elements | Relevant questions | Variables | Studies |
---|---|---|---|---|
Value proposition (Why?) | Core offering | Why our products/services? | Value proposition | |
Value proposition | (2010) | |||
Value proposition | ||||
Value proposition | (2010) | |||
Value proposition | (2010) | |||
Type of offering | (2011) | |||
Offering | (2012) | |||
Offering | (2012) | |||
Product/Service offering | (2013) | |||
Customer value proposition | (2014) | |||
Change in offering | (2014) | |||
Product selection | (2015) | |||
Value propositions | ||||
Value proposition | (2015) | |||
Offering | (2016) | |||
Value proposition | (2016) | |||
Value proposition | (2016) | |||
Value proposition/Offering | (2016) | |||
Value proposition | ||||
Market offering | (2016) | |||
Customer needs | Why customers purchase our products/services? | Customer needs | (2011) | |
Perceived needs | ||||
Customer need | (2012) | |||
Customer engagement | ||||
Target customers | Why target the current segment(s)? | Target customers | (2010) | |
Target customers | (2012) | |||
Customer identification | ||||
Target segments | (2013) | |||
Target market Segment(s) | (2014) | |||
Target customers | (2014) | |||
Customer segments | ||||
Target customers | (2015) | |||
Target customers | (2016) | |||
Value delivery | (2016) | |||
Market/Customer segment | (2016) | |||
Customer segment | ||||
Customers | (2016) | |||
Customer perceived value | Why customers choose us? | Meeting local needs | (2010) | |
Affordability | (2011) | |||
Satisfy perceived needs | ||||
Operational value (What?) | Key assets | What assets do we need? | Key resources | (2011) |
Resources | (2012) | |||
Key assets | (2014) | |||
Key resources | ||||
Resources | (2016) | |||
Value creation | (2016) | |||
Key resources | (2016) | |||
Key resources | ||||
Resources | (2016) | |||
Key process | What processes do we require? | Key processes | (2011) | |
Technologies | ||||
Investment in technology | (2015) | |||
Processes | (2016) | |||
Value creation | (2016) | |||
Partners network | What relationships should we consider? | Value network | ||
Value network | ||||
Value network | (2010) | |||
Network architecture | ||||
Relationships | (2012) | |||
Value chain linkages | ||||
Partners’ network | (2014) | |||
Partner network | (2014) | |||
Partner network | (2015) | |||
Key partners | ||||
Partner network | (2015) | |||
Value networking | (2016) | |||
Supply chain | ||||
Network | (2016) | |||
Distribution channels | What channels can deliver our products/services? | Distribution channel | (2010) | |
Channel | (2011) | |||
Customer access | (2012) | |||
Distribution channel | (2014) | |||
Channels | ||||
Sales channels | ||||
Value delivery | (2016) | |||
Human capital (Who?) | Organisational learning | Who should be engaged in knowledge transfer activities? | Double loop learning | (2010) |
Experimentation process | (2012) | |||
Human resource practices | (2015) | |||
Skills and competencies | Who should execute specific activities? | Resources and competencies | ||
Core competency | (2010) | |||
Resources and competencies | ||||
Core internal competencies | (2013) | |||
Core competency | (2014) | |||
Core competences | (2015) | |||
Domain-specific know-how | (2015) | |||
Incentives | Who should be reward? | Incentives | (2011) | |
Human resource practices | (2015) | |||
Crowd rewards | ||||
Training | Who requires development to carry out specific activities? | Human resource practices | (2015) | |
Financial value (How?) | Revenue streams | How do we generate revenue? | Value finance | |
Volume and structure of revenues | ||||
Revenue model | (2010) | |||
Sales revenues | (2010) | |||
Revenue model | (2011) | |||
Revenue model | (2012) | |||
Monetisation | ||||
Revenue model | (2013) | |||
Revenue | (2013) | |||
Revenue drivers | (2013) | |||
Revenue model | (2014) | |||
Revenue streams | ||||
Type of revenue | (2015) | |||
Value appropriation | (2016) | |||
Revenue stream | (2016) | |||
Revenue model | ||||
Revenue | (2016) | |||
Revenues | (2016) | |||
Cost structure | How do we cost our products/services? | Value finance | ||
Volume and structure of costs | ||||
Cost structure | (2010) | |||
Cost structure | (2010) | |||
Cost structure | (2011) | |||
Cost | (2013) | |||
Cost model | (2013) | |||
Pricing approach | (2013) | |||
Cost structure | (2014) | |||
Cost structure | (2014) | |||
Cost consciousness | (2015) | |||
Company cost structure | ||||
Cost drivers | (2015) | |||
Value appropriation | (2016) | |||
Cost structure | (2016) | |||
Costs | (2016) | |||
Cost structure | ||||
Finances | (2016) | |||
Cash flow | How should we manage cash flow? | Capital employed | (2010) | |
Monetisation | ||||
Margins | How much surplus can we make? | Margin | ||
Profit formula | (2010) | |||
Economic profit equation | (2010) | |||
Profit formula | (2011) | |||
Profit model | (2012) | |||
Profit | (2013) | |||
Margins | (2013) | |||
Estimation of profit potential | (2014) | |||
Profit formula | (2015) | |||
Profit formula | (2016) |
ABS ( 2010 ), Academic Journal Quality Guide , Version 4 , The Association of Business Schools , London .
Al-Debei , M.M. and Avison , D. ( 2010 ), “ Developing a unified framework of the business model concept ”, European Journal of Information Systems , Vol. 19 No. 3 , pp. 359 - 376 .
Amit , R. and Zott , C. ( 2012 ), “ Creating value through business model innovation ”, MIT Sloan Management Review , Vol. 53 No. 3 , pp. 41 - 49 .
Andries , P. and Debackere , K. ( 2013 ), “ Business model innovation: Propositions on the appropriateness of different learning approaches ”, Creativity and Innovation Management , Vol. 22 No. 4 , pp. 337 - 358 .
Baden-Fuller , C. and Haefliger , S. ( 2013 ), “ Business models and technological innovation ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 46 No. 6 , pp. 419 - 426 .
Belenzon , S. and Schankerman , M. ( 2015 ), “ Motivation and sorting of human capital in open innovation ”, Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 36 No. 6 , pp. 795 - 820 .
Bock , A.J. , Opsahl , T. , George , G. and Gann , D.M. ( 2012 ), “ The effects of culture and structure on strategic flexibility during business model innovation ”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 49 No. 2 , pp. 279 - 305 .
Brea-Solís , H. , Casadesus-Masanell , R. and Grifell-Tatjé , E. ( 2015 ), “ Business model evaluation: quantifying Walmart’s sources of advantage ”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal , Vol. 9 No. 1 , pp. 12 - 33 .
Casadesus-Masanell , R. and Llanes , G. ( 2011 ), “ Mixed source ”, Management Science , Vol. 57 No. 7 , pp. 1212 - 1230 .
Casadesus-Masanell , R. and Ricart , J.E. ( 2010 ), “ From strategy to business models and onto tactics ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos 2-3 , pp. 195 - 215 .
Casadesus-Masanell , R. and Zhu , F. ( 2013 ), “ Business model innovation and competitive imitation: the case of sponsor-based business models ”, Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 34 No. 4 , pp. 464 - 482 .
Chatterjee , S. ( 2013 ), “ Simple rules for designing business models ”, California Management Review , Vol. 55 No. 2 , pp. 97 - 124 .
Cavalcante , S. , Kesting , P. and Ulhøi , J. ( 2011 ), “ Business model dynamics and innovation: (re)establishing the missing linkages ”, Management Decision , Vol. 49 No. 8 , pp. 1327 - 1342 .
Chesbrough , H. ( 2010 ), “ Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos. 2-3 , pp. 354 - 363 .
Chesbrough , H. and Rosenbloom , R.S. ( 2002 ), “ The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox corporation’s technology spin off companies ”, Industrial & Corporate Change , Vol. 11 No. 3 , pp. 529 - 555 .
Christensen , C.M. , Bartman , T. and Van Bever , D. ( 2016 ), “ The hard truth about business model innovation ”, MIT Sloan Management Review , Vol. 58 No. 1 , pp. 31 - 40 .
Cortimiglia , M.N. , Ghezzi , A. and Frank , A.G. ( 2016 ), “ Business model innovation and strategy making nexus: evidence from a cross‐industry mixed‐methods study ”, R&D Management , Vol. 46 No. 3 , pp. 414 - 432 .
Cucculelli , M. and Bettinelli , C. ( 2015 ), “ Business models, intangibles and firm performance: evidence on corporate entrepreneurship from Italian manufacturing SMEs ”, Small Business Economics , Vol. 45 No. 2 , pp. 329 - 350 .
Dahan , N.M. , Doh , J.P. , Oetzel , J. and Yaziji , M. ( 2010 ), “ Corporate-NGO collaboration: Co-creating new business models for developing markets ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos 2-3 , pp. 326 - 342 .
DaSilva , C.M. and Trkman , P. ( 2014 ), “ Business model: what it is and what it is not ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 47 No. 6 , pp. 379 - 389 .
Demil , B. and Lecocq , X. ( 2010 ), “ Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos 2-3 , pp. 227 - 246 .
Dmitriev , V. , Simmons , G. , Truong , Y. , Palmer , M. and Schneckenberg , D. ( 2014 ), “ An exploration of business model development in the commercialization of technology innovations ”, R&D Management , Vol. 44 No. 3 , pp. 306 - 321 .
Dunford , R. , Palmer , I. and Benveniste , J. ( 2010 ), “ Business model replication for early and rapid internationalisation: the ING direct experience ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos 5-6 , pp. 655 - 674 .
Esslinger , H. ( 2011 ), “ Sustainable design: beyond the innovation-driven business model ”, The Journal of Product Innovation Management , Vol. 28 No. 3 , pp. 401 - 404 .
Eyring , M.J. , Johnson , M.W. and Nair , H. ( 2011 ), “ New business models in emerging markets ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 89 No. 1 , pp. 89 - 95 .
Frankenberger , K. , Weiblen , T. and Gassmann , O. ( 2014 ), “ The antecedents of open business models: an exploratory study of incumbent firms ”, R&D Management , Vol. 44 No. 2 , pp. 173 - 188 .
Gambardella , A. and McGahan , A.M. ( 2010 ), “ Business-model innovation: general purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos 2-3 , pp. 262 - 271 .
George , G. and Bock , A.J. ( 2011 ), “ The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research ”, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice , Vol. 35 No. 1 , pp. 83 - 111 .
Girotra , K. and Netessine , S. ( 2011 ), “ How to build risk into your business model ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 89 No. 5 , pp. 100 - 105 .
Girotra , K. and Netessine , S. ( 2014 ), “ Four paths to business model innovation ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 92 No. 7 , pp. 96 - 103 .
Hartmann , P.M. , Hartmann , P.M. , Zaki , M. , Zaki , M. , Feldmann , N. and Neely , A. ( 2016 ), “ Capturing value from Big Data – a taxonomy of data-driven business models used by start-up firms ”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management , Vol. 36 No. 10 , pp. 1382 - 1406 .
Hlady-Rispal , M. and Servantie , V. ( 2016 ), “ Business models impacting social change in violent and poverty-stricken neighbourhoods: a case study in Colombia ”, International Small Business Journal , Vol. 35 No. 4 , pp. 1 - 22 .
Huang , H.C. , Lai , M.C. , Lin , L.H. and Chen , C.T. ( 2013 ), “ Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation: an open innovation perspective ”, Journal of Organizational Change Management , Vol. 26 No. 6 , pp. 977 - 1002 .
Huarng , K.-H. ( 2013 ), “ A two-tier business model and its realization for entrepreneurship ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol. 66 No. 10 , pp. 2102 - 2105 .
Iansiti , M. and Lakhani , K.R. ( 2014 ), “ Digital ubiquity: how connections, sensors, and data are revolutionizing business ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 92 No. 11 , pp. 91 - 99 .
Johnson , M.W. , Christensen , C.M. and Kagermann , H. ( 2008 ), “ Reinventing your business model ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 86 No. 12 , pp. 57 - 68 .
Karimi , J. and Walter , Z. ( 2016 ), “ Corporate entrepreneurship, disruptive business model innovation adoption, and its performance: the case of the newspaper industry ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 49 No. 3 , pp. 342 - 360 .
Kastalli , I. , Van Looy , B. and Neely , A. ( 2013 ), “ Steering manufacturing firms towards service business model innovation ”, California Management Review , Vol. 56 No. 1 , pp. 100 - 123 .
Kohler , T. ( 2015 ), “ Crowdsourcing-based business models ”, California Management Review , Vol. 57 No. 4 , pp. 63 - 84 .
Kiron , D. , Kruschwitz , N. , Haanaes , K. , Reeves , M. and Goh , E. ( 2013 ), “ The innovation bottom line ”, MIT Sloan Management Review , Vol. 54 No. 2 , pp. 1 - 20 .
Klang , D. , Wallnöfer , M. and Hacklin , F. ( 2014 ), “ The business model paradox: a systematic review and exploration of antecedents ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 16 No. 4 , pp. 454 - 478 .
Kortmann , S. and Piller , F. ( 2016 ), “ Open business models and closed-loop value chains ”, California Management Review , Vol. 58 No. 3 , pp. 88 - 108 .
Landau , C. , Karna , A. and Sailer , M. ( 2016 ), “ Business model adaptation for emerging markets: a case study of a German automobile manufacturer in India ”, R&D Management , Vol. 46 No. 3 , pp. 480 - 503 .
Lange , K. , Geppert , M. , Saka-Helmhout , A. and Becker-Ritterspach , F. ( 2015 ), “ Changing business models and employee representation in the airline industry: a comparison of British Airways and Deutsche Lufthansa ”, British Journal of Management , Vol. 26 No. 3 , pp. 388 - 407 .
McGrath , R.G. ( 2010 ), “ Business models: a discovery driven approach ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos. 2-3 , pp. 247 - 261 .
McNamara , P. , Peck , S.I. and Sasson , A. ( 2013 ), “ Competing business models, value creation and appropriation in English football ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 46 No. 6 , pp. 475 - 487 .
Markides , C.C. ( 2013 ), “ Business model innovation: what can the ambidexterity literature teach us? ”, Academy of Management Perspectives , Vol. 27 No. 3 , pp. 313 - 323 .
Mason , K. and Spring , M. ( 2011 ), “ The sites and practices of business models ”, Industrial Marketing Management , Vol. 40 No. 6 , pp. 1032 - 1041 .
Mehrizi , M.H.R. and Lashkarbolouki , M. ( 2016 ), “ Unlearning troubled business models: from realization to marginalization ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 49 No. 3 , pp. 298 - 323 .
Mezger , F. ( 2014 ), “ Toward a capability-based conceptualization of business model innovation: insights from an explorative study ”, R&D Management , Vol. 44 No. 5 , pp. 429 - 449 .
Michel , S. ( 2014 ), “ Capture more value ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 92 No. 4 , pp. 78 - 85 .
Morris , M.H. , Shirokova , G. and Shatalov , A. ( 2013 ), “ The business model and firm performance: the case of Russian food service ventures ”, Journal of Small Business Management , Vol. 51 No. 1 , pp. 46 - 65 .
Osterwalder , A. , Pigneur , Y. and Tucci , C.L. ( 2005 ), “ Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept ”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems , Vol. 16 No. 1 , pp. 1 - 25 .
Peters , C. , Blohm , I. and Leimeister , J.M. ( 2015 ), “ Anatomy of successful business models for complex services: insights from the telemedicine field ”, Journal of Management Information Systems , Vol. 32 No. 3 , pp. 75 - 104 .
Rajala , R. , Westerlund , M. and Möller , K. ( 2012 ), “ Strategic flexibility in open innovation – designing business models for open source software ”, European Journal of Marketing , Vol. 46 No. 10 , pp. 1368 - 1388 .
Roberge , M. ( 2015 ), “ The right way to use compensation: to shift strategy, change how you pay your team ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 93 No. 4 , pp. 70 - 75 .
Schneider , S. and Spieth , P. ( 2013 ), “ Business model innovation: towards an integrated future research agenda ”, International Journal of Innovation Management , Vol. 17 No. 1 , pp. 134 - 156 .
Shafer , S.M. , Smith , H.J. and Linder , J.C. ( 2005 ), “ The power of business models ”, Business Horizons , Vol. 48 No. 3 , pp. 199 - 207 .
Sinfield , J.V. , Calder , E. , McConnell , B. and Colson , S. ( 2012 ), “ How to identify new business models ”, MIT Sloan Management Review , Vol. 53 No. 2 , pp. 85 - 90 .
Sinkovics , N. , Sinkovics , R.R. and Yamin , M. ( 2014 ), “ The role of social value creation in business model formulation at the bottom of the pyramid – implications for MNEs? ”, International Business Review , Vol. 23 No. 4 , pp. 692 - 707 .
Spieth , P. , Schneckenberg , D. and Ricart , J.E. ( 2014 ), “ Business model innovation – state of the art and future challenges for the field ”, R&D Management , Vol. 44 No. 3 , pp. 237 - 247 .
Sorescu , A. , Frambach , R.T. , Singh , J. , Rangaswamy , A. and Bridges , C. ( 2011 ), “ Innovations in retail business models ”, Journal of Retailing , Vol. 87 No. 1 , pp. S3 - S16 .
Sosna , M. , Trevinyo-Rodríguez , R.N. and Velamuri , S.R. ( 2010 ), “ Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: the naturhouse case ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos. 2-3 , pp. 383 - 407 .
Storbacka , K. ( 2011 ), “ A solution business model: capabilities and management practices for integrated solutions ”, Industrial Marketing Management , Vol. 40 No. 5 , pp. 699 - 711 .
Taran , Y. , Boer , H. and Lindgren , P. ( 2015 ), “ A business model innovation typology ”, Decision Sciences , Vol. 46 No. 2 , pp. 301 - 331 .
Transfield , D. , Denyer , D. and Smart , P. ( 2003 ), “ Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review ”, British Journal of Management , Vol. 14 No. 3 , pp. 207 - 222 .
Teece , D.J. ( 2010 ), “ Business models, business strategy and innovation ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos 2-3 , pp. 172 - 194 .
Velu , C. ( 2015 ), “ Business model innovation and third-party alliance on the survival of new firms ”, Technovation , Vol. 35 No. 1 , pp. 1 - 11 .
Velu , C. ( 2016 ), “ Evolutionary or revolutionary business model innovation through coopetition? The role of dominance in network markets ”, Industrial Marketing Management , Vol. 53 No. 1 , pp. 124 - 135 .
Velu , C. and Jacob , A. ( 2014 ), “ Business model innovation and owner–managers: the moderating role of competition ”, R&D Management , Vol. 46 No. 3 , pp. 451 - 463 .
Visnjic , I. , Wiengarten , F. and Neely , A. ( 2016 ), “ Only the brave: product innovation, service business model innovation, and their impact on performance ”, Journal of Product Innovation Management , Vol. 33 No. 1 , pp. 36 - 52 .
Weill , P. and Woerner , S.L. ( 2013 ), “ Optimizing your digital business model ”, MIT Sloan Management Review , Vol. 54 No. 3 , pp. 71 - 78 .
Wilson , F. and Post , J.E. ( 2013 ), “ Business models for people, planet (& profits): exploring the phenomena of social business, a market-based approach to social value creation ”, Small Business Economics , Vol. 40 No. 3 , pp. 715 - 737 .
Wirtz , B.W. , Pistoia , A. , Ullrich , S. and Göttel , V. ( 2016 ), “ Business models: origin, development and future research perspectives ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 49 No. 1 , pp. 36 - 54 .
Wu , X. , Ma , R. and Shi , Y. ( 2010 ), “ How do latecomer firms capture value from disruptive technologies? A secondary business-model innovation perspective ”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , Vol. 57 No. 1 , pp. 51 - 62 .
Yunus , M. , Moingeon , B. and Lehmann-Ortega , L. ( 2010 ), “ Building social business models: lessons from the grameen experience ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos 2-3 , pp. 308 - 325 .
Zott , C. and Amit , R. ( 2010 ), “ Business model design: an activity system perspective ”, Long Range Planning , Vol. 43 Nos 2-3 , pp. 216 - 226 .
Zott , C. , Amit , R. and Massa , L. ( 2011 ), “ The business model: recent developments and future research ”, Journal of Management , Vol. 37 No. 4 , pp. 1019 - 1042 .
Weill , P. , Malone , T.W. and Apel , T.G. ( 2011 ), “ The business models investors prefer ”, MIT Sloan Management Review , Vol. 52 No. 4 , pp. 17 - 19 .
Related articles, all feedback is valuable.
Please share your general feedback
Contact Customer Support
MIT SMR ’s fall 2024 issue highlights the need for personal and organizational resilience amid global uncertainty.
Avoiding harm in technology innovation.
Businesses must thoroughly evaluate the risk of deploying a new technology to avoid reputational and financial damage.
Tania Bucic and Gina Colarelli O’Connor
Biometric technologies raise new issues of surveillance and privacy that can put customer trust at risk.
Andrew Park, Jayson Killoran, and Jan Kietzmann
Organizations can develop effective digital twins despite limited training data by combining AI and human knowledge.
Pushkar P. Apte and Costas J. Spanos
Why you should tap innovation at deep-tech startups.
Learn how deep-tech startups in materials, biology, energy, and computing can help enterprise innovation efforts.
Stefan Raff, Fiona E. Murray, and Martin Murmann
Recapping work/24: the human factor.
The full video of MIT SMR ’s annual symposium looks at how to empower an AI-fueled workforce.
MIT SMR Editors
Auditing algorithmic risk.
Two frameworks can help organizations identify potential harms posed by algorithms, AI tools, or large language models.
Cathy O’Neil, Jake Appel, and Sam Tyner-Monroe
Transforming retail: creating tomorrow’s agile environments.
This Executive Interview discusses how retailers can build flexible, future-fit IT environments.
MIT SMR Connections
Empower citizen developers to accelerate innovation.
Learn to drive digital transformation by turning business-domain experts into citizen developers.
A webinar with Richard Jefts, Andrew Manby, and Wade Roush
Innovators working on urgent problems need funders who understand deep-tech opportunities and take a long-term view.
Thomas Ramge and Rafael Laguna de la Vera
Preparing your organization for a generative future.
This webinar from MIT SMR offers guidance to help business leaders thoughtfully plan a generative AI implementation.
George Westerman, Tom Peck, and Abbie Lundberg
This webinar from MIT SMR explores key areas in which generative AI could transform existing ways of doing business.
George Westerman, Noémie Ellezam, and Abbie Lundberg
This webinar from MIT SMR covers the basics of generative AI and explores business use cases for the emerging technology.
George Westerman, Sam Ransbotham, and Abbie Lundberg
In a Q&A, Power and Progress authors Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson discuss the social impact of technological change.
Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson, interviewed by Kaushik Viswanath
Apis: understanding the business benefits and risks.
This free webinar offers business insights about application programming interfaces (APIs).
A webinar with John Engates, Saikrishna Chavali, and Wade Roush
The authors created a three-step framework aimed at helping leaders at incumbent companies identify and execute their deep-tech engagement strategies.
François Candelon, Vinit Patel, Max Männig, and John Paschkewitz
Hype around generative AI tools like ChatGPT impede business leaders’ ability to make well-informed technology choices.
On the Me, Myself, and AI podcast, Lego’s head of data engineering explains its approach to digital transformation.
Sam Ransbotham and Shervin Khodabandeh
This issue of MIT SMR focuses on talent management, innovation strategies, and emerging technologies.
MIT Sloan Management Review
Quantum computers may deliver an economic advantage to business, even on tasks that classical computers can perform.
Francesco Bova, Avi Goldfarb, and Roger Melko
Large incumbent companies should begin adopting blockchain before it gets used against them.
Ravi Sarathy, interviewed by Theodore Kinni
Harvard Business School Online's Business Insights Blog provides the career insights you need to achieve your goals and gain confidence in your business skills.
Today’s competitive landscape heavily relies on innovation. Business leaders must constantly look for new ways to innovate because you can't solve many problems with old solutions.
Innovation is critical across all industries; however, it's important to avoid using it as a buzzword and instead take time to thoroughly understand the innovation process.
Here's an overview of innovation in business, why it's important, and how you can encourage it in the workplace.
Innovation and creativity are often used synonymously. While similar, they're not the same. Using creativity in business is important because it fosters unique ideas . This novelty is a key component of innovation.
For an idea to be innovative, it must also be useful. Creative ideas don't always lead to innovations because they don't necessarily produce viable solutions to problems.
Simply put: Innovation is a product, service, business model, or strategy that's both novel and useful. Innovations don't have to be major breakthroughs in technology or new business models; they can be as simple as upgrades to a company's customer service or features added to an existing product.
Access your free e-book today.
Innovation in business can be grouped into two categories : sustaining and disruptive.
The most successful companies incorporate both types of innovation into their business strategies. While maintaining an existing position in the market is important, pursuing growth is essential to being competitive. It also helps protect a business against other companies affecting its standing.
Learn about the differences between sustaining and disruptive innovation in the video below, and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more explainer content!
Unforeseen challenges are inevitable in business. Innovation can help you stay ahead of the curve and grow your company in the process. Here are three reasons innovation is crucial for your business:
Several tools encourage innovation in the workplace. For example, when a problem’s cause is difficult to pinpoint, you can turn to approaches like creative problem-solving . One of the best approaches to innovation is adopting a design thinking mentality.
Design thinking is a solutions-based, human-centric mindset. It's a practical way to strategize and design using insights from observations and research.
Innovation's requirements for novelty and usefulness call for navigating between concrete and abstract thinking. Introducing structure to innovation can guide this process.
In the online course Design Thinking and Innovation , Harvard Business School Dean Srikant Datar teaches design thinking principles using a four-phase innovation framework : clarify, ideate, develop, and implement.
Innovation requires considering user needs. Design thinking promotes empathy by fostering human-centered design , which addresses explicit pain points and latent needs identified during innovation’s clarification stage.
There are three characteristics of human-centered design:
Consider these characteristics when problem-solving, as each is necessary for successful innovation.
Creativity and idea generation are vital to innovation, but you may encounter situations in which pursuing an idea isn't feasible. Such scenarios represent a conflict between the innovative and operational worlds.
The operational world reflects an organization's routine processes and procedures. Metrics and results are prioritized, and creativity isn't encouraged to the extent required for innovation. Endeavors that disrupt routine—such as risk-taking—are typically discouraged.
The innovative world encourages creativity and experimentation. This side of business allows for open-endedly exploring ideas but tends to neglect the functional side.
Both worlds are necessary for innovation, as creativity must be grounded in reality. You should strive to balance them to produce human-centered solutions. Design thinking strikes this balance by guiding you between the concrete and abstract.
Innovation is easier said than done. It often requires you to collaborate with others, overcome resistance from stakeholders, and invest valuable time and resources into generating solutions. It can also be highly discouraging because many ideas generated during ideation may not go anywhere. But the end result can make the difference between your organization's success or failure.
The good news is that innovation can be learned. If you're interested in more effectively innovating, consider taking an online innovation course. Receiving practical guidance can increase your skills and teach you how to approach problem-solving with a human-centered mentality.
Eager to learn more about innovation? Explore Design Thinking and Innovation ,one of our online entrepreneurship and innovation courses. If you're not sure which course is the right fit, download our free course flowchart to determine which best aligns with your goals.
When you think of innovation, what springs to mind? Maybe it’s a flashy new gadget—but don’t be mistaken. There’s much more to the world of innovation, which extends far beyond new products and things you’ll find on a store shelf.
Marc de Jong is a senior partner in McKinsey’s Amsterdam office, Laura Furstenthal is a senior partner in the Bay Area office, and Erik Roth is a senior partner in the Stamford office.
If products alone aren’t the full story, what is innovation? In a business context, innovation is the ability to conceive, develop, deliver, and scale new products, services, processes, and business models for customers.
Successful innovation delivers net new growth that is substantial. As McKinsey senior partner Laura Furstenthal notes in an episode of the Inside the Strategy Room podcast , “However you measure it, innovation has to increase value and drive growth.”
As important as innovation is, getting it right can be challenging. Over 80 percent of executives surveyed say that innovation is among their top three priorities, yet less than 10 percent report being satisfied with their organizations’ innovation performance. Many established companies are better operators than innovators , producing few new and creative game changers. Most succeed by optimizing existing core businesses.
Some companies do succeed at innovation. Our research considered how proficient 183 companies were at innovation, and compared that assessment against a proprietary database of economic profit (the total profit minus the cost of capital). We found that companies that harness the essentials of innovation see a substantial performance edge that separates them from others—with evidence that mastering innovation can generate economic profit that is 2.4 times higher than that of other players .
Learn more about our Strategy & Corporate Finance practice.
Successful innovation has historically occurred at the intersection of several elements, which can guide prioritization efforts. The three most important elements are the who, the what, and the how :
Successful innovation requires answers to each of these questions.
An example from inventor and businessman Thomas Edison helps illustrate the concept. “In every case, he did not just invent the what, he also invented a how,” says Furstenthal in a conversation on innovation . “In the case of the light bulb, he created the filament and the vacuum tube that allowed it to turn on and off, and he developed the production process that enabled mass production.”
How do organizations become better innovators.
McKinsey conducted research into the attributes and behaviors behind superior innovation performance , which were validated in action at hundreds of companies. This research yielded eight critical elements for organizations to master:
Of these eight essentials, two merit particular attention : aspire and choose . Without these two elements, efforts may be too scattershot to make a lasting difference. It’s particularly crucial to ensure that leaders are setting bold aspirations and making tough choices when it comes to resource allocation and portfolio moves. To do so successfully, many leaders will need to shift their mindsets or management approaches.
Real-world examples of successful innovation, related to some of the eight essentials listed , can highlight the benefits of pursuing innovation systematically :
These examples aren’t necessarily what you may think of when you imagine disruptive innovation—which calls to mind moves that shake up an entire industry, and might be more associated with top tech trends such as the Bio Revolution . Yet these examples show how committing to innovation can make a sizable difference.
Steps to help aspiring innovators get started include the following:
In the words of chemist Linus Pauling, “The way to get to good ideas is to get lots of ideas and throw the bad ones away.”
An innovation portfolio is a thoughtfully curated bundle of potentially innovative initiatives, with clear aspirations and required resources defined for each. Managing the portfolio this way helps find new opportunities and determine the appropriate number and mix of initiatives, including the following:
One way to measure innovation is to look at innovation-driven net new growth, which we call the “green box.” This phrase refers to how you quantify the growth in revenue or earnings that an innovation needs to provide within a defined timeframe. This concept can help clarify aspirations and influence choices on the innovation journey.
While many imagine that innovation is solely about creativity and generating ideas, at its core, innovation is a matter of resource allocation . To put it another way: it’s one thing to frame innovation as a catalyst for growth, and another to act upon it by refocusing people, assets, and management attention on the organization’s best ideas.
The green box can help to solidify a tangible commitment by defining the value that a company creates from breakthrough and incremental innovation, on a defined timeline (say, five years), with quantifiable metrics such as net new revenue or earnings growth. Crucially, the green box looks at growth from innovation alone, setting aside other possible sources such as market momentum, M&A, and so forth. And once defined, the growth aspiration can be cascaded into a set of objectives and metrics that the company’s various operating units can incorporate into its individual innovation portfolios.
It’s useful to note that some organizations may find that measures not solely financial in nature are more appropriate or relevant. For instance, metrics such as the number of subscribers or patients—or customer satisfaction—can resonate. What’s critical is selecting a metric that is a proxy for value creation. A large US healthcare payer , for example, looked to spur innovation that would improve patient satisfaction and the quality of care.
Separate from the concept of the green box, two simple metrics can also offer surprising insight about innovation vis-à-vis the effectiveness of an organization’s R&D spending. Both of these lend themselves to benchmarking, since they can be gauged from the outside in, and they offer insight at the level of a company’s full innovation portfolio. The two R&D conversion metrics are as follows:
While no metric is perfect, these may offer perspective that keeps the focus squarely on returns from innovation and the value it creates—often more meaningful than looking inward at measures of activity, such as the number of patents secured.
Innovation is a team sport. Experience working with strong innovators and start-ups has helped identify ten traits of successful innovation teams . Those fall into four big categories: vision , or the ability to spot opportunities and inspire others to go after them; collaboration , which relates to fostering effective teamwork and change management (for instance, by telling a good innovation story ); learning or absorbing new ideas; and execution , with traits that facilitate snappy decision making even when uncertainty arises.
Being strategic about the composition of an innovation team can help minimize failures and bring discipline to the process.
One broad piece of advice centers on creating a culture that accounts for the human side of innovation . When people worry about failure, criticism, or the career impact of a wrong move, it can keep them from embracing innovation. In a recent poll, 85 percent of executives say fear holds back their organization’s innovation efforts often or always—but there are ways to overcome these barriers .
Additionally, the Committed Innovator podcast and related articles share perspectives from leading experts who have helped their organizations tackle inertia and unlock bold strategic moves. If you are looking for words of wisdom, their insights can help spark inspiration to innovate:
For more in-depth exploration of these topics, see McKinsey’s insights on Strategy & Corporate Finance . Learn more about McKinsey’s Growth & Innovation work—and check out innovation-related job opportunities if you’re interested in working at McKinsey.
Articles referenced include:
Related articles.
Browse innovation resources by topic, from idea generation to innovation management.
Related to the process of starting new businesses and fostering entrepreneurial spirit for innovation.
Deals with the ways in which organizations structure and orient themselves to foster and support innovation.
Deals with the processes of implementing innovation within organizations and ensuring its adoption.
Steps and stages involved in the innovation journey, from idea generation to implementation and evaluation. What is the innovation process? Each step in the process requires a different mindset, different methods and different innovation tools. Check out what resources can help you in this moment and in the future.
Encompasses various approaches and frameworks used to guide and drive innovation efforts.
Focuses on innovation aimed at environmental sustainability and green practices.
Focuses on understanding market trends, customer needs, and feedback for guiding innovation efforts.
Includes terms related to the systematic investigation and development of new products, services, or processes.
Pertains to the development of new or improved products and services, including methodologies and lifecycle management.
This area focuses on strategies, processes, and tools for managing innovation within organizations.
Pertains to the collaborative aspects of innovation, including working with external partners and customers.
Involves identifying and analyzing emerging trends and future possibilities in innovation.
Focuses on the role of technology and digital tools in driving and facilitating innovation.
Covers aspects of leading innovation initiatives and building a culture that supports creative thinking and innovation.
Involves the assessment and tracking of innovation performance and impact.
Involves methodologies and techniques for generating innovative ideas and solutions.
Insights and lessons learned from innovation practices, including successes, failures, and continuous improvement strategies. What great insights do you need to understand innovation? Before applying specific innovation tools, check out this section with tips on how to innovate and great examples.
Different classifications and forms of innovation, such as incremental, radical, disruptive, and more. Innovation can be approached from many different angles. Do you want to create a new strategy for your company, innovate your products or research for the next disruptive innovation?
F inding and choosing a strong research topic is the critical first step when it comes to crafting a high-quality dissertation, thesis or research project. If you’ve landed on this post, chances are you’re looking for a business/management-related research topic , but aren’t sure where to start. Here, we’ll explore a variety of research ideas and topic thought-starters for management-related research degrees (MBAs/DBAs, etc.). These research topics span management strategy, HR, finance, operations, international business and leadership.
NB – This is just the start…
The topic ideation and evaluation process has multiple steps . In this post, we’ll kickstart the process by sharing some research topic ideas within the management domain. This is the starting point, but to develop a well-defined research topic, you’ll need to identify a clear and convincing research gap , along with a well-justified plan of action to fill that gap.
If you’re new to the oftentimes perplexing world of research, or if this is your first time undertaking a formal academic research project, be sure to check out our free dissertation mini-course. In it, we cover the process of writing a dissertation or thesis from start to end. Be sure to also sign up for our free webinar that explores how to find a high-quality research topic.
While the ideas we’ve presented above are a decent starting point for finding a business-related research topic, they are fairly generic and non-specific. So, it helps to look at actual dissertations and theses to see how this all comes together.
Below, we’ve included a selection of research projects from various management-related degree programs (e.g., MBAs, DBAs, etc.) to help refine your thinking. These are actual dissertations and theses, written as part of Master’s and PhD-level programs, so they can provide some useful insight as to what a research topic looks like in practice.
Looking at these titles, you can probably pick up that the research topics here are quite specific and narrowly-focused , compared to the generic ones presented earlier. This is an important thing to keep in mind as you develop your own research topic. That is to say, to create a top-notch research topic, you must be precise and target a specific context with specific variables of interest . In other words, you need to identify a clear, well-justified research gap.
If you’d like hands-on help to speed up your topic ideation process and ensure that you develop a rock-solid research topic, check our our Topic Kickstarter service below.
How To Choose A Research Topic Step-By-Step Tutorial With Examples + Free Topic...
A comprehensive list of automation and robotics-related research topics. Includes free access to a webinar and research topic evaluator.
Research Topics & Ideas: Sociology 50 Topic Ideas To Kickstart Your Research...
A comprehensive list of public health-related research topics. Includes free access to a webinar and research topic evaluator.
Research Topics & Ideas: Neuroscience 50 Topic Ideas To Kickstart Your Research...
📄 FREE TEMPLATES
Research Topic Ideation
Proposal Writing
Literature Review
Methodology & Analysis
Academic Writing
Referencing & Citing
Apps, Tools & Tricks
The Grad Coach Podcast
Great help. thanks
Hi, Your work is very educative, it has widened my knowledge. Thank you so much.
Thank you so much for helping me understand how to craft a research topic. I’m pursuing a PGDE. Thank you
a feasibility study for the establishment of rice processing system in (_____)
Effect of Leadership, computerized accounting systems, risk management and monitoring on the quality of financial Reports among listed banks
May you assist on a possible PhD topic on analyzing economic behaviours within environmental, climate and energy domains, from a gender perspective. I seek to further investigate if/to which extent policies in these domains can be deemed economically unfair from a gender perspective, and whether the effectiveness of the policies can be increased while striving for inequalities not being perpetuated.
healthy work environment and employee diversity, technological innovations and their role in management practices, cultural difference affecting advertising, honesty as a company policy, an analysis of the relationships between quality management and customer satisfaction in subscription based business model,business corruption cases. That I was selected from the above topics.
Research topic accounting
Kindly assist me with a research topic on low income?
Kindly assist me with a research topic on low income? PHD/ Doctoral thesis
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Submit Comment
HBS faculty conduct research on a wide variety of topics. In the application you must indicate your top three choices of research areas, in order of preference, from the topics listed below. Top applicants will be matched with faculty-designed research project based on their indicated interests.
1. Corporate Social Responsibility research explores business impact of delivering economic, social, and environmental benefits to stakeholders.
2. Business and Government researchers study the economic, political, social, and legal environment in which businesses operate. Drawing from perspectives of economic theory, political science, and history, they examine the “rules” and policies established by government and other non-business institutions that affect business in the United States; turn to history to understand the origins of today’s business environment as well as some of the alternatives that have emerged from time to time; and study other countries’ business environments and their historical development. This group of scholars is deeply interested in the impact of globalization and the way rules are emerging to govern international economic transactions as globalization proceeds.
4. Performance Measurement and Outcomes scholars study drivers and effectiveness of performance measurement and management control systems.
5. Market Design seeks to translate economic theory and analysis into practical solutions to real-world problems.
6. Finance researchers strive to understand how managers and firms make value-enhancing decisions; and how financial institutions, markets, and instruments contribute to this process.
7. Globalization scholars concentrate on the effectiveness of management practices in global organizations; cross-cultural learning and adaptation processes; the challenges of taking companies global; emerging-market companies with global potential; and international political economy and its impact on economic development.
8. Health Care research studies how potential application management principles and best practices from other industries can be applied; how the process of innovation can be improved; how principles of strategy and consumer choice can be utilized; how information technology can expand access, decrease costs, and improve quality; and devising approaches in developing nations can impact global health.
9. Human Behavior and Decision-Making research focuses on individual and interactive judgment and decision making, with applications to organizational behavior, consumer behavior, behavioral operations, and behavioral economics. Research topics include the psychology of conversation, ethical decision-making (including cheating and self-deception), the impact of rituals on mourning and consumption, team and organizational dynamics and performance, whether money makes people happy, when and why people disclose information, and health behavior change.
10. Leadership research explores questions of organization change, power and influence, innovation management, and the crucial role leadership plays in organizational success. The topic of leadership spans all academic units at HBS and fosters a collaborative and multi-disciplinary approach.
11. Social Enterprise research seeks to understand the challenges associated with driving sustained, high-impact social change. Current research focuses on leadership of socially mission-driven organizations; the role of business leaders and corporate citizenship in driving social change; business models that address poverty; management of high-performing K-12 public school districts; and financing models for the non-profit sector
12. Technology and Innovation research focuses on value creation of platforms and two-sided markets; use of open architecture and leverage of its collective value; development and execution of innovation strategies; innovative attributes of executives and firms; development of new markets through the creation of disruptive innovations that displace earlier technologies; development of innovations in sectors; and the impact of innovation on economic growth.
13. Other. It is impossible to capture all that HBS faculty study. If you have a specific interest in an area not listed above, please select this category to describe an area of research within the disciplines of economics, sociology, psychology, policy, or history that is relevant to business academia.
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Entrepreneurial bricolage, business model innovation, and sustainable entrepreneurial performance of digital entrepreneurial ventures: the moderating effect of digital entrepreneurial ecosystem empowerment.
2. literature review and hypotheses, 2.1. entrepreneurial bricolage and sustainable entrepreneurial performance, 2.2. entrepreneurial bricolage and business model innovation, 2.3. business model innovation and sustainable entrepreneurial performance, 2.4. the mediating effect of business model innovation, 2.5. the moderating effect of digital entrepreneurial ecosystem empowerment, 2.6. moderated mediation effect, 3. research design, 3.1. variable selection and measurement, 3.2. data collection and sample profile, 4. data analysis and hypothesis testing, 4.1. descriptive analysis, 4.2. reliability and validity analysis, 4.3. common method bias test, 4.4. hypothesis testing, 4.4.1. main effect test, 4.4.2. mediation effect test, 4.4.3. moderation effect test, 4.4.4. moderated mediation effect test, 5. research conclusions and prospects, 5.1. research conclusions, 5.2. theoretical contributions, 5.3. managerial implications, 5.4. research limitations and prospects, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Click here to enlarge figure
Variable | Variable Dimension | Items |
---|---|---|
SEP | ECSP | Our company has increased its market share. |
Our company has improved its profits. | ||
Our company has reduced cost expenditures. | ||
ENSP | Our company has decreased the frequency of environmental incidents. | |
Our company has improved compliance with environmental standards. | ||
We have enhanced our company’s environmental condition. | ||
SOSP | Our company has reduced the impact and risk to the public. | |
We have improved occupational health and safety for our employees. | ||
We have enhanced our company’s image in the eyes of customers. | ||
We have improved our company’s social reputation. | ||
EB | RB | Our company is adept at using existing labor, raw materials, skills, and other resources to solve problems. |
Our company is skilled at acquiring inexpensive labor, raw materials, skills, and other resources to address issues. | ||
Our company is proficient in utilizing overlooked labor, raw materials, skills, and other resources to tackle challenges. | ||
UB | Our company frequently encourages digital users to participate in our operations. | |
Our company often assists digital users in solving problems that other companies are unwilling or unable to address. | ||
Our company regularly provides products or services to digital users whom other companies find unattractive. | ||
Our company often expands into emerging, niche, or marginalized digital markets. | ||
IB | In operations, our company typically employs unique methods rather than traditional approaches used by other companies. | |
Our company frequently breaks away from conventional systems and norms during its operations. | ||
Our company is willing to abandon traditional industry practices if better outcomes can be achieved. | ||
Our company often utilizes distinctive or proprietary digital systems and norms. | ||
BMI | EBMI | We can reduce the cost of products or services. |
We can provide quick and convenient services to users. | ||
We can lower the search and communication costs for our partners. | ||
We can reduce the search and communication costs for users. | ||
We can decrease the asymmetry of information in transactions. | ||
We can accelerate the speed of transactions. | ||
NBMI | We can combine products, information, and services in innovative ways. | |
Our company has created a pricing model that differs from other companies in the industry. | ||
We have developed new channels that are distinct from those of other companies in the industry. | ||
We have adopted a profit model that is different from other companies in the industry. | ||
Our company actively seeks new partners in product production or promotion. | ||
We can motivate partners in novel ways. | ||
DEEE | DE | The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem helps us acquire digital technology. |
The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem helps us identify digital entrepreneurship opportunities using digital technology. | ||
The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem helps us develop digital entrepreneurship opportunities through the use of digital technology. | ||
RE | The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem provides comprehensive infrastructure. | |
The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem offers ample financial support. | ||
The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem brings us partners. | ||
The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem brings us users. | ||
SE | The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem provides us with policy benefits and other information services. | |
The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem offers intermediary services such as business, tax, and integrated communication. | ||
The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem frequently provides us with entrepreneurial training and guidance. | ||
The digital entrepreneurship ecosystem often hosts entrepreneurial salons and sharing sessions. |
Variable | Variable Dimension | Number of Items | Dimension α Value | Variable α Value | Factor Loadings | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEP | ECSP | 3 | 0.758 | 0.844 | 0.692~0.731 | 0.757 | 0.510 |
ENSP | 3 | 0.811 | 0.754~0.797 | 0.814 | 0.593 | ||
SOSP | 4 | 0.852 | 0.718~0.797 | 0.852 | 0.591 | ||
EB | RB | 3 | 0.752 | 0.839 | 0.650~0.808 | 0.762 | 0.519 |
UB | 4 | 0.809 | 0.688~0.742 | 0.809 | 0.515 | ||
IB | 4 | 0.832 | 0.727~0.762 | 0.832 | 0.553 | ||
BMI | EBMI | 6 | 0.904 | 0.874 | 0.768~0.795 | 0.904 | 0.611 |
NBMI | 6 | 0.893 | 0.749~0.778 | 0.893 | 0.581 | ||
DEEE | DE | 3 | 0.888 | 0.935 | 0.834~0.876 | 0.887 | 0.723 |
RE | 4 | 0.937 | 0.868~0.909 | 0.938 | 0.790 | ||
SE | 4 | 0.935 | 0.862~0.905 | 0.936 | 0.784 |
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. ECSP | |||||||||||
2. ENSP | 0.562 ** | ||||||||||
3. SOSP | 0.342 ** | 0.326 ** | |||||||||
4. RB | 0.479 ** | 0.426 ** | 0.535 ** | ||||||||
5. UB | 0.412 ** | 0.477 ** | 0.447 ** | 0.438 ** | |||||||
6. IB | 0.358 ** | 0.396 ** | 0.343 ** | 0.462 ** | 0.254 ** | ||||||
7. EBMI | 0.461 ** | 0.545 ** | 0.285 ** | 0.420 ** | 0.360 ** | 0.309 ** | |||||
8. NBMI | 0.411 ** | 0.312 ** | 0.344 ** | 0.292 ** | 0.255 ** | 0.263 ** | 0.260 ** | ||||
9. DE | 0.216 ** | 0.217 ** | 0.197 ** | 0.058 | 0.106 * | 0.008 | 0.353 ** | 0.284 ** | |||
10. RE | 0.199 ** | 0.207 ** | 0.187 ** | 0.058 | 0.198 ** | 0.034 | 0.226 ** | 0.200 ** | 0.578 ** | ||
11. SE | 0.166 ** | 0.209 ** | 0.122 * | −0.009 | 0.071 | 0.008 | 0.202 ** | 0.179 ** | 0.602 ** | 0.586 ** |
Variable | SEP | BMI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |
Gender | −0.024 | −0.036 | −0.016 | −0.029 | −0.013 | −0.022 |
Age | −0.045 | −0.020 | −0.031 | −0.019 | −0.023 | −0.005 |
Educational Attainment | 0.108 * | 0.043 | 0.088 * | 0.048 | 0.032 | −0.016 |
Venture Age | −0.044 | −0.087 * | −0.033 | −0.070 | −0.017 | −0.049 |
Venture Size | 0.048 | 0.071 | 0.018 | 0.048 | 0.049 | 0.065 |
EB | 0.721 *** | 0.539 *** | 0.526 *** | |||
BMI | 0.628 *** | 0.346 *** | ||||
R | 0.017 | 0.531 | 0.410 | 0.618 | 0.004 | 0.278 |
Adjusted R | 0.003 | 0.523 | 0.400 | 0.610 | −0.010 | 0.266 |
F-value | 1.249 | 68.694 *** | 42.078 *** | 83.776 *** | 0.271 | 23.324 *** |
Variable | BMI | SEP | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 7 | Model 8 | Model 9 | Model 10 | |
Gender | −0.006 | −0.008 | 0.081 * | 0.096 * |
Age | −0.095 | −0.068 | −0.003 | −0.033 |
Educational Attainment | −0.022 | −0.065 | −0.015 | −0.014 |
Venture Age | −0.015 | −0.028 | −0.032 | −0.014 |
Venture Size | 0.039 | 0.055 | −0.018 | −0.017 |
EB | 0.493 *** | 0.413 *** | ||
DEEE | 0.310 *** | 0.151 ** | 0.069 | 0.145 ** |
EB × DEEE | 0.324 *** | |||
BMI | 0.604 *** | 0.562 *** | ||
BMI × DEEE | 0.258 *** | |||
R | 0.379 | 0.448 | 0.414 | 0.475 |
Adjusted R | 0.367 | 0.435 | 0.403 | 0.463 |
F-value | 31.630 *** | 36.671 *** | 36.679 *** | 40.923 *** |
Moderator Variable (DEEE) | EB->BMI->SEP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Effect | Boot SE | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | |
Low Value | 0.0296 | 0.0293 | −0.0208 | 0.0957 |
Medium Value | 0.1476 | 0.0253 | 0.1011 | 0.2007 |
High Value | 0.2705 | 0.0591 | 0.1621 | 0.3947 |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Liu, X.; Zhang, L. Entrepreneurial Bricolage, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Entrepreneurial Performance of Digital Entrepreneurial Ventures: The Moderating Effect of Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Empowerment. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 8168. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188168
Liu X, Zhang L. Entrepreneurial Bricolage, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Entrepreneurial Performance of Digital Entrepreneurial Ventures: The Moderating Effect of Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Empowerment. Sustainability . 2024; 16(18):8168. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188168
Liu, Xiaoli, and Lei Zhang. 2024. "Entrepreneurial Bricolage, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Entrepreneurial Performance of Digital Entrepreneurial Ventures: The Moderating Effect of Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Empowerment" Sustainability 16, no. 18: 8168. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188168
Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
add to folder:
Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.
Ever feel like your workplace could use a jolt of creativity? We’ve all been there.
But what if there were simple, actionable ways to spark innovation? Well, get ready to be inspired! We’re diving deep into 17 real-world innovation examples in the workplace that can transform your company culture and drive serious growth.
Get ready for a creativity boost and discover strategies that will make your team say, “Why didn’t we think of that before?”
What is Innovation in the Workplace? – And Why It Matters.
Innovation in the workplace is not about coming up with the next big thing or having the latest tech. Rather, it’s more about fostering a mindset of continuous improvement, where everyone feels empowered to challenge the status quo and to explore unforeseen possibilities.
Think of it like this: if a company stands still, it risks getting left behind. Markets are constantly shifting, technologies evolving, and customer expectations are changing at lightning speed.
This means that innovation at work isn’t a luxury anymore, it’s actually a necessity.
But innovation isn’t just about survival; it’s also about growth and opportunity. That’s why so many companies are now prioritizing hiring a Chief Innovation Officer ( yep, that’s a thing ). By constantly seeking out new and better ways of doing things, companies can unlock hidden efficiencies, tap into new markets, and create products or services that truly delight their customers.
Moreover, innovation is also good for employees. A culture of innovation fosters a sense of excitement, engagement, and purpose. It encourages people to think creatively, take risks, and learn from their mistakes. It creates an environment where everyone feels like they have a stake in the company’s success and that their ideas matter.
Because in the end, innovation isn’t just about keeping up with the competition; it’s about creating a better future for everyone.
17 Best Innovation Examples in the Workplace
1) Fostering a Culture of Innovation
1.1 Idea Management Systems
Ever had a brilliant idea but didn’t know where to share it?
That’s where idea management systems come in! Think of it as a virtual suggestion box, but better. Everyone can pitch their ideas, discuss them, and even vote on their favorites.
This is how you make innovation an engaging team sport!
1.2 Hackathons & Innovation Challenges
Think of these as creativity marathons!
Employees get together, brainstorm innovative ideas, and crack tough problems or come up with impressive new ideas. It’s fast-paced, fun, and it’s an efficient way to get those creative juices flowing.
1.3 Innovation Labs
Sometimes, your employees just need a space to experiment and play around with new ideas, away from the daily grind. That’s where innovation labs shine.
It’s like a playground for innovation, where dedicated teams or even individuals can tinker with new technologies and approaches ( we’ll talk more about how technology can help drive innovative and creative ideas in the workplace too, so be sure to read this article until the very end ).
1.4 Cross-functional Collaboration
Ever noticed how talking to someone from a different department can spark new ideas? That’s the power of cross-functional collaboration.
That’s when you break down those silos and bring different teams together to share their perspectives and find solutions that might not have been possible otherwise.
1.5 Continuous Learning & Development
We’ve already said it: the world’s changing fast, and you need to keep up! That’s why your company should aim to encourage continuous learning and development and we’re talking, at all levels.
Whether it’s attending conferences, taking courses, or pursuing certifications, your employees should be at the forefront of industry trends so that they can bring those fresh ideas back to the table.
2) Workplace Practices & Policies
2.1 Flexible Work Arrangements
Traditional 9-to-5 schedules are getting a makeover ( hooray !).
Embracing flexible work arrangements, such as remote work and flexible hours, is a hallmark of best examples of how to drive innovation in the workplaces.
Don’t be fooled by the outdated way of doing things. In fact, show your commitment to adapting to the evolving needs of the modern workforce. That’s because empowering employees to achieve a better work-life balance often results in a boost in productivity and job satisfaction.
2.2 Employee Wellness Programs
Adding on to the above, recognizing the link between employee well-being and productivity, innovative companies are prioritizing comprehensive wellness programs.
Ahealthier and happier workforce translates to a more engaged and creative one. In fact, an University of Oxford study showed that happy workers are 13% more productive.
From group yoga classes to meditation sessions, and even mental health support… These are just a few of the many real-world examples of initiatives aimed at creating a workplace where employees feel valued and cared for. As a result, you guessed it, this fuels creativity and innovation.
2.3 Employee Recognition & Rewards
Feeling valued is a powerful motivator ( ever since getting a star from our kindergarten teachers, we all love being recognized by our efforts ).
And companies that regularly acknowledge and reward their employees for their contributions cultivate a culture of appreciation. Such recognition not only boosts morale but also fosters motivation and encourages individuals to consistently perform at their best.
2.4 Diversity & Inclusion Initiatives
It’s a given, a truly innovative workplace embraces diversity. That’s because, by fostering an inclusive environment where everyone feels welcome and respected, companies can unlock a wider range of ideas and talent.
This diversity of thought and experience becomes a catalyst for innovative ideas to bloom like a beautiful garden during Spring.
2.5 Transparent Communication
Open and honest communication builds trust and fosters a sense of ownership among employees. Innovative companies prioritize transparency, which ensures that information flows freely at all levels.
The result? An empowered workforce that feels connected to the company’s mission and goals. And TA-DA , this leads to increased collaboration and a shared sense of purpose.
3) Technology & Tools
3.1 Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML)
AI and ML aren’t just commonplace terms, they’re actually transforming the way everyone works. From automating mundane tasks to extracting valuable insights from mountains of data, these technologies are driving innovation by enabling us to work smarter, not harder.
Imagine making data-driven decisions with unprecedented accuracy or freeing up your team to focus on strategic initiatives. That’s the power of AI and ML in action!
3.2 Cloud Computing
The cloud isn’t just a fluffy place in the sky; it’s a game-changer for workplace innovation.
Simply by providing on-demand access to computing resources, storage, and collaboration tools, cloud computing enables agility, flexibility, and scalability. Now, teams can work seamlessly from anywhere, access critical information in real-time, and scale their operations effortlessly.
It’s innovation that breaks down barriers and empowers teams to achieve more!
3.3 Collaboration & Communication Platforms
Sorry grandmas, but siloed communication and endless email threads are becoming a thing of the past ( it’s been long due ).
Collaboration and communication platforms like Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom are fostering a new era of connectedness in the workplace. These tools enable real-time communication, seamless file sharing, and virtual collaboration, regardless of location.
3.4 Project Management Tools
Managing complex projects can feel like herding cats, but project management tools bring order to the chaos.
Innovation management platforms like innosabi streamline your entire innovation process, from the initial planning and task allocation to tracking progress and meeting deadlines.
This ensures projects stay on track, teams stay aligned, and everyone knows what’s happening, when.
3.5 Automation & Robotics
The robots aren’t taking over ( yet !), but they are transforming the workplace as we know it. So let’s welcome them for now.
Whether it’s streamlining manufacturing processes or automating data entry, these technologies are driving efficiency, productivity, and ultimately, new creations.
4) Additional Examples: Thinking Outside the Box
4.1 Design Thinking
Forget about jumping straight to solutions. Design thinking is all about putting people first!
The whole idea behind it is to take the time to truly understand your customers’ needs and pain points before you ever start brainstorming ideas. It’s a creative process of trial and error, where you prototype, test, and refine your solutions until you hit the bullseye.
Why? Because this human-centered approach ensures you’re creating products and services that people actually want and need.
4.2 Open Innovation
They say two heads are better than one, right? Well, imagine what you can achieve when you open your doors to collaboration!
Open innovation taps into the collective genius of your external partners, customers… and even your competitors. Sharing ideas, co-creating solutions, and leveraging diverse perspectives all lead to innovation. Kind of like hosting a brainstorming session… but on steroids!
Learn more : Scaling Innovation Processes Through Internal and External Stakeholder Communication
3 Successful Real-World Examples of Innovation in the Workplace
Google’s “20% Time”
Google famously allows its employees to dedicate 20% of their workweek to pursue personal projects and ideas.
As a result, this has led to the birth of groundbreaking innovations like Gmail and AdSense, demonstrating the power of empowering employees to explore their creativity and passions.
Pixar’s “Braintrust” :
Pixar’s unique “Braintrust” approach involves regular, candid feedback sessions where filmmakers openly share their work-in-progress and receive constructive criticism from colleagues.
LEGO’s Ideas Platform :
This is a prime example of open innovation. LEGO invites fans to submit their own product ideas, and those that receive enough support are considered for production.
It shows how tapping into the creativity of a loyal and passionate customer base leads to the development of unique and popular products.
Let’s Wrap It Up
So, there you have it – a whirlwind tour of innovation in the workplace! Remember, this is not about fancy gadgets or groundbreaking inventions.
Whether it’s through idea management systems, design thinking workshops, or simply embracing flexible work arrangements, the key is to cultivate an environment where people feel excited, engaged, and motivated to contribute their best ideas.
So, go out there and spark some creativity! Encourage collaboration, celebrate successes, and don’t be afraid to experiment. The future belongs to those who dare to innovate!
Popular articles from this firm, what is discontinuous innovation (and why it’s the key to staying ahead) *, seamless connectivity optimizing ip management through advanced integration *, what is incremental innovation in business - benefits, risks, examples *, how elearning cost reduction boosts corporate training engagement *, innovation vs invention: differentiating key concepts in business strategy *.
An Introduction to Cloud Computing Contracts - Without the Jargon - Learn Live
Advanced Copyright Law - Key Areas in Depth
The EU AI Act - An Introduction to Risks, Compliance & More - Learn Live
Copyright Protection - Digging into The Detail - Learn Live
Uncovering and growing business innovation potential in south african townships.
Informal businesses significantly contribute to employment and income generation in South Africa. As HSRC research shows, innovation is crucial to their survival. On 24 and 25 April 2024, the HSRC held a workshop with informal business owners at Philippi Village, Cape Town, to share a new evidence-based toolkit designed to support informal businesses in strengthening their innovation capabilities. This article sheds light on how informal business owners can use the toolkit to foster innovation for business sustainability and growth. By Il-haam Petersen, Lebogang Khoza and Setsoheng Mayeki.
Although informal businesses innovate continuously, innovation is used as part of reactive rather than proactive strategies. A research study published in 2021 shows how informal business owners may break from necessity-driven pathways by proactively using innovation for problem solving and taking up business opportunities. Proactive innovation can be a game-changer for survivalist and microenterprises.
At a recent workshop held in Philippi township, Cape Town, a team of HSRC researchers shared a set of guidelines and interactive learning tools designed to help informal business owners craft their own business innovation strategies. Business owners learned about innovation through a business innovation simulation and explored practical and proactive approaches to innovating in their businesses. They also connected with other informal business owners, learning with and from each other.
The workshop was attended by a diverse group of over 30 informal business owners from the township, including spaza shop owners and food vendors, furniture makers, car wash service providers, hair salon owners, and street vendors selling a variety of goods. To facilitate uptake and engagement, the workshop was conducted in English and the main language spoken in the township, IsiXhosa.
Using an informal business innovation toolkit
The workshop programme was based on a set of business innovation training modules co-created with the help of toolkit development specialist Bridget Steffen, who focuses on experiential learning techniques.
On day 1, participants learned about innovation through a set of playful scenarios. The concept and importance of a business innovation network was shared through a practical string-connection exercise. As each person introduced themselves and their businesses, they tossed a roll of string to another person, until everyone in the workshop was connected (Figure 1).
Figure 1. String exercise introducing the concept and importance of a business innovation network
The next session facilitated information and knowledge sharing among the business owners, deepening the connections. Using colour pens, each created an A3 poster describing their businesses, business goals and biggest challenges (Figure 2). This was followed by a gallery walk (Figure 3).
Figure 2. Poster preparation
Figure 3. A gallery walk in the imaginary business marketplace
Based on the training modules, the HSRC’s Informal Business Innovation Toolkit encourages learning through scenario games. Based on an immersive learning approach, the games draw on real examples gathered through HSRC research. One is a card game facilitating engagement and discussion on crises and opportunities towards better problem-solving skills. The game started with the business owners selecting a card from a deck, setting out challenges as a crisis event or business opportunity (Figure 4). Responding to the scenarios on the cards prompted the participants to develop their awareness of how they respond to challenges. For some, it was an emotional experience, as the scenario was an example of a crisis they had experienced in their business.
Figure 4: Participant with a crisis card
Participants were guided to map their business innovation networks, a key part of a business innovation strategy, and use their networks to problem solve and take up business opportunities (Figure 5). Using the Five Whys technique, participants were guided to identify the root cause of a challenge before deciding on an action plan. They enjoyed the immersive learning approach; one business owner reported that the “activities made learning more exciting”.
Figure 5: Participant discussing the card they picked
The focus of day 2 was to guide the business owners through a process of creating a business innovation strategy. It started with a time machine exercise, encouraging participants to take a guided journey that stretched their imaginations into the past and possible futures of their businesses. Mindfulness was encouraged by inviting participants to keep their feet on the ground and take deep breaths. This was followed by a discussion and challenge-mapping exercise (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Challenge-mapping exercise
For most, increasing threats from extortion syndicates operating in the township were a major challenge. As one business owner explained:
“The issue of protection fees, often demanded by gangs, has become a significant concern for local businesses. These fees … are demanded under the threat of violence or vandalism if not paid … Business owners who refuse to comply often face dire consequences, including damage to their property, personal harm, or even the closure of their business.”
Four key ingredients of business innovation
The foundation of a business innovation strategy is the four key business innovation ingredients identified in the toolkit: knowledge, continuous learning, an innovation mindset and business culture, and good finance and risk management. Drawing on these four ingredients, participants were introduced to a set of colour-coded typical innovation strategies they could use to guide their customised business innovation strategies. Each strategy is associated with typical business goals:
Working in groups, the participants created a fictitious business and developed an innovation strategy for that business.
In general, the business owners aspired to obtain funding but faced obstacles in meeting the funding application requirements, such as age restrictions and lack of business registration. The HSRC researchers emphasised that while the toolkit offers information on the benefits of formalisation, including accessing funding opportunities, formalisation itself should not be the ultimate goal. Instead, it is a step towards achieving long-term sustainability.
A take-home exercise was completing a business innovation strategy for their businesses. Each participant received a can of beans, a printout of the Strategy on a Tin Can template (Figure 7), and a pack of vegetable seeds. As Steffen explained, the seeds symbolise the “skills, ideas and connections” they gained in the workshop and can plant to continue growing their business innovation capabilities and opportunities.
Figure 7. HSRC/CeSTII research team and informal business owners with their Strategy on a Tin Can templates at the Informal Business Innovation Workshop, Philippi Village, 25 April 2024
Fostering innovation mindsets
Coming into the workshop, the business owners did not realise that they were innovating in their businesses. A need exists for greater engagement and visibility of the HSRC in townships and informal settings. When asked about ways to improve the training and learning tools, most responded that they were happy with the training:
“We can grow our business with the skills we have.”
“I connected with other small business owners and learnt how to improve my business.”
“New ideas on how to grow my business.”
“Putting my ideas to the test.”
“Improving my business and attracting more customers.”
“Now I can overcome a crisis and challenges in my business.”
“I learnt more about marketing and expanding the business.”
“I learnt from different people and activities.”
“I was not aware of innovation. Now I am aware.”
“I could not respond to crisis. Now I can.”
“The app will improve our business.”
Next steps to sharing the toolkit
The workshop was useful for testing the learning tools and training modules. The participants’ feedback was used to refine the toolkit and inform the final production phase of the My Business Innovation Planner ( MyBIP ) app, which includes the toolkit and additional interactive digital tools.
Participants’ recommendations for improving the app included simplifying the login procedures, translating the content into multiple languages, and enhancing the interactive features to minimise data usage. Using the MyBIP app is one way informal business owners can benefit directly from the research findings. The app will be launched later in 2024 and will be available as a free download from Google Play and the Apple App Store.
For more information on the informal business innovation toolkit project, please contact the project lead, Dr Il-haam Petersen , [email protected] .
The project resources and Information Business Innovation Toolkit are available on the project website: https://informalbizinnovationhub.hsrc.ac.za/ .
Follow us via the MyBIP Channel on WhatsApp for updates on the app.
If you enjoyed reading this article, please click here to subscribe to the HSRC Review quarterly magazine.
Browse information about current and completed research projects.
Access is provided to research outputs generated by HSRC researchers since 2000. All research outputs are provided free of charge to the public, with the exception of confidential reports.
The HSRC Research Data Service provides a digital repository of the HSRC's research data in support of evidence-based human and social development.
COMMENTS
These sample innovation topics show what's trending. The benefits of quantum computing. Automation in customer management. A look at predictive analysis. Using the Internet of Things Correctly. Database improvement with blockchain. New cybersecurity interventions. 5G revolution. Using edge computing in research.
Innovation Digital Article. Stephen Wunker. Interviews with 50 leaders across industries provide insight into how to nurture the right ideas. September 05, 2024.
Innovation and Invention. New research on innovation from Harvard Business School faculty on issues including encouraging creativity, managing teams, and problem solving. Page 1 of 447 Results →. 29 Aug 2024.
New research on innovation strategy from Harvard Business School faculty on issues including open source innovation, best environments for staff creativity, and legal ways to protect innovation. Page 1 of 47 Results →
Companies typically treat their innovation projects as a portfolio: a mix of projects that, collectively, aim to meet their various strategic objectives. Some projects, for instance, will improve ...
New research on technological innovation from Harvard Business School faculty on issues including using data mining to improve productivity, why business IT innovation is so difficult, and the business implications of the technology revolution.
The business model innovation (BMI) concept has become a well-established phenomenon of current academic research. While Foss and Saebi's (Journal of Management, 2017, 43, 200-227) seminal literature review on BMI revealed 349 articles on BMI published between 1972 and 2015, an additional number of 1727 articles on the topic have been published since 2016.
A Better Way to Unlock Innovation and Drive Change. Diya Kapur Misra, Linda A. Hill, Gaurav Laroia, and Christiane Hamacher. Avoiding Harm in Technology Innovation. Tania Bucic and Gina Colarelli O'Connor. The Three Traps That Stymie Reinvention. Ryan Raffaelli. When Generative AI Meets Product Development. Tucker J. Marion, Mahdi Srour, and ...
Business Research Topics are as follows: The impact of social media marketing on customer engagement and brand loyalty. The effectiveness of AI in improving customer service and satisfaction. The role of entrepreneurship in economic development and job creation. The impact of the gig economy on the labor market.
Invest productively in all innovation capabilities, including research and development, resourcing, and operational agility. Cultivate strong M&A capabilities, particularly programmatic dealmaking. Innovation can be especially rewarding when deployed as a crisis-management measure. During periods of uncertainty, organizations that invest in ...
The goal of a business is to enhance profitable revenue. Often this mission is accomplished by innovation, commonly by the process of bringing new products or services to market. This paper identifies major trends in the literature and practice and provides a perspective on how these trends may guide future research on innovation. Specifically, we document six themes that have appeared in ...
Faculty Research. Brian Foody, CEO of Iogen Corporation, was an early leader in advanced biofuels, developing a range of technologies to transform agricultural waste into transportation fuel. With $100 million in revenue and 350 patents across various biofuel technologies, Iogen was looking to the future - towards the energy transition.
Successful growth in new sectors requires balancing support for the core business with investment in radical innovation. Ryan Raffaelli. August 19, 2024. ... Open innovation requires moving knowledge across divides. Organizational silos are the biggest barriers to success. ... New research shows how companies can advance open innovation by ...
Business models can be developed through varying degrees of innovation from an evolutionary process of continuous fine-tuning to a revolutionary process of replacing existing business models. Recent research shows that survival of firms is dependent on the degree of their business model innovation (Velu, 2015, 2016).
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly adopted by organizations to innovate, and this is ever more reflected in scholarly work. To illustrate, assess and map research at the intersection of AI and innovation, we performed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of published work indexed in the Clarivate Web of Science (WOS) and Elsevier Scopus databases (the final sample includes 1448 ...
A webinar with Richard Jefts, Andrew Manby, and Wade Roush. March 20, 2024. Technology Innovation Strategy.
New research on innovation and management from Harvard Business School faculty on issues including the importance of workplace transparency, how to manage 'creative types,' and crowdsourcing solutions.
Innovation can help you stay ahead of the curve and grow your company in the process. Here are three reasons innovation is crucial for your business: It allows adaptability: The recent COVID-19 pandemic disrupted business on a monumental scale. Routine operations were rendered obsolete over the course of a few months.
In a business context, innovation is the ability to conceive, develop, deliver, and scale new products, services, processes, and business models for customers. Successful innovation delivers net new growth that is substantial. As McKinsey senior partner Laura Furstenthal notes in an episode of the Inside the Strategy Room podcast, "However ...
The innovation process typically begins with an idea, which is then developed and eventually commercialized. Innovation management is the process of overseeing and organizing this process, from idea generation to implementation. It includes activities such as market research, product development, and business model innovation.
Here, we'll explore a variety of research ideas and topic thought-starters for management-related research degrees (MBAs/DBAs, etc.). These research topics span management strategy, HR, finance, operations, international business and leadership. NB - This is just the start…. The topic ideation and evaluation process has multiple steps.
In the application you must indicate your top three choices of research areas, in order of preference, from the topics listed below. Top applicants will be matched with faculty-designed research project based on their indicated interests. 1. Corporate Social Responsibility research explores business impact of delivering economic, social, and ...
Transformations in business and society make this question increasingly urgent for executives, business school deans, students, faculty, and the public. In a new book, Rethinking the MBA: Business Education at a Crossroads, Harvard Business School's Srikant M. Datar, David A. Garvin, and Patrick G. Cullen suggest opportunities for innovation.
Digital entrepreneurial ventures are increasingly embracing a high-quality development trajectory that prioritizes green, low-carbon, and sustainable practices, necessitating ongoing environmental enhancements and the active assumption of social responsibilities alongside economic progress. Despite this, there is a significant disparity in the sustainable entrepreneurial performance among ...
3 Successful Real-World Examples of Innovation in the Workplace Google's "20% Time" Google famously allows its employees to dedicate 20% of their workweek to pursue personal projects and ideas.
WASHINGTON - Led by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics and Technology, the U.S. Army Small Business Innovation Research Program has just unveiled five new funding ...
Informal businesses significantly contribute to employment and income generation in South Africa. As HSRC research shows, innovation is crucial to their survival. On 24 and 25 April 2024, the HSRC held a workshop with informal business owners at Philippi Village, Cape Town, to share a new evidence-based toolkit designed to support informal businesses in strengthening