The salvation of free education and its public schools lies in giving more fiscal space to government to allow it to invest heavily in overhauling the education system.
Free education has served us well over the past five decades especially in terms of access, in improving our mean years of schooling, in enrolment in higher education and female education and in reducing socioeconomic inequality. But the education system has begun to falter for quite some time now in terms of overall efficiency and effectiveness.
Nothing happens overnight. It is difficult to uncover, measure and therefore analyze the total impact of the country’s educational policies – overly free education system, school discipline, messages of overindulgence, parents’ responsibility, values system, teacher training, teachers’ salary, private tuition, teacher selection process, etc – that have led to such a state of affairs. But everyone agrees that we cannot continue with such an outdated system which has failed to bring out our students’ talent and potential and inspire them to life-long learning while meeting the country’s future needs.
Today a variety of trends are utterly reshaping the education landscape – 24/7 access to online teaching, learning and discovery environments, long-life learning. The budget for education will be rising in the near future to meet these challenges of the worldwide revolution in the education system oriented towards new teaching methodology and technology.
There will increasing risks that the overly free education – free transport, free exams, free meals, free stationeries – may end up being very costly. In the sense that Government will not be able to fully support the public schools; quality will continue to plunge and the state system will become dysfunctional, and most of the products of these state schools will be misfits when they get out into the real world.
Government schools will become reserves for children at the very bottom of our social ladder while private schools will thrive providing a quality education for the elite. (This is what we seem to be experiencing in the health sector – a wanton deteriorating public health but improving private health. Our free public schools will only be trapping generations of students at the margins of society and locking them out of the economy.
This is what our bright youthful Omnicane award winners have tried to warn us about, oblivious of the reactions of our politicians, the hardcore supporters of the Welfare State and some of our obstinate leftists. Underlying such an education system subsisting in parallel with the insidious private tuition is the fact that Government has been subsiding the elite. With the ongoing cosmetic reform of the system, it is undeniable that the latter feels that it is no longer serving its purpose and cares the least about its gradual decay. They are encouraging more and more private schools to pop up across the nation, giving well-to-do families an alternative to public education.
It will no longer be feasible to continue providing wholly free education from general taxation. The salvation of free education and its public schools lies in giving more fiscal space to Government to allow it to invest heavily in overhauling the education system to meet the above-mentioned challenges. This will require that policymakers, business leaders and the universities to: a) rededicate themselves to creating a more flexible system, including improving efficiency and effectiveness, b) do away with some of the freebies of our education system, and c) introduce measures aimed at cost sharing with parents and students (exempting those on the social register) so that education funding can be supplemented by sources other than government.
The Metro Express: The accompanying measures
What are the accompanying measures that will be needed to prevent the Metro Express from becoming a white elephant given that the road infrastructure is also being improved and the number of cars on our roads continues to increase relentlessly? The just released indicators on Road Transport show a net addition of 11,826 vehicles to the existing fleet for the first semester of 2018. At end of June 2018, there were 543,623 vehicles registered at the National Transport Authority (NTA).
The EDB should come forward with the accompanying measures that will follow the coming into operation of the Metro Express. The population should be prepared for that – a different mindset for both the commuter and car users. Building the Metro is one thing and ensuring that it is operating successfully and efficiently is another.
We hope we will not have to go through the same mess as the measures and penalties to reduce road accidents – going backward and forward. We hope we will have enough time to analyse and discuss these measures.
Our fears are that these measures, which are likely to include many controversial and hard-hitting ones on private car users, will only be announced after the next general elections. They will buy in the electorate by tricking them into taking the sweeter pill first… Short term gains for long term pains!
Rs15 to Rs19 billion for the Surveillance State
Most of the time some of the crimes are displaced to nearby areas within or close to the city centre where there is no camera coverage but where there are similar opportunities to commit crimes. Indeed research carried out shows that despite the popularity of closed circuit television (CCTV)/video surveillance, evidence of its crime prevention capabilities is inconclusive. Research has largely reported its effect as “mixed”. At such cost, to go for a system that is not that foolproof is a folly.
The European Forum for Urban Security, “Charter for a Democratic Use of Video-Surveillance,” provides a useful overview of the issues at stake as well as a set of principles and tools to ensure that citizens’ rights are respected with CCTV/video surveillance systems. These include :
Necessity : The use of camera systems must be justified empirically, ideally by an independent authority. Objectives and intended outcomes must be defined.
Proportionality : CCTV equipment must be appropriate for the problem it is intended to address. Technology should “respond to the established objectives, without going further. Data should be protected and the length of time it is retained be clearly defined.
Transparency : Citizens should know what the objectives of a CCTV/video system are, what its installation and operational costs are, the areas being surveyed, and what the results are. Reports should occur regularly so citizens can make informed decisions.
Accountability : Those in charge of public CCTV systems should be clearly identified and accountable to the public, whether the systems are run by the government or private firms.
Independent oversight : An external body should be charged with ensuring that systems respect the public’s rights and are achieving their stated objectives. Ideally citizens would have a voice in the oversight process.
Indeed, this Charter drives us to challenge the whole approach to this Safe City project. What will be the role of Mauritius Telecom and the Chinese Company Huawei? The Agreement should be made public.
The Census Issue: “L’hypocrisie politicienne”
In our dear little “C’est un plaisir” country, when some societal issues appear occasionally, as they do in most societies, we tend to sweep them under the carpet.
After the Grand Bassin gandia issue, the LGBT march, the child marriage issue, religious conversions and now the census issue: “L’hypocrisie politicienne”, there is a common pattern. The elite, the thinkers, leaders of communities, social activists, NGOs who are always on the forefront on non-controversial issues, look the other way, burying their heads in the sands allowing the radicals, the delinquents, the hooligans, the conservatives, the religious bigots, the fanatics to take over the main stage.
When some avant-gardistes delve deeper, they are castigated, threatened, boycotted… and the views of the conformist majority prevail and we go back to our comfort zone, doing business as usual. They get away with it and slowly and gradually but surely we are allowing the parasites to gnaw at our foundation. We are not building out houses on granites as Wilhelm Reich used to say — If, little man among millions, you were to shoulder the barest fraction of your responsibility, the world would be a very different place. Your great friends wouldn’t perish, struck down by your smallness.”
Are we not civilised enough to even talk to each other on these… “Man’s right to know, to learn, to inquire, to make bona fide errors, to investigate human emotions must, by all means, be safe, if the word “freedom” should ever be more than an empty political slogan.”
Or is it easier to ignore it, avoid the tensions these create in our minds and in society and across communities? Or is it much larger than that? There is the fear of reprobation from our community, the social pressure to conform… they have imposed their will, their linear thinking, and imprison us in their archaic conformism and attitudes. Are we afraid of being free, of being left alone on the side lines, being marginalised…?
Hypocrisy is not our nature . Like Francis Fukuyma ( Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment ), Kwame Anthony Appiah ( The Lies that bind. Rethinking Identity ) and Michael Ignatieff ( The Ordinary Virtues: Moral Order in a Divided World ), we are prepared to engage a debate and a dialogue that looks beyond group identity and failed institutions and meritocracy.
We believe that “identity politics is a symptom of democratic decay and a diversion from the real task. That is to create coalitions that can move past our differences, strengthen our shared public goods, rebuild the ladder of economic opportunity, and recognise once again the human identity we have in common.”
* Published in print edition on 13 September 2018
SUBSCRIBE NOW
Advocated as an educational philosophy to tackle exclusion, inclusive education (IE) is now a worldwide trend. Despite the well-acknowledged benefits of inclusion, educational practitioners have several difficulties which act as significant setbacks in operationalising inclusion in practice. Given its novelty in Mauritius, IE implementation is not fully understood. The purpose of the study was to explore the perceptions of secondary school educational practitioners on certain aspects of inclusive education, namely the academic profile of students with special education needs encountered by secondary school educators and rectors, the difficulties faced when dealing with them, and the barriers and enablers to inclusive education. It involved a quantitative descriptive research design. Data were collected from 588 secondary educators and 42 rectors using a specifically designed questionnaire. Following the analysis of data, respondents confirmed the presence of children with special education needs in their classrooms. While respondents indicated that the majority of students with special education needs had an academic profile of the same level of age-matched peers, they reported difficulties encountered with these learners in terms of deficits in attention, participation and behavioural problems. The main barriers identified were the lack of training in special education and the lack of proper infrastructure. Findings revealed training and knowledge in special education, the availability of proper infrastructure, support in terms of teaching aids, specialised equipment and teaching assistants as the main enabling factors. Training is therefore recommended to build competency of educators and rectors in inclusive practices. Appropriate infrastructure and support in terms of educational materials and support personnel should also be provided.
Adeniyi, S.O., Owolabi, J.O., & Olojede, K. (2015) Determinants of Successful inclusive education practice in Lagos State Nigeria. World Journal of Education 5(2), 26-32. doi: 10.5430/wje.v5n2p26
Ball, K., & Green, R. L. (2014). An investigation of the attitudes of school leaders toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in the general education setting. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 27 (1/2), 57-76.
Barton, L., & Armstrong F. (2007). Policy experience and change: Cross-cultural reflection’s on inclusive education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Billingsley, B. S. (2012) “Inclusive school reform: Distributed leadership through the phases of change” in J. B. Crockett, B. S. Billingsley, & M. L. Boscardin (Eds.), Handbook of leadership and administration for special education, Taylor & Francis, New York, pp. 170-190
Billingsley, B., & McLeskey, J. (2014). Principal leadership for effective inclusive schools. In J. McLeskey, N. L. Waldron, F. Spooner, & B. Algozzine (Eds.), Handbook of research and practice for effective inclusive schools. New York: Routledge.
Bunwaree, S., Wake Carroll, B., & Carroll, T. (2005). Popular participation in contentious policy areas: Education policy in Mauritius. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:
Research and Practice, 7(2), 155-176. doi: 10.1080/13876980500116220
Busgopaul, N, (2006). Educating marginalised young people in Mauritius. Conference paper presented at the Fourth Pan Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning: Achieving Development Goals: Innovation, Learning, Collaboration and Foundations.
CRPD (2014). Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 35 of the Convention, Initial reports of State parties due in 2010: Mauritius, CRPD/C/MUS/1. Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/55c877784.html
Das, A., & Shah, R. (2014). Special education today in India. Special education international perspectives: Practices across the globe. In Advances in Special Education, 28, 561-581). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Forlin, C., Keen, M., & Barrett, E. (2008). The concerns of mainstream teachers: Coping with inclusivity in an Australian context. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55(3), 251-264.
Gaad E., & Khan, L. (2007). Primary mainstream teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion of Students with special education needs in the private sector: A perspective from Dubai. International Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 95-109.
Geleta, A., D. (2019). School Principals and Teachers’ Perceptions of Inclusive Education in Sebeta Town Primary Government Schools, Sebeta, Ethiopia. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education (IJTIE), 8(1), 1364-1372.
Gungapersand, K.R. (2019). Perspectives of trainee support teachers on inclusive education in Mauritius. Asian Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(1), 3-28
Heung V and Grossman D (2007) Inclusive education as a strategy for achieving education for all: perspectives from three Asian societies. In: Baker DP and Wiseman AW (eds) International Perspectives on Education and Society. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 155–180.
Idol, L. (2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education. Remedial & Special Education, 27(2), 77-94.
Kawser, U., Ahmed, M., & Ahmed, M. (2016). Barriers of Inclusive Education in Bangladesh Making Inclusion a Reality. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities Research, 2(2), 1-4.
Kryszewska, H (2017) “Teaching Students with Special Needs in Inclusive Classrooms”, Special Educational Needs, ELT Journal, 71(4), 525–528.
Kuper, H., Saran, A.,& White, H. (2018).Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) of What Works to Improve Educational Outcomes for People with Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Campbell Collaboration. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/727787/Education_Rapid_Review_full_report.pdf
Lashley, C. (2007). Principal leadership for special education: An ethical framework. Exceptionality, 15, 177-187. doi:10.1080/09362830701503511
Ministry of Education and Human Resources (MOEHR) (2014). Education reforms in action 2008-2014. Retrieved from https://education.govmu.org/Documents/downloads/Documents/Education%20Reforms%20in%20Action%202008-2014%20.pdf
Ministry of Education and Human Resources, Tertiary Education and Scientific Research (MOEHRTESR) (2017a). The Four Year Extended Programme booklet. Retrieved from http://ministry-education.govmu.org/English/educationsector/nys/Documents/4-Year%20Extended%20Programme%20Booklet%202017.pdf
Ministry of Education and Human Resources, Tertiary Education and Scientific Research (MOEHRTESR) (2017b). EXPLAINING THE NYCBE REFORM - The Secondary Sector booklet. Retrieved from http://ministry-education.govmu.org/English/educationsector/nys/Documents/NYS%20Brochure%20Secondary%20English%20(Viewing)%20FINAL%20121217.pdf
Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (MOFED) (2019). Budget Speech 2019-embracing a brighter future together as a nation. Retrieved from http://budget.mof.govmu.org/budget2019-20/2019_20budgetspeech.pdf
Mitchell, D (2015) “Inclusive education is a multi-faceted concept”, Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, Vol.5, No.1, pp. 9-30
Mӧwes, A.D., (2012). Challenges in implementing inclusive education in Namibia. Nera Journal, 56, 56-67.
Odongo, G., & Davidson, R. (2016). Examining the attitudes and concerns of the Kenyan teachers toward the inclusion of children with disabilities in the general education classroom: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Special Education, 31(2), 1-30.
Republic of Mauritius (2010). Country Report to the Third Conference of State Parties to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 1 – 3 September 2010. Retrieved from www.un.org › COP › COP3 › Mauritius - Report CRPD.
Sailor, W. (2014). Advances in school wide inclusive school reform. Remedial and Special Education, 36: 94-99.
Salisbury, C. (2006). Principals’ perspectives on inclusive elementary schools. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31 (1), 70-82.
Sharma, U. (2001). The Attitudes and Concerns of School Principals and Teachers Regarding the Integration of Students with Disabilities into Regular Schools in Delhi, India [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. The University of Melbourne, Parkville.
Sharma, U., Loreman, T., Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1):12–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x
Statistics Mauritius (2016). Education Statistics 2016. Retrieved from http://statsmauritius.govmu.org/English/StatsbySubj/Documents/Digest/Education/Digest_Educ_2016.pdf
Statistics Mauritius (2018). Education Statistics 2018. Retrieved from https://statsmauritius.govmu.org/Documents/Statistics/Digests/Education/Digest_Edu_Yr18.pdf
Tiwari, A., Das, A.,& Sharma, M. (2015). Inclusive education a “rhetoric” or “reality”? Teachers' perspectives and beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education 52, 128-136.
United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
Williams, J. M. (2015). Attitude and perceptions of public school principals in Illinois toward inclusion of students with disabilities in the general education classroom (1680274240) [Doctoral dissertation, McKendree University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Yildiz, N.G. (2015).Teacher and Student Behaviours in Inclusive Classrooms, Educational Sciences, Theory & Practice, 15(1), 177-184.
Zwane, S.L., & Malale, M.M. (2018). Investigating barriers teachers face in the implementation of inclusive education in high schools in Gege branch, Swaziland, African Journal of Disability 7, 391. doi: org/10.4102/ajod.v7i0.391
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Information.
Make a submission.
African Journal of Teacher Education (AJOTE) ISSN: 1916-7822
Students are often asked to write an essay on Advantages and Disadvantages of Free Education in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.
Let’s take a look…
Introduction.
Free education means offering learning without charging students. It has both advantages and disadvantages.
Free education can help everyone, especially those who can’t afford fees. It promotes equality, as all students get the same opportunities.
However, free education can strain government budgets. Also, it may lead to overcrowded classrooms and less attention to each student.
While free education has clear benefits like promoting equality, it also has drawbacks like potential overcrowding. It’s important to balance these factors.
Advantages of free education.
One significant advantage of free education is the promotion of equality. It enables students from all socioeconomic backgrounds to have equal access to learning opportunities, thereby reducing income-based educational disparities. Additionally, free education can lead to a more educated populace, which is crucial for societal growth and development. As more people gain access to quality education, the pool of skilled labor increases, fostering economic growth.
On the downside, free education can strain public resources. Governments must find ways to fund education, which may lead to increased taxes or cuts in other areas. Furthermore, the surge in student numbers can lead to overcrowded classrooms and reduced quality of education. Lastly, free education might devalue degrees. If everyone has a degree, it becomes less of a differentiating factor in the job market, potentially leading to credential inflation.
In conclusion, free education carries both significant benefits and challenges. While it promotes equality and economic growth, it also poses financial challenges and potential devaluation of degrees. Therefore, it’s crucial to strike a balance, perhaps through a mixed system that combines free and fee-paying education, to ensure sustainable and equitable access to education.
Education is a fundamental human right and an essential tool for societal development. The concept of free education has been embraced by some countries, while others still debate its feasibility. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of free education.
Free education has several advantages. Primarily, it promotes equal opportunity. By eliminating financial barriers, all individuals, regardless of their socioeconomic status, have the same chance to acquire knowledge and skills. This fosters social mobility, as education is a key determinant of one’s future prospects.
Lastly, free education can help reduce social issues such as crime and poverty. Studies have shown a correlation between education and reduced crime rates. Similarly, education equips individuals with the skills needed to secure well-paying jobs, thereby reducing poverty levels.
Despite these advantages, free education also has its drawbacks. The most significant is the financial burden it places on the government. Free education requires substantial funding to maintain high-quality standards, and this could lead to increased taxes or cuts in other public services.
Another disadvantage is the possibility of diminished value perception. When education is free, students may not value it as much, leading to a lack of motivation or commitment. This could result in lower academic performance and higher dropout rates.
In conclusion, free education has both advantages and disadvantages. While it promotes equal opportunity, enhances workforce education, and helps reduce social issues, it also places a financial burden on the government, may lead to resource strain, and potentially diminishes value perception. Therefore, the implementation of free education requires careful planning and consideration to maximize its benefits while mitigating the drawbacks. The debate on free education is complex and multifaceted, reflecting the significant role education plays in society.
Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .
Happy studying!
https://educationhub.blog.gov.uk/2024/08/20/gcse-results-day-2024-number-grading-system/
Thousands of students across the country will soon be finding out their GCSE results and thinking about the next steps in their education.
Here we explain everything you need to know about the big day, from when results day is, to the current 9-1 grading scale, to what your options are if your results aren’t what you’re expecting.
GCSE results day will be taking place on Thursday the 22 August.
The results will be made available to schools on Wednesday and available to pick up from your school by 8am on Thursday morning.
Schools will issue their own instructions on how and when to collect your results.
The shift to the numerical grading system was introduced in England in 2017 firstly in English language, English literature, and maths.
By 2020 all subjects were shifted to number grades. This means anyone with GCSE results from 2017-2020 will have a combination of both letters and numbers.
The numerical grading system was to signal more challenging GCSEs and to better differentiate between students’ abilities - particularly at higher grades between the A *-C grades. There only used to be 4 grades between A* and C, now with the numerical grading scale there are 6.
The grades are ranked from 1, the lowest, to 9, the highest.
The grades don’t exactly translate, but the two grading scales meet at three points as illustrated below.
The bottom of grade 7 is aligned with the bottom of grade A, while the bottom of grade 4 is aligned to the bottom of grade C.
Meanwhile, the bottom of grade 1 is aligned to the bottom of grade G.
If your results weren’t what you were expecting, firstly don’t panic. You have options.
First things first, speak to your school or college – they could be flexible on entry requirements if you’ve just missed your grades.
They’ll also be able to give you the best tailored advice on whether re-sitting while studying for your next qualifications is a possibility.
If you’re really unhappy with your results you can enter to resit all GCSE subjects in summer 2025. You can also take autumn exams in GCSE English language and maths.
Speak to your sixth form or college to decide when it’s the best time for you to resit a GCSE exam.
Entry requirements vary depending on the college and course. Ask your school for advice, and call your college or another one in your area to see if there’s a space on a course you’re interested in.
Apprenticeships combine a practical training job with study too. They’re open to you if you’re 16 or over, living in England, and not in full time education.
As an apprentice you’ll be a paid employee, have the opportunity to work alongside experienced staff, gain job-specific skills, and get time set aside for training and study related to your role.
You can find out more about how to apply here .
The National Career Service is a free resource that can help you with your career planning. Give them a call to discuss potential routes into higher education, further education, or the workplace.
Whatever your results, if you want to find out more about all your education and training options, as well as get practical advice about your exam results, visit the National Careers Service page and Skills for Careers to explore your study and work choices.
You may also be interested in:
Tags: GCSE grade equivalent , gcse number grades , GCSE results , gcse results day 2024 , gsce grades old and new , new gcse grades
Share this page, related content and links, about the education hub.
The Education Hub is a site for parents, pupils, education professionals and the media that captures all you need to know about the education system. You’ll find accessible, straightforward information on popular topics, Q&As, interviews, case studies, and more.
Please note that for media enquiries, journalists should call our central Newsdesk on 020 7783 8300. This media-only line operates from Monday to Friday, 8am to 7pm. Outside of these hours the number will divert to the duty media officer.
Members of the public should call our general enquiries line on 0370 000 2288.
Follow us on social media, search by date.
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
5 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | ||
26 | 27 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Elizabeth H. Bradley and Jonathon S. Kahn ask if the breakdown of dialogue on campus is in part a reflection of how we teach.
By Elizabeth H. Bradley and Jonathon S. Kahn
You have / 5 articles left. Sign up for a free account or log in.
Olena Zagoruyko/iStock/Getty Images Plus
A new academic year is set to begin after what was one of the most tumultuous years on college campuses since the Vietnam War–era protests. Depending on one’s perspective, higher education institutions have emerged as sites of protest against a disturbing foreign conflict rife with humanitarian crises; they have been dangerous hotbeds of radicalism threatening Jewish community members; or they have been testing grounds for the limits of free speech in the 21st century. From our vantage point, as the president and a faculty member at a small liberal arts college, all can be true, and it is precisely the legitimacy of multiple perspectives that has made life on campus this past year so difficult and demanding.
We can’t sugarcoat it, because we live it: The breakdown of dialogue on college campuses is real. The irony that liberal arts institutions of higher education are struggling to navigate diverse perspectives is not lost on us. Institutions of higher education insist that navigating differences is core to their work. Mission statements aplenty claim that being able to engage multiple viewpoints represents a central educational value. That so many colleges and universities are grappling with their most basic and central educational commitments should give pause.
It pushes us to ask a question that has largely gone unasked: Is a breakdown in how we now educate partially to blame for the current breakdown on campuses? In other words, is it us?
Current tumult has obscured a crucial organizing tenet of higher education: to be always in pursuit of greater understanding. It is cliché, perhaps. But in these toughest of days, we found ourselves thinking about the deeper implications of being “in pursuit.” To pursue understanding is to conceive of knowledge building as requiring continuous seeking, revising and questioning. Such an approach to learning is desperately needed today not only because it fosters curiosity (which it does) but also because it staves off absolutist impulses to deride and silence others’ views, impulses we have seen firsthand.
Consider, for example, a tremendously difficult class one of us co-taught on the history of blackface performances and minstrel practices during the early part of the 20th century at what was then our all-women’s college. Since the course dealt with deeply racist practices, the understandable desire to singularly condemn the college’s history was palpable. Indeed, at the start of the class, many students, most of whom were white, described their motivations for taking the class primarily in terms of exposing the college’s racist past. “Critique” was the language they spoke, which they took to mean uncovering the college’s blameworthy history, denouncing the practices they were studying and confirming their own absolutes about race and hypocrisy at elite institutions more broadly. They described their attachment to the institution as tenuous. It was clear that, to their thinking, college was a place to have an educational experience and receive a degree, while the notion that they might develop a sense of fidelity or obligation to a college with a racist history, or develop a complex understanding of a condemned practice, was an anathema.
But something different happened. What unfolded over the course of the semester was an exercise in the pursuit of understanding. If the students began the course convinced about the racist motivations of their counterparts in the early 20th century, their research complicated those assumptions. They learned that all-women performances of blackface at that time were quite rare, and so what was happening on campus then represented something distinct. Their inquiries led them to consider the transition from 19th-century Victorian models of white womanhood to newer formulations in the early 20th century that came to be known as first-wave feminism. They began to ask: Is it possible that these blackface performances contributed to this transition? Did commitments to feminism and gender equality at that time actually reinforce persistent racial inequalities? How is it possible that these young women could have genuinely believed they were pursuing a form of self-liberation through racist tropes and performances?
Their answers to these questions went in many directions, and none of them excused the racism of this time. But instead of vilifying these earlier students and refusing to understand perspectives different from their own, our students began to see their predecessors as flawed and complicated with multiple motivations; these included a daring to do what men were doing in an attempt to articulate their own desires for equality. Again, our students did not excuse these practices or the women who participated in them as much as they began to understand their behavior as sitting in a complex network of forces, a condition that may very well mark the human experience. Crucially in the final sets of class meetings, the students began to wonder about themselves as similarly flawed and circumscribed by social forces of which they may not be fully aware.
The effects of this insight on the students’ relationships to the institution were significant. They began to see the college in the early 20th century as a context in which young white women, many of whom were from the middle classes, were struggling to craft a self during a tumultuous time of changing norms. The parallels became obvious. The students began to understand that they too sit in cross-pressured contexts in which they are haltingly and fallibly trying to make sense of themselves in their own turbulent times.
We do not want to overstate the effects of the class; however, the experience gave students a profound encounter with the power of epistemic humility, an acknowledgement of the necessity of curiosity, nuance, uncertainty and multiple perspectives needed for building knowledge. That encounter expanded the students’ capacity to understand—and even have empathy for—a broader range of experiences and perspectives, a necessary condition for engaging the pluralism possible on a college campus.
The question facing higher education today is how to build these types of experiences. The good news is that this doesn’t require fancy lab equipment or other expensive infrastructure. It does require three basic elements—instructors committed to giving their students an experience of novel inquiry, primary sources and time. When faculty make clear that the entire purpose of the class is for students to figure out what they think, students begin to understand the power of question asking. From there, any question—from the teacher, their classmates and themselves—feels exploratory and enticing.
Primary sources—original documents or images—are vital because they cry out for multiple interpretations, functioning like a ball-and-socket joint around which students’ thoughts, ideas and questions can begin to turn. Critically, all this takes time. Students need time to trust that the instructor genuinely wants them to go on a journey of their own. And the meanings of images and texts surface slowly, yielding only to the student’s patience and persistence to ask questions from multiple perspectives.
At the end of the 19th century, William James insisted that education required “the habit of always seeing an alternative, of not taking the usual for granted, of making conventionalities fluid again, of imagining foreign states of mind.” In the 20th century, W. E. B. Du Bois worried about the dangers of education reinforcing “the overwhelming sense of the I, and the consequent forgetting of the Thou.” And in the 21st century, the feminist literary theorist Rita Felski asks , “Why—even as we extol multiplicity, difference, hybridity … are we so hyperarticulate about our adversaries?”
All three circle around the same idea. To be always in the pursuit of greater understanding is to confess that we have more to learn. It is to conceive of education as a process of relationship building between our own perspectives and experiences not our own. Without this, our relationships with those with different experiences risk becoming brittle and unsustainable. Unable to contain a community’s multitudes, we resort to excising—canceling—those whom we cannot countenance. The pursuit of understanding requires the opposite.
Today’s campuses need to develop and be given greater latitude for this version of learning. We know from experience that this process is messy, and we need to allow for that messiness, knowing that exploration, mistakes and missteps are all part of learning. We must resist the temptation to drop the “in pursuit” and focus only on the “understanding,” as if learning amounts to nothing more than the dogmatic piling up of facts.
The pursuit of understanding emphasizes the dynamics of learning, which necessarily expands our abilities to comprehend a broad range of perspectives and experiences. Most importantly, the pursuit of understanding pushes us to ask what sort of human each of us wants to be in relation to others. Our future together relies on being forever in pursuit.
Elizabeth H. Bradley is the president of Vassar College and a professor of science, technology and society, and of political science. She is deeply engaged with research on the performance and quality of higher education institutions in the U.S. Jonathon S. Kahn is a professor of religion and the former director of engaged pluralism at Vassar College. He works at the intersection of race, religious ethics and politics.
For students looking for meaning in their lives, colleges and universities can encourage purposeful living.
More from views.
John K. Wilson opposes academic boycotts but supports the AAUP’s controversial new statement nevertheless.
To help scale traditional faculty/student models of undergraduate research engagement, institutional leaders can cons
Litigation stemming from antisemitism on campuses shows that colleges must revive their commitments to freedom and to
4 /5 Articles remaining this month.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
The educational system in Mauritius is largely based on the British School system. After the independence of our island Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam promoted free education and thus allowed everyone to have equal right to education and now schooling is compulsory up to the age of 16. This year the government has allocated Rs 4,208 million to ...
The education system in Mauritius is categorized into 4 main sectors - pre-primary, primary, secondary and tertiary. There is additionally a provision for pre-vocational and vocational education and training for school leavers and students outside of the academic stream. Pre-primary schools accept students from the age of three.
Ministry Of Education And Human Resources, Tertiary Education And Scientific Research 1) The Public is hereby informed that Government has decided to introduce free higher education in public Tertiary Education Institutions (TEIs). 2) The measure will cover the following public TEIs, namely: i. University of Mauritius; ii.
The Plan for Mauritius spelt out the objective of ensuring education for all, on the principle that3 a literate and intelligent population is the best guarantee of future economic wisdom. This intensified in 1948, when a simple literacy test became a criterion for eligibility to vote.
Free Tertiary Education is not in itself a novel concept. Since 1977 the University of Mauritius was technically delivering undergraduate courses at no cost to those who obtained a seat. Students were not charged tuition fees but nevertheless, had to meet general fees which was around Rs 4000 in the late 1990s and that gradually increased to Rs ...
The GER of primary schooling is 100% and the T:L ratio is approximately 1:27. In March 2011, there were 350 primary schools with 116,068 learners, 51% of whom were boys and 49% girls. This pattern of gender distribution replicates the enrolment trends in pre-primary education (ibid.).
The Education System In Mauritius Education Essay. Education has been free for the secondary degree since 1977 and for full clip undergraduate degree at the University of Mauritius since 1988. The State provides equal support for instruction, on occasion striving tight budgets and even subsidising a great portion of the outgo in grant aided ...
Independent Mauritius modelled itself as a democratic, politically stable welfare state, founded on the principle of free compulsory education as a backbone to development. Today, it is regarded as a higher middle-income country with gross domestic product (GDP) at purchasing power parity (PPP) per capita of 22,278 USD (World Bank 2018).
Schooling Education in Mauritius. August 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-0032-9_54. In book: Handbook of Education Systems in South Asia (pp.575-605) Authors: Michael Samuel. University of KwaZulu ...
Secondary Education in Mauritius is a 7-year cycle from Grade 7 to Grade 13. With the Nine-Year Continuous Basic Education (NYCBE)reforms (2016), ALL children having completed the first six years of basic education (Grades 1 to 6) in their primary school, move on to Grade 7 in a secondary school. Grade. Level of Education. Grades 1 to 6. Primary.
Education plays an important role in the development of the country. The education system in Mauritius is divided into pre-primary, primary, secondary, and tertiary education. Mainly based on the British system; the education in Mauritius has been widely influenced by the British colonization. Long after the independence of the country in 1968 ...
Abstract. This paper comes at the right moment when the Prime Minister of Mauritius declared on the 1st January 2019 that there would be free tertiary education in public universities of the country. This measure was instinctively considered as populist due to the imminence of forthcoming elections in the country and met with criticisms from ...
Rethinking the Education System in Mauritius A Discussion Paper Proposed by Think Mauritius 1. Introduction 1.1 Importance of education Education is the foundation of our society; it is a lifelong empowerment process, which helps citizens to develop personally and to become empathic individuals. It enables individuals to develop to their
Schooling in Mauritius. The Mauritian education system follows the Anglo-Saxon model and is divided into primary, secondary, and higher education. Schooling is compulsory and free until age 16, and children between the ages of 3-5 must attend preschool before moving on to primary school. Wearing uniforms is mandatory in government schools.
The Secondary Education In Mauritius Education Essay. Since the 1980's, education has always been one of the most over-ridding priorities of all existing Mauritian governments. This is because our island does not have any natural resources and education is the key to success and prosperity of the nation. Education, therefore, has been at the ...
In his traditional New Year's address to the nation on 1 January 2019, the prime minister of Mauritius made an announcement which he described as historic: as from the start of the academic year 2019, education in all public tertiary education institutions in Mauritius, for both full-time and part-time courses leading to a certificate, diploma or degree, will be free for all Mauritian citizens.
example, the Mauritius Institute of Education (MIE) offers a Postgraduate Diploma in Inclusive and Special Education (PGDISE; MIE, 2015). Advances in the field of inclusive education in Mauritius are still at a budding stage and much research is required to understand the application of inclusive education in Mauritius.
MOEHR (2008). Ministry of Education and Human Resources Strategy Plan 2008-2020, Phoenix: Mauritius. Mok, M. M. C. and Cheng, Y. C. (2001). 'A theory of self-learning in a human and technological environment: Implications for education reforms'. International Journal of Education Management, 15(4), 172-186.
Free education has served us well over the past five decades especially in terms of access, in improving our mean years of schooling, in enrolment in higher education and female education and in reducing socioeconomic inequality. ... An Appeal Dear Reader 65 years ago Mauritius Times was founded with a resolve to fight for justice and fairness ...
Advocated as an educational philosophy to tackle exclusion, inclusive education (IE) is now a worldwide trend. Despite the well-acknowledged benefits of inclusion, educational practitioners have several difficulties which act as significant setbacks in operationalising inclusion in practice. Given its novelty in Mauritius, IE implementation is not fully understood.
Kreol or lack thereof. My essay concludes by analyzing the broader context of this Mauritian case study, explicating the benefits of mother tongue language education beyond the scope of Mauritius and comparing language education policy and its effects in other creole-speaking, post-colonial nations in order to situate Mauritius within the greater,
Things to know about schools in Mauritius: Education is mandatory for students up to the age of 16. After the independence of Mauritius, Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam promoted free education and thus, allowed everyone to have equal right to education and now schooling is compulsory up to the age of 16. This year, the government has allocated Rs ...
Disadvantages of Free Education. On the downside, free education can strain public resources. Governments must find ways to fund education, which may lead to increased taxes or cuts in other areas. Furthermore, the surge in student numbers can lead to overcrowded classrooms and reduced quality of education. Lastly, free education might devalue ...
Thousands of students across the country will soon be finding out their GCSE results and thinking about the next steps in their education.. Here we explain everything you need to know about the big day, from when results day is, to the current 9-1 grading scale, to what your options are if your results aren't what you're expecting.
Elizabeth H. Bradley and Jonathon S. Kahn ask if the breakdown of dialogue on campus is in part a reflection of how we teach. A new academic year is set to begin after what was one of the most tumultuous years on college campuses since the Vietnam War-era protests. Depending on one's perspective, higher education institutions have emerged as sites of protest against a disturbing foreign ...