mendel law experiment

This page has been archived and is no longer updated

Gregor Mendel and the Principles of Inheritance

Traits are passed down in families in different patterns. Pedigrees can illustrate these patterns by following the history of specific characteristics, or phenotypes, as they appear in a family. For example, the pedigree in Figure 1 shows a family in which a grandmother (generation I) has passed down a characteristic (shown in solid red) through the family tree. The inheritance pattern of this characteristic is considered dominant , because it is observable in every generation. Thus, every individual who carries the genetic code for this characteristic will show evidence of the characteristic. In contrast, Figure 2 shows a different pattern of inheritance, in which a characteristic disappears in one generation, only to reappear in a subsequent one. This pattern of inheritance, in which the parents do not show the phenotype but some of the children do, is considered recessive . But where did our knowledge of dominance and recessivity first come from?

Gregor Mendel’s Courage and Persistence

Mendel was curious about how traits were transferred from one generation to the next, so he set out to understand the principles of heredity in the mid-1860s. Peas were a good model system, because he could easily control their fertilization by transferring pollen with a small paintbrush. This pollen could come from the same flower (self-fertilization), or it could come from another plant's flowers (cross-fertilization). First, Mendel observed plant forms and their offspring for two years as they self-fertilized, or "selfed," and ensured that their outward, measurable characteristics remained constant in each generation. During this time, Mendel observed seven different characteristics in the pea plants, and each of these characteristics had two forms (Figure 3). The characteristics included height (tall or short), pod shape (inflated or constricted), seed shape (smooth or winkled), pea color (green or yellow), and so on. In the years Mendel spent letting the plants self, he verified the purity of his plants by confirming, for example, that tall plants had only tall children and grandchildren and so forth. Because the seven pea plant characteristics tracked by Mendel were consistent in generation after generation of self-fertilization, these parental lines of peas could be considered pure-breeders (or, in modern terminology, homozygous for the traits of interest). Mendel and his assistants eventually developed 22 varieties of pea plants with combinations of these consistent characteristics.

Mendel not only crossed pure-breeding parents, but he also crossed hybrid generations and crossed the hybrid progeny back to both parental lines. These crosses (which, in modern terminology, are referred to as F 1 , F 1 reciprocal, F 2 , B 1 , and B 2 ) are the classic crosses to generate genetically hybrid generations.

Understanding Dominant Traits

Understanding recessive traits.

When conducting his experiments, Mendel designated the two pure-breeding parental generations involved in a particular cross as P 1 and P 2 , and he then denoted the progeny resulting from the crossing as the filial, or F 1 , generation. Although the plants of the F 1 generation looked like one parent of the P generation, they were actually hybrids of two different parent plants. Upon observing the uniformity of the F 1 generation, Mendel wondered whether the F 1 generation could still possess the nondominant traits of the other parent in some hidden way.

To understand whether traits were hidden in the F 1 generation, Mendel returned to the method of self-fertilization. Here, he created an F 2 generation by letting an F 1 pea plant self-fertilize (F 1 x F 1 ). This way, he knew he was crossing two plants of the exact same genotype . This technique, which involves looking at a single trait, is today called a monohybrid cross . The resulting F 2 generation had seeds that were either round or wrinkled. Figure 4 shows an example of Mendel's data.

When looking at the figure, notice that for each F 1 plant, the self-fertilization resulted in more round than wrinkled seeds among the F 2 progeny. These results illustrate several important aspects of scientific data:

• Multiple trials are necessary to see patterns in experimental data.
• There is a lot of variation in the measurements of one experiment.
• A large sample size, or "N," is required to make any quantitative comparisons or conclusions.

In Figure 4, the result of Experiment 1 shows that the single characteristic of seed shape was expressed in two different forms in the F 2 generation: either round or wrinkled. Also, when Mendel averaged the relative proportion of round and wrinkled seeds across all F 2 progeny sets, he found that round was consistently three times more frequent than wrinkled. This 3:1 proportion resulting from F 1 x F 1 crosses suggested there was a hidden recessive form of the trait. Mendel recognized that this recessive trait was carried down to the F 2 generation from the earlier P generation .

Mendel and Alleles

As mentioned, Mendel's data did not support the ideas about trait blending that were popular among the biologists of his time. As there were never any semi-wrinkled seeds or greenish-yellow seeds, for example, in the F 2 generation, Mendel concluded that blending should not be the expected outcome of parental trait combinations. Mendel instead hypothesized that each parent contributes some particulate matter to the offspring. He called this heritable substance "elementen." (Remember, in 1865, Mendel did not know about DNA or genes.) Indeed, for each of the traits he examined, Mendel focused on how the elementen that determined that trait was distributed among progeny. We now know that a single gene controls seed form, while another controls color, and so on, and that elementen is actually the assembly of physical genes located on chromosomes. Multiple forms of those genes, known as alleles , represent the different traits. For example, one allele results in round seeds, and another allele specifies wrinkled seeds.

One of the most impressive things about Mendel's thinking lies in the notation that he used to represent his data. Mendel's notation of a capital and a lowercase letter ( Aa ) for the hybrid genotype actually represented what we now know as the two alleles of one gene : A and a . Moreover, as previously mentioned, in all cases, Mendel saw approximately a 3:1 ratio of one phenotype to another. When one parent carried all the dominant traits ( AA ), the F 1 hybrids were "indistinguishable" from that parent. However, even though these F 1 plants had the same phenotype as the dominant P 1 parents, they possessed a hybrid genotype ( Aa ) that carried the potential to look like the recessive P 1 parent ( aa ). After observing this potential to express a trait without showing the phenotype, Mendel put forth his second principle of inheritance: the principle of segregation . According to this principle, the "particles" (or alleles as we now know them) that determine traits are separated into gametes during meiosis , and meiosis produces equal numbers of egg or sperm cells that contain each allele (Figure 5).

Dihybrid Crosses

Mendel had thus determined what happens when two plants that are hybrid for one trait are crossed with each other, but he also wanted to determine what happens when two plants that are each hybrid for two traits are crossed. Mendel therefore decided to examine the inheritance of two characteristics at once. Based on the concept of segregation , he predicted that traits must sort into gametes separately. By extrapolating from his earlier data, Mendel also predicted that the inheritance of one characteristic did not affect the inheritance of a different characteristic.

Mendel tested this idea of trait independence with more complex crosses. First, he generated plants that were purebred for two characteristics, such as seed color (yellow and green) and seed shape (round and wrinkled). These plants would serve as the P 1 generation for the experiment. In this case, Mendel crossed the plants with wrinkled and yellow seeds ( rrYY ) with plants with round, green seeds ( RRyy ). From his earlier monohybrid crosses, Mendel knew which traits were dominant: round and yellow. So, in the F 1 generation, he expected all round, yellow seeds from crossing these purebred varieties, and that is exactly what he observed. Mendel knew that each of the F 1 progeny were dihybrids; in other words, they contained both alleles for each characteristic ( RrYy ). He then crossed individual F 1 plants (with genotypes RrYy ) with one another. This is called a dihybrid cross . Mendel's results from this cross were as follows:

• 315 plants with round, yellow seeds
• 108 plants with round, green seeds
• 101 plants with wrinkled, yellow seeds
• 32 plants with wrinkled, green seeds

Thus, the various phenotypes were present in a 9:3:3:1 ratio (Figure 6).

Next, Mendel went through his data and examined each characteristic separately. He compared the total numbers of round versus wrinkled and yellow versus green peas, as shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1: Data Regarding Seed Shape

Table 2: Data Regarding Pea Color

The proportion of each trait was still approximately 3:1 for both seed shape and seed color. In other words, the resulting seed shape and seed color looked as if they had come from two parallel monohybrid crosses; even though two characteristics were involved in one cross, these traits behaved as though they had segregated independently. From these data, Mendel developed the third principle of inheritance: the principle of independent assortment . According to this principle, alleles at one locus segregate into gametes independently of alleles at other loci. Such gametes are formed in equal frequencies.

Mendel’s Legacy

More lasting than the pea data Mendel presented in 1862 has been his methodical hypothesis testing and careful application of mathematical models to the study of biological inheritance. From his first experiments with monohybrid crosses, Mendel formed statistical predictions about trait inheritance that he could test with more complex experiments of dihybrid and even trihybrid crosses. This method of developing statistical expectations about inheritance data is one of the most significant contributions Mendel made to biology.

But do all organisms pass their on genes in the same way as the garden pea plant? The answer to that question is no, but many organisms do indeed show inheritance patterns similar to the seminal ones described by Mendel in the pea. In fact, the three principles of inheritance that Mendel laid out have had far greater impact than his original data from pea plant manipulations. To this day, scientists use Mendel's principles to explain the most basic phenomena of inheritance.

References and Recommended Reading

• Add Content to Group

Article History

Flag inappropriate.

Email your Friend

•  |  Lead Editor:  Terry McGuire

Within this Subject (29)

• Gene Linkage (5)
• Methods for Studying Inheritance Patterns (7)
• The Foundation of Inheritance Studies (11)
• Variation in Gene Expression (6)

Other Topic Rooms

• Gene Inheritance and Transmission
• Gene Expression and Regulation
• Nucleic Acid Structure and Function
• Chromosomes and Cytogenetics
• Evolutionary Genetics
• Population and Quantitative Genetics
• Genes and Disease
• Genetics and Society
• Cell Origins and Metabolism
• Proteins and Gene Expression
• Subcellular Compartments
• Cell Communication
• Cell Cycle and Cell Division

© 2014 Nature Education

• Press Room |
• Terms of Use |
• Privacy Notice |

Visual Browse