Are brand preferences inherent, constructed, or a mixture of both? A memory-based dual-process model
- Original Paper
- Published: 06 May 2024
Cite this article
- Jiang Zhiying 1 ,
- Suman Ann Thomas 2 &
- Chu Junhong 3
131 Accesses
Explore all metrics
Understanding whether consumer preferences are inherent or constructed has profound implications for a range of marketing and economic issues, such as demand estimation, consumer education and information, market design and competition. The literature reveals a formidable divide between inherent versus constructed preferences, underscoring a long-standing debate regarding the nature of consumer preferences. In this research, we develop a dual-process structural learning model rooted in cognitive theories, enabling empirical estimation of the extent to which preferences are inherent versus constructed. Our results show that brand preferences are largely constructed, with 76% of brand evaluations across all studied brands being formed at the time of purchase. This finding helps to reconcile the enduring divide that has shaped the field’s evolution. In addition, our analysis reveals that the mode of evaluation significantly influences market competitive dynamics, with 60% of brand-switching resulted from constructed preferences. Furthermore, we also find mode of evaluation has asymmetric impacts on established versus new brands. These findings open up novel avenues for shaping competitive landscapes by strategically altering (e.g., through nudges) consumer’s mode of evaluation, becoming extremely relevant in the digital economy characterized by overwhelming and rapid information exchange.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Similar content being viewed by others
The brand that wasn’t there: The impact of brand displacement on viewer engagement and brand attitude
Investigating the Drivers that Determines Brand Loyalty: A Study of the Experience-Commitment-Loyalty Construct
The Process of Brand Experience: An Interdisciplinary Perspective: An Abstract
We refer to the representative consumer as a female for ease of writing, but any observation is generalizable to the male consumer as well.
Completeness means that there should be a complete order relation between the options that enables the consumer to determine the optimal option in the light of available choice alternatives. Consistency of preferences means that the order relation of preferences is context invariant, i.e., preferences should not change with the way choice options are described, or with the way the evaluation or judgment is elicited.
Equation ( 3 ) can be written as Eq. ( 4 ) if we follow the law of motion and recursively replace the posterior as the function of its prior and the newly received signal.
We will be referring to the econometrician as a male to differentiate him from the consumer.
Aggleton JP, Brown MW (1999) Episodic memory, amnesia and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis. Behav Brain Sci 22:425–44
Article Google Scholar
Allenby GM, Rossi PE (1991) Quality perceptions and asymmetric switching between brand. Market Sci 10(3):185–204
Atkinson RC, Shiffrin RM (1968) Huamn Memory: A proposed system and its control process. Psychol Learn Motiv 2:89–195
Barber D (2012) Bayesian reasoning and machine learning. Cambridge University Press
Book Google Scholar
Barber D, Bishop CM (1998) Ensemble learning in Bayesian neural networks. Nato ASI Ser F Comput Syst Sci 168:215–238
Google Scholar
Barret LF, Tugade MM, Engle RW (2004) Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychol Bull 130(4):553–573
Bayes T, Price R (1763) An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chance. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Canton, A.M.F.R.S. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 53:370–418
Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes. J Consum Res 25(3):187–217
Braun KA (1999) Postexperience advertising effects on consumer memory. J Consum Res 25(4):319–334
Bronnenberg BJ, Dubé JP, Gentzkow M (2012) The evolution of brand preferences: Evidence from consumer packaged goods. Am Econ Rev 102(6):2472–2508
Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(5):752–756
Chen S, David S, Chaiken S (1996) Getting at the truth or getting along: accuracy-versus impression motivated heuristic and systematic processing. J Pers Soc Psychol 71(2):262–275
Chiang J (1991) A simultaneous approach to the whether, what and how much to buy questions. Mark Sci 10(4):297–315
Chintagunta PK (1993) Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions of households. Mark Sci 12(2):184–208
Craik FIM, Lockhart RS (1972) Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 11(6):671–684
Deighton J, Romer D, McQueen J (1989) Using drama to persuade. J Consum Res 16(3):335–343
Dimofte CV, Yalch RF (2010) The role of frequency of experience with a product category and temporal orientation in self-referent advertising. J Consum Psychol 20(3):343–354
Dubé JP, Hitsch G, Rossi P (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. Rand J Econ 41(3):417–445
Ebbinghaus H (1885) Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. Dover, New York
Erdem T, Keane M (1996) Decision making under uncertainty: capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Mark Sci 15(1):1–20
Henseler J, Guerreiro M, de Matos N (2021) The interplay of marketing and design. RMS 15:1129–1137
Hoch SJ, Ha YW (1986) Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. J Consum Res 13(2):221–233
Houthakker HS (1950) Revealed preference and the utility function. Econ New Ser 17(66):159–174
Huber J, Payne J, Puto C (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J Consum Res 9(1):90–98
Johnson SK, Anderson MC (2004) The role of inhibitory control in forgetting semantic knowledge. Psychol Sci 15(7):448–453
Kivetz R, Netzer O, Schrift R (2008) The synthesis of preferences: bridging behavioral decision research and marketing science. J Consum Psychol 18:179–186
Lewis D (1973) Counterfactuals and Comparative Possibility. In: Harper WL, Stalnaker R, Pearce G (eds) IFS. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9117-0_3
Li H, Srinivasan K (2019) Competitive dynamics in the sharing economy: An analysis in the context of Airbnband hotels. Mark Sci 38(3):365–391
Mcfadden DL (1999) Rationality for economists. J Risk Uncertain 19(1/3):73–105
Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2003) Price uncertainty and consumer search: a structural model of consideration set formation. Mark Sci 22(1):58–84
Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2004) Role of forgetting in memory-based choice decisions: a structural model. Quant Mark Econ 2:107–140
Mishkin M, Suzuki WA, Gadian DG, VarghaKhadem F (1997) Hierarchical organization of cognitive memory. Philos Trans r Soc London B 352:1461–1467
Motta-Filho MA (2021) Brand experience manual: bridging the gap between brand strategy and customer experience. RMS 15:1173–1204
Neal RM (2012) Bayesian learning for neural networks, vol 118. Springer Science & Business Media
Palos-Sanchez P, Saura JR, Correia MB (2021) Do tourism application’s’ quality and user experience influence its acceptance by tourists. RMS 15:1205–1241
Payne JW, Bettman JR, Coupey E, Johnson EJ (1992) A Constructive process view of decision making: multiple strategies in judgment and choice. Acta Psychol 80(1–3):107–141
Renoult L, Rugg MD (2020) An historical perspective on Endel Tulving’s episodic-semantic distinction. Neuropsychologia 139:107366
Richter M (1966) Revealed preference theory. Econometrica 34(3):635–645
Samuelson P (1964) Economics: An Introductory Analysis, 6th edn. MacGraw-Hill, New York
Simonson I (1989) Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. J Consum Res 16(2):158–174
Simonson I (2008) Will I like a ‘medium’ pillow? Another look at constructed and inherent preferences. J Consum Psychol 18(3):155–169
Simonson I, Tversky A (1992) Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J Mark Res 29(3):231–295
Slovic P (1995) The construction of preference. Am Psychol 50(5):364–371
Squire LR (1986) Mechanisms of memory. Science 232(4758):1612–1619
Squire LR (2004) Memory systems of the brain: a brief history and current perspective. Neurobiol Learn Mem 82(3):171–177
Suri R, Monroe KB (2003) The effects of time constraints on consumers’ judgments of prices and products. J Consum Res 30(1):92–104
Thaler RH (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Mark Sci 4(3):199–214
Theodoridis S (2015) Machine learning: a Bayesian and optimization perspective. Academic press
Tipping ME (2001) Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res 1(Jun):211–244
Tulving E (1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving E, Donaldson W (eds) Organization of memory. Academic Press, New York, pp 381–403
Tulving E (1983) Elements of episodic memory. Oxford University Press, New York
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–458
Tversky A, Slovic P, Kahneman D (1990) The causes of preference reversal. Am Econ Rev 80(1):204–217
Wingfield A, Byrnes DL (2013) The psychology of human memory. Academic Press Inc., New York
Zhang L, Chung DJ (2020) Price bargaining and competition in online platforms: An empirical analysis of thedaily deal market. Mark Sci 39(4):687–706
Zhao Y, Yang S, Narayan V, Zhao Y (2013). Modeling consumer learning from online product reviews. Mark Sci 32(1):153–169
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
SUSS School of Business, Singapore University of Social Sciences, 463 Clementi Rd, Singapore, 599494, Singapore
Jiang Zhiying
StratAgile Pte. Ltd., 22, #08-05 New Industrial Rd, Singapore, 536208, Singapore
Suman Ann Thomas
HKU Business School, Hong Kong University, 720 K.K. Leung Building, Pok Fu Lan Rd, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
Chu Junhong
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Jiang Zhiying .
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (PDF 179 KB)
Rights and permissions.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Zhiying, J., Thomas, S.A. & Junhong, C. Are brand preferences inherent, constructed, or a mixture of both? A memory-based dual-process model. Rev Manag Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00765-x
Download citation
Received : 30 January 2023
Accepted : 18 April 2024
Published : 06 May 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00765-x
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Inherent preference
- Constructed preference
- Quality learning
- Memory -based choice
- Dual-process model
- Information and Knowledge
- Communication
- Unawareness
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The present research contributes to existing marketing and branding literature in five ways: First, the research fills the gap in the extant literature by building a model which provides an understanding of consumer brand preferences and future purchase intentions.
This review paper examines the influential role of branding in shaping consumer purchase decisions. Branding has emerged as a powerful tool for businesses to differentiate their products or...
In this article, we review the literature studying the formation of consumers’ brand preferences. Our goals consist of summarizing several stylized facts regarding brands and the industrial mar-ket structure of consumers goods industries, and surveying the theoretical and empirical analyses
Despite strong interest in the subject, however, there is little empirical evidence of how brand value is created and what its precise effects are. This study explores some of the consequences of brand equity. In particular, the authors examine the effect of brand equity on consumer preferences and purchase intentions.
Abstract. The paper deals with the results of the primary research which purpose was to examine the impact of brand on influencing consumers to purchase a product. The goal of the paper is to stress the fact that the brand has an impact on customer decision-making process.
Our results show that brand preferences are largely constructed, with 76% of brand evaluations across all studied brands being formed at the time of purchase. This finding helps to reconcile the enduring divide that has shaped the field’s evolution.
explore the topic of humanistic and purposeful brand associations as drivers of brand preference. An initial literature review provided a theoretical framework to aid in the analysis of empirical findings.
Extensive research has investigated how perceived brand globalness (PBG) and perceived brand localness (PBL) affect brand. In this systematic literature review, the authors organize and synthesize the literature on PBG and PBL by analyzing 95 articles published in the past 17 years.
This study seeks to develop a model that provides an understanding of how brand knowledge and brand experience determine brand preference and to investigate its impact on brand repurchase intention. Accordingly, exploratory focus group discussions are employed followed by a survey of mobile phone users in Egypt.
In this article, we study the long-run evolution of brand preferences, using a new dataset that combines Nielsen Homescan data on purchases of consumer packaged goods with details of consumers’ life histories.