what comprises the introduction part of a research paper discuss each section brainly

How to Write a Research Paper Introduction (with Examples)

The research paper introduction section, along with the Title and Abstract, can be considered the face of any research paper. The following article is intended to guide you in organizing and writing the research paper introduction for a quality academic article or dissertation.

The research paper introduction aims to present the topic to the reader. A study will only be accepted for publishing if you can ascertain that the available literature cannot answer your research question. So it is important to ensure that you have read important studies on that particular topic, especially those within the last five to ten years, and that they are properly referenced in this section. 1 What should be included in the research paper introduction is decided by what you want to tell readers about the reason behind the research and how you plan to fill the knowledge gap. The best research paper introduction provides a systemic review of existing work and demonstrates additional work that needs to be done. It needs to be brief, captivating, and well-referenced; a well-drafted research paper introduction will help the researcher win half the battle.

The introduction for a research paper is where you set up your topic and approach for the reader. It has several key goals:

• Present your research topic
• Capture reader interest
• Summarize existing research
• Position your own approach
• Define your specific research problem and problem statement
• Highlight the novelty and contributions of the study
• Give an overview of the paper’s structure

The research paper introduction can vary in size and structure depending on whether your paper presents the results of original empirical research or is a review paper. Some research paper introduction examples are only half a page while others are a few pages long. In many cases, the introduction will be shorter than all of the other sections of your paper; its length depends on the size of your paper as a whole.

• Break through writer’s block. Write your research paper introduction with Paperpal Copilot

Table of Contents

What is the introduction for a research paper, why is the introduction important in a research paper, craft a compelling introduction section with paperpal. try now, 1. introduce the research topic:, 2. determine a research niche:, 3. place your research within the research niche:, craft accurate research paper introductions with paperpal. start writing now, frequently asked questions on research paper introduction, key points to remember.

The introduction in a research paper is placed at the beginning to guide the reader from a broad subject area to the specific topic that your research addresses. They present the following information to the reader

• Scope: The topic covered in the research paper
• Context: Background of your topic
• Importance: Why your research matters in that particular area of research and the industry problem that can be targeted

The research paper introduction conveys a lot of information and can be considered an essential roadmap for the rest of your paper. A good introduction for a research paper is important for the following reasons:

• It stimulates your reader’s interest: A good introduction section can make your readers want to read your paper by capturing their interest. It informs the reader what they are going to learn and helps determine if the topic is of interest to them.
• It helps the reader understand the research background: Without a clear introduction, your readers may feel confused and even struggle when reading your paper. A good research paper introduction will prepare them for the in-depth research to come. It provides you the opportunity to engage with the readers and demonstrate your knowledge and authority on the specific topic.
• It explains why your research paper is worth reading: Your introduction can convey a lot of information to your readers. It introduces the topic, why the topic is important, and how you plan to proceed with your research.
• It helps guide the reader through the rest of the paper: The research paper introduction gives the reader a sense of the nature of the information that will support your arguments and the general organization of the paragraphs that will follow. It offers an overview of what to expect when reading the main body of your paper.

What are the parts of introduction in the research?

A good research paper introduction section should comprise three main elements: 2

• What is known: This sets the stage for your research. It informs the readers of what is known on the subject.
• What is lacking: This is aimed at justifying the reason for carrying out your research. This could involve investigating a new concept or method or building upon previous research.
• What you aim to do: This part briefly states the objectives of your research and its major contributions. Your detailed hypothesis will also form a part of this section.

How to write a research paper introduction?

The first step in writing the research paper introduction is to inform the reader what your topic is and why it’s interesting or important. This is generally accomplished with a strong opening statement. The second step involves establishing the kinds of research that have been done and ending with limitations or gaps in the research that you intend to address. Finally, the research paper introduction clarifies how your own research fits in and what problem it addresses. If your research involved testing hypotheses, these should be stated along with your research question. The hypothesis should be presented in the past tense since it will have been tested by the time you are writing the research paper introduction.

The following key points, with examples, can guide you when writing the research paper introduction section:

• Highlight the importance of the research field or topic
• Describe the background of the topic
• Present an overview of current research on the topic

Example: The inclusion of experiential and competency-based learning has benefitted electronics engineering education. Industry partnerships provide an excellent alternative for students wanting to engage in solving real-world challenges. Industry-academia participation has grown in recent years due to the need for skilled engineers with practical training and specialized expertise. However, from the educational perspective, many activities are needed to incorporate sustainable development goals into the university curricula and consolidate learning innovation in universities.

• Reveal a gap in existing research or oppose an existing assumption
• Formulate the research question

Example: There have been plausible efforts to integrate educational activities in higher education electronics engineering programs. However, very few studies have considered using educational research methods for performance evaluation of competency-based higher engineering education, with a focus on technical and or transversal skills. To remedy the current need for evaluating competencies in STEM fields and providing sustainable development goals in engineering education, in this study, a comparison was drawn between study groups without and with industry partners.

• State the purpose of your study
• Highlight the key characteristics of your study
• Describe important results
• Highlight the novelty of the study.
• Offer a brief overview of the structure of the paper.

Example: The study evaluates the main competency needed in the applied electronics course, which is a fundamental core subject for many electronics engineering undergraduate programs. We compared two groups, without and with an industrial partner, that offered real-world projects to solve during the semester. This comparison can help determine significant differences in both groups in terms of developing subject competency and achieving sustainable development goals.

Write a Research Paper Introduction in Minutes with Paperpal

Paperpal Copilot is a generative AI-powered academic writing assistant. It’s trained on millions of published scholarly articles and over 20 years of STM experience. Paperpal Copilot helps authors write better and faster with:

• Real-time writing suggestions
• In-depth checks for language and grammar correction
• Paraphrasing to add variety, ensure academic tone, and trim text to meet journal limits

With Paperpal Copilot, create a research paper introduction effortlessly. In this step-by-step guide, we’ll walk you through how Paperpal transforms your initial ideas into a polished and publication-ready introduction.

How to use Paperpal to write the Introduction section

Step 1: Sign up on Paperpal and click on the Copilot feature, under this choose Outlines > Research Article > Introduction

Step 2: Add your unstructured notes or initial draft, whether in English or another language, to Paperpal, which is to be used as the base for your content.

Step 3: Fill in the specifics, such as your field of study, brief description or details you want to include, which will help the AI generate the outline for your Introduction.

Step 4: Use this outline and sentence suggestions to develop your content, adding citations where needed and modifying it to align with your specific research focus.

Step 5: Turn to Paperpal’s granular language checks to refine your content, tailor it to reflect your personal writing style, and ensure it effectively conveys your message.

You can use the same process to develop each section of your article, and finally your research paper in half the time and without any of the stress.

The purpose of the research paper introduction is to introduce the reader to the problem definition, justify the need for the study, and describe the main theme of the study. The aim is to gain the reader’s attention by providing them with necessary background information and establishing the main purpose and direction of the research.

The length of the research paper introduction can vary across journals and disciplines. While there are no strict word limits for writing the research paper introduction, an ideal length would be one page, with a maximum of 400 words over 1-4 paragraphs. Generally, it is one of the shorter sections of the paper as the reader is assumed to have at least a reasonable knowledge about the topic. 2 For example, for a study evaluating the role of building design in ensuring fire safety, there is no need to discuss definitions and nature of fire in the introduction; you could start by commenting upon the existing practices for fire safety and how your study will add to the existing knowledge and practice.

When deciding what to include in the research paper introduction, the rest of the paper should also be considered. The aim is to introduce the reader smoothly to the topic and facilitate an easy read without much dependency on external sources. 3 Below is a list of elements you can include to prepare a research paper introduction outline and follow it when you are writing the research paper introduction. Topic introduction: This can include key definitions and a brief history of the topic. Research context and background: Offer the readers some general information and then narrow it down to specific aspects. Details of the research you conducted: A brief literature review can be included to support your arguments or line of thought. Rationale for the study: This establishes the relevance of your study and establishes its importance. Importance of your research: The main contributions are highlighted to help establish the novelty of your study Research hypothesis: Introduce your research question and propose an expected outcome. Organization of the paper: Include a short paragraph of 3-4 sentences that highlights your plan for the entire paper

Cite only works that are most relevant to your topic; as a general rule, you can include one to three. Note that readers want to see evidence of original thinking. So it is better to avoid using too many references as it does not leave much room for your personal standpoint to shine through. Citations in your research paper introduction support the key points, and the number of citations depend on the subject matter and the point discussed. If the research paper introduction is too long or overflowing with citations, it is better to cite a few review articles rather than the individual articles summarized in the review. A good point to remember when citing research papers in the introduction section is to include at least one-third of the references in the introduction.

The literature review plays a significant role in the research paper introduction section. A good literature review accomplishes the following: Introduces the topic – Establishes the study’s significance – Provides an overview of the relevant literature – Provides context for the study using literature – Identifies knowledge gaps However, remember to avoid making the following mistakes when writing a research paper introduction: Do not use studies from the literature review to aggressively support your research Avoid direct quoting Do not allow literature review to be the focus of this section. Instead, the literature review should only aid in setting a foundation for the manuscript.

Remember the following key points for writing a good research paper introduction: 4

• Avoid stuffing too much general information: Avoid including what an average reader would know and include only that information related to the problem being addressed in the research paper introduction. For example, when describing a comparative study of non-traditional methods for mechanical design optimization, information related to the traditional methods and differences between traditional and non-traditional methods would not be relevant. In this case, the introduction for the research paper should begin with the state-of-the-art non-traditional methods and methods to evaluate the efficiency of newly developed algorithms.
• Avoid packing too many references: Cite only the required works in your research paper introduction. The other works can be included in the discussion section to strengthen your findings.
• Avoid extensive criticism of previous studies: Avoid being overly critical of earlier studies while setting the rationale for your study. A better place for this would be the Discussion section, where you can highlight the advantages of your method.
• Avoid describing conclusions of the study: When writing a research paper introduction remember not to include the findings of your study. The aim is to let the readers know what question is being answered. The actual answer should only be given in the Results and Discussion section.

To summarize, the research paper introduction section should be brief yet informative. It should convince the reader the need to conduct the study and motivate him to read further. If you’re feeling stuck or unsure, choose trusted AI academic writing assistants like Paperpal to effortlessly craft your research paper introduction and other sections of your research article.

1. Jawaid, S. A., & Jawaid, M. (2019). How to write introduction and discussion. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 13(Suppl 1), S18.

2. Dewan, P., & Gupta, P. (2016). Writing the title, abstract and introduction: Looks matter!. Indian pediatrics, 53, 235-241.

3. Cetin, S., & Hackam, D. J. (2005). An approach to the writing of a scientific Manuscript1. Journal of Surgical Research, 128(2), 165-167.

4. Bavdekar, S. B. (2015). Writing introduction: Laying the foundations of a research paper. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 63(7), 44-6.

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.  

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.  

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!  

Related Reads:

• Scientific Writing Style Guides Explained
• 5 Reasons for Rejection After Peer Review
• Ethical Research Practices For Research with Human Subjects
• 8 Most Effective Ways to Increase Motivation for Thesis Writing 

Practice vs. Practise: Learn the Difference

Academic paraphrasing: why paperpal’s rewrite should be your first choice , you may also like, how to write your research paper in apa..., how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write a phd research proposal, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), research funding basics: what should a grant proposal..., how to write an abstract in research papers..., how to write dissertation acknowledgements, how to write the first draft of a..., mla works cited page: format, template & examples, how to write a high-quality conference paper.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Turk J Urol
• v.39(Suppl 1); 2013 Sep

How to write an introduction section of a scientific article?

An article primarily includes the following sections: introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Before writing the introduction, the main steps, the heading and the familiarity level of the readers should be considered. Writing should begin when the experimental system and the equipment are available. The introduction section comprises the first portion of the manuscript, and it should be written using the simple present tense. Additionally, abbreviations and explanations are included in this section. The main goal of the introduction is to convey basic information to the readers without obligating them to investigate previous publications and to provide clues as to the results of the present study. To do this, the subject of the article should be thoroughly reviewed, and the aim of the study should be clearly stated immediately after discussing the basic references. In this review, we aim to convey the principles of writing the introduction section of a manuscript to residents and young investigators who have just begun to write a manuscript.

Introduction

When entering a gate of a magnificent city we can make a prediction about the splendor, pomposity, history, and civilization we will encounter in the city. Occasionally, gates do not give even a glimpse of the city, and it can mislead the visitors about inner sections of the city. Introduction sections of the articles are like gates of a city. It is a presentation aiming at introducing itself to the readers, and attracting their attention. Attractiveness, clarity, piquancy, and analytical capacity of the presentation will urge the reader to read the subsequent sections of the article. On the other hand as is understood from the motto of antique Greek poet Euripides “a bad beginning makes a bad ending”, ‘Introduction’ section of a scientific article is important in that it can reveal the conclusion of the article. [ 1 ]

It is useful to analyze the issues to be considered in the ‘Introduction’ section under 3 headings. Firstly, information should be provided about the general topic of the article in the light of the current literature which paves the way for the disclosure of the objective of the manuscript. Then the specific subject matter, and the issue to be focused on should be dealt with, the problem should be brought forth, and fundamental references related to the topic should be discussed. Finally, our recommendations for solution should be described, in other words our aim should be communicated. When these steps are followed in that order, the reader can track the problem, and its solution from his/her own perspective under the light of current literature. Otherwise, even a perfect study presented in a non-systematized, confused design will lose the chance of reading. Indeed inadequate information, inability to clarify the problem, and sometimes concealing the solution will keep the reader who has a desire to attain new information away from reading the manuscript. [ 1 – 3 ]

First of all, explanation of the topic in the light of the current literature should be made in clear, and precise terms as if the reader is completely ignorant of the subject. In this section, establishment of a warm rapport between the reader, and the manuscript is aimed. Since frantic plunging into the problem or the solution will push the reader into the dilemma of either screening the literature about the subject matter or refraining from reading the article. Updated, and robust information should be presented in the ‘Introduction’ section.

Then main topic of our manuscript, and the encountered problem should be analyzed in the light of the current literature following a short instance of brain exercise. At this point the problems should be reduced to one issue as far as possible. Of course, there might be more than one problem, however this new issue, and its solution should be the subject matter of another article. Problems should be expressed clearly. If targets are more numerous, and complex, solutions will be more than one, and confusing.

Finally, the last paragraphs of the ‘Introduction’ section should include the solution in which we will describe the information we generated, and related data. Our sentences which arouse curiosity in the readers should not be left unanswered. The reader who thinks to obtain the most effective information in no time while reading a scientific article should not be smothered with mysterious sentences, and word plays, and the readers should not be left alone to arrive at a conclusion by themselves. If we have contrary expectations, then we might write an article which won’t have any reader. A clearly expressed or recommended solutions to an explicitly revealed problem is also very important for the integrity of the ‘Introduction’ section. [ 1 – 5 ]

We can summarize our arguments with the following example ( Figure 1 ). The introduction section of the exemplary article is written in simple present tense which includes abbreviations, acronyms, and their explanations. Based on our statements above we can divide the introduction section into 3 parts. In the first paragraph, miniaturization, and evolvement of pediatric endourological instruments, and competitions among PNL, ESWL, and URS in the treatment of urinary system stone disease are described, in other words the background is prepared. In the second paragraph, a newly defined system which facilitates intrarenal access in PNL procedure has been described. Besides basic references related to the subject matter have been given, and their outcomes have been indicated. In other words, fundamental references concerning main subject have been discussed. In the last paragraph the aim of the researchers to investigate the outcomes, and safety of the application of this new method in the light of current information has been indicated.

An exemplary introduction section of an article

Apart from the abovementioned information about the introduction section of a scientific article we will summarize a few major issues in brief headings

Important points which one should take heed of:

• Abbreviations should be given following their explanations in the ‘Introduction’ section (their explanations in the summary does not count)
• Simple present tense should be used.
• References should be selected from updated publication with a higher impact factor, and prestigous source books.
• Avoid mysterious, and confounding expressions, construct clear sentences aiming at problematic issues, and their solutions.
• The sentences should be attractive, tempting, and comjprehensible.
• Firstly general, then subject-specific information should be given. Finally our aim should be clearly explained.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing Guide

Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Research Paper

Definition:

Research Paper is a written document that presents the author’s original research, analysis, and interpretation of a specific topic or issue.

It is typically based on Empirical Evidence, and may involve qualitative or quantitative research methods, or a combination of both. The purpose of a research paper is to contribute new knowledge or insights to a particular field of study, and to demonstrate the author’s understanding of the existing literature and theories related to the topic.

Structure of Research Paper

The structure of a research paper typically follows a standard format, consisting of several sections that convey specific information about the research study. The following is a detailed explanation of the structure of a research paper:

The title page contains the title of the paper, the name(s) of the author(s), and the affiliation(s) of the author(s). It also includes the date of submission and possibly, the name of the journal or conference where the paper is to be published.

The abstract is a brief summary of the research paper, typically ranging from 100 to 250 words. It should include the research question, the methods used, the key findings, and the implications of the results. The abstract should be written in a concise and clear manner to allow readers to quickly grasp the essence of the research.

Introduction

The introduction section of a research paper provides background information about the research problem, the research question, and the research objectives. It also outlines the significance of the research, the research gap that it aims to fill, and the approach taken to address the research question. Finally, the introduction section ends with a clear statement of the research hypothesis or research question.

Literature Review

The literature review section of a research paper provides an overview of the existing literature on the topic of study. It includes a critical analysis and synthesis of the literature, highlighting the key concepts, themes, and debates. The literature review should also demonstrate the research gap and how the current study seeks to address it.

The methods section of a research paper describes the research design, the sample selection, the data collection and analysis procedures, and the statistical methods used to analyze the data. This section should provide sufficient detail for other researchers to replicate the study.

The results section presents the findings of the research, using tables, graphs, and figures to illustrate the data. The findings should be presented in a clear and concise manner, with reference to the research question and hypothesis.

The discussion section of a research paper interprets the findings and discusses their implications for the research question, the literature review, and the field of study. It should also address the limitations of the study and suggest future research directions.

The conclusion section summarizes the main findings of the study, restates the research question and hypothesis, and provides a final reflection on the significance of the research.

The references section provides a list of all the sources cited in the paper, following a specific citation style such as APA, MLA or Chicago.

How to Write Research Paper

You can write Research Paper by the following guide:

• Choose a Topic: The first step is to select a topic that interests you and is relevant to your field of study. Brainstorm ideas and narrow down to a research question that is specific and researchable.
• Conduct a Literature Review: The literature review helps you identify the gap in the existing research and provides a basis for your research question. It also helps you to develop a theoretical framework and research hypothesis.
• Develop a Thesis Statement : The thesis statement is the main argument of your research paper. It should be clear, concise and specific to your research question.
• Plan your Research: Develop a research plan that outlines the methods, data sources, and data analysis procedures. This will help you to collect and analyze data effectively.
• Collect and Analyze Data: Collect data using various methods such as surveys, interviews, observations, or experiments. Analyze data using statistical tools or other qualitative methods.
• Organize your Paper : Organize your paper into sections such as Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Ensure that each section is coherent and follows a logical flow.
• Write your Paper : Start by writing the introduction, followed by the literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Ensure that your writing is clear, concise, and follows the required formatting and citation styles.
• Edit and Proofread your Paper: Review your paper for grammar and spelling errors, and ensure that it is well-structured and easy to read. Ask someone else to review your paper to get feedback and suggestions for improvement.
• Cite your Sources: Ensure that you properly cite all sources used in your research paper. This is essential for giving credit to the original authors and avoiding plagiarism.

Research Paper Example

Note : The below example research paper is for illustrative purposes only and is not an actual research paper. Actual research papers may have different structures, contents, and formats depending on the field of study, research question, data collection and analysis methods, and other factors. Students should always consult with their professors or supervisors for specific guidelines and expectations for their research papers.

Research Paper Example sample for Students:

Title: The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health among Young Adults

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on the mental health of young adults. A literature review was conducted to examine the existing research on the topic. A survey was then administered to 200 university students to collect data on their social media use, mental health status, and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. The results showed that social media use is positively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. The study also found that social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) are significant predictors of mental health problems among young adults.

Introduction: Social media has become an integral part of modern life, particularly among young adults. While social media has many benefits, including increased communication and social connectivity, it has also been associated with negative outcomes, such as addiction, cyberbullying, and mental health problems. This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on the mental health of young adults.

Literature Review: The literature review highlights the existing research on the impact of social media use on mental health. The review shows that social media use is associated with depression, anxiety, stress, and other mental health problems. The review also identifies the factors that contribute to the negative impact of social media, including social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO.

Methods : A survey was administered to 200 university students to collect data on their social media use, mental health status, and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. The survey included questions on social media use, mental health status (measured using the DASS-21), and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis.

Results : The results showed that social media use is positively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. The study also found that social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO are significant predictors of mental health problems among young adults.

Discussion : The study’s findings suggest that social media use has a negative impact on the mental health of young adults. The study highlights the need for interventions that address the factors contributing to the negative impact of social media, such as social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO.

Conclusion : In conclusion, social media use has a significant impact on the mental health of young adults. The study’s findings underscore the need for interventions that promote healthy social media use and address the negative outcomes associated with social media use. Future research can explore the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing the negative impact of social media on mental health. Additionally, longitudinal studies can investigate the long-term effects of social media use on mental health.

Limitations : The study has some limitations, including the use of self-report measures and a cross-sectional design. The use of self-report measures may result in biased responses, and a cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causality.

Implications: The study’s findings have implications for mental health professionals, educators, and policymakers. Mental health professionals can use the findings to develop interventions that address the negative impact of social media use on mental health. Educators can incorporate social media literacy into their curriculum to promote healthy social media use among young adults. Policymakers can use the findings to develop policies that protect young adults from the negative outcomes associated with social media use.

References :

• Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study. Preventive medicine reports, 15, 100918.
• Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Barrett, E. L., Sidani, J. E., Colditz, J. B., … & James, A. E. (2017). Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A nationally-representative study among US young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 1-9.
• Van der Meer, T. G., & Verhoeven, J. W. (2017). Social media and its impact on academic performance of students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 383-398.

Appendix : The survey used in this study is provided below.

Social Media and Mental Health Survey

• How often do you use social media per day?
• Less than 30 minutes
• 30 minutes to 1 hour
• 1 to 2 hours
• 2 to 4 hours
• More than 4 hours
• Which social media platforms do you use?
• Others (Please specify)
• How often do you experience the following on social media?
• Social comparison (comparing yourself to others)
• Cyberbullying
• Fear of Missing Out (FOMO)
• Have you ever experienced any of the following mental health problems in the past month?
• Do you think social media use has a positive or negative impact on your mental health?
• Very positive
• Somewhat positive
• Somewhat negative
• Very negative
• In your opinion, which factors contribute to the negative impact of social media on mental health?
• Social comparison
• In your opinion, what interventions could be effective in reducing the negative impact of social media on mental health?
• Education on healthy social media use
• Counseling for mental health problems caused by social media
• Social media detox programs
• Regulation of social media use

Thank you for your participation!

Applications of Research Paper

Research papers have several applications in various fields, including:

• Advancing knowledge: Research papers contribute to the advancement of knowledge by generating new insights, theories, and findings that can inform future research and practice. They help to answer important questions, clarify existing knowledge, and identify areas that require further investigation.
• Informing policy: Research papers can inform policy decisions by providing evidence-based recommendations for policymakers. They can help to identify gaps in current policies, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and inform the development of new policies and regulations.
• Improving practice: Research papers can improve practice by providing evidence-based guidance for professionals in various fields, including medicine, education, business, and psychology. They can inform the development of best practices, guidelines, and standards of care that can improve outcomes for individuals and organizations.
• Educating students : Research papers are often used as teaching tools in universities and colleges to educate students about research methods, data analysis, and academic writing. They help students to develop critical thinking skills, research skills, and communication skills that are essential for success in many careers.
• Fostering collaboration: Research papers can foster collaboration among researchers, practitioners, and policymakers by providing a platform for sharing knowledge and ideas. They can facilitate interdisciplinary collaborations and partnerships that can lead to innovative solutions to complex problems.

When to Write Research Paper

Research papers are typically written when a person has completed a research project or when they have conducted a study and have obtained data or findings that they want to share with the academic or professional community. Research papers are usually written in academic settings, such as universities, but they can also be written in professional settings, such as research organizations, government agencies, or private companies.

Here are some common situations where a person might need to write a research paper:

• For academic purposes: Students in universities and colleges are often required to write research papers as part of their coursework, particularly in the social sciences, natural sciences, and humanities. Writing research papers helps students to develop research skills, critical thinking skills, and academic writing skills.
• For publication: Researchers often write research papers to publish their findings in academic journals or to present their work at academic conferences. Publishing research papers is an important way to disseminate research findings to the academic community and to establish oneself as an expert in a particular field.
• To inform policy or practice : Researchers may write research papers to inform policy decisions or to improve practice in various fields. Research findings can be used to inform the development of policies, guidelines, and best practices that can improve outcomes for individuals and organizations.
• To share new insights or ideas: Researchers may write research papers to share new insights or ideas with the academic or professional community. They may present new theories, propose new research methods, or challenge existing paradigms in their field.

Purpose of Research Paper

The purpose of a research paper is to present the results of a study or investigation in a clear, concise, and structured manner. Research papers are written to communicate new knowledge, ideas, or findings to a specific audience, such as researchers, scholars, practitioners, or policymakers. The primary purposes of a research paper are:

• To contribute to the body of knowledge : Research papers aim to add new knowledge or insights to a particular field or discipline. They do this by reporting the results of empirical studies, reviewing and synthesizing existing literature, proposing new theories, or providing new perspectives on a topic.
• To inform or persuade: Research papers are written to inform or persuade the reader about a particular issue, topic, or phenomenon. They present evidence and arguments to support their claims and seek to persuade the reader of the validity of their findings or recommendations.
• To advance the field: Research papers seek to advance the field or discipline by identifying gaps in knowledge, proposing new research questions or approaches, or challenging existing assumptions or paradigms. They aim to contribute to ongoing debates and discussions within a field and to stimulate further research and inquiry.
• To demonstrate research skills: Research papers demonstrate the author’s research skills, including their ability to design and conduct a study, collect and analyze data, and interpret and communicate findings. They also demonstrate the author’s ability to critically evaluate existing literature, synthesize information from multiple sources, and write in a clear and structured manner.

Characteristics of Research Paper

Research papers have several characteristics that distinguish them from other forms of academic or professional writing. Here are some common characteristics of research papers:

• Evidence-based: Research papers are based on empirical evidence, which is collected through rigorous research methods such as experiments, surveys, observations, or interviews. They rely on objective data and facts to support their claims and conclusions.
• Structured and organized: Research papers have a clear and logical structure, with sections such as introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. They are organized in a way that helps the reader to follow the argument and understand the findings.
• Formal and objective: Research papers are written in a formal and objective tone, with an emphasis on clarity, precision, and accuracy. They avoid subjective language or personal opinions and instead rely on objective data and analysis to support their arguments.
• Citations and references: Research papers include citations and references to acknowledge the sources of information and ideas used in the paper. They use a specific citation style, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago, to ensure consistency and accuracy.
• Peer-reviewed: Research papers are often peer-reviewed, which means they are evaluated by other experts in the field before they are published. Peer-review ensures that the research is of high quality, meets ethical standards, and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field.
• Objective and unbiased: Research papers strive to be objective and unbiased in their presentation of the findings. They avoid personal biases or preconceptions and instead rely on the data and analysis to draw conclusions.

Advantages of Research Paper

Research papers have many advantages, both for the individual researcher and for the broader academic and professional community. Here are some advantages of research papers:

• Contribution to knowledge: Research papers contribute to the body of knowledge in a particular field or discipline. They add new information, insights, and perspectives to existing literature and help advance the understanding of a particular phenomenon or issue.
• Opportunity for intellectual growth: Research papers provide an opportunity for intellectual growth for the researcher. They require critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, which can help develop the researcher’s skills and knowledge.
• Career advancement: Research papers can help advance the researcher’s career by demonstrating their expertise and contributions to the field. They can also lead to new research opportunities, collaborations, and funding.
• Academic recognition: Research papers can lead to academic recognition in the form of awards, grants, or invitations to speak at conferences or events. They can also contribute to the researcher’s reputation and standing in the field.
• Impact on policy and practice: Research papers can have a significant impact on policy and practice. They can inform policy decisions, guide practice, and lead to changes in laws, regulations, or procedures.
• Advancement of society: Research papers can contribute to the advancement of society by addressing important issues, identifying solutions to problems, and promoting social justice and equality.

Limitations of Research Paper

Research papers also have some limitations that should be considered when interpreting their findings or implications. Here are some common limitations of research papers:

• Limited generalizability: Research findings may not be generalizable to other populations, settings, or contexts. Studies often use specific samples or conditions that may not reflect the broader population or real-world situations.
• Potential for bias : Research papers may be biased due to factors such as sample selection, measurement errors, or researcher biases. It is important to evaluate the quality of the research design and methods used to ensure that the findings are valid and reliable.
• Ethical concerns: Research papers may raise ethical concerns, such as the use of vulnerable populations or invasive procedures. Researchers must adhere to ethical guidelines and obtain informed consent from participants to ensure that the research is conducted in a responsible and respectful manner.
• Limitations of methodology: Research papers may be limited by the methodology used to collect and analyze data. For example, certain research methods may not capture the complexity or nuance of a particular phenomenon, or may not be appropriate for certain research questions.
• Publication bias: Research papers may be subject to publication bias, where positive or significant findings are more likely to be published than negative or non-significant findings. This can skew the overall findings of a particular area of research.
• Time and resource constraints: Research papers may be limited by time and resource constraints, which can affect the quality and scope of the research. Researchers may not have access to certain data or resources, or may be unable to conduct long-term studies due to practical limitations.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Research Paper Outline – Types, Example, Template

Research Paper Conclusion – Writing Guide and...

Implications in Research – Types, Examples and...

Table of Contents – Types, Formats, Examples

Research Methods – Types, Examples and Guide

Research Paper Title Page – Example and Making...

How to Craft the Perfect Introduction for Your Scientific Paper: A Step-by-Step Guide

-with a nifty template.

Thank you for reading DrAiMD’s Substack. This post is public so feel free to share it.

The introduction section is one of the most important parts of a scientific paper . It sets the stage for the entire paper and gives readers their first impression of your work. A well-written introduction quickly engages readers, establishes your credibility as a researcher, and convinces them that your study is worth reading about.

In this comprehensive guide, we provide science writers, researchers, and academics with a detailed walkthrough and template to follow how to write a compelling introduction that will wow journal editors and readers. 

Thanks for reading DrAiMD’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Why the Introduction Matters in Scientific Writing

The introduction is the first thing editors, reviewers, and readers will see when assessing your scientific paper. It acts as a gateway into the rest of your work.

Here are four key reasons why nailing your introduction is critical:

1. Creates a First Impression

The introduction is your chance to make a strong first impression. A vague, disorganized, or dull introduction sets off alarm bells and makes readers unsure about the quality of your research.

Crafting a crisp, engaging opening section shows editors and readers that you can communicate science effectively. It quickly convinces them your study is well-designed and your findings are significant.

2. Establishes Your Credibility

How you write your introduction establishes your scientific credibility and qualifications. It demonstrates your ability to synthesize large amounts of complex information and hone in on the most salient points.

When you showcase knowledge of the field and properly cite authoritative sources, you come across as an expert. This earns you the trust of editors, reviewers, and readers right from the start.

3. Contextualizes Your Research

A good introduction doesn't just describe your study; it contextualizes it. By summarizing current understanding and identifying knowledge gaps, you frame your research within the larger scientific field.

This context convinces readers that your work is relevant timely, and advances the field meaningfully. It helps establish the significance of your study.

4. Acts as a Roadmap

Finally, the introduction acts as a roadmap for the paper itself. A well-structured overview not only tells readers what to expect but helps guide them smoothly through the entirety of your work.

With a solid introduction as their guide, readers are primed to understand the key arguments and takeaways of your research.

Structure of an Effective Introduction

Introductions answer two questions: what is the gap of knowledge needed for this study, and how does this study fill that gap? The paper is a story that starts in the intro and ends in the discussion. In that way, the introduction is the. To phrase it differently, it needs to identify a knowledge gap, explain why this gap needs filling, and show how this study fills that gap. 

According to a study analyzing all papers in the jacc cardiology journal in 2013. Here is the breakdown of the length of each part of the paper according to their findings. Introductions are very compact and generally only 11% of the paper, or 1 page (ideally), maximum 400 words over 1-4 paragraphs (ideally 3) - some journals restrict this to 350 words (E.g., ABC); 5-10 references (Araújo, 2014) . 

Scientific introductions generally follow a standard structure consisting of four key elements. Let's look at each in detail:

Starts with a broad opening statement on the research field

Sets the overall scene and scope

Review previous work and current understanding of the topic

Summarizes relevant foundational/seminal research

Provides context for readers

Identifies limitations, contradictions, and gaps in existing research

States why certain key problems remain unsolved or underexplored

Highlight explicitly what your study aims to address

Study Overview

Outline the purpose, focus, and nature of your investigation

States research questions, hypotheses, and objectives

Briefly explain the methodology and approach

This basic framework allows you to establish relevance, orient readers, carve a niche for your work, and map out the ensuing paper. Let's see how to execute each section successfully.

Opening Section

The opening paragraph is crucial for grabbing the reader's attention right away. Avoid vague, general statements here. Be as specific as possible when introducing the broad research field.

For example:

Weak opening: "Cancer research is very important today."

Strong opening: "Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, responsible for over 1.7 million fatalities annually."

When drafting your opening:

Hook readers with an interesting fact/stat or thought-provoking question

Briefly explain why this field is significant, timely, or relevant

Keep it focused and specific to set the scope of the paper

Cite a reputable source if presenting a statistic or claim

This section should be concise - 1-2 paragraphs at most. It sets the stage for the background review.

Background Section

The background review summarizes existing work on your research topic to contextualize your study. It demonstrates your command of the field.

When conducting the literature review:

Include 5-8 of the most important papers or findings

Cover seminal/foundational research as well as recent studies

Organize chronologically or thematically as fits your narrative

Analyze; don't just summarize each paper separately

Synthesize; identify overarching trends/themes across papers

This section comprises the bulk of the introduction. Take 2-3 paragraphs to cover early work, then 3-4 paragraphs to discuss recent developments and the current state of the field.

Identifying the Gap

With the background established, the next task is identifying critical knowledge gaps. You need to convince readers that there is a compelling problem that your study addresses.

Common approaches include:

Pinpointing gaps in the literature

Revealing limitations of previous work

Identifying contradictions among existing findings

Explaining how certain research questions remain unanswered

Describing how practical problems remain unsolved

Phrase this section carefully. Avoid overly criticizing other researchers. Frame the gap as an opportunity for advancement rather than a flaw in current work.

This part is generally 1 paragraph explicitly setting up the need for and timeliness of your investigation.

Overview of Your Study

With the need established, clearly define the purpose and nature of your research.

Research aims, objectives, and questions

Specific hypotheses being tested, if applicable

Brief description of study methodology and design

Scope and limitations of your investigation

Avoid going into excessive detail or discussing actual findings here. The goal is to provide a broad preview and framing of your study, not give away results.

Keep this section to 1-2 concise paragraphs. You will expand on methods/results in subsequent sections.

Let's look at a sample introduction integrating these elements:

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

While introductions seem straightforward, many writers make mistakes that weaken their impact and credibility. Here are key pitfalls to avoid:

Don't Open with Broad, Vague Statements

Intro sentences like "Cancer is a major problem worldwide" are dull, offer no specific context and don't engage readers. Open with a compelling fact or statistic instead.

Don't Make Sweeping Claims

Avoid overstating the novelty or impact of your work. Stick to measured statements supported by citations. Let the study speak for itself.

Don't Go into Excessive Detail

Don't devote paragraphs to minor tangents or literature that isn't directly relevant. Stick to seminal and recent studies that set up your research.

Don't Just Summarize Previous Papers

The background shouldn't just be a series of summary paragraphs of past papers. Synthesize across papers to identify overarching themes/trends.

Don't Be Vague About the Gap

Explicitly state the specific gaps, limitations, contradictions, or unanswered questions you aim to address. Avoid vague statements about the need for more research.

Don't Use Overly Critical Language

Critiquing previous work is an important part of identifying gaps. However, avoid language that comes across as overly disparaging to other researchers.

Helpful Tips for Writing a Strong Introduction

Follow these tips to craft an introduction that hooks readers, establishes context, and clearly sets up the rationale for your study:

Spend time organizing your literature into a logical narrative flow before drafting.

Focus on landmark studies and recent developments; cite 5-8 key papers.

Synthesize; don't just summarize one paper at a time.

Be explicit in identifying gaps; say "however..." or "in contrast..."

Phrase the gap as an opportunity to advance understanding.

Keep background concise; aim for 400 words over 3-4 paragraphs.

Avoid technical terms/jargon unless absolutely necessary.

Be clear and specific when stating research aims and questions.

Ask a colleague to review your draft and provide feedback.

 Introduction template and guide 

Problem - What is Known?

Start with a broad opening sentence that sets the stage for the research area.

Briefly summarize the current state of knowledge in your field.

Use this section to introduce the general topic and its significance.

Example: "The field of [Your Research Area] has significantly expanded in the last decade, with notable advancements in [Specific Aspects]. Despite these developments, several critical areas remain unexplored."

Contextualization

Connect the identified problem to its broader implications.

Explain why this problem is important to your field or the wider world.

Address how this problem impacts relevant stakeholders or society.

Example: "Understanding [Specific Aspect] is crucial for [Reason], affecting [Stakeholders/Society] by [Implications]. This underscores the need for further research in this area."

Knowledge Gap - What is Not Known?

Identify and articulate the gaps in the existing literature or knowledge.

Highlight what is missing from the current understanding.

Use this to bridge what your research specifically addresses.

Example: "However, existing research lacks comprehensive insights into [Specific Aspect], particularly in the context of [Specific Context]. This gap in knowledge hinders our understanding of [Implications of the Gap]."

Definition and Purpose of the Study

Clearly state the purpose of your study.

Define the scope and objectives of your research.

Introduce your research question or hypothesis.

Example: "This study aims to address this gap by [Your Study's Aim]. Through [Methods/Approach], the research will explore [Specific Elements], thereby contributing to [Field/Understanding]."

Note:  This introduction should ideally be contained within 1 page, not exceeding 400 words, ideally structured into three paragraphs, and supported by 5-10 references.

Concluding thoughts 

The introduction serves a vital purpose in scientific writing. Crafting a compelling opening section requires brevity, organization, and clarity. Following the standard structure, along with the best practices discussed above, will help you write introductions that impress editors, engage readers, and enhance the impact of your published papers. Remember to start broad, review previous literature, highlight gaps, and clearly frame your study. Let us know in the comments if this guide helps you improve your scientific introductions moving forward!

References  

Araújo C. G. (2014). Detailing the writing of scientific manuscripts: 25-30 paragraphs.  Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia ,  102 (2), e21–e23. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20140019

Ready for more?

• Langson Library
• Science Library
• Grunigen Medical Library
• Law Library
• Connect From Off-Campus
• Accessibility
• Gateway Study Center

Email this link

Writing a scientific paper.

• Writing a lab report

What is a "good" introduction?

Citing sources in the introduction, "introduction checklist" from: how to write a good scientific paper. chris a. mack. spie. 2018..

• LITERATURE CITED
• Bibliography of guides to scientific writing and presenting
• Peer Review
• Presentations
• Lab Report Writing Guides on the Web

This is where you describe briefly and clearly why you are writing the paper. The introduction supplies sufficient background information for the reader to understand and evaluate the experiment you did. It also supplies a rationale for the study.

• Present the problem and the proposed solution
• Presents nature and scope of the problem investigated
• Reviews the pertinent literature to orient the reader
• States the method of the experiment
• State the principle results of the experiment

It is important to cite sources in the introduction section of your paper as evidence of the claims you are making. There are ways of citing sources in the text so that the reader can find the full reference in the literature cited section at the end of the paper, yet the flow of the reading is not badly interrupted. Below are some example of how this can be done:     "Smith (1983) found that N-fixing plants could be infected by several different species of Rhizobium."     "Walnut trees are known to be allelopathic (Smith 1949,  Bond et al. 1955, Jones and Green 1963)."     "Although the presence of Rhizobium normally increases the growth of legumes (Nguyen 1987), the opposite effect has been observed (Washington 1999)." Note that articles by one or two authors are always cited in the text using their last names. However, if there are more than two authors, the last name of the 1st author is given followed by the abbreviation et al. which is Latin for "and others". 

From:  https://writingcenter.gmu.edu/guides/imrad-reports-introductions

• Indicate the field of the work, why this field is important, and what has already been done (with proper citations).
• Indicate a gap, raise a research question, or challenge prior work in this territory.
• Outline the purpose and announce the present research, clearly indicating what is novel and why it is significant.
• Avoid: repeating the abstract; providing unnecessary background information; exaggerating the importance of the work; claiming novelty without a proper literature search. 
• << Previous: ABSTRACT
• Next: METHODS >>
• Last Updated: Aug 4, 2023 9:33 AM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uci.edu/scientificwriting

Off-campus? Please use the Software VPN and choose the group UCIFull to access licensed content. For more information, please Click here

Software VPN is not available for guests, so they may not have access to some content when connecting from off-campus.

• Foundations
• Write Paper

Search form

• Experiments
• Anthropology
• Self-Esteem
• Social Anxiety

• Research Paper >

Parts of a Research Paper

One of the most important aspects of science is ensuring that you get all the parts of the written research paper in the right order.

This article is a part of the guide:

• Outline Examples
• Example of a Paper
• Write a Hypothesis
• Introduction

Browse Full Outline

• 1 Write a Research Paper
• 2 Writing a Paper
• 3.1 Write an Outline
• 3.2 Outline Examples
• 4.1 Thesis Statement
• 4.2 Write a Hypothesis
• 5.2 Abstract
• 5.3 Introduction
• 5.4 Methods
• 5.5 Results
• 5.6 Discussion
• 5.7 Conclusion
• 5.8 Bibliography
• 6.1 Table of Contents
• 6.2 Acknowledgements
• 6.3 Appendix
• 7.1 In Text Citations
• 7.2 Footnotes
• 7.3.1 Floating Blocks
• 7.4 Example of a Paper
• 7.5 Example of a Paper 2
• 7.6.1 Citations
• 7.7.1 Writing Style
• 7.7.2 Citations
• 8.1.1 Sham Peer Review
• 8.1.2 Advantages
• 8.1.3 Disadvantages
• 8.2 Publication Bias
• 8.3.1 Journal Rejection
• 9.1 Article Writing
• 9.2 Ideas for Topics

You may have finished the best research project on earth but, if you do not write an interesting and well laid out paper, then nobody is going to take your findings seriously.

The main thing to remember with any research paper is that it is based on an hourglass structure. It begins with general information and undertaking a literature review , and becomes more specific as you nail down a research problem and hypothesis .

Finally, it again becomes more general as you try to apply your findings to the world at general.

Whilst there are a few differences between the various disciplines, with some fields placing more emphasis on certain parts than others, there is a basic underlying structure.

These steps are the building blocks of constructing a good research paper. This section outline how to lay out the parts of a research paper, including the various experimental methods and designs.

The principles for literature review and essays of all types follow the same basic principles.

Reference List

For many students, writing the introduction is the first part of the process, setting down the direction of the paper and laying out exactly what the research paper is trying to achieve.

For others, the introduction is the last thing written, acting as a quick summary of the paper. As long as you have planned a good structure for the parts of a research paper, both approaches are acceptable and it is a matter of preference.

A good introduction generally consists of three distinct parts:

• You should first give a general presentation of the research problem.
• You should then lay out exactly what you are trying to achieve with this particular research project.
• You should then state your own position.

Ideally, you should try to give each section its own paragraph, but this will vary given the overall length of the paper.

1) General Presentation

Look at the benefits to be gained by the research or why the problem has not been solved yet. Perhaps nobody has thought about it, or maybe previous research threw up some interesting leads that the previous researchers did not follow up.

Another researcher may have uncovered some interesting trends, but did not manage to reach the significance level , due to experimental error or small sample sizes .

2) Purpose of the Paper

The research problem does not have to be a statement, but must at least imply what you are trying to find.

Many writers prefer to place the thesis statement or hypothesis here, which is perfectly acceptable, but most include it in the last sentences of the introduction, to give the reader a fuller picture.

3) A Statement of Intent From the Writer

The idea is that somebody will be able to gain an overall view of the paper without needing to read the whole thing. Literature reviews are time-consuming enough, so give the reader a concise idea of your intention before they commit to wading through pages of background.

In this section, you look to give a context to the research, including any relevant information learned during your literature review. You are also trying to explain why you chose this area of research, attempting to highlight why it is necessary. The second part should state the purpose of the experiment and should include the research problem. The third part should give the reader a quick summary of the form that the parts of the research paper is going to take and should include a condensed version of the discussion.

This should be the easiest part of the paper to write, as it is a run-down of the exact design and methodology used to perform the research. Obviously, the exact methodology varies depending upon the exact field and type of experiment .

There is a big methodological difference between the apparatus based research of the physical sciences and the methods and observation methods of social sciences. However, the key is to ensure that another researcher would be able to replicate the experiment to match yours as closely as possible, but still keeping the section concise.

You can assume that anybody reading your paper is familiar with the basic methods, so try not to explain every last detail. For example, an organic chemist or biochemist will be familiar with chromatography, so you only need to highlight the type of equipment used rather than explaining the whole process in detail.

In the case of a survey , if you have too many questions to cover in the method, you can always include a copy of the questionnaire in the appendix . In this case, make sure that you refer to it.

This is probably the most variable part of any research paper, and depends on the results and aims of the experiment.

For quantitative research , it is a presentation of the numerical results and data, whereas for qualitative research it should be a broader discussion of trends, without going into too much detail.

For research generating a lot of results , then it is better to include tables or graphs of the analyzed data and leave the raw data in the appendix, so that a researcher can follow up and check your calculations.

A commentary is essential to linking the results together, rather than just displaying isolated and unconnected charts and figures.

It can be quite difficult to find a good balance between the results and the discussion section, because some findings, especially in a quantitative or descriptive experiment , will fall into a grey area. Try to avoid repeating yourself too often.

It is best to try to find a middle path, where you give a general overview of the data and then expand on it in the discussion - you should try to keep your own opinions and interpretations out of the results section, saving that for the discussion later on.

This is where you elaborate on your findings, and explain what you found, adding your own personal interpretations.

Ideally, you should link the discussion back to the introduction, addressing each point individually.

It’s important to make sure that every piece of information in your discussion is directly related to the thesis statement , or you risk cluttering your findings. In keeping with the hourglass principle, you can expand on the topic later in the conclusion .

The conclusion is where you build on your discussion and try to relate your findings to other research and to the world at large.

In a short research paper, it may be a paragraph or two, or even a few lines.

In a dissertation, it may well be the most important part of the entire paper - not only does it describe the results and discussion in detail, it emphasizes the importance of the results in the field, and ties it in with the previous research.

Some research papers require a recommendations section, postulating the further directions of the research, as well as highlighting how any flaws affected the results. In this case, you should suggest any improvements that could be made to the research design .

No paper is complete without a reference list , documenting all the sources that you used for your research. This should be laid out according to APA , MLA or other specified format, allowing any interested researcher to follow up on the research.

One habit that is becoming more common, especially with online papers, is to include a reference to your own paper on the final page. Lay this out in MLA, APA and Chicago format, allowing anybody referencing your paper to copy and paste it.

• Psychology 101
• Flags and Countries
• Capitals and Countries

Martyn Shuttleworth (Jun 5, 2009). Parts of a Research Paper. Retrieved Aug 20, 2024 from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/parts-of-a-research-paper

You Are Allowed To Copy The Text

The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) .

This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page.

That is it. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page. You can use it freely (with some kind of link), and we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations (with clear attribution).

Want to stay up to date? Follow us!

Check out the official book.

Learn how to construct, style and format an Academic paper and take your skills to the next level.

(also available as ebook )

Save this course for later

Don't have time for it all now? No problem, save it as a course and come back to it later.

Footer bottom

• Privacy Policy

• Subscribe to our RSS Feed
• Like us on Facebook
• Follow us on Twitter

How to Write a Research Paper: Parts of the Paper

• Choosing Your Topic
• Citation & Style Guides This link opens in a new window
• Critical Thinking
• Evaluating Information
• Parts of the Paper
• Writing Tips from UNC-Chapel Hill
• Librarian Contact

Parts of the Research Paper Papers should have a beginning, a middle, and an end. Your introductory paragraph should grab the reader's attention, state your main idea, and indicate how you will support it. The body of the paper should expand on what you have stated in the introduction. Finally, the conclusion restates the paper's thesis and should explain what you have learned, giving a wrap up of your main ideas.

1. The Title The title should be specific and indicate the theme of the research and what ideas it addresses. Use keywords that help explain your paper's topic to the reader. Try to avoid abbreviations and jargon. Think about keywords that people would use to search for your paper and include them in your title.

2. The Abstract The abstract is used by readers to get a quick overview of your paper. Typically, they are about 200 words in length (120 words minimum to  250 words maximum). The abstract should introduce the topic and thesis, and should provide a general statement about what you have found in your research. The abstract allows you to mention each major aspect of your topic and helps readers decide whether they want to read the rest of the paper. Because it is a summary of the entire research paper, it is often written last. 

3. The Introduction The introduction should be designed to attract the reader's attention and explain the focus of the research. You will introduce your overview of the topic,  your main points of information, and why this subject is important. You can introduce the current understanding and background information about the topic. Toward the end of the introduction, you add your thesis statement, and explain how you will provide information to support your research questions. This provides the purpose and focus for the rest of the paper.

4. Thesis Statement Most papers will have a thesis statement or main idea and supporting facts/ideas/arguments. State your main idea (something of interest or something to be proven or argued for or against) as your thesis statement, and then provide your supporting facts and arguments. A thesis statement is a declarative sentence that asserts the position a paper will be taking. It also points toward the paper's development. This statement should be both specific and arguable. Generally, the thesis statement will be placed at the end of the first paragraph of your paper. The remainder of your paper will support this thesis.

Students often learn to write a thesis as a first step in the writing process, but often, after research, a writer's viewpoint may change. Therefore a thesis statement may be one of the final steps in writing. 

Examples of Thesis Statements from Purdue OWL

5. The Literature Review The purpose of the literature review is to describe past important research and how it specifically relates to the research thesis. It should be a synthesis of the previous literature and the new idea being researched. The review should examine the major theories related to the topic to date and their contributors. It should include all relevant findings from credible sources, such as academic books and peer-reviewed journal articles. You will want  to:

• Explain how the literature helps the researcher understand the topic.
• Try to show connections and any disparities between the literature.
• Identify new ways to interpret prior research.
• Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature.

More about writing a literature review. . .

6. The Discussion ​The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe what you have learned from your research. Make the reader understand why your topic is important. The discussion should always demonstrate what you have learned from your readings (and viewings) and how that learning has made the topic evolve, especially from the short description of main points in the introduction.Explain any new understanding or insights you have had after reading your articles and/or books. Paragraphs should use transitioning sentences to develop how one paragraph idea leads to the next. The discussion will always connect to the introduction, your thesis statement, and the literature you reviewed, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the introduction. You want to: 

• Demonstrate critical thinking, not just reporting back facts that you gathered.
• If possible, tell how the topic has evolved over the past and give it's implications for the future.
• Fully explain your main ideas with supporting information.
• Explain why your thesis is correct giving arguments to counter points.

7. The Conclusion A concluding paragraph is a brief summary of your main ideas and restates the paper's main thesis, giving the reader the sense that the stated goal of the paper has been accomplished. What have you learned by doing this research that you didn't know before? What conclusions have you drawn? You may also want to suggest further areas of study, improvement of research possibilities, etc. to demonstrate your critical thinking regarding your research.

• << Previous: Evaluating Information
• Next: Research >>
• Last Updated: Feb 13, 2024 8:35 AM
• URL: https://libguides.ucc.edu/research_paper

• Research guides

Writing an Educational Research Paper

Research paper sections, customary parts of an education research paper.

There is no one right style or manner for writing an education paper. Content aside, the writing style and presentation of papers in different educational fields vary greatly. Nevertheless, certain parts are common to most papers, for example:

Title/Cover Page

Contains the paper's title, the author's name, address, phone number, e-mail, and the day's date.

Not every education paper requires an abstract. However, for longer, more complex papers abstracts are particularly useful. Often only 100 to 300 words, the abstract generally provides a broad overview and is never more than a page. It describes the essence, the main theme of the paper. It includes the research question posed, its significance, the methodology, and the main results or findings. Footnotes or cited works are never listed in an abstract. Remember to take great care in composing the abstract. It's the first part of the paper the instructor reads. It must impress with a strong content, good style, and general aesthetic appeal. Never write it hastily or carelessly.

Introduction and Statement of the Problem

A good introduction states the main research problem and thesis argument. What precisely are you studying and why is it important? How original is it? Will it fill a gap in other studies? Never provide a lengthy justification for your topic before it has been explicitly stated.

Limitations of Study

Indicate as soon as possible what you intend to do, and what you are not going to attempt. You may limit the scope of your paper by any number of factors, for example, time, personnel, gender, age, geographic location, nationality, and so on.

Methodology

Discuss your research methodology. Did you employ qualitative or quantitative research methods? Did you administer a questionnaire or interview people? Any field research conducted? How did you collect data? Did you utilize other libraries or archives? And so on.

Literature Review

The research process uncovers what other writers have written about your topic. Your education paper should include a discussion or review of what is known about the subject and how that knowledge was acquired. Once you provide the general and specific context of the existing knowledge, then you yourself can build on others' research. The guide Writing a Literature Review will be helpful here.

Main Body of Paper/Argument

This is generally the longest part of the paper. It's where the author supports the thesis and builds the argument. It contains most of the citations and analysis. This section should focus on a rational development of the thesis with clear reasoning and solid argumentation at all points. A clear focus, avoiding meaningless digressions, provides the essential unity that characterizes a strong education paper.

After spending a great deal of time and energy introducing and arguing the points in the main body of the paper, the conclusion brings everything together and underscores what it all means. A stimulating and informative conclusion leaves the reader informed and well-satisfied. A conclusion that makes sense, when read independently from the rest of the paper, will win praise.

Works Cited/Bibliography

See the Citation guide .

Education research papers often contain one or more appendices. An appendix contains material that is appropriate for enlarging the reader's understanding, but that does not fit very well into the main body of the paper. Such material might include tables, charts, summaries, questionnaires, interview questions, lengthy statistics, maps, pictures, photographs, lists of terms, glossaries, survey instruments, letters, copies of historical documents, and many other types of supplementary material. A paper may have several appendices. They are usually placed after the main body of the paper but before the bibliography or works cited section. They are usually designated by such headings as Appendix A, Appendix B, and so on.

• << Previous: Choosing a Topic
• Next: Find Books >>
• Last Updated: Aug 12, 2024 2:35 PM
• Subjects: Education
• Tags: education , education_paper , education_research_paper

Frequently asked questions

What should i include in a research paper introduction.

The introduction of a research paper includes several key elements:

• A hook to catch the reader’s interest
• Relevant background on the topic
• Details of your research problem

and your problem statement

• A thesis statement or research question
• Sometimes an overview of the paper

Frequently asked questions: Writing a research paper

A research project is an academic, scientific, or professional undertaking to answer a research question . Research projects can take many forms, such as qualitative or quantitative , descriptive , longitudinal , experimental , or correlational . What kind of research approach you choose will depend on your topic.

The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.

Formulating a main research question can be a difficult task. Overall, your question should contribute to solving the problem that you have defined in your problem statement .

However, it should also fulfill criteria in three main areas:

• Researchability
• Feasibility and specificity
• Relevance and originality

Research questions anchor your whole project, so it’s important to spend some time refining them.

In general, they should be:

• Focused and researchable
• Answerable using credible sources
• Complex and arguable
• Feasible and specific
• Relevant and original

All research questions should be:

• Focused on a single problem or issue
• Researchable using primary and/or secondary sources
• Feasible to answer within the timeframe and practical constraints
• Specific enough to answer thoroughly
• Complex enough to develop the answer over the space of a paper or thesis
• Relevant to your field of study and/or society more broadly

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

Your research objectives indicate how you’ll try to address your research problem and should be specific:

Research objectives describe what you intend your research project to accomplish.

They summarize the approach and purpose of the project and help to focus your research.

Your objectives should appear in the introduction of your research paper , at the end of your problem statement .

The main guidelines for formatting a paper in Chicago style are to:

• Use a standard font like 12 pt Times New Roman
• Use 1 inch margins or larger
• Apply double line spacing
• Indent every new paragraph ½ inch
• Include a title page
• Place page numbers in the top right or bottom center
• Cite your sources with author-date citations or Chicago footnotes
• Include a bibliography or reference list

To automatically generate accurate Chicago references, you can use Scribbr’s free Chicago reference generator .

The main guidelines for formatting a paper in MLA style are as follows:

• Use an easily readable font like 12 pt Times New Roman
• Set 1 inch page margins
• Include a four-line MLA heading on the first page
• Center the paper’s title
• Use title case capitalization for headings
• Cite your sources with MLA in-text citations
• List all sources cited on a Works Cited page at the end

To format a paper in APA Style , follow these guidelines:

• Use a standard font like 12 pt Times New Roman or 11 pt Arial
• If submitting for publication, insert a running head on every page
• Apply APA heading styles
• Cite your sources with APA in-text citations
• List all sources cited on a reference page at the end

No, it’s not appropriate to present new arguments or evidence in the conclusion . While you might be tempted to save a striking argument for last, research papers follow a more formal structure than this.

All your findings and arguments should be presented in the body of the text (more specifically in the results and discussion sections if you are following a scientific structure). The conclusion is meant to summarize and reflect on the evidence and arguments you have already presented, not introduce new ones.

The conclusion of a research paper has several key elements you should make sure to include:

• A restatement of the research problem
• A summary of your key arguments and/or findings
• A short discussion of the implications of your research

Don’t feel that you have to write the introduction first. The introduction is often one of the last parts of the research paper you’ll write, along with the conclusion.

This is because it can be easier to introduce your paper once you’ve already written the body ; you may not have the clearest idea of your arguments until you’ve written them, and things can change during the writing process .

The way you present your research problem in your introduction varies depending on the nature of your research paper . A research paper that presents a sustained argument will usually encapsulate this argument in a thesis statement .

A research paper designed to present the results of empirical research tends to present a research question that it seeks to answer. It may also include a hypothesis —a prediction that will be confirmed or disproved by your research.

Ask our team

Want to contact us directly? No problem.  We  are always here for you.

• Email [email protected]
• Start live chat
• Call +1 (510) 822-8066
• WhatsApp +31 20 261 6040

Our team helps students graduate by offering:

• A world-class citation generator
• Plagiarism Checker software powered by Turnitin
• Innovative Citation Checker software
• Professional proofreading services
• Over 300 helpful articles about academic writing, citing sources, plagiarism, and more

Scribbr specializes in editing study-related documents . We proofread:

• PhD dissertations
• Research proposals
• Personal statements
• Admission essays
• Motivation letters
• Reflection papers
• Journal articles
• Capstone projects

Scribbr’s Plagiarism Checker is powered by elements of Turnitin’s Similarity Checker , namely the plagiarism detection software and the Internet Archive and Premium Scholarly Publications content databases .

The add-on AI detector is powered by Scribbr’s proprietary software.

The Scribbr Citation Generator is developed using the open-source Citation Style Language (CSL) project and Frank Bennett’s citeproc-js . It’s the same technology used by dozens of other popular citation tools, including Mendeley and Zotero.

You can find all the citation styles and locales used in the Scribbr Citation Generator in our publicly accessible repository on Github .

• Search This Site All UCSD Sites Faculty/Staff Search Term
• Contact & Directions
• Climate Statement
• Cognitive Behavioral Neuroscience
• Cognitive Psychology
• Developmental Psychology
• Social Psychology
• Adjunct Faculty
• Non-Senate Instructors
• Researchers
• Psychology Grads
• Affiliated Grads
• New and Prospective Students
• Honors Program
• Experiential Learning
• Programs & Events
• Psi Chi / Psychology Club
• Prospective PhD Students
• Current PhD Students
• Area Brown Bags
• Colloquium Series
• Anderson Distinguished Lecture Series
• Speaker Videos
• Undergraduate Program
• Academic and Writing Resources

Writing Research Papers

• Research Paper Structure

Whether you are writing a B.S. Degree Research Paper or completing a research report for a Psychology course, it is highly likely that you will need to organize your research paper in accordance with American Psychological Association (APA) guidelines.  Here we discuss the structure of research papers according to APA style.

Major Sections of a Research Paper in APA Style

A complete research paper in APA style that is reporting on experimental research will typically contain a Title page, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and References sections. 1  Many will also contain Figures and Tables and some will have an Appendix or Appendices.  These sections are detailed as follows (for a more in-depth guide, please refer to " How to Write a Research Paper in APA Style ”, a comprehensive guide developed by Prof. Emma Geller). 2

What is this paper called and who wrote it? – the first page of the paper; this includes the name of the paper, a “running head”, authors, and institutional affiliation of the authors.  The institutional affiliation is usually listed in an Author Note that is placed towards the bottom of the title page.  In some cases, the Author Note also contains an acknowledgment of any funding support and of any individuals that assisted with the research project.

One-paragraph summary of the entire study – typically no more than 250 words in length (and in many cases it is well shorter than that), the Abstract provides an overview of the study.

Introduction

What is the topic and why is it worth studying? – the first major section of text in the paper, the Introduction commonly describes the topic under investigation, summarizes or discusses relevant prior research (for related details, please see the Writing Literature Reviews section of this website), identifies unresolved issues that the current research will address, and provides an overview of the research that is to be described in greater detail in the sections to follow.

What did you do? – a section which details how the research was performed.  It typically features a description of the participants/subjects that were involved, the study design, the materials that were used, and the study procedure.  If there were multiple experiments, then each experiment may require a separate Methods section.  A rule of thumb is that the Methods section should be sufficiently detailed for another researcher to duplicate your research.

What did you find? – a section which describes the data that was collected and the results of any statistical tests that were performed.  It may also be prefaced by a description of the analysis procedure that was used. If there were multiple experiments, then each experiment may require a separate Results section.

What is the significance of your results? – the final major section of text in the paper.  The Discussion commonly features a summary of the results that were obtained in the study, describes how those results address the topic under investigation and/or the issues that the research was designed to address, and may expand upon the implications of those findings.  Limitations and directions for future research are also commonly addressed.

List of articles and any books cited – an alphabetized list of the sources that are cited in the paper (by last name of the first author of each source).  Each reference should follow specific APA guidelines regarding author names, dates, article titles, journal titles, journal volume numbers, page numbers, book publishers, publisher locations, websites, and so on (for more information, please see the Citing References in APA Style page of this website).

Tables and Figures

Graphs and data (optional in some cases) – depending on the type of research being performed, there may be Tables and/or Figures (however, in some cases, there may be neither).  In APA style, each Table and each Figure is placed on a separate page and all Tables and Figures are included after the References.   Tables are included first, followed by Figures.   However, for some journals and undergraduate research papers (such as the B.S. Research Paper or Honors Thesis), Tables and Figures may be embedded in the text (depending on the instructor’s or editor’s policies; for more details, see "Deviations from APA Style" below).

Supplementary information (optional) – in some cases, additional information that is not critical to understanding the research paper, such as a list of experiment stimuli, details of a secondary analysis, or programming code, is provided.  This is often placed in an Appendix.

Variations of Research Papers in APA Style

Although the major sections described above are common to most research papers written in APA style, there are variations on that pattern.  These variations include: 

• Literature reviews – when a paper is reviewing prior published research and not presenting new empirical research itself (such as in a review article, and particularly a qualitative review), then the authors may forgo any Methods and Results sections. Instead, there is a different structure such as an Introduction section followed by sections for each of the different aspects of the body of research being reviewed, and then perhaps a Discussion section. 
• Multi-experiment papers – when there are multiple experiments, it is common to follow the Introduction with an Experiment 1 section, itself containing Methods, Results, and Discussion subsections. Then there is an Experiment 2 section with a similar structure, an Experiment 3 section with a similar structure, and so on until all experiments are covered.  Towards the end of the paper there is a General Discussion section followed by References.  Additionally, in multi-experiment papers, it is common for the Results and Discussion subsections for individual experiments to be combined into single “Results and Discussion” sections.

Departures from APA Style

In some cases, official APA style might not be followed (however, be sure to check with your editor, instructor, or other sources before deviating from standards of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association).  Such deviations may include:

• Placement of Tables and Figures  – in some cases, to make reading through the paper easier, Tables and/or Figures are embedded in the text (for example, having a bar graph placed in the relevant Results section). The embedding of Tables and/or Figures in the text is one of the most common deviations from APA style (and is commonly allowed in B.S. Degree Research Papers and Honors Theses; however you should check with your instructor, supervisor, or editor first). 
• Incomplete research – sometimes a B.S. Degree Research Paper in this department is written about research that is currently being planned or is in progress. In those circumstances, sometimes only an Introduction and Methods section, followed by References, is included (that is, in cases where the research itself has not formally begun).  In other cases, preliminary results are presented and noted as such in the Results section (such as in cases where the study is underway but not complete), and the Discussion section includes caveats about the in-progress nature of the research.  Again, you should check with your instructor, supervisor, or editor first.
• Class assignments – in some classes in this department, an assignment must be written in APA style but is not exactly a traditional research paper (for instance, a student asked to write about an article that they read, and to write that report in APA style). In that case, the structure of the paper might approximate the typical sections of a research paper in APA style, but not entirely.  You should check with your instructor for further guidelines.

Workshops and Downloadable Resources

• For in-person discussion of the process of writing research papers, please consider attending this department’s “Writing Research Papers” workshop (for dates and times, please check the undergraduate workshops calendar).

Downloadable Resources

• How to Write APA Style Research Papers (a comprehensive guide) [ PDF ]
• Tips for Writing APA Style Research Papers (a brief summary) [ PDF ]
• Example APA Style Research Paper (for B.S. Degree – empirical research) [ PDF ]
• Example APA Style Research Paper (for B.S. Degree – literature review) [ PDF ]

Further Resources

How-To Videos     

• Writing Research Paper Videos

APA Journal Article Reporting Guidelines

• Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report . American Psychologist , 73 (1), 3.
• Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report . American Psychologist , 73 (1), 26.  

External Resources

• Formatting APA Style Papers in Microsoft Word
• How to Write an APA Style Research Paper from Hamilton University
• WikiHow Guide to Writing APA Research Papers
• Sample APA Formatted Paper with Comments
• Sample APA Formatted Paper
• Tips for Writing a Paper in APA Style

1 VandenBos, G. R. (Ed). (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.) (pp. 41-60).  Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

2 geller, e. (2018).  how to write an apa-style research report . [instructional materials]. , prepared by s. c. pan for ucsd psychology.

Back to top  

• Formatting Research Papers
• Using Databases and Finding References
• What Types of References Are Appropriate?
• Evaluating References and Taking Notes
• Citing References
• Writing a Literature Review
• Writing Process and Revising
• Improving Scientific Writing
• Academic Integrity and Avoiding Plagiarism
• Writing Research Papers Videos

Writing the Five Principal Sections: Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion

• First Online: 12 October 2013

Cite this chapter

• Karen Englander 2  

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

4674 Accesses

The five-part structure of research papers (Introduction, Method, Results and Discussion plus Abstract) serves as the conceptual basis for the content. The structure can be considered an “hourglass” or a “conversation” with predictable elements. Each section of the paper has its own common internal structure and linguistic features. The structures and features are explained with examples from published papers in a range of scientific disciplines. Exceptions to the four-part structure are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2009). Writing scientific research articles . West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

Google Scholar  

Cooper, E. A., Piazza, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2012). The perceptual basis of common photographic practice. Journal of Vision, 12 (5), 1–14.

Article   Google Scholar  

Esquer Mendez, J. L., Hernández Rodríguez, M., & Bückle Ramirez, L. F. (2010). Thermal tolerance and compatibility zones as a tool to establish the optimum culture condition of the halibut Paralichthys californicus (Ayres, 1859). Aquaculture Research, 41 (7), 1015–1021.

Glassman-Deal, H. (2010). Science research writing: For non-native speakers of English . London: Imperial College Press.

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Penrose, A. M., & Katz, S. B. (2001). Writing in the sciences: Exploring conventions of scientific discourse . New York: Longman.

Pérez-Flores, M. A., Antonio-Carpio, R. G., Enrique Gómez-Treviño, E., & Ferguson, I. (2011). 3D inversion of control source LIN electromagnetic data. Unpublished manuscript.

Rodríguez-Santiago, M. A., & Rosales-Casián, J. A. (2011). Parasite structure of the Ocean Whitefish Caulolatilus princeps from Baja California, México (East Pacific). Helgoland Marine Research, 65 (2), 197–202.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Languages, Literatures and Linguistics, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

Karen Englander

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Englander .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Englander, K. (2014). Writing the Five Principal Sections: Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion. In: Writing and Publishing Science Research Papers in English. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7714-9_8

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7714-9_8

Published : 12 October 2013

Publisher Name : Springer, Dordrecht

Print ISBN : 978-94-007-7713-2

Online ISBN : 978-94-007-7714-9

eBook Packages : Humanities, Social Sciences and Law Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

The Research Process: Parts of the Research Article

• Search Strategies
• Creating a Research Question
• Search Terms
• Finding e-Books
• Finding Articles and Images
• Journal Articles
• Books & Other Sources

Parts of the Research Article

• Reading and Understanding Research
• Data and Datasets
• Literature Reviews
• Recording Your Research
• Annotated Bibliographies

When you write a research paper, many instructors will ask you to find scholarly research articles as a basis for your research.  A scholarly research article presents original research and is written and reviewed by experts in a field.   A typical scholarly research article has several sections that can include the:

Introduction

Bibliography or reference list, definitions.

Each part of the research article above has a specific purpose for the reader.  

The abstract is a succinct summary of a research article, usually only a paragraph long.  The abstract should tell readers whether an article will be useful for their research.

The introduction gives background information on the topic or problems that the research article addresses.  The introduction usually includes a problem statement, which describes a specific problem that the researchers are trying to solve.  The introduction can also include a literature review, intended to critically evaluate material that has been published on a certain topic or research problem.  A literature review is often included as a separate section within a research article. 

In the Methods section of a research article, the researchers describe the design of their study and how it was carried out.  This may include a description of any instrument used to collect quantitative or qualitative data, the sample or participants, how data was gathered, and any statistical analysis of data.    

The Results section of a research article reports the findings of the study, whether they come from quantitative or qualitative measures.  In this section the findings are presented to the reader, but it does not include an interpretation of the findings

In the Discussion section, researchers interpret the findings of the study and comment on whether the study answered the problem/s it was attempting to solve.  Researchers may also discuss the limitations of the study and suggestions for further research.

The bibliography or references section is a list of all the resources cited within the body of the article.

Other Resources

• Parts of the Research Article: Marymount University Library
• OpenMichigan: Major Content Sections of a Research Report and Related Critiquing Guidelines
• Components of a Research Paper: Center for Innovation in Research and Teaching
• Writing the Empirical Research Article: Book Chapter by D.J. Bem
• << Previous: Books & Other Sources
• Next: Reading and Understanding Research >>
• Last Updated: Feb 9, 2024 2:22 PM
• URL: https://alvernia.libguides.com/researchprocess

Welcome to 2024! Happy New Year!

Research Writing ~ How to Write a Research Paper

• Choosing A Topic
• Critical Thinking
• Domain Names
• Starting Your Research
• Writing Tips
• Parts of the Paper
• Edit & Rewrite
• Citations This link opens in a new window

Papers should have a beginning, a middle, and an end. Your introductory paragraph should grab the reader's attention, state your main idea and how you will support it. The body of the paper should expand on what you have stated in the introduction. Finally, the conclusion restates the paper's thesis and should explain what you have learned, giving a wrap up of your main ideas.   

1. The Title The title should be specific and indicate the theme of the research and what ideas it addresses. Use keywords that help explain your paper's topic to the reader. Try to avoid  abbreviations  and  jargon.  Think about keywords that people would use to search for your paper and include them in your title. 

2. The Abstract The abstract is used by readers to get a quick overview of your paper. Typically, they are about 200 words in length (120 words minimum to  250 words maximum). The abstract should introduce the topic and thesis, and should provide a general statement about what you have found in your research. The abstract allows you to mention each major aspect of you topic and helps readers decide whether they want to read the rest of the paper. Because it is a summary of the entire research paper, it is often written last. 

3. The Introduction The introduction should be designed to attract the reader's attention and explain the focus of the research. You will introduce your overview of the topic, your main points of information, and why this subject is important. You can introduce the current understanding and background information about the topic. Toward the end of the introduction, you add your thesis statement, and explain how you will provide information to support your research questions. This provides the purpose, focus, and structure for the rest of the paper.

4. Thesis Statement Most papers will have a thesis statement or main idea and supporting facts/ideas/arguments. State your main idea (something of interest or something to be proven or argued for or against) as your thesis statement, and then provide  supporting facts and arguments. A thesis statement is a declarative sentence that asserts the position a paper will be taking. It also points toward the paper's development. This statement should be both specific and arguable. Generally, the thesis statement will be placed at the end of the first paragraph of your paper. The remainder of your paper will support this thesis.

Students often learn to write a thesis as a first step in the writing process, but often, after research, a writers viewpoint may change. Therefore a thesis statement may be one of the final steps in writing. 

Examples of thesis statements from Purdue OWL. . .

5. The Literature Review The purpose of the literature review is to describe past important research and how it specifically relates to the research thesis. It should be a synthesis of the previous literature and the new idea being researched. The review should examine the major theories related to the topic to date and their contributors. It should include all relevant findings from credible sources, such as academic books and peer-reviewed journal articles. You will want  to:

• Explain how the literature helps the researcher understand the topic.
• Try to show connections and any disparities between the literature.
• Identify new ways to interpret prior research.
• Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature.

More about writing a literature review. . .  from The Writing Center at UNC-Chapel Hill More about summarizing. . . from the Center for Writing Studies at the University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign

6. The Discussion ​The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe what you have learned from your research. Make the reader understand why your topic is important. The discussion should always demonstrate what you have learned from your readings (and viewings) and how that learning has made the topic evolve, especially from the short description of main points in the introduction. Explain any new understanding or insights you have had after reading your articles and/or books. Paragraphs should use transitioning sentences to develop how one paragraph idea leads to the next. The discussion will always connect to the introduction, your thesis statement, and the literature you reviewed, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the introduction. You want to: 

• Demonstrate critical thinking, not just reporting back facts that you gathered.
• If possible, tell how the topic has evolved over the past and give it's implications for the future.
• Fully explain your main ideas with supporting information.
• Explain why your thesis is correct giving arguments to counter points.

​7. The Conclusion A concluding paragraph is a brief summary of your main ideas and restates the paper's main thesis, giving the reader the sense that the stated goal of the paper has been accomplished. What have you learned by doing this research that you didn't know before? What conclusions have you drawn? You may also want to suggest further areas of study, improvement of research possibilities, etc. to demonstrate your critical thinking regarding your research.

• << Previous: Writing Tips
• Next: Edit & Rewrite >>
• Last Updated: Feb 1, 2024 4:06 PM
• URL: https://library.hccc.edu/research_paper

Gabert Library

NHC Library

• Database A-Z
• Research Guides
• Citation Help
• Ask a Librarian
• Library Instruction
• Academic Liaisons
• Library Staff Login

How to Write the Discussion Section of a Research Paper

The discussion section of a research paper analyzes and interprets the findings, provides context, compares them with previous studies, identifies limitations, and suggests future research directions.

Updated on September 15, 2023

Structure your discussion section right, and you’ll be cited more often while doing a greater service to the scientific community. So, what actually goes into the discussion section? And how do you write it?

The discussion section of your research paper is where you let the reader know how your study is positioned in the literature, what to take away from your paper, and how your work helps them. It can also include your conclusions and suggestions for future studies.

First, we’ll define all the parts of your discussion paper, and then look into how to write a strong, effective discussion section for your paper or manuscript.

Discussion section: what is it, what it does

The discussion section comes later in your paper, following the introduction, methods, and results. The discussion sets up your study’s conclusions. Its main goals are to present, interpret, and provide a context for your results.

What is it?

The discussion section provides an analysis and interpretation of the findings, compares them with previous studies, identifies limitations, and suggests future directions for research.

This section combines information from the preceding parts of your paper into a coherent story. By this point, the reader already knows why you did your study (introduction), how you did it (methods), and what happened (results). In the discussion, you’ll help the reader connect the ideas from these sections.

Why is it necessary?

The discussion provides context and interpretations for the results. It also answers the questions posed in the introduction. While the results section describes your findings, the discussion explains what they say. This is also where you can describe the impact or implications of your research.

Adds context for your results

Most research studies aim to answer a question, replicate a finding, or address limitations in the literature. These goals are first described in the introduction. However, in the discussion section, the author can refer back to them to explain how the study's objective was achieved. 

Shows what your results actually mean and real-world implications

The discussion can also describe the effect of your findings on research or practice. How are your results significant for readers, other researchers, or policymakers?

What to include in your discussion (in the correct order)

A complete and effective discussion section should at least touch on the points described below.

Summary of key findings

The discussion should begin with a brief factual summary of the results. Concisely overview the main results you obtained.

Begin with key findings with supporting evidence

Your results section described a list of findings, but what message do they send when you look at them all together?

Your findings were detailed in the results section, so there’s no need to repeat them here, but do provide at least a few highlights. This will help refresh the reader’s memory and help them focus on the big picture.

Read the first paragraph of the discussion section in this article (PDF) for an example of how to start this part of your paper. Notice how the authors break down their results and follow each description sentence with an explanation of why each finding is relevant. 

State clearly and concisely

Following a clear and direct writing style is especially important in the discussion section. After all, this is where you will make some of the most impactful points in your paper. While the results section often contains technical vocabulary, such as statistical terms, the discussion section lets you describe your findings more clearly. 

Interpretation of results

Once you’ve given your reader an overview of your results, you need to interpret those results. In other words, what do your results mean? Discuss the findings’ implications and significance in relation to your research question or hypothesis.

Analyze and interpret your findings

Look into your findings and explore what’s behind them or what may have caused them. If your introduction cited theories or studies that could explain your findings, use these sources as a basis to discuss your results.

For example, look at the second paragraph in the discussion section of this article on waggling honey bees. Here, the authors explore their results based on information from the literature.

Unexpected or contradictory results

Sometimes, your findings are not what you expect. Here’s where you describe this and try to find a reason for it. Could it be because of the method you used? Does it have something to do with the variables analyzed? Comparing your methods with those of other similar studies can help with this task.

Context and comparison with previous work

Refer to related studies to place your research in a larger context and the literature. Compare and contrast your findings with existing literature, highlighting similarities, differences, and/or contradictions.

How your work compares or contrasts with previous work

Studies with similar findings to yours can be cited to show the strength of your findings. Information from these studies can also be used to help explain your results. Differences between your findings and others in the literature can also be discussed here. 

How to divide this section into subsections

If you have more than one objective in your study or many key findings, you can dedicate a separate section to each of these. Here’s an example of this approach. You can see that the discussion section is divided into topics and even has a separate heading for each of them. 

Limitations

Many journals require you to include the limitations of your study in the discussion. Even if they don’t, there are good reasons to mention these in your paper.

Why limitations don’t have a negative connotation

A study’s limitations are points to be improved upon in future research. While some of these may be flaws in your method, many may be due to factors you couldn’t predict.

Examples include time constraints or small sample sizes. Pointing this out will help future researchers avoid or address these issues. This part of the discussion can also include any attempts you have made to reduce the impact of these limitations, as in this study .

How limitations add to a researcher's credibility

Pointing out the limitations of your study demonstrates transparency. It also shows that you know your methods well and can conduct a critical assessment of them.  

Implications and significance

The final paragraph of the discussion section should contain the take-home messages for your study. It can also cite the “strong points” of your study, to contrast with the limitations section.

Restate your hypothesis

Remind the reader what your hypothesis was before you conducted the study. 

How was it proven or disproven?

Identify your main findings and describe how they relate to your hypothesis.

How your results contribute to the literature

Were you able to answer your research question? Or address a gap in the literature?

Future implications of your research

Describe the impact that your results may have on the topic of study. Your results may show, for instance, that there are still limitations in the literature for future studies to address. There may be a need for studies that extend your findings in a specific way. You also may need additional research to corroborate your findings. 

Sample discussion section

This fictitious example covers all the aspects discussed above. Your actual discussion section will probably be much longer, but you can read this to get an idea of everything your discussion should cover.

Our results showed that the presence of cats in a household is associated with higher levels of perceived happiness by its human occupants. These findings support our hypothesis and demonstrate the association between pet ownership and well-being. 

The present findings align with those of Bao and Schreer (2016) and Hardie et al. (2023), who observed greater life satisfaction in pet owners relative to non-owners. Although the present study did not directly evaluate life satisfaction, this factor may explain the association between happiness and cat ownership observed in our sample.

Our findings must be interpreted in light of some limitations, such as the focus on cat ownership only rather than pets as a whole. This may limit the generalizability of our results.

Nevertheless, this study had several strengths. These include its strict exclusion criteria and use of a standardized assessment instrument to investigate the relationships between pets and owners. These attributes bolster the accuracy of our results and reduce the influence of confounding factors, increasing the strength of our conclusions. Future studies may examine the factors that mediate the association between pet ownership and happiness to better comprehend this phenomenon.

This brief discussion begins with a quick summary of the results and hypothesis. The next paragraph cites previous research and compares its findings to those of this study. Information from previous studies is also used to help interpret the findings. After discussing the results of the study, some limitations are pointed out. The paper also explains why these limitations may influence the interpretation of results. Then, final conclusions are drawn based on the study, and directions for future research are suggested.

How to make your discussion flow naturally

If you find writing in scientific English challenging, the discussion and conclusions are often the hardest parts of the paper to write. That’s because you’re not just listing up studies, methods, and outcomes. You’re actually expressing your thoughts and interpretations in words.

• How formal should it be?
• What words should you use, or not use?
• How do you meet strict word limits, or make it longer and more informative?

Always give it your best, but sometimes a helping hand can, well, help. Getting a professional edit can help clarify your work’s importance while improving the English used to explain it. When readers know the value of your work, they’ll cite it. We’ll assign your study to an expert editor knowledgeable in your area of research. Their work will clarify your discussion, helping it to tell your story. Find out more about AJE Editing.

Adam Goulston, PsyD, MS, MBA, MISD, ELS

Science Marketing Consultant

See our "Privacy Policy"

Ensure your structure and ideas are consistent and clearly communicated

Pair your Premium Editing with our add-on service Presubmission Review for an overall assessment of your manuscript.

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• Academic Writing Style
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

Academic writing refers to a style of expression that researchers use to define the intellectual boundaries of their disciplines and specific areas of expertise. Characteristics of academic writing include a formal tone, use of the third-person rather than first-person perspective (usually), a clear focus on the research problem under investigation, and precise word choice. Like specialist languages adopted in other professions, such as, law or medicine, academic writing is designed to convey agreed meaning about complex ideas or concepts within a community of scholarly experts and practitioners.

Academic Writing. Writing Center. Colorado Technical College; Hartley, James. Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Guide . New York: Routledge, 2008; Ezza, El-Sadig Y. and Touria Drid. T eaching Academic Writing as a Discipline-Specific Skill in Higher Education . Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2020.

Importance of Good Academic Writing

The accepted form of academic writing in the social sciences can vary considerable depending on the methodological framework and the intended audience. However, most college-level research papers require careful attention to the following stylistic elements:

I.  The Big Picture Unlike creative or journalistic writing, the overall structure of academic writing is formal and logical. It must be cohesive and possess a logically organized flow of ideas; this means that the various parts are connected to form a unified whole. There should be narrative links between sentences and paragraphs so that the reader is able to follow your argument. The introduction should include a description of how the rest of the paper is organized and all sources are properly cited throughout the paper.

II.  Tone The overall tone refers to the attitude conveyed in a piece of writing. Throughout your paper, it is important that you present the arguments of others fairly and with an appropriate narrative tone. When presenting a position or argument that you disagree with, describe this argument accurately and without loaded or biased language. In academic writing, the author is expected to investigate the research problem from an authoritative point of view. You should, therefore, state the strengths of your arguments confidently, using language that is neutral, not confrontational or dismissive.

III.  Diction Diction refers to the choice of words you use. Awareness of the words you use is important because words that have almost the same denotation [dictionary definition] can have very different connotations [implied meanings]. This is particularly true in academic writing because words and terminology can evolve a nuanced meaning that describes a particular idea, concept, or phenomenon derived from the epistemological culture of that discipline [e.g., the concept of rational choice in political science]. Therefore, use concrete words [not general] that convey a specific meaning. If this cannot be done without confusing the reader, then you need to explain what you mean within the context of how that word or phrase is used within a discipline.

IV.  Language The investigation of research problems in the social sciences is often complex and multi- dimensional . Therefore, it is important that you use unambiguous language. Well-structured paragraphs and clear topic sentences enable a reader to follow your line of thinking without difficulty. Your language should be concise, formal, and express precisely what you want it to mean. Do not use vague expressions that are not specific or precise enough for the reader to derive exact meaning ["they," "we," "people," "the organization," etc.], abbreviations like 'i.e.'  ["in other words"], 'e.g.' ["for example"], or 'a.k.a.' ["also known as"], and the use of unspecific determinate words ["super," "very," "incredible," "huge," etc.].

V.  Punctuation Scholars rely on precise words and language to establish the narrative tone of their work and, therefore, punctuation marks are used very deliberately. For example, exclamation points are rarely used to express a heightened tone because it can come across as unsophisticated or over-excited. Dashes should be limited to the insertion of an explanatory comment in a sentence, while hyphens should be limited to connecting prefixes to words [e.g., multi-disciplinary] or when forming compound phrases [e.g., commander-in-chief]. Finally, understand that semi-colons represent a pause that is longer than a comma, but shorter than a period in a sentence. In general, there are four grammatical uses of semi-colons: when a second clause expands or explains the first clause; to describe a sequence of actions or different aspects of the same topic; placed before clauses which begin with "nevertheless", "therefore", "even so," and "for instance”; and, to mark off a series of phrases or clauses which contain commas. If you are not confident about when to use semi-colons [and most of the time, they are not required for proper punctuation], rewrite using shorter sentences or revise the paragraph.

VI.  Academic Conventions Among the most important rules and principles of academic engagement of a writing is citing sources in the body of your paper and providing a list of references as either footnotes or endnotes. The academic convention of citing sources facilitates processes of intellectual discovery, critical thinking, and applying a deliberate method of navigating through the scholarly landscape by tracking how cited works are propagated by scholars over time . Aside from citing sources, other academic conventions to follow include the appropriate use of headings and subheadings, properly spelling out acronyms when first used in the text, avoiding slang or colloquial language, avoiding emotive language or unsupported declarative statements, avoiding contractions [e.g., isn't], and using first person and second person pronouns only when necessary.

VII.  Evidence-Based Reasoning Assignments often ask you to express your own point of view about the research problem. However, what is valued in academic writing is that statements are based on evidence-based reasoning. This refers to possessing a clear understanding of the pertinent body of knowledge and academic debates that exist within, and often external to, your discipline concerning the topic. You need to support your arguments with evidence from scholarly [i.e., academic or peer-reviewed] sources. It should be an objective stance presented as a logical argument; the quality of the evidence you cite will determine the strength of your argument. The objective is to convince the reader of the validity of your thoughts through a well-documented, coherent, and logically structured piece of writing. This is particularly important when proposing solutions to problems or delineating recommended courses of action.

VIII.  Thesis-Driven Academic writing is “thesis-driven,” meaning that the starting point is a particular perspective, idea, or position applied to the chosen topic of investigation, such as, establishing, proving, or disproving solutions to the questions applied to investigating the research problem. Note that a problem statement without the research questions does not qualify as academic writing because simply identifying the research problem does not establish for the reader how you will contribute to solving the problem, what aspects you believe are most critical, or suggest a method for gathering information or data to better understand the problem.

IX.  Complexity and Higher-Order Thinking Academic writing addresses complex issues that require higher-order thinking skills applied to understanding the research problem [e.g., critical, reflective, logical, and creative thinking as opposed to, for example, descriptive or prescriptive thinking]. Higher-order thinking skills include cognitive processes that are used to comprehend, solve problems, and express concepts or that describe abstract ideas that cannot be easily acted out, pointed to, or shown with images. Think of your writing this way: One of the most important attributes of a good teacher is the ability to explain complexity in a way that is understandable and relatable to the topic being presented during class. This is also one of the main functions of academic writing--examining and explaining the significance of complex ideas as clearly as possible.  As a writer, you must adopt the role of a good teacher by summarizing complex information into a well-organized synthesis of ideas, concepts, and recommendations that contribute to a better understanding of the research problem.

Academic Writing. Writing Center. Colorado Technical College; Hartley, James. Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Guide . New York: Routledge, 2008; Murray, Rowena  and Sarah Moore. The Handbook of Academic Writing: A Fresh Approach . New York: Open University Press, 2006; Johnson, Roy. Improve Your Writing Skills . Manchester, UK: Clifton Press, 1995; Nygaard, Lynn P. Writing for Scholars: A Practical Guide to Making Sense and Being Heard . Second edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2015; Silvia, Paul J. How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2007; Style, Diction, Tone, and Voice. Writing Center, Wheaton College; Sword, Helen. Stylish Academic Writing . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.

Strategies for...

Understanding Academic Writing and Its Jargon

The very definition of research jargon is language specific to a particular community of practitioner-researchers . Therefore, in modern university life, jargon represents the specific language and meaning assigned to words and phrases specific to a discipline or area of study. For example, the idea of being rational may hold the same general meaning in both political science and psychology, but its application to understanding and explaining phenomena within the research domain of a each discipline may have subtle differences based upon how scholars in that discipline apply the concept to the theories and practice of their work.

Given this, it is important that specialist terminology [i.e., jargon] must be used accurately and applied under the appropriate conditions . Subject-specific dictionaries are the best places to confirm the meaning of terms within the context of a specific discipline. These can be found by either searching in the USC Libraries catalog by entering the disciplinary and the word dictionary [e.g., sociology and dictionary] or using a database such as Credo Reference [a curated collection of subject encyclopedias, dictionaries, handbooks, guides from highly regarded publishers] . It is appropriate for you to use specialist language within your field of study, but you should avoid using such language when writing for non-academic or general audiences.

Problems with Opaque Writing

A common criticism of scholars is that they can utilize needlessly complex syntax or overly expansive vocabulary that is impenetrable or not well-defined. When writing, avoid problems associated with opaque writing by keeping in mind the following:

1.   Excessive use of specialized terminology . Yes, it is appropriate for you to use specialist language and a formal style of expression in academic writing, but it does not mean using "big words" just for the sake of doing so. Overuse of complex or obscure words or writing complicated sentence constructions gives readers the impression that your paper is more about style than substance; it leads the reader to question if you really know what you are talking about. Focus on creating clear, concise, and elegant prose that minimizes reliance on specialized terminology.

2.   Inappropriate use of specialized terminology . Because you are dealing with concepts, research, and data within your discipline, you need to use the technical language appropriate to that area of study. However, nothing will undermine the validity of your study quicker than the inappropriate application of a term or concept. Avoid using terms whose meaning you are unsure of--do not just guess or assume! Consult the meaning of terms in specialized, discipline-specific dictionaries by searching the USC Libraries catalog or the Credo Reference database [see above].

Additional Problems to Avoid

In addition to understanding the use of specialized language, there are other aspects of academic writing in the social sciences that you should be aware of. These problems include:

• Personal nouns . Excessive use of personal nouns [e.g., I, me, you, us] may lead the reader to believe the study was overly subjective. These words can be interpreted as being used only to avoid presenting empirical evidence about the research problem. Limit the use of personal nouns to descriptions of things you actually did [e.g., "I interviewed ten teachers about classroom management techniques..."]. Note that personal nouns are generally found in the discussion section of a paper because this is where you as the author/researcher interpret and describe your work.
• Directives . Avoid directives that demand the reader to "do this" or "do that." Directives should be framed as evidence-based recommendations or goals leading to specific outcomes. Note that an exception to this can be found in various forms of action research that involve evidence-based advocacy for social justice or transformative change. Within this area of the social sciences, authors may offer directives for action in a declarative tone of urgency.
• Informal, conversational tone using slang and idioms . Academic writing relies on excellent grammar and precise word structure. Your narrative should not include regional dialects or slang terms because they can be open to interpretation. Your writing should be direct and concise using standard English.
• Wordiness. Focus on being concise, straightforward, and developing a narrative that does not have confusing language . By doing so, you  help eliminate the possibility of the reader misinterpreting the design and purpose of your study.
• Vague expressions (e.g., "they," "we," "people," "the company," "that area," etc.). Being concise in your writing also includes avoiding vague references to persons, places, or things. While proofreading your paper, be sure to look for and edit any vague or imprecise statements that lack context or specificity.
• Numbered lists and bulleted items . The use of bulleted items or lists should be used only if the narrative dictates a need for clarity. For example, it is fine to state, "The four main problems with hedge funds are:" and then list them as 1, 2, 3, 4. However, in academic writing, this must then be followed by detailed explanation and analysis of each item. Given this, the question you should ask yourself while proofreading is: why begin with a list in the first place rather than just starting with systematic analysis of each item arranged in separate paragraphs? Also, be careful using numbers because they can imply a ranked order of priority or importance. If none exists, use bullets and avoid checkmarks or other symbols.
• Descriptive writing . Describing a research problem is an important means of contextualizing a study. In fact, some description or background information may be needed because you can not assume the reader knows the key aspects of the topic. However, the content of your paper should focus on methodology, the analysis and interpretation of findings, and their implications as they apply to the research problem rather than background information and descriptions of tangential issues.
• Personal experience. Drawing upon personal experience [e.g., traveling abroad; caring for someone with Alzheimer's disease] can be an effective way of introducing the research problem or engaging your readers in understanding its significance. Use personal experience only as an example, though, because academic writing relies on evidence-based research. To do otherwise is simply story-telling.

NOTE:   Rules concerning excellent grammar and precise word structure do not apply when quoting someone.  A quote should be inserted in the text of your paper exactly as it was stated. If the quote is especially vague or hard to understand, consider paraphrasing it or using a different quote to convey the same meaning. Consider inserting the term "sic" in brackets after the quoted text to indicate that the quotation has been transcribed exactly as found in the original source, but the source had grammar, spelling, or other errors. The adverb sic informs the reader that the errors are not yours.

Academic Writing. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Academic Writing Style. First-Year Seminar Handbook. Mercer University; Bem, Daryl J. Writing the Empirical Journal Article. Cornell University; College Writing. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Murray, Rowena  and Sarah Moore. The Handbook of Academic Writing: A Fresh Approach . New York: Open University Press, 2006; Johnson, Eileen S. “Action Research.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education . Edited by George W. Noblit and Joseph R. Neikirk. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020); Oppenheimer, Daniel M. "Consequences of Erudite Vernacular Utilized Irrespective of Necessity: Problems with Using Long Words Needlessly." Applied Cognitive Psychology 20 (2006): 139-156; Ezza, El-Sadig Y. and Touria Drid. T eaching Academic Writing as a Discipline-Specific Skill in Higher Education . Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2020; Pernawan, Ari. Common Flaws in Students' Research Proposals. English Education Department. Yogyakarta State University; Style. College Writing. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Invention: Five Qualities of Good Writing. The Reading/Writing Center. Hunter College; Sword, Helen. Stylish Academic Writing . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012; What Is an Academic Paper? Institute for Writing Rhetoric. Dartmouth College.

Structure and Writing Style

I. Improving Academic Writing

To improve your academic writing skills, you should focus your efforts on three key areas: 1.   Clear Writing . The act of thinking about precedes the process of writing about. Good writers spend sufficient time distilling information and reviewing major points from the literature they have reviewed before creating their work. Writing detailed outlines can help you clearly organize your thoughts. Effective academic writing begins with solid planning, so manage your time carefully. 2.  Excellent Grammar . Needless to say, English grammar can be difficult and complex; even the best scholars take many years before they have a command of the major points of good grammar. Take the time to learn the major and minor points of good grammar. Spend time practicing writing and seek detailed feedback from professors. Take advantage of the Writing Center on campus if you need help. Proper punctuation and good proofreading skills can significantly improve academic writing [see sub-tab for proofreading you paper ].

Refer to these three basic resources to help your grammar and writing skills:

• A good writing reference book, such as, Strunk and White’s book, The Elements of Style or the St. Martin's Handbook ;
• A college-level dictionary, such as, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary ;
• The latest edition of Roget's Thesaurus in Dictionary Form .

3.  Consistent Stylistic Approach . Whether your professor expresses a preference to use MLA, APA or the Chicago Manual of Style or not, choose one style manual and stick to it. Each of these style manuals provide rules on how to write out numbers, references, citations, footnotes, and lists. Consistent adherence to a style of writing helps with the narrative flow of your paper and improves its readability. Note that some disciplines require a particular style [e.g., education uses APA] so as you write more papers within your major, your familiarity with it will improve.

II. Evaluating Quality of Writing

A useful approach for evaluating the quality of your academic writing is to consider the following issues from the perspective of the reader. While proofreading your final draft, critically assess the following elements in your writing.

• It is shaped around one clear research problem, and it explains what that problem is from the outset.
• Your paper tells the reader why the problem is important and why people should know about it.
• You have accurately and thoroughly informed the reader what has already been published about this problem or others related to it and noted important gaps in the research.
• You have provided evidence to support your argument that the reader finds convincing.
• The paper includes a description of how and why particular evidence was collected and analyzed, and why specific theoretical arguments or concepts were used.
• The paper is made up of paragraphs, each containing only one controlling idea.
• You indicate how each section of the paper addresses the research problem.
• You have considered counter-arguments or counter-examples where they are relevant.
• Arguments, evidence, and their significance have been presented in the conclusion.
• Limitations of your research have been explained as evidence of the potential need for further study.
• The narrative flows in a clear, accurate, and well-organized way.

Boscoloa, Pietro, Barbara Arféb, and Mara Quarisaa. “Improving the Quality of Students' Academic Writing: An Intervention Study.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (August 2007): 419-438; Academic Writing. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Academic Writing Style. First-Year Seminar Handbook. Mercer University; Bem, Daryl J. Writing the Empirical Journal Article. Cornell University; Candlin, Christopher. Academic Writing Step-By-Step: A Research-based Approach . Bristol, CT: Equinox Publishing Ltd., 2016; College Writing. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Style . College Writing. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Invention: Five Qualities of Good Writing. The Reading/Writing Center. Hunter College; Sword, Helen. Stylish Academic Writing . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012; What Is an Academic Paper? Institute for Writing Rhetoric. Dartmouth College.

Writing Tip

Considering the Passive Voice in Academic Writing

In the English language, we are able to construct sentences in the following way: 1.  "The policies of Congress caused the economic crisis." 2.  "The economic crisis was caused by the policies of Congress."

The decision about which sentence to use is governed by whether you want to focus on “Congress” and what they did, or on “the economic crisis” and what caused it. This choice in focus is achieved with the use of either the active or the passive voice. When you want your readers to focus on the "doer" of an action, you can make the "doer"' the subject of the sentence and use the active form of the verb. When you want readers to focus on the person, place, or thing affected by the action, or the action itself, you can make the effect or the action the subject of the sentence by using the passive form of the verb.

Often in academic writing, scholars don't want to focus on who is doing an action, but on who is receiving or experiencing the consequences of that action. The passive voice is useful in academic writing because it allows writers to highlight the most important participants or events within sentences by placing them at the beginning of the sentence.

Use the passive voice when:

• You want to focus on the person, place, or thing affected by the action, or the action itself;
• It is not important who or what did the action;
• You want to be impersonal or more formal.

Form the passive voice by:

• Turning the object of the active sentence into the subject of the passive sentence.
• Changing the verb to a passive form by adding the appropriate form of the verb "to be" and the past participle of the main verb.

NOTE: Consult with your professor about using the passive voice before submitting your research paper. Some strongly discourage its use!

Active and Passive Voice. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Diefenbach, Paul. Future of Digital Media Syllabus. Drexel University; Passive Voice. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina.  

• << Previous: 2. Preparing to Write
• Next: Applying Critical Thinking >>
• Last Updated: Aug 20, 2024 9:48 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Author Biographies
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Neurological impact of respiratory viruses: insights into glial cell responses in the central nervous system.

1. Introduction

2. glial cells in the central nervous system, 2.1. microglia, 2.2. astrocytes, 3. respiratory viruses and the glial cells of the cns, 3.1. human respiratory syncytial virus, 3.2. severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, 3.3. influenza virus, 3.4. human parvoviruses.

4. Conclusions

Author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Jessen, K.R. Glial cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004 , 36 , 1861–1867. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Allen, N.J.; Lyons, D.A. Glia as architects of central nervous system formation and function. Science 2018 , 362 , 181–185. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xu, S.; Lu, J.; Shao, A.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, J. Glial Cells: Role of the Immune Response in Ischemic Stroke. Front. Immunol. 2020 , 11 , 294. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bohmwald, K.; Gálvez, N.M.S.; Ríos, M.; Kalergis, A.M. Neurologic alterations due to respiratory virus infections. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018 , 12 , 386. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Heegaard, E.D.; Brown, K.E. Human parvovirus B19. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002 , 15 , 485–505. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boncristiani, H.F.; Criado, M.F.; Arruda, E. Respiratory Viruses. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology , 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 500–518. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Qiu, J.; Söderlund-Venermo, M.; Young, N.S. Human parvoviruses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017 , 30 , 43–113. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Bhattacharya, S.; Agarwal, S.; Shrimali, N.M.; Guchhait, P. Interplay between hypoxia and inflammation contributes to the progression and severity of respiratory viral diseases. Mol. Aspects Med. 2021 , 81 , 101000. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bohmwald, K.; Andrade, C.A.; Mora, V.P.; Muñoz, J.T.; Ramírez, R.; Rojas, M.F.; Kalergis, A.M. Neurotrophin Signaling Impairment by Viral Infections in the Central Nervous System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022 , 23 , 5817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Watanabe, T. Acute encephalitis and encephalopathy associated with human parvovirus B19 infection in children. World J. Clin. Pediatr. 2015 , 4 , 126. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bohmwald, K.; Andrade, C.A.; Kalergis, A.M. Contribution of pro-inflammatory molecules induced by respiratory virus infections to neurological disorders. Pharmaceuticals 2021 , 14 , 340. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jäkel, S.; Dimou, L. Glial Cells and Their Function in the Adult Brain: A Journey through the History of Their Ablation. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017 , 11 , 24. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Antel, J.P.; Becher, B.; Ludwin, S.K.; Prat, A.; Quintana, F.J. Glial Cells as Regulators of Neuroimmune Interactions in the Central Nervous System. J. Immunol. 2020 , 204 , 251–255. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Nayak, D.; Roth, T.L.; McGavern, D.B. Microglia Development and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014 , 32 , 367. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Spiteri, A.G.; Wishart, C.L.; Pamphlett, R.; Locatelli, G.; King, N.J.C. Microglia and monocytes in inflammatory CNS disease: Integrating phenotype and function. Acta Neuropathol. 2022 , 143 , 179–224. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Borst, K.; Dumas, A.A.; Prinz, M. Microglia: Immune and non-immune functions. Immunity 2021 , 54 , 2194–2208. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Xu, P.; Yu, Y.; Wu, P. Role of microglia in brain development after viral infection. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024 , 12 , 1340308. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yang, I.; Han, S.J.; Kaur, G.; Crane, C.; Parsa, A.T. The role of microglia in central nervous system immunity and glioma immunology. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2010 , 17 , 6–10. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Fiebich, B.L.; Batista, C.R.A.; Saliba, S.W.; Yousif, N.M.; de Oliveira, A.C.P. Role of microglia TLRs in neurodegeneration. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018 , 12 , 329. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Olson, J.K.; Miller, S.D. Microglia Initiate Central Nervous System Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses through Multiple TLRs. J. Immunol. 2004 , 173 , 3916–3924. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guo, S.; Wang, H.; Yin, Y. Microglia Polarization From M1 to M2 in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022 , 14 , 815347. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tremblay, M.E.; Madore, C.; Bordeleau, M.; Tian, L.; Verkhratsky, A. Neuropathobiology of COVID-19: The Role for Glia. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020 , 14 , 592214. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ransohoff, R.M. A polarizing question: Do M1 and M2 microglia exist. Nat. Neurosci. 2016 , 19 , 987–991. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Giovannoni, F.; Quintana, F.J. The Role of Astrocytes in CNS Inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2020 , 41 , 805–819. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Sofroniew, M.V.; Vinters, H.V. Astrocytes: Biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2009 , 119 , 7–35. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Deneen, B.; Akdemir, E.S.; Huang, A.Y.S. Astrocytogenesis: Where, when, and how. F1000Research 2020 , 9 , 233. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Filous, A.R.; Silver, J. Targeting astrocytes in CNS injury and disease: A translational research approach. Prog. Neurobiol. 2016 , 144 , 173–187. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lundgaard, I.; Osório, M.J.; Kress, B.T.; Sanggaard, S.; Nedergaard, M. White matter astrocytes in health and disease. Neuroscience 2014 , 276 , 161–173. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dong, Y.; Benveniste, E.N. Immune function of astrocytes. Glia 2001 , 36 , 180–190. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Villablanca, C.; Vidal, R.; Gonzalez-Billault, C. Are cytoskeleton changes observed in astrocytes functionally linked to aging? Brain Res. Bull. 2023 , 196 , 59–67. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lawrence, J.M.; Schardien, K.; Wigdahl, B.; Nonnemacher, M.R. Roles of neuropathology-associated reactive astrocytes: A systematic review. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2023 , 11 , 42. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Oberheim, N.A.; Goldman, S.A.; Nedergaard, M. Heterogeneity of Astrocytic Form and Function. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012 , 814 , 23. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Siracusa, R.; Fusco, R.; Cuzzocrea, S. Astrocytes: Role and functions in brain pathologies. Front. Pharmacol. 2019 , 10 , 1114. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ding, Z.B.; Song, L.J.; Wang, Q.; Kumar, G.; Yan, Y.Q.; Ma, C.G. Astrocytes: A double-edged sword in neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen. Res. 2021 , 16 , 1702–1710. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Rodgers, K.R.; Lin, Y.; Langan, T.J.; Iwakura, Y.; Chou, R.C. Innate Immune Functions of Astrocytes are Dependent Upon Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha. Sci. Rep. 2020 , 10 , 7047. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Zimmerman, R.K.; Balasubramani, G.K.; D’Agostino, H.E.A.; Clarke, L.; Yassin, M.; Middleton, D.B.; Silveira, F.P.; Wheeler, N.D.; Landis, J.; Peterson, A.; et al. Population-based hospitalization burden estimates for respiratory viruses, 2015–2019. Influenza Other Respi. Viruses 2022 , 16 , 1133–1140. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bohmwald, K.; Andrade, C.A.; Gálvez, N.M.S.; Mora, V.P.; Muñoz, J.T.; Kalergis, A.M. The Causes and Long-Term Consequences of Viral Encephalitis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021 , 15 , 755875. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Griffiths, C.; Drews, S.J.; Marchant, D.J. Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Infection, Detection, and New Options for Prevention and Treatment. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2017 , 30 , 277–319. [ Google Scholar ]
• Andrade, C.A.; Kalergis, A.M.; Bohmwald, K. Potential Neurocognitive Symptoms Due to Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection. Pathogens 2022 , 11 , 47. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen, L.; Cai, J.; Zhang, J.; Tang, Y.; Chen, J.; Xiong, S.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.; Li, M.; et al. Respiratory syncytial virus co-opts hypoxia-inducible factor-1α-mediated glycolysis to favor the production of infectious virus. mBio 2023 , 14 , e0211023. [ Google Scholar ]
• Haeberle, H.A.; Dürrstein, C.; Rosenberger, P.; Hosakote, Y.M.; Kuhlicke, J.; Kempf, V.A.J.; Garofalo, R.P.; Eitzschig, H.K. Oxygen-independent stabilization of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1 during RSV infection. PLoS ONE 2008 , 3 , 14–16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhuang, X.; Gallo, G.; Sharma, P.; Ha, J.; Magri, A.; Borrmann, H.; Harris, J.M.; Tsukuda, S.; Bentley, E.; Kirby, A.; et al. Hypoxia inducible factors inhibit respiratory syncytial virus infection by modulation of nucleolin expression. iScience 2024 , 27 , 108763. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lee, S.J.; Kim, J.M.; Keum, H.R.; Kim, S.W.; Baek, H.S.; Byun, J.C.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.M. Seasonal Trends in the Prevalence and Incidence of Viral Encephalitis in Korea (2015–2019). J. Clin. Med. 2023 , 12 , 2003. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Saravanos, G.L.; King, C.L.; Deng, L.; Dinsmore, N.; Ramos, I.; Takashima, M.; Crawford, N.; Clark, J.E.; Dale, R.C.; Jones, C.A.; et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus–Associated Neurologic Complications in Children: A Systematic Review and Aggregated Case Series. J. Pediatr. 2021 , 239 , 39–49.e9. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• He, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wei, J.; Yang, Z.; Ren, L.; Deng, Y.; Chen, S.; Zang, N.; Liu, E. Exploring Key Genes and Mechanisms in Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Infected BALB/c Mice via Multi-Organ Expression Profiles. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022 , 12 , 858305. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bohmwald, K.; Soto, J.A.; Andrade-Parra, C.; Fernández-Fierro, A.; Espinoza, J.A.; Ríos, M.; Eugenin, E.A.; González, P.A.; Opazo, M.C.; Riedel, C.A.; et al. Lung pathology due to hRSV infection impairs blood–brain barrier permeability enabling astrocyte infection and a long-lasting inflammation in the CNS. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2021 , 91 , 159–171. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Morichi, S.; Kawashima, H.; Ioi, H.; Yamanaka, G.; Kashiwagi, Y.; Hoshika, A.; Nakayama, T.; Watanabe, Y. Classification of acute encephalopathy in respiratory syncytial virus infection. J. Infect. Chemother. 2011 , 17 , 776–781. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Feng, Z.; Xu, L.; Xie, Z. Receptors for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection and Host Factors Regulating the Life Cycle of Respiratory Syncytial Virus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022 , 12 , 858629. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ozawa, D.; Nakamura, T.; Koike, M.; Hirano, K.; Miki, Y.; Beppu, M. Shuttling protein nucleolin is a microglia receptor for amyloid beta peptide 1-42. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2013 , 36 , 1587–1593. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Müller, N. The role of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders. Front. Pharmacol. 2019 , 10 , 1251. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vartak-Sharma, N.; Ghorpade, A. Astrocyte elevated gene-1 regulates astrocyte responses to neural injury: Implications for reactive astrogliosis and neurodegeneration. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012 , 9 , 195. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meucci, O.; Fatatis, A.; Simen, A.A.; Miller, R.J. Expression of CX3CR1 chemokine receptors on neurons and their role in neuronal survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000 , 97 , 8075–8080. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Romano, R.; Bucci, C. Role of EGFR in the Nervous System. Cells 2020 , 9 , 1887. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Qu, W.S.; Tian, D.S.; Guo, Z.B.; Fang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, Z.Y.; Xie, M.J.; Zhang, H.Q.; Lü, J.G.; Wang, W. Inhibition of EGFR/MAPK signaling reduces microglial inflammatory response and the associated secondary damage in rats after spinal cord injury. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012 , 9 , 178. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Tselnicker, I.F.; Boisvert, M.M.; Allen, N.J. The role of neuronal versus astrocyte-derived heparan sulfate proteoglycans in brain development and injury. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014 , 42 , 1263–1269. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• O’Callaghan, P.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.P. Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans as Relays of Neuroinflammation. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2018 , 66 , 305–319. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mao, Y.; Bajinka, O.; Tang, Z.; Qiu, X.; Tan, Y. Lung–brain axis: Metabolomics and pathological changes in lungs and brain of respiratory syncytial virus-infected mice. J. Med. Virol. 2022 , 94 , 5885–5893. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bajinka, O.; Tang, Z.; Mao, Y.; Qiu, X.; Darboe, A.; Tan, Y. Respiratory syncytial virus infection disrupts pulmonary microbiota to induce microglia phenotype shift. J. Med. Virol. 2023 , 95 , e28976. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, X.Y.; Zhang, X.C.; Yu, H.Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, L.; Zhu, G.X.; Cao, X.J.; Huang, S.H. Respiratory syncytial virus infection of microglia exacerbates SH-SY5Y neuronal cell injury by inducing the secretion of inflammatory cytokines: A Transwell in vitro study. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2021 , 24 , 213–221. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gusev, E.; Sarapultsev, A.; Solomatina, L.; Chereshnev, V. SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Response and the Pathogenesis of COVID-19. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022 , 23 , 1716. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pal, M.; Berhanu, G.; Desalegn, C.; Kandi, V. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2): An Update. Cureus 2020 , 12 , e7423. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lamers, M.M.; Haagmans, B.L. SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022 , 20 , 270–284. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jeong, G.U.; Lyu, J.; Kim, K.-D.; Chung, Y.C.; Yoon, G.Y.; Lee, S.; Hwang, I.; Shin, W.-H.; Ko, J.; Lee, J.-Y.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Microglia Elicits Proinflammatory Activation and Apoptotic Cell Death. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022 , 10 , e0109122. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Samudyata; Oliveira, A.O.; Malwade, S.; Rufino de Sousa, N.; Goparaju, S.K.; Gracias, J.; Orhan, F.; Steponaviciute, L.; Schalling, M.; Sheridan, S.D.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 promotes microglial synapse elimination in human brain organoids. Mol. Psychiatry 2022 , 27 , 3939–3950. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jahani, M.; Dokaneheifard, S.; Mansouri, K. Hypoxia: A key feature of COVID-19 launching activation of HIF-1 and cytokine storm. J. Inflamm. 2020 , 17 , 33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luo, Z.; Tian, M.; Yang, G.; Tan, Q.; Chen, Y.; Li, G.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Wan, P.; Wu, J. Hypoxia signaling in human health and diseases: Implications and prospects for therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022 , 7 , 218. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Rutkai, I.; Mayer, M.G.; Hellmers, L.M.; Ning, B.; Huang, Z.; Monjure, C.J.; Coyne, C.; Silvestri, R.; Golden, N.; Hensley, K.; et al. Neuropathology and virus in brain of SARS-CoV-2 infected non-human primates. Nat. Commun. 2022 , 13 , 1745. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Adingupu, D.D.; Soroush, A.; Hansen, A.; Twomey, R.; Dunn, J.F. Brain hypoxia, neurocognitive impairment, and quality of life in people post-COVID-19. J. Neurol. 2023 , 270 , 3303–3314. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Leng, A.; Shah, M.; Ahmad, S.A.; Premraj, L.; Wildi, K.; Li Bassi, G.; Pardo, C.A.; Choi, A.; Cho, S.M. Pathogenesis Underlying Neurological Manifestations of Long COVID Syndrome and Potential Therapeutics. Cells 2023 , 12 , 816. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Zalpoor, H.; Akbari, A.; Samei, A.; Forghaniesfidvajani, R.; Kamali, M.; Afzalnia, A.; Manshouri, S.; Heidari, F.; Pornour, M.; Khoshmirsafa, M.; et al. The roles of Eph receptors, neuropilin-1, P2X7, and CD147 in COVID-19-associated neurodegenerative diseases: Inflammasome and JaK inhibitors as potential promising therapies. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2022 , 27 , 10. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Steardo, L.; Steardo, L.; Scuderi, C. Astrocytes and the Psychiatric Sequelae of COVID-19: What We Learned from the Pandemic. Neurochem. Res. 2023 , 48 , 1015–1025. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Awogbindin, I.O.; Ben-Azu, B.; Olusola, B.A.; Akinluyi, E.T.; Adeniyi, P.A.; Di Paolo, T.; Tremblay, M.È. Microglial Implications in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19: Lessons From Viral RNA Neurotropism and Possible Relevance to Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021 , 15 , 670298. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yao, C.; Liu, X.; Tang, Y.; Wang, C.; Duan, C.; Liu, X.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, E.; Xiang, Y.; et al. Lipopolysaccharide induces inflammatory microglial activation through CD147-mediated matrix metalloproteinase expression. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023 , 30 , 35352–35365. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Huang, Y.; Happonen, K.E.; Burrola, P.G.; O’Connor, C.; Hah, N.; Huang, L.; Nimmerjahn, A.; Lemke, G. Microglia use TAM receptors to detect and engulf amyloid β plaques. Nat. Immunol. 2021 , 22 , 586–594. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dey, R.; Bishayi, B. Microglial Inflammatory Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Comprehensive Review. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2024 , 44 , 2. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Jia, L.; Zhang, Y. Potential mechanism of SARS-CoV-2-associated central and peripheral nervous system impairment. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2022 , 146 , 225–236. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ferraro, E.; Germanò, M.; Mollace, R.; Mollace, V.; Malara, N. HIF-1, the Warburg Effect, and Macrophage/Microglia Polarization Potential Role in COVID-19 Pathogenesis. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021 , 2021 , 8841911. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Olivarria, G.M.; Cheng, Y.; Furman, S.; Pachow, C.; Hohsfield, L.A.; Smith-Geater, C.; Miramontes, R.; Wu, J.; Burns, M.S.; Tsourmas, K.I.; et al. Microglia Do Not Restrict SARS-CoV-2 Replication following Infection of the Central Nervous System of K18-Human ACE2 Transgenic Mice. J. Virol. 2022 , 96 , e0196921. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Savelieff, M.G.; Feldman, E.L.; Stino, A.M. Neurological sequela and disruption of neuron-glia homeostasis in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Neurobiol. Dis. 2022 , 168 , 293. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Albornoz, E.A.; Amarilla, A.A.; Modhiran, N.; Parker, S.; Li, X.X.; Wijesundara, D.K.; Aguado, J.; Zamora, A.P.; McMillan, C.L.D.; Liang, B.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 drives NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human microglia through spike protein. Mol. Psychiatry 2022 , 28 , 2878–2893. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Garber, C.; Soung, A.; Vollmer, L.L.; Kanmogne, M.; Last, A.; Brown, J.; Klein, R.S. T cells promote microglia-mediated synaptic elimination and cognitive dysfunction during recovery from neuropathogenic flaviviruses. Nat. Neurosci. 2019 , 22 , 1276. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Su, W.; Ju, J.; Gu, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, S.; Yu, J.; Mu, D. SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein triggers depression-like behaviors and dysosmia via TLR2-mediated neuroinflammation in mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2023 , 20 , 110. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, Y.; Yang, W.; Chen, F.; Cui, L. COVID-19 and cognitive impairment: Neuroinvasive and blood–brain barrier dysfunction. J. Neuroinflamm. 2022 , 19 , 222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Beckman, D.; Bonillas, A.; Diniz, G.B.; Ott, S.; Roh, J.W.; Elizaldi, S.R.; Schmidt, B.A.; Sammak, R.L.; Van Rompay, K.K.A.; Iyer, S.S.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects neurons and induces neuroinflammation in a non-human primate model of COVID-19. Cell Rep. 2022 , 41 , 111573. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kempuraj, D.; Aenlle, K.K.; Cohen, J.; Mathew, A.; Isler, D.; Pangeni, R.P.; Nathanson, L.; Theoharides, T.C.; Klimas, N.G. COVID-19 and Long COVID: Disruption of the Neurovascular Unit, Blood-Brain Barrier, and Tight Junctions. Neuroscientist 2023 , 11 , 10738584231194927. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, L.; Zhou, L.; Bao, L.; Liu, J.; Zhu, H.; Lv, Q.; Liu, R.; Chen, W.; Tong, W.; Wei, Q.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier accompanied with basement membrane disruption without tight junctions alteration. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021 , 6 , 337. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Malik, J.R.; Acharya, A.; Avedissian, S.N.; Byrareddy, S.N.; Fletcher, C.V.; Podany, A.T.; Dyavar, S.R. ACE-2, TMPRSS2, and Neuropilin-1 Receptor Expression on Human Brain Astrocytes and Pericytes and SARS-CoV-2 Infection Kinetics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 , 24 , 8622. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kong, W.; Montano, M.; Corley, M.J.; Helmy, E.; Kobayashi, H.; Kinisu, M.; Suryawanshi, R.; Luo, X.; Royer, L.A.; Roan, N.R.; et al. Neuropilin-1 Mediates SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Astrocytes in Brain Organoids, Inducing Inflammation Leading to Dysfunction and Death of Neurons. MBio 2022 , 13 , e0230822. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Crunfli, F.; Carregari, V.C.; Veras, F.P.; Silva, L.S.; Henrique, M.; Mayara, E.; Firmino, S.; Paiva, I.M. Morphological, cellular, and molecular basis of brain infection in COVID-19 patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022 , 119 , e2200960119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Patrizz, A.; Doran, S.J.; Chauhan, A.; Ahnstedt, H.; Roy-O’Reilly, M.; Lai, Y.J.; Weston, G.; Tarabishy, S.; Patel, A.R.; Verma, R.; et al. EMMPRIN/CD147 plays a detrimental role in clinical and experimental ischemic stroke. Aging 2020 , 12 , 5121–5139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meertens, L.; Labeau, A.; Dejarnac, O.; Cipriani, S.; Sinigaglia, L.; Bonnet-Madin, L.; Le Charpentier, T.; Hafirassou, M.L.; Zamborlini, A.; Cao-Lormeau, V.M.; et al. Axl Mediates ZIKA Virus Entry in Human Glial Cells and Modulates Innate Immune Responses. Cell Rep. 2017 , 18 , 324–333. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mifsud, E.J.; Kuba, M.; Barr, I.G. Innate immune responses to influenza virus infections in the upper respiratory tract. Viruses 2021 , 13 , 2090. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ekstrand, J.J. Neurologic Complications of Influenza. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 2012 , 19 , 96–100. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guo, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Meng, X.; Zhu, Y.; Han, P.; Zhou, X.; Hu, Y.; Wang, R. Nuclear translocation of HIF-1α induced by influenza A (H1N1) infection is critical to the production of proinflammatory cytokines. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2017 , 6 , e39. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhao, C.; Chen, J.; Cheng, L.; Xu, K.; Yang, Y.; Su, X. Deficiency of HIF-1α enhances influenza A virus replication by promoting autophagy in alveolar type II epithelial cells. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020 , 9 , 691–706. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fugate, J.E.; Lam, E.M.; Rabinstein, A.A.; Wijdicks, E.F.M. Acute hemorrhagic leukoencephalitis and hypoxic brain injury associated with H1N1 influenza. Arch. Neurol. 2010 , 67 , 756–758. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, K.Y.; Singer, H.S.; Crain, B.; Gujar, S.; Lin, D.D.M. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy mimicking acute necrotizing encephalopathy. Pediatr. Neurol. 2015 , 52 , 110–114. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ding, X.M.; Wang, Y.F.; Lyu, Y.; Zou, Y.; Wang, X.; Ruan, S.M.; Wu, W.H.; Liu, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, R.L.; et al. The effect of influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 virus infection on cytokine production and gene expression in BV2 microglial cells. Virus Res. 2022 , 312 , 198716. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sieben, C.; Sezgin, E.; Eggeling, C.; Manley, S. Influenza a viruses use multivalent sialic acid clusters for cell binding and receptor activation. PLoS Pathog. 2020 , 16 , e1008656. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Düsedau, H.P.; Steffen, J.; Figueiredo, C.A.; Boehme, J.D.; Schultz, K.; Erck, C.; Korte, M.; Faber-Zuschratter, H.; Smalla, K.H.; Dieterich, D.; et al. Influenza A Virus (H1N1) Infection Induces Microglial Activation and Temporal Dysbalance in Glutamatergic Synaptic Transmission. mBio 2021 , 12 , e0177621. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pei, X.D.; Zhai, Y.F.; Zhang, H.H. Influenza virus H1N1 induced apoptosis of mouse astrocytes and the effect on protein expression. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014 , 7 , 572–575. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ng, Y.P.; Lee, S.M.Y.; Cheung, T.K.W.; Nicholls, J.M.; Peiris, J.S.M.; Ip, N.Y. Avian influenza H5N1 virus induces cytopathy and proinflammatory cytokine responses in human astrocytic and neuronal cell lines. Neuroscience 2010 , 168 , 613–623. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ng, Y.P.; Yip, T.F.; Peiris, J.S.M.; Ip, N.Y.; Lee, S.M.Y. Avian influenza A H7N9 virus infects human astrocytes and neuronal cells and induces inflammatory immune responses. J. Neurovirol. 2018 , 24 , 752–760. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Jiang, H.; Qiu, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, W.; Cui, A.; Li, X. The epidemiological and genetic characteristics of human parvovirus B19 in patients with febrile rash illnesses in China. Sci. Rep. 2023 , 13 , 15913. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Dittmer, F.P.; de Guimarães, C.M.; Peixoto, A.B.; Pontes, K.F.M.; Bonasoni, M.P.; Tonni, G.; Araujo Júnior, E. Parvovirus B19 Infection and Pregnancy: Review of the Current Knowledge. J. Pers. Med. 2024 , 14 , 139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zou, Q.; Chen, P.; Chen, J.; Chen, D.; Xia, H.; Chen, L.; Feng, H.; Feng, L. Multisystem Involvement Induced by Human Parvovirus B19 Infection in a Non-immunosuppressed Adult: A Case Report. Front. Med. 2022 , 9 , 808205. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pichon, M.; Labois, C.; Tardy-Guidollet, V.; Mallet, D.; Casalegno, J.S.; Billaud, G.; Lina, B.; Gaucherand, P.; Mekki, Y. Optimized nested PCR enhances biological diagnosis and phylogenetic analysis of human parvovirus B19 infections. Arch. Virol. 2019 , 164 , 2775–2781. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pillet, S.; Le Guyader, N.; Hofer, T.; Nguyenkhac, F.; Koken, M.; Aubin, J.T.; Fichelson, S.; Gassmann, M.; Morinet, F. Hypoxia enhances human B19 erythrovirus gene expression in primary erythroid cells. Virology 2004 , 327 , 1–7. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Xu, M.; Leskinen, K.; Gritti, T.; Groma, V.; Arola, J.; Lepistö, A.; Sipponen, T.; Saavalainen, P.; Söderlund-Venermo, M. Prevalence, Cell Tropism, and Clinical Impact of Human Parvovirus Persistence in Adenomatous, Cancerous, Inflamed, and Healthy Intestinal Mucosa. Front. Microbiol. 2022 , 13 , 914181. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barah, F.; Whiteside, S.; Batista, S.; Morris, J. Neurological aspects of human parvovirus B19 infection: A systematic review. Rev. Med. Virol. 2014 , 24 , 154–168. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pattabiraman, C.; Prasad, P.; Sudarshan, S.; George, A.K.; Sreenivas, D.; Rasheed, R.; Ghosh, A.; Pal, A.; Hameed, S.K.S.; Bandyopadhyay, B.; et al. Identification and Genomic Characterization of Parvovirus B19V Genotype 3 Viruses from Cases of Meningoencephalitis in West Bengal, India. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022 , 10 , e0225121. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Skuja, S.; Vilmane, A.; Svirskis, S.; Groma, V.; Murovska, M. Evidence of human parvovirus B19 infection in the post-mortem brain tissue of the elderly. Viruses 2018 , 10 , 8–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Isumi, H.; Nunoue, T.; Nishida, A.; Takashima, S. Fetal brain infection with human parvovirus B19. Pediatr. Neurol. 1999 , 21 , 661–663. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Manning, A.; Willey, S.J.; Bell, J.E.; Simmonds, P. Comparison of tissue distribution, persistence, and molecular epidemiology of parvovirus B19 and novel human parvoviruses PARV4 and human bocavirus. J. Infect. Dis. 2007 , 195 , 1345–1352. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Hobbs, J.A. Detection of adeno-associated virus 2 and parvovirus B19 in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J. Neurovirol. 2006 , 12 , 190–199. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Trapani, S.; Caporizzi, A.; Ricci, S.; Indolfi, G. Human Bocavirus in Childhood: A True Respiratory Pathogen or a “Passenger” Virus? A Comprehensive Review. Microorganisms 2023 , 11 , 1243. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Yu, J.M.; Chen, Q.Q.; Hao, Y.X.; Yu, T.; Zeng, S.Z.; Wu, X.B.; Zhang, B.; Duan, Z.J. Identification of human bocaviruses in the cerebrospinal fluid of children hospitalized with encephalitis in China. J. Clin. Virol. 2013 , 57 , 374–377. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mitui, M.T.; Shahnawaz Bin Tabib, S.M.; Matsumoto, T.; Khanam, W.; Ahmed, S.; Mori, D.; Akhter, N.; Yamada, K.; Kabir, L.; Nishizono, A.; et al. Detection of human bocavirus in the cerebrospinal fluid of children with encephalitis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012 , 54 , 964–967. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ergul, A.B.; Altug, U.; Aydin, K.; Guven, A.S.; Altuner Torun, Y. Acute necrotizing encephalopathy causing human bocavirus. Neuroradiol. J. 2017 , 30 , 164–167. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Akturk, H.; Sidotlessk, G.; Salman, N.; Sutcu, M.; Tatli, B.; Akcay Ciblak, M.; Bulent Erol, O.; Hancerli Torun, S.; Citak, A.; Somer, A. Atypical presentation of human bocavirus: Severe respiratory tract infection complicated with encephalopathy. J. Med. Virol. 2015 , 87 , 1831–1838. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vilmane, A.; Terentjeva, A.; Tamosiunas, P.L.; Suna, N.; Suna, I.; Petraityte-burneikiene, R.; Murovska, M.; Rasa-dzelzkaleja, S.; Nora- Krukle, Z. Human parvoviruses may affect the development and clinical course of meningitis and meningoencephalitis. Brain Sci. 2020 , 10 , 339. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thapa, R.R.; Plentz, A.; Edinger, M.; Wolff, D.; Angstwurm, K.; Söderlund-Venermo, M. Human bocavirus 1 respiratory tract reactivations or reinfections in two adults, contributing to neurological deficits and death. Access Microbiol. 2021 , 3 , 237. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mohammadi, M. HBoV-1: Virus structure, genomic features, life cycle, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis and clinical manifestations. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023 , 13 , 1198127. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Agungpriyono, D.R.; Uchida, K.; Tabaru, H.; Yamaguchi, R.; Tateyama, S. Subacute massive necrotizing myocarditis by canine parvovirus type 2 infection with diffuse leukoencephalomalacia in a puppy. Vet. Pathol. 1999 , 36 , 77–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Shao, L.; Shen, W.; Wang, S.; Qiu, J. Recent Advances in Molecular Biology of Human Bocavirus 1 and Its Applications. Front. Microbiol. 2021 , 12 , 696604. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luo, Y.; Qiu, J. Human parvovirus B19: A mechanistic overview of infection and DNA replication. Future Virol. 2015 , 10 , 155–167. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ning, K.; Zou, W.; Xu, P.; Cheng, F.; Zhang, E.Y.; Zhang-Chen, A.; Kleiboeker, S.; Qiu, J. Identification of AXL as a co-receptor for human parvovirus B19 infection of human erythroid progenitors. Sci. Adv. 2023 , 9 , ade0869. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Piewbang, C.; Wardhani, S.W.; Dankaona, W.; Lacharoje, S.; Chai-In, P.; Yostawonkul, J.; Chanseanroj, J.; Boonrungsiman, S.; Kasantikul, T.; Poovorawan, Y.; et al. Canine bocavirus-2 infection and its possible association with encephalopathy in domestic dogs. PLoS ONE 2021 , 16 , 0255425. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schildgen, O.; Schildgen, V. The Role of the Human Bocavirus (HBoV) in Respiratory Infections. Adv. Tech. Diagn. Microbiol. 2018 , 2 , 281. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Mora, V.P.; Kalergis, A.M.; Bohmwald, K. Neurological Impact of Respiratory Viruses: Insights into Glial Cell Responses in the Central Nervous System. Microorganisms 2024 , 12 , 1713. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081713

Mora VP, Kalergis AM, Bohmwald K. Neurological Impact of Respiratory Viruses: Insights into Glial Cell Responses in the Central Nervous System. Microorganisms . 2024; 12(8):1713. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081713

Mora, Valentina P., Alexis M. Kalergis, and Karen Bohmwald. 2024. "Neurological Impact of Respiratory Viruses: Insights into Glial Cell Responses in the Central Nervous System" Microorganisms 12, no. 8: 1713. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081713

Article Metrics

Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals