qualis medical research archives

Society Homepage About Public Health Policy Contact

About the journal.

About the journal

The Medical Research Archives is the official journal of the European Society of Medicine. The journal was founded in 2014 and has published over 2,500 peer-reviewed articles across 12 volumes. Originally published both in print and online, the journal has since become a fully online and open-access publication. Issues are published monthly on the society’s website and on a variety of digital platforms.

The journal publishes original research, reviews, and case reports addressing health issues of interest to a global community of medical professionals. While issues of the journal are often focused around topics of particular interest to the society, submissions from non- members are most welcome. In addition to the regular issues there are also several theme issues released each year which are dedicated to a single disease or topic.

About the society

The European Society of Medicine is more than a professional association. We are a community. Our members work in countries all around the world, yet are united by a common goal: to promote health and health equity, globally.

Public health has always been a core focus of both the society and the Medical Research Archives. The society’s scientific resources translate into compelling advocacy messages to inspire change in healthcare policy and medical innovation. Reducing the burden of disease is a difficult challenge which often demands a multidisciplinary approach. The multitude of backgrounds from which our members come allows us to be stronger, speaking with one voice, when advocating for change.

Further reading

Society homepage

Author Center

Latest issue

Editorial Board

Meet the ESMED Community

Most cited articles

Primary Central Nervous System Germ Cell Tumors: A Review and Update 98 citations

Pesticides used in Thailand and toxic effects to human health 96 citations

Keeping an Eye on Bardet-Biedl Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of the Role of Bardet-Biedl Syndrome Genes in the Eye 93 citations

Health of mothers of children with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder: a review of the literature 55 citations

The Impact of the Role of Doctor of Nursing PracticeNurses on Healthcare and Leadership 53 citations

Most viewed articles

The Effects of Anabolic Androgenic Steroids on Performance and its Adverse Side Effects in Athletes 306,594 views

Regular sanitizing of cell phones during the Covid-19 pandemic 67,617 views

The Impact of the Role of Doctor of Nursing PracticeNurses on Healthcare and Leadership 59,214 views

Differential diagnosis of tonsillitis, tonsillar detritus accumulation, and tonsillar keratin cysts 52,724 views

The John F. Kennedy X-rays: The saga of the largest “Metallic fragment” 33,066 views

Free publication for society members

Members of the European Society of Medicine can benefit from free publication of their articles in the society's journal.

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Classification of periodicals in the CAPES QUALIS system: changes to the criteria are URGENTLY needed!

Bruno caramelli.

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

Collection date 2010 Jan.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

The Brazilian Medical Association (AMB), concerned about the future of Brazilian scientific publications following the release of the new criteria for the CAPES QUALIS system, organized a series of meetings in its main office in São Paulo. Editors of the principal medical journals in this country, directors of ABEC (Brazilian Association of Scientific Editors) and coordinators of the CAPES fields of Medicine II and Medicine III exchanged information and, above all, drew up proposals for improving the process of evaluating Brazilian scientific publications through the new CAPES QUALIS system. Scientific production classified by means of QUALIS forms one of the main items for assessing postgraduate programs over the last three-year period. Considering that the main source of scientific articles for Brazilian journals is from postgraduate programs linked to CAPES, it is very important to refine the discourse and ensure a common language for all the parties involved. From the editors' side, there is the fear that the new CAPES criteria may create a subclass of periodicals based exclusively on the ISI Impact Factor. The previous criterion indicated an impact factor of 1 as the cutoff point. Recently, some Brazilian journals were able to attain this level, through enormous effort. However, the new criteria not only consider the impact factor alone, but also establish much higher cutoff points. Through adopting this measure, Brazilian journals will become neglected by postgraduate supervisors and students – the great producers of Brazilian science – thus creating a vicious circle in which our periodicals will have difficulty in surviving.

Professor João Pereira Leite spoke on behalf of CAPES. In addition to coordinating the field of Medicine II, he is also the current representative of the field of health in the Scientific and Technical Board (CTC), the highest body within CAPES. At one of our meetings, he gave a detailed explanation about the criteria adopted during previous three-year periods and their impact on Brazilian postgraduate programs. He also explained that, in view of the evident improvement in the level of these programs, the cutoff or separation point needed to be raised in order to achieve better qualitative discrimination and stratification between them. Data coming from the programs, gathered through the CAPES system, showed that in many programs, more than 50% (and in some, more than 80%) of their scientific production was published in periodicals in the higher strata. In turn, CAPES decided to create a greater number of strata in order to be able to reclassify the periodicals. A descending scale was put forward, according to the impact factor: A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5 and C. In addition, an equivalence factor was created, according to which the sum of published papers in journals in lower strata would be equivalent to a smaller number of papers in higher strata. Thus, for example, for a given field, two B1 articles would be equivalent to 1.2 A1 articles; one B1 article + one A2 article would be equivalent to 1.4 A1 articles; and three B2 articles would be equivalent to 1.2 A1 articles. According to Professor João Leite, “this equivalence will benefit journals with different levels of qualification”. He also stated that the new classification was drawn up based on the median impact factor of the journals, as obtained from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and calculated annually by the ISI Web of Knowledge. To calculate the median, a list of the journals in which each CAPES field publishes was drawn up. From this list, and from the respective impact factors, the median was calculated for each field and the new stratification was constructed, consisting of A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5 and C.

The editors argued against the position of Professor Leite, recalling that the three-year nature of the CAPES assessment process conferred a relative mismatch in reclassifying the periodicals, given that several Brazilian journals will have their impact factors increased or published for the first time over the course of 2010, particularly those that have just be admitted to the ISI. Furthermore, they would have to wait three years to change categories within the new QUALIS. Another point that the editors questioned was in relation to choosing the impact factors published by the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) as the ONLY universal index for gauging the quality of periodicals. Journal impact factors have large standard deviations and, certainly for this reason, CAPES used the median of these indices to analyze the production pattern of postgraduate programs. In fact, according to this criterion, the best journals for some medical specialties such as surgery have lower impact factors, which could imply a bias that would be extremely unfavorable for them.

The two sides agreed that placing value on Brazilian periodicals is important for national scientific growth and development. To ensure and stimulate this virtuous circle, it is necessary to stimulate and encourage the citation of articles by Brazilian authors and to intensify the efforts of editors, reviewers and authors of periodicals towards increasing the quality of articles, among other measures. Concomitantly, it is necessary to obtain greater support from government bodies, especially CAPES and CNPq, with regard to administration of financial resources and qualitative stratification, respectively.

The results from these discussions were presented at various meetings of editors, postgraduate program coordinators and researchers, and they were complemented by new suggestions. It is hoped that these ideas, described below, will serve as a conclusion for this editorial and that, at the same time, they will be an important tool for changes to the periodical classification criteria in the CAPES QUALIS system, to be made by the bodies responsible for them. The proposals are as follows:

The qualitative analysis of Brazilian periodicals should be reassessed and not just involve the impact factor published by the Journal Citation Reports (JCR);

The particular characteristics of each field of interest or each specialty should be taken into consideration and respected;

The Brazilian editorial sector, differing from the rest of the world, where it is maintained basically through private initiative, is funded by public and private universities and the scientific associations of professional categories;

Brazilian periodicals require greater support and encouragement, which could come in the form of: bursaries for editors, financial support for publication, greater visibility for national periodicals abroad, criteria for qualitative classification that are more objective and comprehensive, and differentiated support corresponding to the performance of each journal;

Support for internationalization of scientific periodicals, by means of support for professionalization of the editorial process and dissemination of journals in other countries;

Continual updating of periodical classification within the new QUALIS, without having to wait for the three-yearly evaluation;

Participation by representatives of professional categories (ABEC and AMB, among others) in the decisionmaking process regarding the CAPES QUALIS system;

Vigorous stimulation of citation directly at the source, i.e. the postgraduate programs, for example, by determining that postgraduate programs graded 6 and 7 not only need to have a percentage of published papers in high impact journals, but also should have percentage quotas of published papers in Brazilian periodicals. Through this, the two extremes of scientific publication will be taken into consideration, since young future researchers start their careers by publishing in Brazilian periodicals under guidance from experiences researchers.

Finally, to corroborate all these actions, and with concern regarding the development of repercussions from the new CAPES QUALIS and other assessments on periodicals, the Brazilian Association of Scientific Editors (ABEC) dedicated three days of its last National Meeting of Scientific Editors, held in November 2009, to forums for specific fields. At this meeting, representatives from CAPES and editors from all the fields of scientific knowledge discussion the subject at length and, in the end, put forward the Guidelines from the Forums for Specific Fields of the 12 th National meeting of Scientific Editors – 2009, which will be sent out to all Brazilian agencies for research support in due course, and this will occur periodically, since the process is continuous.

• View on publisher site
• PDF (145.0 KB)
• Collections

Similar articles

Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.

• Download .nbib .nbib
• Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

Add to Collections

Validity of Qualis database as a predictor of evidence hierarchy and risk of bias in randomized controlled trials: a case study in dentistry

Affiliation.

• 1 Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected]
• PMID: 21484055
• PMCID: PMC3059854
• DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000200025

Objective: To evaluate the validity of the Qualis database in identifying the levels of scientific evidence and the quality of randomized controlled trials indexed in the Lilacs database.

Methods: We selected 40 open-access journals and performed a page-by-page hand search, to identify published articles according to the type of study during a period of six years. Classification of studies was performed by independent reviewers assessed for their reliability. Randomized controlled trials were identified for separate evaluation of risk of bias using four dimensions: generation of allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, and incomplete outcome data. The Qualis classification was considered to be the outcome variable. The statistical tests used included Kappa, Spearman's correlation, Kendall-tau and ordinal regressions.

Results: Studies with low levels of scientific evidence received similar Qualis classifications when compared to studies with high levels of evidence. In addition, randomized controlled trials with a high risk of bias for the generation of allocation sequences and allocation concealment were more likely to be published in journals with higher Qualis levels.

Discussion: The hierarchy level of the scientific evidence as classified by type of research design, as well as by the validity of studies according to the bias control level, was not correlated or associated with Qualis stratification.

Conclusion: Qualis classifications for journals are not an approximate or indirect predictor of the validity of randomized controlled trials published in these journals and are therefore not a legitimate or appropriate indicator of the validity of randomized controlled trials.

Publication types

• Validation Study
• Databases, Factual / standards*
• Epidemiologic Methods
• Evidence-Based Medicine / standards*
• Journal Impact Factor*
• Publication Bias / statistics & numerical data
• Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / classification
• Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / standards*
• Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / statistics & numerical data
• Research Design / standards
• Research Design / statistics & numerical data
• Time Factors

Identifiers

Linking ISSN (ISSN-L): 2375-1916

URL http://www.journals.ke-i.org/index.php/mra/issue/archive

Google https://www.google.com/search?q=ISSN+%222375-1924%22

Bing https://www.bing.com/search?q=ISSN+%222375-1924%22

Yahoo https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=ISSN%20%222375-1924%22

Pubmed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%222375-1924%22%5BJournal%5D&sort=

Library of Congress https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/search?searchCode=STNO&searchArg=2375-1924&searchType=1&limitTo=none&fromYear=&toYear=&limitTo=LOCA%3Dall&limitTo=PLAC%3Dall&limitTo=TYPE%3Dall&limitTo=LANG%3Dall&recCount=25

Resource information

Title proper: Medical research archives.

Other variant title: MRA

Country: United States

Medium: Online

Record information

Last modification date: 06/02/2021

Type of record: Confirmed

ISSN Center responsible of the record: ISSN National Centre for the USA For all potential issues concerning this bibliographic record (missing or wrong data etc.), please contact the ISSN National Centre mentioned above by clicking on the link.

downloads requested

Discover all the features of the complete ISSN records

Display mode x.

Labelled view

MARC21 view

UNIMARC view