determination of acidity of water sample experiment conclusion

Update image

Determination of acidity of water.

• Erlenmeyer flasks
• Indicator solutions
• CO 2 free water
• Standard NaOH solution 0.02N
• Methyl orange indicator solution
• Phenolphthalein indicator solution
• Sodium thiosulphate 0.1 N.
• 25 mL of sample is pipette into Erlenmeyer flask.
• If free residual chlorine is present, 0.05 mL (1 drop) of 0.1 N thiosulphate solution is added.
• 2 drops of methyl orange indicator is added.
• These contents are titrated against 0.02 N hydroxide solution. The end point is noted when colour change from orange red to yellow.
• Then two drops of phenolphthalein indicator is added and titration continued till a pink colour just develops. The volumes of the titrant used are noted down.

Support our developers

More in this section

• Environmental Science Methodology
• Important Information
• Reagents and Media
• Solids in Water
• Turbidity of Water
• Alkalinity of Water
• Hardness of Water
• pH of Water
• Chloride in Water
• Iron and Manganese in Water
• Sulphate and Sulphide in Water
• Optimum Coagulant Dosage
• Dissolved Oxygen in Water
• B.O.D of Wastewater
• Chlorine in Bleaching Powder
• Residual Chlorine
• Coliforms in Water
• Ammonia Nitrogen
• Nitrate Nitrogen
• Nitrite Nitrogen
• Kjeldahl Nitrogen
• Fluoride in Water
• Acidity of Water
• COD in Water
• Oil and Grease in Water
• Odour in Water
• Colour in Water

© 2012 - 2024 Biocyclopedia

Disclaimer    Privacy Policy    Feedback

Login to your account

Login / signup with.

Your browser is not supported

Sorry but it looks as if your browser is out of date. To get the best experience using our site we recommend that you upgrade or switch browsers.

Find a solution

• Skip to main content
• Skip to navigation

• Back to parent navigation item
• Primary teacher
• Secondary/FE teacher
• Early career or student teacher
• Higher education
• Curriculum support
• Literacy in science teaching
• Periodic table
• Interactive periodic table
• Climate change and sustainability
• Resources shop
• Collections
• Remote teaching support
• Starters for ten
• Screen experiments
• Assessment for learning
• Microscale chemistry
• Faces of chemistry
• Classic chemistry experiments
• Nuffield practical collection
• Anecdotes for chemistry teachers
• On this day in chemistry
• Global experiments
• PhET interactive simulations
• Chemistry vignettes
• Context and problem based learning
• Journal of the month
• Chemistry and art
• Art analysis
• Pigments and colours
• Ancient art: today's technology
• Psychology and art theory
• Art and archaeology
• Artists as chemists
• The physics of restoration and conservation
• Ancient Egyptian art
• Ancient Greek art
• Ancient Roman art
• Classic chemistry demonstrations
• In search of solutions
• In search of more solutions
• Creative problem-solving in chemistry
• Solar spark
• Chemistry for non-specialists
• Health and safety in higher education
• Analytical chemistry introductions
• Exhibition chemistry
• Introductory maths for higher education
• Commercial skills for chemists
• Kitchen chemistry
• Journals how to guides
• Chemistry in health
• Chemistry in sport
• Chemistry in your cupboard
• Chocolate chemistry
• Adnoddau addysgu cemeg Cymraeg
• The chemistry of fireworks
• Festive chemistry
• Education in Chemistry
• Teach Chemistry
• On-demand online
• Live online
• Selected PD articles
• PD for primary teachers
• PD for secondary teachers
• What we offer
• Chartered Science Teacher (CSciTeach)
• Teacher mentoring
• UK Chemistry Olympiad
• Who can enter?
• How does it work?
• Resources and past papers
• Top of the Bench
• Schools' Analyst
• Regional support
• Education coordinators
• RSC Yusuf Hamied Inspirational Science Programme
• RSC Education News
• Supporting teacher training
• Interest groups

• More navigation items

Testing the pH of different solutions

In association with Nuffield Foundation

• No comments

Use this practical to reinforce students’ understanding of pH by preparing and testing acidic and alkaline solutions

In this experiment, students prepare a series of solutions by dilution, using deionised water with hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide. Each solution approximates to a pH number. Students then confirm what they have done using universal indicator. The practical shows that a solution with a given pH number differs in concentration from the one with the next pH number by a factor of 10.

The experiment can also be used as a teacher demonstration.

To save time, students can work in groups of four. One pair of students makes the acidic solutions; the other pair makes the alkaline solutions. They then put the two sets of solutions together to make one set covering the pH range from 1 to 13.

• Eye protection
• Test tubes, x13 (see note 6 below)
• Test tube rack(s), with sufficient space for 13 test tubes
• Beakers, 100 cm 3 , x2
• Measuring cylinders, 10 cm 3 , x2
• Dropping pipettes (optional)
• Deionised or distilled water
• Dilute hydrochloric acid, 0.1 M
• Dilute sodium hydroxide solution, 0.1 M
• Universal indicator solution (HIGHLY FLAMMABLE), full range, ideally in small dropping bottles
• pH indicator chart

Health, safety and technical notes

• Read our standard health and safety guidance.
• Wear eye protection throughout.
• Dilute hydrochloric acid, HCl(aq) – see CLEAPSS Hazcard  HC047a and CLEAPSS Recipe Book RB043.
• Dilute sodium hydroxide solution, NaOH(aq), (IRRITANT at concentration used) – see CLEAPSS Hazcard  HC091a and CLEAPSS Recipe Book RB085. 
• Universal indicator solution (HIGHLY FLAMMABLE) – see CLEAPSS Hazcard  HC032 and CLEAPSS Recipe Book RB000. 
• Test tubes with a capacity of around 10 cm 3 are ideal. The test tubes should be as clean as possible. Test tubes, dropping pipettes and measuring cylinders should be washed in tap water and then rinsed with deionised or distilled water.

Students 1 and 2

• Number the test tubes 1–7.
• Half-fill test tube 1 with the hydrochloric acid solution.
• Transfer 1 cm 3 of the hydrochloric acid into the measuring cylinder. Add distilled or deionised water to the measuring cylinder, up to the 10 cm 3 mark.
• Pour some of the resulting diluted solution from the measuring cylinder into test tube 2, enough to come to a similar height as the solution in test tube 1.
• Carefully, pour away all but 1 cm 3 of the solution remaining in the measuring cylinder. Now add distilled or deionised water to the measuring cylinder up to the 10 cm 3 mark. Pour the resulting solution into test tube 3. Continue in this way until you have solutions in test tubes 1 to 6. Put only distilled or deionised water into test tube 7.

Students 3 and 4

• Repeat instructions 1–5 using the sodium hydroxide solution instead of hydrochloric acid. Number the test tubes 8–13.

Both groups

• Put the two racks of test tubes together so that the solutions are in order 1 to 13. The test tubes now have solutions in them with pH 1 (test tube 1) to pH 13 (test tube 13).
• Add a drop of universal indicator to each test tube. Rock each test tube from side to side to mix the contents. Add more universal indicator solution to each test tube if needed to allow the colours to be seen more clearly. Be sure to add the same number of drops of indicator to each test tube.
• Compare the colours of the solutions with the pH indicator chart.

Teaching notes

The depth of discussion will depend on the level of the students involved.

The pH of the solutions in test tubes 5, 6, 8 and 9 will not be very accurate. It is not possible to get pH 7 by diluting the pH 6 solution. Successive dilutions past 6 give solutions with pH progressively closer to, but never quite reaching, pH 7. The same applies to further dilutions on the alkaline side of neutral.

The colour you get in test tube 7 might tell you something about the quality of your deionised water.

Students sometimes worry about overfilling the measuring cylinder to a level above the 10 cm 3 mark. However, this will not make much difference to the overall outcome.

Draw out that the students have had to dilute solutions by 10 to change from one pH number to the next. A solution of pH 1 is ten times more acidic (has a greater concentration of hydrogen ions) than a solution of pH 2. A solution with pH 4 is not ‘very acidic’ as is often stated.

The letter p in pH stands for ‘power’ (or ‘potenz’ in German) and refers to the concentration of hydrogen (H + ) ions in the solution when expressed in the form 10 – n mol dm – 3 , where n is the pH. The relationship between pH number and hydrogen ion concentration can be expressed as:

pH = –log 10 [H + (aq)].

Universal indicator is a mixture of indicators made in such a way as to give, as far as possible, a different colour for each pH number. Students should notice that it is not very effective at the extremes of the range.

Additional information

This is a resource from the  Practical Chemistry project , developed by the Nuffield Foundation and the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Practical Chemistry activities accompany  Practical Physics  and  Practical Biology .

© Nuffield Foundation and the Royal Society of Chemistry

• 11-14 years
• 14-16 years
• 16-18 years
• Practical experiments
• Demonstrations
• Acids and bases

Specification

• The pH scale is an indication of the hydrogen ion concentration and runs from below 0 to above 14.
• Acidic solutions have a higher concentration of H⁺(aq) ions than OH⁻(aq) and have a pH below 7.
• Alkaline solutions have a higher concentration of OH⁻(aq) ions than H⁺(aq) ions and have a pH above 7.
• Dilution of an acidic solution with water will decrease the concentration of H⁺(aq) and the pH will increase towards 7.
• Dilution of an alkaline solution with water will decrease the concentration of OH⁻(aq) and the pH will decrease towards 7.
• (e) relationship between pH and H⁺) ion concentration (pH = ‒log[H⁺(aq)])
• 1.8.3 interpret given data about universal indicator (colour or pH) to classify solutions as acidic, alkaline or neutral and to indicate the relative strengths of acidic and alkaline solutions according to the following classification: pH 0–2 strong acid…
• 1.8.2 interpret given data about universal indicator (colour or pH) to classify solutions as acidic, alkaline or neutral and to indicate the relative strengths of acidic and alkaline solutions according to the following classification: pH 0–2 strong acid…
• pH scale. Use of universal indicator paper or solution. Limitations of the pH scale - usefulness confined to dilute aqueous solutions.
• Choice of indicator.
• 8. Investigate reactions between acids and bases; use indicators and the pH scale

Related articles

Demonstrations with dry ice

2024-08-27T06:00:00Z By Declan Fleming

Explore changes of state and neutralisation reactions with this trio of demonstrations using solid carbon dioxide 

How science can make burial, cremation and memorial greener

2023-11-13T06:00:00Z By Kit Chapman

Does alkaline hydrolysis offer a more sustainable approach?

Investigating the sugar content and pH of fizzy drinks | 11–14 years

Compare fizzy drinks’ ingredients, acidities and health implications

No comments yet

Only registered users can comment on this article., more experiments.

‘Gold’ coins on a microscale | 14–16 years

By Dorothy Warren and Sandrine Bouchelkia

Practical experiment where learners produce ‘gold’ coins by electroplating a copper coin with zinc, includes follow-up worksheet

Practical potions microscale | 11–14 years

By Kirsty Patterson

Observe chemical changes in this microscale experiment with a spooky twist.

Antibacterial properties of the halogens | 14–18 years

By Kristy Turner

Use this practical to investigate how solutions of the halogens inhibit the growth of bacteria and which is most effective

• Contributors
• Email alerts

Site powered by Webvision Cloud

Determination of alkalinity in the water sample: a theoretical approach

• Chemistry Teacher International 5(3):283-290
• 5(3):283-290
• CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Abstract and Figures

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Aikaterini Frigana

• Dionissios Mantzavinos
• Frank M. Dunnivant

• N.F. Gray Ph.D. Sc.D.

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

• Chemistry Practicals
• CBSE Class 11 Chemistry Practical
• Determination Of Ph Of Some Solutions Experiment

Determination Of pH Of Some Solutions Obtained From Fruit Juices, Solution Of Known And Varied Concentrations Of Acids, Bases And Salts Using pH Paper Or Universal Indicator

Acids are substances that generate free hydrogen ions (H+ ions) when dissolved in water. Bases are substances when dissolved in water produces hydroxyl ions (OH- ions). Acidic solutions are rich in hydrogen ions and basic solutions are poor in hydrogen ions. Universal indicator is a pH indicator composed of different chemical compounds. Learn how to find whether the solution is an acid or base.

Determination of pH of Solutions like fruit juices of different acids, bases, and salts using pH paper and universal indicator.

Materials Required:

pH paper, Universal indicator, sample solutions, test tubes, white tile and dropper

The Procedure of Determination of pH Using Universal Indicator:

• Take the given samples of fruit juices like lemon, orange, pineapple, and apple in a separate test tube.
• Make sure you have taken at least 2 mL of juices in each test tube.
• Use a separate dropper to transfer each juice sample into a test tube.
• Add two drops of universal indicator.
• Mix the content thoroughly by shaking it gently.
• Refer the pH chart to match the colour that appears in the test tube. (match the colour produced with standard colour pH chart)
• Record your observation.

Precautions to be taken during the experiment:

• Carefully match the colour of the solution that appears with the standard colour pH chart.
• Add the equal quantity of indicator into the juice sample

Observation

Determination of pH Using Universal Indicator on different

The Procedure of Determination of pH Using pH paper:

• On a white tile place a clean pH paper strip.
• Drop of the sample on the pH paper using a clean dropper.
• Observe the change in the colour of the pH paper.
• Now compare the colour obtained on the pH paper with the colour shades on the standard pH chart.
• Make a note of the pH value obtained.
• Keep the pH strips away from chemical fumes.
• Keep the pH paper clean

Determination of pH Using pH paper

Viva Voice:

• What is the pH of the solution if it is acidic?It is less than 7
• Which has lower pH value – apple juice or lemon juice?Since lemon juice is more acidic it has a lower pH value
• What is the pH of water at 25-degree Celsius?pH = 7
• What is the pH of distilled water?pH = 7

Put your understanding of this concept to test by answering a few MCQs. Click ‘Start Quiz’ to begin!

Select the correct answer and click on the “Finish” button Check your score and answers at the end of the quiz

Visit BYJU’S for all Chemistry related queries and study materials

Your result is as below

Request OTP on Voice Call

Register with BYJU'S & Download Free PDFs

Register with byju's & watch live videos.

• No category

Expt 1-Alkalinity of water sample

Related documents.

Add this document to collection(s)

You can add this document to your study collection(s)

Add this document to saved

You can add this document to your saved list

Suggest us how to improve StudyLib

(For complaints, use another form )

Input it if you want to receive answer

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Development of a unified method for the determination of legacy and metabolites of current pesticides in serum for exposure assessment

• Research Paper
• Published: 27 August 2024

Cite this article

• Willian G. Birolli   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7859-1830 1 , 2 ,
• Fernando M. Lanças   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-5905 1 ,
• Henrique C. S. Silveira   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8607-6206 2 &
• Álvaro J. Santos-Neto   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1719-8458 1  

34 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

The use of pesticides is often regarded as a fundamental aspect of conventional agriculture. However, these compounds have gained recognition as some of the oldest and most widely employed xenobiotic contaminants, necessitating effective strategies for human biomonitoring. In this context, a method was developed for the determination of 16 legacy organochlorine pesticides, 6 metabolites of current pesticides (2,4-D, malathion, parathion, fipronil, pyraclostrobin, cypermethrin, permethrin, cyfluthrin), and 1 triazine herbicide (atrazine) in serum. Samples were prepared with water, formic acid, acetonitrile, and ultrasound irradiation, followed by solid-phase extraction with Oasis Prime HLB. Subsequently, metabolites from current pesticides underwent derivatization using MTBSTFA with 1% TBDMSCl for analysis via gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS), employing an SLB-5MS fused silica capillary column. Analytical curves were generated with limits of quantification from 0.3 to 4.0 ng.mL −1 . Accuracy ranged from 69 to 124%, and the coefficient of variation from 2 to 28%. Moreover, determining 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-ol was suggested as a biomarker for pyraclostrobin biomonitoring. This analytical approach facilitated the determination of both legacy and metabolites of current pesticides in the same serum sample, presenting an interesting and cost-effective option for large cohorts, and multi-omics studies that evaluate time-dependent biomarkers in blood samples, thereby enabling biomonitoring within the same matrix. Furthermore, a proof-of-concept involving 10 volunteers demonstrated exposure to 9 pesticides at mean concentrations measured in ng mL −1 , consistent with findings from various biomonitoring initiatives.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Assessing human exposure to pesticides and mycotoxins: optimization and validation of a method for multianalyte determination in urine samples

Scaling up a targeted exposome LC-MS/MS biomonitoring method by incorporating veterinary drugs and pesticides

Quantitative determination of pesticides in human plasma using bio-SPME-LC–MS/MS: a robust tool to assess occupational exposure to pesticides

Explore related subjects.

• Environmental Chemistry

Cabral L, Pandey P, Xu X. Epic narratives of the Green Revolution in Brazil, China, and India. Agric Human Values. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10460-021-10241-X .

Article   Google Scholar  

Xiao J, Dong X, Zhang X, Ye F, Cheng J, Dan G, Zhao Y, Zou Z, Cao J. Sai Y (2021) Pesticides exposure and dopaminergic neurodegeneration. Exposure and Health. 2021;13(3):295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12403-021-00384-X .

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Kim KH, Kabir E, Jahan SA. Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects. Sci Total Environ. 2017;575:525–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2016.09.009 .

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Ye M, Beach J, Martin JW, Senthilselvan A. Occupational pesticide exposures and respiratory health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10126442 . (OPEN ACCESS).

Rani L, Thapa K, Kanojia N, Sharma N, Singh S, Grewal AS, Srivastav AL, Kaushal J. An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment. J Clean Prod. 2021;283:124657. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.124657 .

Escher BI, Hackermüller J, Polte T, Scholz S, Aigner A, Altenburger R, Böhme A, Bopp SK, Brack W, Busch W, Chadeau-Hyam M, Covaci A, Eisenträger A, Galligan JJ, Garcia-Reyero N, Hartung T, Hein M, Herberth G, Jahnke A, Kleinjans J, Klüver N, Krauss M, Lamoree M, Lehmann I, Luckenbach T, Miller GW, Müller A, Phillips DH, Reemtsma T, Rolle-Kampczyk U, Schüürmann G, Schwikowski B, Tan YM, Trump S, Walter-Rohde S, Wambaugh JF. From the exposome to mechanistic understanding of chemical-induced adverse effects. Environ Int. 2017;99:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2016.11.029 .

Ohlander J, Fuhrimann S, Basinas I, Cherrie JW, Galea KS, Povey AC, Van Tongeren M, Harding AH, Jones K, Vermeulen R, Kromhout H. Systematic review of methods used to assess exposure to pesticides in occupational epidemiology studies, 1993–2017. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77:357–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/OEMED-2019-105880 .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Lerro CC, Freeman LEB, DellaValle CT, Andreotti G, Hofmann JN, Koutros S, Parks CG, Shrestha S, Alavanja MCR, Blair A, Lubin JH, P SD, Ward MH (2021) Pesticide exposure and incident thyroid cancer among male pesticide applicators in agricultural health study. Environ Int 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2020.106187 .

Paglia G, Del Greco FM, Carli C, Sigurdsson BB, Smarason S, Wegher M, Pattaro C, Wegher L. Longitudinal assessment of chlorpyrifos exposure in farmers and residents of an Italian Alpine region. Expo Health. 2021;13:651–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12403-021-00409-5/FIGURES/1 .

Metcalfe CD, Bayen S, Desrosiers M, Muñoz G, Sauvé S, Yargeau V. An introduction to the sources, fate, occurrence and effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals released into the environment. Environ Res. 2022;207:112658. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2021.112658 .

Huhn S, Escher BI, Krauss M, Scholz S, Hackermüller J. Altenburger R (2021) Unravelling the chemical exposome in cohort studies: routes explored and steps to become comprehensive. Environ Sci Europe. 2021;33:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12302-020-00444-0 .

Miao Y, Rong M, Li M, He H, Zhang L, Zhang S, Liu C, Zhu Y, Deng YL, Chen PP, Zeng JY, Zhong R, Mei SR, Miao XP, Zeng Q. Serum concentrations of organochlorine pesticides, biomarkers of oxidative stress, and risk of breast cancer. Environ Pollut. 2021;286:117386. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2021.117386 .

Bao W, Liu B, Simonsen DW, Lehmler HJ. Association between exposure to pyrethroid insecticides and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general US adult population. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:367–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMAINTERNMED.2019.6019 .

Francisco LFV, da Silva RN, Oliveira MA, dos Santos Neto MF, Gonçalves IZ, Marques MMC, Silveira HCS. Occupational exposures and risks of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15:2600. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092600 .

United States Environmental Protection Agency. About the Agricultural Health Study. 2021. https://aghealth.nih.gov/about/ . Accessed 10 Aug 2021.

Alavanja MC, Sandler DP, McMaster SB, Zahm SH, McDonnell CJ, Lynch CF, Pennybacker M, Rothman N, Dosemeci M, Bond AE, Blair A. The Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect. 1996;104:362–9. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.96104362 .

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Lemarchand C, Tual S, Levêque-Morlais N, Perrier S, Belot A, Velten M, Guizard A-V, Marcotullio E, Monnereau A, (FRANCIM) the FN of CR, Clin B, Baldi I, Lebailly P. Cancer incidence in the AGRICAN cohort study (2005–2011). Cancer Epidemiol. 2017;49:175. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CANEP.2017.06.003 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

World Health Organization. AGRICOH: a consortium of agricultural cohort studies. 2022. https://agricoh.iarc.fr/ . Accessed 18 May 2022.

Barbosa de Sousa A, Rohr P, Silveira HCS (2023) Analysis of mitochondrial DNA copy number variation in Brazilian farmers occupationally exposed to pesticides. Int J Environ Health Res 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2023.2280147

Ottenbros IB, Ammann P, Imboden M, Fuhrimann S, Zock JP, Lebret E, Vermeulen RCH, Nijssen R, Lommen A, Mol H, Vlaanderen JJ, Probst-Hensch N. Urinary pesticide mixture patterns and exposure determinants in the adult population from the Netherlands and Switzerland: application of a suspect screening approach. Environ Res. 2023;239:117216. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2023.117216 .

Medina DAV, Rodríguez Cabal LF, Titato GM, Lanças FM, Santos-Neto ÁJ. Automated online coupling of robot-assisted single drop microextraction and liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2019;1595:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHROMA.2019.02.036 .

Sartore DM, Vargas Medina DA, Bocelli MD, Jordan-Sinisterra M, Santos-Neto ÁJ, Lanças FM. Modern automated microextraction procedures for bioanalytical, environmental, and food analyses. J Sep Sci. 2023;46:2300215. https://doi.org/10.1002/JSSC.202300215 .

Goodman JE, Prueitt RL, Boffetta P, Halsall C, Sweetman A. “Good epidemiology practice” guidelines for pesticide exposure assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:5114. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH17145114 .

Neuber AC, Tostes CH, Ribeiro AG, Marczynski GT, Komoto TT, Rogeri CD, da Silva VD, Mauad EC, Reis RM, Marques MMC. The biobank of Barretos Cancer Hospital: 14 years of experience in cancer research. Cell Tissue Bank. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10561-021-09941-9 .

Dale WE, Miles JW, Gaixes TB. Quantitative method for determination of DDT and DDT metabolites in blood serum. J AOAC Int. 1970;53:1287–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/53.6.1287 .

Li J, Chen T, Wang Y, Shi Z, Zhou X, Sun Z, Wang D, Wu Y. Simple and fast analysis of tetrabromobisphenol A, hexabromocyclododecane isomers, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in serum using solid-phase extraction or QuEChERS extraction followed by tandem mass spectrometry coupled to HPLC and GC. J Sep Sci. 2017;40:709–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/JSSC.201600969 .

Fang J, Wu Q, Zhao Y, Zhao H, Xu S, Cai Z. Comparison of different mass spectrometric approaches coupled to gas chromatography for the analysis of organochlorine pesticides in serum samples. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2017;1040:180–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCHROMB.2016.12.001 .

Stubleski J, Kukucka P, Salihovic S, Lind PM, Lind L, Kärrman A. A method for analysis of marker persistent organic pollutants in low-volume plasma and serum samples using 96-well plate solid phase extraction. J Chromatogr A. 2018;1546:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHROMA.2018.02.057 .

Lacassie E, Marquet P, Gaulier JM, Dreyfuss MF, Lachâtre G. Sensitive and specific multiresidue methods for the determination of pesticides of various classes in clinical and forensic toxicology. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;121:116–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00461-3 .

Sundberg SE, Ellington JJ, Evans JJ. A simple and fast extraction method for organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in small volumes of avian serum. J Chromatogr B. 2006;831:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCHROMB.2005.11.037 .

Xiang L, Limei W, Lulu S, Zhengce W, Jing K, Mingye Z, Yongman L, Youjie W, Surong M. Simultaneous determination of 35 organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in the serum of the general population in Wuhan by solid phase extraction-gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Se Pu. 2022;40:461–8. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.12013 .

Palát J, Kukučka P, Codling GP, Price EJ, Janků P, Klánová J. Application of 96-well plate SPE method for analysis of persistent organic pollutants in low volume blood serum samples. Chemosphere. 2022;287:132300. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2021.132300 .

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Urinary pyrethroids, herbicides, and OP metabolites in urine. NHANES 2009–2010. 2013. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/2009-2010/labmethods/UPHOPM_F_met.pdf . Accessed 7 Dec 2023.

Gao B, Poma G, Malarvannan G, Dumitrascu C, Bastiaensen M, Wang M, Covaci A. Development of an analytical method based on solid-phase extraction and LC-MS/MS for the monitoring of current-use pesticides and their metabolites in human urine. J Environ Sci. 2022;111:153–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JES.2021.03.029 .

Behniwal PK, She J (2017) Development of HPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of metabolites of organophosphate pesticides, synthetic pyrethroids, herbicides and DEET in human urine. 97:548–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2017.1325881

Hajrulai-Musliu Z, Uzunov R, Jovanov S, Musliu D, Dimitrieska-Stojkovikj E, Stojanovska-Dimzoska B, Angeleska A, Stojkovski V, Sasanya JJ. Multi-class/residue method for determination of veterinary drug residues, mycotoxins and pesticide in urine using LC-MS/MS technique. BMC Vet Res. 2023;19. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12917-023-03720-2 .

Rousis NI, Zuccato E, Castiglioni S. Monitoring population exposure to pesticides based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry measurement of their urinary metabolites in urban wastewater: a novel biomonitoring approach. Sci Total Environ. 2016;571:1349–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2016.07.036 .

Shareef A, Angove MJ, Wells JD. Optimization of silylation using N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide, N, O-bis-(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide and N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-N-methyltrifluoroacetamide for the determination of the estrogens estrone and 17α-ethinylestradiol by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1108:121–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHROMA.2005.12.098 .

Heberer T, Stan HJ. Detection of more than 50 substituted phenols as their t-butyldimethylsilyl derivatives using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 1997;341:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(96)00557-0 .

Hung CC, Sari Simaremare SR, Hsieh CJ, Yiin LM. Simultaneous determination of pyrethroid, organophosphate and carbamate metabolites in human urine by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GCMS). Appl Sci. 2019;9:879. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP9050879 .

Yoshida T, Yoshida J. Simultaneous analytical method for urinary metabolites of organophosphorus compounds and moth repellents in general population. J Chromatogr B. 2012;880:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCHROMB.2011.11.018 .

Schettgen T, Dewes P, Kraus T. A method for the simultaneous quantification of eight metabolites of synthetic pyrethroids in urine of the general population using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408:5467–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00216-016-9645-2/TABLES/5 .

Guo XY, Sun LS, Huang MY, Xu WL, Wang Y, Wang N. Simultaneous determination of eight metabolites of organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides in urine. J Environ Sci Health B. 2017;52:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2016.1224695 .

Schmidt L, Müller J, Göen T. Simultaneous monitoring of seven phenolic metabolites of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDC) in human urine using gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405:2019–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00216-012-6618-Y .

Denghel H, Göen T. Simultaneous assessment of phenolic metabolites in human urine for a specific biomonitoring of exposure to organophosphate and carbamate pesticides. Toxicol Lett. 2018;298:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TOXLET.2018.07.048 .

Schmidt L, Göen T. Simultaneous determination of the full chlorophenol spectrum in human urine using gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2017;965:123–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACA.2017.02.016 .

Lu D, Feng C, Wang D, Lin Y, Ip HSS, She J, Xu Q, Wu C, Wang G, Zhou Z. Analysis of twenty phenolic compounds in human urine: hydrochloric acid hydrolysis, solid-phase extraction based on K2CO3-treated silica, and gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407:4131–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00216-015-8598-1/TABLES/3 .

Govarts E, Gilles L, Rodriguez Martin L, Santonen T, Apel P, Alvito P, Anastasi E, Andersen HR, Andersson AM, Andryskova L, Antignac JP, Appenzeller B, Barbone F, Barnett-Itzhaki Z, Barouki R, Berman T, Bil W, Borges T, Buekers J, Cañas-Portilla A, Covaci A, Csako Z, Den Hond E, Dvorakova D, Fabelova L, Fletcher T, Frederiksen H, Gabriel C, Ganzleben C, Göen T, Halldorsson TI, Haug LS, Horvat M, Huuskonen P, Imboden M, Jagodic Hudobivnik M, Janasik B, Janev Holcer N, Karakitsios S, Katsonouri A, Klanova J, Kokaraki V, Kold Jensen T, Koponen J, Laeremans M, Laguzzi F, Lange R, Lemke N, Lignell S, Lindroos AK, Lobo Vicente J, Luijten M, Makris KC, Mazej D, Melymuk L, Meslin M, Mol H, Montazeri P, Murawski A, Namorado S, Niemann L, Nübler S, Nunes B, Olafsdottir K, Palkovicova Murinova L, Papaioannou N, Pedraza-Diaz S, Piler P, Plichta V, Poteser M, Probst-Hensch N, Rambaud L, Rauscher-Gabernig E, Rausova K, Remy S, Riou M, Rosolen V, Rousselle C, Rüther M, Sarigiannis D, Silva MJ, Šlejkovec Z, Snoj Tratnik J, Stajnko A, Szigeti T, Tarazona JV, Thomsen C, Tkalec Ž, Tolonen H, Trnovec T, Uhl M, Van Nieuwenhuyse A, Vasco E, Verheyen VJ, Viegas S, Vinggaard AM, Vogel N, Vorkamp K, Wasowicz W, Weber T, Wimmerova S, Woutersen M, Zimmermann P, Zvonar M, Koch H, Kolossa-Gehring M, Esteban López M, Castaño A, Stewart L, Sepai O, Schoeters G. Harmonized human biomonitoring in European children, teenagers and adults: EU-wide exposure data of 11 chemical substance groups from the HBM4EU Aligned Studies (2014–2021). Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023;249:114119. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEH.2023.114119 .

Forté CA, Millar JA, Colacino JA. Integrating NHANES and toxicity forecaster data to compare pesticide exposure and bioactivity by farmwork history and US citizenship. J Eposure Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2023;2023:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00583-5 .

Rylander C, Lund E, Frøyland L, Sandanger TM. Predictors of PCP, OH-PCBs, PCBs and chlorinated pesticides in a general female Norwegian population. Environ Int. 2012;43:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2012.02.008 .

Waliszewski SM, Caba M, Herrero-Mercado M, Saldariaga-Noreña H, Meza E, Zepeda R, Martínez-Valenzuela C, Arroyo SG, Pietrini RV. Organochlorine pesticide residue levels in blood serum of inhabitants from Veracruz, Mexico. Environ Monit Assess. 2012;184:5613–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10661-011-2366-2 .

Han M, Ma A, Dong Z, Yin J, Shao B. Organochlorine pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in serum of Beijing population: exposure and health risk assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2023;860:160358. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.160358 .

United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 2015–2016 Data documentation, codebook, and frequencies. Pesticides - organochlorine pesticides - pooled samples. 2020. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2015-2016/PSTPOL_I.htm#LBCPDE . Accessed 28 Jan 2024.

United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 2015–2016 Data documentation, codebook, and frequencies. Pyrethroids, herbicides, & organophosphorus metabolites. 2023. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2015-2016/UPHOPM_I.htm#URX24D . Accessed 28 Jan 2024.

Yoshizawa K, Yoshida M, Moretto A. Pyraclostrobin - FAO/WHO meeting on pesticide residues. 2018. https://apps.who.int/pesticide-residues-jmpr-database/Document/273 . Accessed 19 Aug 2024.

Leite FG, Sampaio CF, Cardoso Pires JA, de Oliveira DP, Dorta DJ. Toxicological impact of strobilurin fungicides on human and environmental health: a literature review. J Environ Sci Health B. 2024;59:142–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2024.2312786 .

Birolli WG, da Silva BF, Rodrigues-Filho E. Biodegradation of the fungicide pyraclostrobin by bacteria from orange cultivation plots. Sci Total Environ. 2020;746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140968 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank PhD Guilherme Miola Titato for his support during the experimental work.

This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) under grant numbers 2018/23105–6 and 2017/02147–0, and by the Ministry of Health of Brazil under grant numbers 881187/2018, 879335/2018, 894586/2019, and 894588/2019. H. C. S. Silveira (grant 314247/2021–1), A. J. Santos-Neto (grant 314731/2021–0), and F. M. Lanças (grant 308843/2019–3) are recipients of productivity fellowships from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). W. G. Birolli is a post-doctoral fellow funded by the Ministry of Health of Brazil under grant number 879335/2018.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Chromatography Group, São Carlos Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil

Willian G. Birolli, Fernando M. Lanças & Álvaro J. Santos-Neto

Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil

Willian G. Birolli & Henrique C. S. Silveira

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

PhD W. G. Birolli: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. Prof. F. M. Lanças: conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition, resources, supervision, resources, project administration, writing—review and editing. Prof. H. C. S. Silveira: conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition, resources, supervision, project administration, writing—review and editing. Prof. A. J. Santos-Neto: conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition, resources, project administration, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willian G. Birolli .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval.

This study adhered strictly to ethical regulations set by the research ethics committee of the Barretos Cancer Hospital, under protocol no. 1585/2018.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Source of biological material

All participants signed the informed consent. Sample collection occurred in 2021 at the Barretos region of São Paulo State, Brazil, with serum samples stored at − 80 °C in the biobank of the Barretos Cancer Hospital.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 804 KB)

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Birolli, W.G., Lanças, F.M., Silveira, H.C.S. et al. Development of a unified method for the determination of legacy and metabolites of current pesticides in serum for exposure assessment. Anal Bioanal Chem (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-024-05488-2

Download citation

Received : 16 April 2024

Revised : 07 August 2024

Accepted : 09 August 2024

Published : 27 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-024-05488-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Persistent organic pollutants
• Biomonitoring
• Organophosphate
• Gas chromatography
• Mass spectrometry
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

A dual-function chromogenic and fluorogenic benzofurazan probe for plazomicin and its innovative utility for development of two microwell assays with high throughput for analysis of drug substance and pharmaceutical formulations †

First published on 27th August 2024

Plazomicin (PLZ) is a novel aminoglycoside which has been recently approved by The US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections including acute pyelonephritis, caused by certain Enterobacteriaceae, in adult patients with limited or no options for alternative treatment. This study focuses on the development of microwell-based photometric and fluorometric assays for the quantitative determination of PLZ in its bulk drug substance and commercial pharmaceutical formulations (Zemedri® injections). Both assays utilize the dual-function chromogenic and fluorogenic properties of the 4-fluoro-7-nitrobenzofurazan (NBD-F) probe. The reaction between PLZ and NBD-F, conducted in a borate buffer at pH 8, resulted in the formation of a colored and fluorescent reaction product. The product exhibited maximum light absorption at 473 nm and emitted fluorescence at 541 nm when excited at 473 nm. Factors influencing the reaction between PLZ and NBD-F were thoroughly investigated, and optimal conditions were determined. Under the optimized reaction conditions, calibration curves were generated to establish the relationship between absorbance and fluorescence intensities of the reaction product with the corresponding PLZ concentrations. The absorbance–concentration relation was linear in a PLZ concentration range of 20–800 μg mL −1 with a limit of quantitation of 25 μg mL −1 , while the fluorescence–concentration relation was linear in the concentration range of 0.05–1.5 μg mL −1 with a limit of quantitation of 0.08 μg mL −1 . Both assays underwent validation and were successfully applied to the quantitation of PLZ in its bulk drug substance and pharmaceutical formulations (injections) with satisfactory accuracy and precision. The eco-friendliness/greenness assessment of the assays demonstrated that both assays comply with the requirements of green analytical chemistry approaches. Furthermore, the proposed microwell assay plates allowed for the simultaneous handling of numerous samples with micro-volumes, enabling high-throughput analysis. In conclusion, this study represents the first evaluation of NBD-F as a dual-function probe for the microwell-based photometric and fluorometric determination of PLZ. The developed assays serve as valuable analytical tools for the quality control of PLZ's bulk drug substance and pharmaceutical formulations.

1. Introduction

To ensure effective and safe therapy using PLZ, its pharmaceutical formulation (Zemdri® injection) must possess high-quality in terms of an exact content of the active drug substance. Currently, there is only one available assay in the literature for analyzing PLZ and its impurities in bulk drug substances, which involves liquid chromatography coupled with an on-line mass spectrometry detector. However, there is currently no assay available for analyzing the exact drug content of Zemdri® injection. This study aims to address this gap by developing validated assays for determining the amount of PLZ in Zemdri® injection. It is well established that liquid chromatographic assays (HPLC) offer excellent accuracy and selectivity in diverse fields of analysis, it has the capability to separate complex samples which simple photometric and fluorometric methods lack, and that this added capability comes with the environmental cost of using greater amounts of solvents. Thus, there exists a class of samples (simple solutions with a limited number of solutes) for which the separation capabilities of HPLC are not needed, and for these it is environmentally advantageous, and advantageous in terms of throughput to use simpler direct photo- and fluorometric methods. 6,7 Furthermore, the development of either HPLC or spectrometric (photo- and fluorometric) assays for PLZ is challenging due to the absence of chromophore and fluorophore. Therefore, derivatization procedures are required for development of either of the techniques. 8,9 Based on the simplicity of sample matrices (bulk drug form and pharmaceutical formulation) targeted in this study for PLZ, it is crucial to develop photo- and fluorometric assays for determining the amount of PLZ in both its bulk form and formulation. These assays are particularly valuable because they can be easily automated with analyzers, allowing for the sequential analysis of numerous samples. They are especially useful in evaluating pharmaceutical formulations, especially for assessing the contents of drug substances formulations. 10,11

The conventional spectrometric assays relying on a manual approach using volumetric flasks or cuvettes, result in the consumption of significant amounts of samples and solvents and imposed limitations on analytical throughput. 10 Hence, it was essential to develop an alternative innovative assay that is environmentally friendly and offers enhanced capabilities for high throughput analysis. Microwell spectrometric assays have emerged as a notable environmentally friendly approach in pharmaceutical analysis. 12,13 One of the key advantages of this methodology is its ability to utilize smaller volumes of samples and reagents compared to traditional spectrometric practices. This not only reduces waste generation but also lowers the costs associated with solvents and reagents. Moreover, the adoption of microscale techniques in the laboratory setting allows for a reduction in the use of hazardous chemicals and solvents, promoting sustainability. The versatility of microwell spectrometric assays enables their application across various areas of the pharmaceutical industry. Furthermore, this technique is well-suited for automation, leading to improved efficiency, reduced errors, and savings in time and labor. These advantages have significantly contributed to the growing popularity of microwell spectrometry within the pharmaceutical industry. 14–16

This study describes, for the first time, the development of two microwell spectrometric (photometric and fluorometric) assays for the determination of PLZ in bulk form and Zemdri® injection. These assays were designated as MW-PM and MW-FL assays, respectively. Both assays involved the microscale formation of a dual function chromogenic and fluorogenic derivative upon reaction of PLZ with 4-fluoro-7-nitrobenzofurazan (NBD-F) probe. The analysis procedures were conducted in 96-well plates and the absorbances (in MW-PM) or fluorescence (in MW-FL) of the reaction's solutions were measured by a multifunction microplate reader. The absorbances were measured at 473 nm, and the emitted fluorescence signals were measured at 541 nm after excitation at 473 nm. Both MW-PM and MW-FL assays meet the requirements of green and high-throughput analytical approaches used for the quality control of PLZ in pharmaceutical industry.

2. Experimental

2.1. apparatus, 2.2. chemicals and materials, 2.3. preparation of standard and sample solutions, 2.4. general procedures of mw-pm and mw-fl assays, 2.5. determination of reaction stoichiometry, 3. results and discussion, 3.1. strategy for assays development.

The reaction between NBD-F and PLZ, which contains amino groups, has not been previously reported. Hence, this study focuses on investigating this reaction and utilizing it to develop sensitive and straightforward photometric and fluorimetric assays for the determination of PLZ in bulk drug substance and pharmaceutical formulations, particularly injections. Considering the advantages of microwell-based analysis, as demonstrated in previous studies, 14–16 this research aims to explore the utility of NBD-F as a dual-function probe in developing this methodology for PLZ. The aim is to form a colored and fluorescent PLZ-NBD derivative upon their reaction.

3.2. Spectral characteristics

3.3. optimization of reaction conditions.

The effect of pH of borate buffer solution on the reactions was investigated using pH values ranging from 3 to 12. The results indicated that the signals increased as the pH increased, reaching maximum readings at pH range of 8–10 ( Fig. 3B ). This increase in signals with alkaline pH values can be attributed to the conversion of the amino group of PLZ from the acid salt form (at acidic pH values) to the free amino group as the pH becomes alkaline. This conversion facilitates the nucleophilic substitution reaction. However, readings sharply decreased at pH values above 10. This decline may be attributed to an increase in the concentration of hydroxide ions, which hinders the condensation reaction between PLZ and NBD-F. Accordingly, the subsequent experiments were carried out at pH 8 ± 0.5.

The results indicated that higher temperatures accelerated the reaction; however, they did not improve the signal values ( Fig. 3C ). The maximum signals were obtained when the reaction was carried out for 20 min at 40 °C and 10 min at 50 °C, respectively. It was observed that the signals remained stable for approximately 40 min at 40 °C, but they decreased significantly at 50 °C, and the values were not reproducible. This decline in the signals was likely due to the degradation of the reagent at high temperatures. Notably, these observations align with the findings previously reported by Aktas et al. 23 Additionally, the imprecise readings might be attributed to inconsistent partial evaporation of methanol (used for NBD-F solution) from the wells during incubation at 50 °C. In order to develop assays with compromised features in terms of time, throughput, precision, and convenience, subsequent experiments were conducted at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) for 30 min.

A concise overview of the variables affecting the reaction of PLZ with NBD-F is given in Table 1 .

3.4. Reaction stoichiometry and pathway

3.5. Validation of MW-PM and MW-FL assays

Linear relationships with small intercepts and determination coefficients (0.9994 and 0.0993 for MW-PM and MW-FL assays, respectively) were established within the concentrations ranges of 20 to 800 for MW-PM assay and 0.05 to 1.5 μg mL −1 for MW-FL assay ( Table 2 ). The determination of the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) followed the guidelines of The International Council of Harmonization (ICH) for validating analytical procedures. 27 For MW-PM, the LOD and LOQ values were determined to be 8.3 and 25 μg mL −1 , respectively. For MW-FL, the LOD and LOQ values were 0.03 and 0.08 μg mL −1 ( Table 2 ). The regression and performance parameters of the proposed MW-SP and MW-FL assays are summarized in Table 2 .

To assess the accuracy of the MW-PM and MW-FL assays, recovery studies were conducted using the same PLZ samples. As shown in Table 3 , the recovery values ranged from 98.9% to 101.4% and 99.1% to 101.6% for MW-PM and MW-FL assays, respectively. Also, the errors ranged from −0.4% to 1.2% and −1.1 to 1.6% for MW-PM and MW-FL, respectively. These results demonstrate the high accuracy of both assays.

The high precision and accuracy achieved by the proposed MW-PM and MW-FL assays can be attributed to several key factors:

(1) Consistent sample handling: the use of microwell plates ensures reproducible samples and reagents (NBD-F, buffer, and HCl) handling. Each well is designed with uniform volume, shape, and dimensions, promoting standardized sample preparation. This consistency reduces variability in sample/reagents dispensing, leading to improved measurement precision.

(2) Parallel processing: the 96-well assay plates enable simultaneous dispensing of multiple samples and conducting reactions. This parallel processing capability minimizes the impact of random errors and enhances the statistical significance of the results. It also mitigates variations caused by sequential sample handling, which can introduce errors and affect precision.

(3) Small sample volumes: the MW-PM and MW-FL assays utilize small sample and reagent volumes (50 μL each). This approach reduces the influence of pipetting errors and enhances both precision and accuracy in measurements.

(4) Controlled environmental conditions: the procedures of both assays are performed under controlled room temperature conditions (25 ± 2 °C), effectively minimizing the effects of temperature fluctuations on samples and reactions. Temperature stability helps prevent errors and maintains the accuracy of measurements. By ensuring controlled conditions, the reproducibility and reliability of the results are enhanced.

(5) Optical pathlength: the optical pathlength is an important parameter in spectroscopic measurements of solutions in microwell assay plates by multi-mode reader as it affects the sensitivity and accuracy of both absorbance and fluorescence measurements. In multi-mode microwell plates, the optical pathlength can vary based on the design of the plate and the volume of the sample. In the present assays involving 200 μL as a total volume of sample solution, the optical pathlength is 2 mm.

Furthermore, the ruggedness of the assays was assessed by involving two different analysts to perform the procedures on three different days. The results obtained from the day-to-day variations demonstrated reproducibility, with RSD values not exceeding 1.8% for both assays. This further underscores the reliability and consistency of both assays, even when conducted by different analysts on different occasions.

3.6. Analysis of PLZ drug substance and Zemdri® injection

3.7. Eco-friendliness/greenness of MW-PM and MW-FL assays

The results obtained from AES are presented in Table 6 . With 50 μL of methanolic solution of NBD-F and 50 μL of HCl solution, a total of 4 penalty points (PPs) were assigned. The hazardous impact of methanol and the other reagents contributed to a subtotal of 9 PPs. Parameters related to energy consumption by the microplate reader and occupational hazards did not receive any PPs, as they complied with GAC guidelines. Waste production and treatment parameters received subtotals of 1 and 3 PPs, respectively. These scores were assigned because the assay generated less than 1 mL of waste per sample, and the waste was not treated. The total PPs for the assay amounted to 13, resulting in an Eco-scale score of 87 (100 − 13). This high score, exceeding 75, indicates that the proposed microwell-based analytical methods demonstrate an excellent level of environmental friendliness.

Fig. 7 presents a pictogram of the results obtained from the GAPI tool, which assesses 15 parameters. Two parameters (1, and 15) are depicted in red. Parameter 1 signifies that samples were collected or prepared offline, and parameter 15 reflects that the assays' waste was not treated. Parameters 5 and 6 are depicted in yellow, indicating that the assays are suitable for quantitative analysis and the samples were extracted on a microscale, respectively. The remaining parameters are shown in green, indicating that they meet the requirements of green procedures according to the tool's guidelines. 29

The AGREE pictogram, displayed in Fig. 7 , illustrates the assessment results. Parameter 1, related to sample treatment, is marked with yellow due to the manual execution of sample treatment. Parameter 3, which concerns device positioning (online or offline) is depicted in red because the analysis was performed offline using a plate reader. The remaining parameters are assigned a green color. The total score obtained is 0.8 out of 1, indicating a high level of environmental friendliness for the assays.

In conclusion, the results obtained from the three assessment tools provide conclusive evidence of the eco-friendliness of the proposed MW-PM and MW-FL assays for PLZ and their alignment with the principles of GAC.

3.8. High throughput of MW-PM and MW-FL assays

4. conclusion, abbreviations.

Data availability

Conflicts of interest, acknowledgements.

• J. A. Clark and D. S. Burgess, Plazomicin: a new aminoglycoside in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. , 2020, 7 , 1–15  Search PubMed .
• A. Bilinskaya, K. E. Linder and J. L. Kuti, Plazomicin: an intravenous aminoglycoside antibacterial for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. , 2020, 18 , 705–720  CrossRef   CAS .
• M. W. McCarthy, Plazomicin for the treatment of patients with complicated urinary tract infection, Drugs Today , 2018, 54 , 513–518  CrossRef   CAS .
• FDA, ZEMDRI™ Prescribing Information, available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/210303orig1s000lbl.pdf, accessed on June 29, 2024.
• A. Alfieri, S. Di Franco, V. Donatiello, V. Maffei, C. Fittipaldi, M. Fiore, F. Coppolino, P. Sansone, M. C. Pace and M. B. Passavanti, Plazomicin against multidrug-resistant bacteria: a scoping review, Life , 2022, 12 , 1949  CrossRef   CAS .
• A. Eldin, O. Ismaiel, W. Hassan and A. Shalaby, Green analytical chemistry: Opportunities for pharmaceutical quality control, J. Anal. Chem. , 2016, 71 , 861–871  CrossRef   CAS .
• P. G. Wang, High-throughput Analysis in the Pharmaceutical Industry , CRC Press, New York, 2008  Search PubMed .
• F. Farouk, H. M. E. Azzazy and W. M. A. Niessen, Challenges in the determination of aminoglycoside antibiotics, a review, Anal. Chim. Acta , 2015, 890 , 21–43  CrossRef   CAS .
• R. Hari, S. Taherunnisa, S. Y. Raut, S. Mutalik and K. B. Koteshwara, Challenges in the development of analytical test procedure for aminoglycosides: A critical review, J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. , 2019, 9 , 145–152  CrossRef   CAS .
• S. Görög, Ultraviolet-visible Spectrophotometry in Pharmaceutical Analysis , CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 2018  Search PubMed .
• A. Bose, I. Thomas, G. Kavitha and E. Abraham, Fluorescence spectroscopy and its applications: a review, Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Anal. , 2018, 8 , 1–8  CrossRef   CAS .
• G. Liu and J.-M. Lin, Microplate-based assays: The future of pharmaceutical analysis, Trends Anal. Chem. , 2016, 85 , 43–48  Search PubMed .
• P. Singh and B. Singh, Microwell spectrophotometry: A green analytical technique for pharmaceutical analysis, J. Pharm. Anal. , 2017, 7 , 203–208  CrossRef .
• M. S. Alsalhi, M. Al-Outaibi and I. A. Darwish, Development of three innovative green microwell spectrometric methods with high throughput for determination of seleciclib in its bulk form and capsules, Sustainable Chem. Pharm. , 2024, 37 , 101443  CrossRef   CAS .
• I. A. Darwish and N. Z. Alzoman, Development and validation of green and high-throughput microwell spectrophotometric assay for the determination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in their pharmaceutical dosage forms, Molecules , 2023, 28 , 4221  CrossRef   CAS   PubMed .
• I. A. Darwish and N. Z. Alzoman, Development of green and high throughput microplate reader-assisted universal microwell spectrophotometric assay for direct determination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in their pharmaceutical formulations irrespective the diversity of their chemical structures, Molecules , 2023, 28 , 4049  CrossRef   CAS   PubMed .
• M. Pesez and J. Bartos, Colorimetric and Spectrofluorimetric Analysis of Organic Compounds and Drugs , Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1974, pp. 628–630  Search PubMed .
• I. A. Darwish, H. H. Abdine, S. M. Amer and L. I. Al-Rayes, Simple spectrophotometric method for determination of paroxetine in tablets using 1,2-naphthoquinone-4-sulphonate as a chromogenic reagent, Int. J. Anal. Chem. , 2009, 2009 , 237601  CrossRef .
• H. Raissi, I. Chérif, H. Ayachi, A. H. Said, F. Hassen, S. Ayachi and T. Boubaker, Structure-Property relationships in benzofurazan derivatives: A combined experimental and DFT/TD-DFT investigation, in Density Functional Theory: Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Applications , ed. D. Glossman-Mitni, IntechOpen, London, 2021  Search PubMed .
• T. Santa, Recent advances in development and application of derivatization reagents having a benzofurazan structure: a brief overview, Biomed. Chromatogr. , 2014, 28 , 760–766  CrossRef   CAS   PubMed .
• B. I. Salman, M. F. B. Ali, M. A. Marzouq and S. A. Hussein, Utility of the fluorogenic characters of benzofurazan for analysis of tigecycline using spectrometric technique; application to pharmacokinetic study, urine and pharmaceutical formulations, Luminescence , 2019, 34 , 175–182  CrossRef   CAS .
• A. O. Alnajjar, A. A. Elbashir, R. E. Elgorashe, A. M. Ebrahim, A. M. Idris and H. M. Abd El-Lateef, Utilization of 4-fluoro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-F) as a fluorogenic reagent for the development of a spectrofluorometric assay method for taurine in energy drinks, J. Chem. Res. , 2022, 46 , 1–7  Search PubMed .
• E. S. Aktas, L. Ersoy and O. Sagirh, A new spectrofluorimetric method for the determination of lisinopril in tablets, Farmaco , 2003, 58 , 165–168  CrossRef   CAS   PubMed .
• H. Miyano, T. Toyo’oka and K. Imai, Further studies on the reaction of amines and proteins with 4-fluoro-7-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole, Anal. Chim. Acta , 1985, 170 , 81–87  CrossRef   CAS .
• K. Imai, T. Toyo Oka and H. Miyano, Fluorigenic reagents for primary and secondary amines and thiols in high-performance liquid chromatography. A review, Analyst , 1984, 109 , 1365–1373  RSC .
• A. A. Elbashir, F. E. O. Suliman and H. Y. Aboul-enein, The application of 7-chloro-4-nitrobenzoxadiazole and 4-fluoro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole for the analysis of amines and amino acids using high-performance liquid chromatography, Gazi Univ. J. Sci. , 2011, 24 , 679–697  Search PubMed .
• ICH, International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; ICH Harmonised Guideline; Validation of Analytical Procedure: Q2(R2) , ICH, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022  Search PubMed .
• A. Gałuszka, P. Konieczka, Z. M. Migaszewski and J. Namieśnik, Analytical eco-scale for assessing the greenness of analytical procedures, Trends Anal. Chem. , 2012, 37 , 61–72  CrossRef .
• J. Płotka-Wasylka, A new tool for the evaluation of the analytical procedure: Green Analytical Procedure Index, Talanta , 2018, 181 , 204–209  CrossRef .
• F. Pena-Pereira, W. Wojnowski and M. Tobiszewski, AGREE-analytical greenness metric approach and software, Anal. Chem. , 2020, 92 , 10076–10082  CrossRef   CAS .

• Open access
• Published: 28 August 2024

The use of biostimulants as a key to sustainable hydroponic lettuce farming under saline water stress

• Boran İkiz 1 ,
• Hayriye Yildiz Dasgan 1 ,
• Sibel Balik 1 ,
• Sebnem Kusvuran 2 &
• Nazim S. Gruda 3  

BMC Plant Biology volume  24 , Article number:  808 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

The utilization of high-quality water in agriculture is increasingly constrained by climate change, affecting availability, quality, and distribution due to altered precipitation patterns, increased evaporation, extreme weather events, and rising salinity levels. Salinity significantly challenges salt-sensitive vegetables like lettuce, particularly in a greenhouse. Hydroponics water quality ensures nutrient solution stability, enhances nutrient uptake, prevents contamination, regulates pH and electrical conductivity, and maintains system components. This study aimed to mitigate salt-induced damage in lettuce grown via the floating culture method under 50 mM NaCl salinity by applying biostimulants.

We examined lettuce’s physiological, biochemical, and agronomical responses to salt stress after applying biostimulants such as amino acids, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), fulvic acid, and chitosan. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse with a randomized complete block design, and each treatment was replicated four times. Biostimulant applications alleviated salt’s detrimental effects on plant weight, height, leaf number, and leaf area. Yield increases under 50 mM NaCl were 75%, 51%, 31%, 34%, and 33% using vermicompost, PGPR, fulvic acid, amino acid, and chitosan, respectively. Biostimulants improved stomatal conductance (58–189%), chlorophyll content (4–10%), nutrient uptake (15–109%), and water status (9–107%). They also reduced MDA content by 26–42%. PGPR (1.0 ml L ‒1 ), vermicompost (2 ml L ‒1 ), and fulvic acid (40 mg L ‒1 ) were particularly effective, enhancing growth, yield, phenol, and mineral content while reducing nitrate levels under saline conditions.

Conclusions

Biostimulants activated antioxidative defense systems, offering a sustainable, cost-effective solution for mitigating salt stress in hydroponic lettuce cultivation.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The current trajectory of global population growth is expected to continue throughout this century. Projections suggest that the world population will reach 9.7 billion by 2050 and 10.9 billion by 2100 [ 1 ]. The coexistence of malnutrition, over nutrition, and environmental pollution stemming from food-related activities is widespread globally. These intertwined issues share common determinants and necessitate comprehensive and integrated solutions. Concurrently, climate change emerges as a primary driver of risks, jeopardizing food security, plant ecosystems, and the nutritional quality of diets [ 1 ]. Climate, defined as the long-term variations in atmospheric conditions within a particular region, significantly influences agricultural practices [ 2 ]. Climate change impacts a wide range of stakeholders, including consumers, producers, media, and suppliers, on a global scale. These deviations from average atmospheric variables have increasingly exacerbated the frequency and intensity of various stressors on agricultural crop yield and quality [ 3 , 4 ]. Agriculture is very vulnerable to climate change and is the most affected sector. Bisbis et al. [ 5 ] demonstrated that this also applies to the production of greenhouse vegetables. Exposing crops to abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity triggered by climate change negatively affects sustainable food production [ 6 ]. Agriculture, constituting approximately one-third of the Earth’s terrestrial surface, occupies a substantial portion of the global land area. The agricultural sector significantly influences anthropogenic water consumption, accounting for 70% of water utilization [ 7 ]. The prominence of agriculture in this context underscores its pivotal role in shaping globaldynamics. It emphasizes the imperative for informed water resource management strategies within the agricultural sector to foster sustainability and mitigate potential ecological ramifications. Suboptimal water resource management practices within the watershed pose significant challenges. This is evident in the excessive water use for irrigation, leading to substantial wastage of water resources [ 8 ]. Furthermore, unchecked pollution of water bodies exacerbates the problem, further threatening the sustainability of water reservoirs. Additionally, a noticeable decline in groundwater levels adds to the agricultural sector’s multifaceted challenges [ 9 ].

Salinity in soil and water is a widespread challenge, significantly inhibiting global agricultural food production, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. The incidence of salt stress has become a widespread problem affecting approximately 20% of the world’s arable land, with an expectation that it will increase to 50% by the end of the 21st century [ 10 ]. The scarcity of water resources often obligates using saline groundwater for irrigation purposes in agricultural activities [ 11 ]. Elevated salinity levels induce damage at the molecular level to DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids. At the cellular level, salt stress triggers osmotic and ionic stress, disrupts gas and nutrient exchange, and leads to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) molecules such as hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), hydroxyl radical (OH • ), superoxide (O2 •‒ ), and singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) [ 12 , 13 ]. ROS diminishes cell expansion and metabolic activity, induces stomatal closure, alters photosynthesis, and disrupts carbon fixation, reducing growth, development, photosynthesis, and yield [ 14 , 15 ]. Moreover, there’s an increasing strategy of using drainage and wastewater for irrigation, reflecting a growing necessity to maximize available water resources in the face of escalating water scarcity issues [ 16 ]. Therefore, there is an increasing need to enhance awareness regarding saline water management [ 11 , 17 ].

Soilless culture is an agricultural technology that uses water sparingly in this context. It represents a contemporary method of plant cultivation in which plants are grown using inert organic or inorganic substrates. Typically, this cultivation technique involves using nutrient solutions in combination with the substrates above to provide plants with the necessary nutrients [ 18 ]. Soilless culture systems generally allow flexibility and intensification, ensuring high crop yields and high-quality products even in regions with unfavorable growing conditions [ 19 ]. These systems provide efficient tools to manage saline stress on plants, preventing salinity levels higher than the tolerance threshold of crops, which negatively affect plant growth and yield. Concurrently, controlled saline stress can be applied to increase secondary metabolites (phytochemicals/antioxidants) and sensorial quality traits (color, firmness, aroma) [ 20 , 21 ] and to reduce anti-nutritional factors such as nitrate [ 22 ], improving the “whole” quality of vegetable products.

Biostimulants represent innovative agronomic tools positioned between fertilizers and plant growth regulators, demonstrating a unique ability to enhance plant growth and productivity. Biostimulants strengthen the efficacy of nutrient utilization within plants, bolster resilience against adverse environmental factors, elevate the caliber of produce, and facilitate optimal uptake of nutrients in scant quantities within the soil and root system [ 23 , 24 ]. According to the most recent European regulation on fertilizers, these substances are classified based on their concentrations and consist of organic or inorganic products containing bioactive compounds and/or microorganisms. Applying biostimulants to the plant or rhizosphere improves nutrient absorption and assimilation efficiency, augments tolerance to abiotic stresses, and enhances the overall quality of the agricultural product. These effects are observed independently of the nutrient content of the biostimulants. This regulatory definition encapsulates the multifaceted role of biostimulants in modern agriculture [ 25 , 26 ].

The Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) play a crucial role in mitigating salinity stress by enhancing water absorption capabilities, facilitating the uptake of essential nutrients, and accumulating osmolytes such as proline, glutamate, glycine betaine, soluble sugars, and carbohydrates [ 27 , 28 ]. Additionally, PGPR contributes to the augmentation of antioxidative enzymes [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Vermicompost promotes biodiversity by fostering beneficial microorganisms, thereby enhancing plant growth by directly synthesizing plant growth-regulating hormones and enzymes. Furthermore, it indirectly aids in plant development by mitigating the impact of plant pathogens, nematodes, and other pests, thus strengthening plant health and reducing yield losses [ 32 ]. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) serve as crucial root symbionts, playing a pivotal role in enhancing the growth of crop plants and helping host plants acquire tolerance to abiotic stressors such as salinity and drought [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Fulvic acid, hypothesized to originate from microbial metabolic processes, acts as a stimulatory agent in protecting crops from the adverse effects of salt stress [ 37 , 38 ]. Chitosan is a natural biopolymer derived from chitin, found in the exoskeletons of crustaceans such as shrimp, crab, and lobster. It is produced by deacetylation of chitin, resulting in a positively charged polysaccharide [ 39 , 40 ]. Chitosan, due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability, non-toxicity, and antimicrobial properties, is used in agriculture as a biopesticide, biofertilizer, and biostimulant to enhance plant growth, improve crop yield, and protect against abiotic stresses and diseases [ 41 , 42 ].

Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.), a prominent leafy vegetable in the Asteraceae family, holds significant nutritional value. It is a rich source of essential vitamins, including A, C, folate, and K, contributing to immune system support and optimal bone health maintenance. The presence of antioxidants, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, and carotenoids, plays a crucial role in protecting the body against the harmful effects of free radicals, thereby reducing the risk of cellular damage and associated diseases [ 43 ]. It is commonly consumed as a fresh salad or minimally processed food, such as fresh-cut and mixed salads. Its consistent year-round consumer demand highlights its enduring popularity in the market [ 44 ]. Lettuce is known for its ease of cultivation and short growth cycleand is well-suited for year-round hydroponic cultivation. As a leading leafy vegetable, lettuce is a primary choice for hydroponic cultivation [ 45 ]. Moreover, lettuce is a sensitive vegetable to salt stress. This can significantly reduce yield and crop quality [ 45 , 46 , 47 ].

This study aims to assess the impact of sustainable and environmentally friendly biostimulant practices on enhancing the yield and quality of hydroponically grown lettuce using saline irrigation water. Lettuce, the foremost leafy vegetable, has been chosen for this study. Efficiently utilizing saline waters is paramount, particularly in regions facing water salinity challenges. Greenhouse hydroponic systems offer a sustainable solution for cultivating crops like lettuce, where water quality plays a pivotal role. Maintaining high water quality ensures optimal nutrient delivery and uptake efficiency, which is essential for maximizing yields and minimizing environmental impact. As such, integrating technologies that promote water conservation and saline water management in hydroponic setups enhances agricultural productivity and contributes to sustainable water resource management. Biostimulants may play a crucial role in improving efficiency whenusing saline waters. We hypothesize that applying amino acids, AMF, PGPR, vermicompost, fulvic acid, or chitosan will mitigate salt stress. Additionally, we anticipate observing alterations in the activity of antioxidant enzymes, changes in antioxidant levels, and mineral content in lettuce leaves, indicative of the effects of salt stress mitigation mediated by biostimulants. This study is among the first to comprehensively compare and examine six biostimulants in greenhouse hydroponic lettuce cultivation under 50 mM saline conditions.

Materials and methods

Experimental design and growth conditions.

The study was carried out in a glasshouse 36°59′N, 35°18′E, at an elevation of 20 m above sea level during the autumn and winter seasons of 2021–2022 in a Mediterranean climate. During the daytime, temperatures inside the greenhouse fluctuated between 20 and 24 °C, while at night, they ranged from 13 to 16 °C. The relative humidity remained at 60–70%, and the plants received exposure to natural sunlight.

The Batavia type of lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. crispa ), specifically the ‘Caipira’® cultivar from Enza Zaden seed company, was used as plant material. A hydroponic system using 50-L cultivation containers was set up, with plant roots submerged in aerated nutrient solution. The experiment followed a randomized complete block design with four replicates per treatment and ten plants per replicate, each tank serving as one replicate (Fig.  1 ). The distance between the rows of lettuce plants was 15 × 15 cm, with a plant density of 44.44 plant m −2 . The lettuce plants were grown with the following nutrient solution in control treatment [ 48 ] (in mg L ‒1 ): N (200), P (50), K (300), Ca (200), Mg (65), Fe (5.0), Mn (0.8), Cu (0.3), Zn (0.3), B (0.3), and Mo (0.05). The hydroponically grown lettuce plants were treated with 50 mM NaCl salinity. The biostimulants of AMF, amino acids, fulvic acid, chitosan, PGPR, and vermicompost were applied to a 50 mM NaCl salinized nutrient solution. Lettuce plants were grown in a floating culture system for 45 days and harvested. The pH of the nutrient solution was diligently maintained within the range of 6.0–6.2, while the electrical conductivity (EC) values were incrementally elevated to 1.3, 1.8, and 2.0 dS m ‒1 levels in the control application throughout plant growth.

The experiment layout in the greenhouse involved growing lettuce in a floating culture system with biostimulants under 50 mM saline water. Application of biostimulants into the root medium

Biostimulant applications

Amino acid and fulvic acid, products of “Köklü Group” company, were utilized under the commercial names “Aminoset”® and “Sacaka WS”®, respectively. “Aminoset”® consists of total organic matter 50%, organic carbon 20%, organic nitrogen 4%, and free amino acid 30%. On the other hand, “Sacaka WS”® contains organic matter 80% and fulvic acid 70%. The amino acid and fulvic acid doses in the root medium of lettuce were set at 100 mg/L and 40 mg/L, respectively. Additionally, “ERS” ® (Bioglobal Inc. Co.), a mycorrhizal mixture containing Glomus intraradices, Glomus aggregatum, Glomus mosseae, Glomus clarum, Glomus monosporus, Glomus deserticola, Glomus brasilianum, Glomus etunicatum, and Gigaspora margarita with a concentration of 1 × 10 4  g −1 , was applied to the seeds before sowing at a rate of 1000 spores seed −1 [ 45 ]. Furthermore, “Rhizofill” ® (NG-Biyoteknoloji Ltd. Co.), a mixture of Bacillus subtilis (1 × 109 ml-1), Bacillus megaterium (1 × 10 9  ml −1 ), and Pseudomonas fluorescens (1 × 10 10  ml −1 ), was used as a PGPR biostimulant at a dose of 1.0 ml L −1 [ 45 ]. “Adaga”® from Adaga company, containing 2.5% N-Acetyl-D-Glucosamine, was employed as chitosan at a dose of 300 µl/L in a hydroponic growing container. Lastly, “EkosolFarm”® (100% organic liquid vermicompost) from Ekosol Tarim company was used as vermicompost at a 2 ml/L dose. The treatments of the study were established as given in Table  1 . In hydroponic lettuce cultivation, the nutrient solution was renewed every 10 days. Salt and biostimulant applications were also renewed.

Plant growth parameters

The harvested lettuce plants were individually weighed, and the total yield was expressed as kg m ‒2 at the end of the 45 days of the growing period. The lettuce height , diameter, and circumferencewere measured using a ruler. The stem diameter was measured with a digital caliper as mm. The number of leaves per plant was recorded, and the leaf area was determined using a leaf area meter (Li-3100, LICOR, Lincoln, NE, USA), expressed as cm 2 per plant. A digital penetrometer (Bareiss HPE-III-Fff, ABQ Industrial, USA) was utilized to quantify the firmness of lettuce, measured in kilograms. Chlorophyll content in the leaves was assessed using a leaf SPAD chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502, Minolta, Osaka, Japan). Leaf color values were digitally displayed on a portable digital handheld color spectrophotometer device (HunterLab, Virginia, USA) for the harvested lettuce leaves, and hue angle was calculated. Fresh weight (FW) of lettuce leaves was measured, followed by drying at 65 ºC for 24 h and reweighing (DW) to calculate the percentage of dry matter content (DW = 100 × DW/FW) [ 45 ].

Lettuce antioxidant measurements

The methodology Spanos and Wrolstad [ 49 ] outlined determined total phenolic content with a modification. The quantification of total extracted phenolics was expressed in milligrams of Gallic acid (GA) equivalents, as determined by absorbance readings at 765 nm, utilizing a UV–visible spectrophotometer (UV-1700 Pharma Spec Shimadzu, Japan). The quantification of total flavonoid content in lettuce leaf samples using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (UV-1700 Pharma Spec Shimadzu, Japan) at 765 nm, as Quettier et al. [ 50 ] outlined. The total flavonoid substances were determined by a calibration prepared with standards. Vitamin C quantification was conducted employing the adapted procedure delineated by Elgailani et al. [ 51 ]. Basil leaves underwent homogenization using a high-speed blender, and a 5 mL basil extract was subsequently combined with 45 mL of 0.4% oxalic acid before filtration. The resulting filtrate, comprising 1 mL of extract and 9 mL of 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol sodium salt, was subjected to transmittance measurement at 520 nm using a UV spectrophotometer.

Mineral elements, sodium, and nitrate analysis

The concentrations of potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) in lettuce leaves were assessed using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Quarters of 3 individual plants from each replication were subjected to a drying process at 65 °C for 48 h, followed by grinding using a mill with a 20-mesh sieve. The resultant leaf powder underwent combustion in a furnace at 550 °C for 8 h, and the resulting ash was dissolved in 3.3% hydrochloric acid (HCl). Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu Concentrations were determined through atomic absorption spectrometry in absorbance mode. In contrast, K, Ca, Mg, and Na concentrations were determined in emission mode [ 52 ]. The Kjeldahl and Barton methods determined leaf nitrogen and phosphorus levels [ 48 ]. The colorimetric determination of leaf nitrate accumulation in lettuce leaves was conducted through the transnitration of salicylic acid, as described by Cataldo et al. [ 53 ] and modified by Dasgan et al. [ 54 ].

Antioxidative enzyme activities

The activity of antioxidant enzymes was assessed by extracting enzymes from 0.5 g of lettuce leaf tissue using a mortar and pestle, combined with 5 mL of extraction buffer containing 50 mM potassium-phosphate buffer at pH 7.6 and 0.1 mM disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate. Following centrifugation of the homogenate for 15 min at 15.000 g, the supernatant fraction was utilized for enzyme assays. All enzyme extraction procedures were conducted at 4 °C, and activities were determined according to [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. SOD activity was determined by monitoring the reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) induced by superoxide radicals at a wavelength of 560 nm. A unit of SOD activity was defined as the enzyme amount required to inhibit 50% of NBT reduction by photochemical means. CAT activity was determined by monitoring the degradation rate of H 2 O 2 at 240 nm. For this analysis, 50 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.6 containing 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 ml of 100 mM H 2 O 2 , and enzyme extract were added to the reaction medium in a final volume of 1 ml. APX activity was determined by measuring ascorbate consumption at 290 nm. A unit of APX activity was defined as the enzyme amount required to metabolize one mole of ascorbate per minute. GR activity was determined by measuring the absorbance of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) at 340 nm and its oxidation rate in the presence of the enzyme. The enzyme volume required to oxidize 1 mol of NADPH per minute was defined as 1 unit of GR activity.

Determination of MDA (malondialdehyde) and relative water content (RWC)

Lipid peroxidation level was calculated based on the MDA (malondialdehyde) level determined using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reaction, following the method described by Heath and Packer [ 58 ] and modified according to Kusvuran and Yilmaz [ 59 ]. Absorbance was measured at 532 nm after centrifugation of the supernatant at 10.000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. Any non-specific absorption at 600 nm was subtracted from the values obtained. The proline content was quantified from aliquots of leaf crude extracts using the method outlined by Magne and Larher [ 60 ], improved by Dasgan et al. [ 61 ]. The collected leaf samples’ relative water content (RWC) was assessed on the day of harvest. Initially, the leaf samples were submerged in deionized water for 4 h. Subsequently, the turgor weights of the leaf samples were measured following this immersion period. Following these measurements, the leaf samples were dried in an oven at 65 °C for 48 h to determine their dry weight. The RWC of the leaves was calculated using the following equation [ 57 ]:

Statistical analysis

The impacts of the treatments on morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics, as well as enzyme activities, were assessed utilizing the JMP statistical program (Version 7.0, Statistical Software, 2007). The means of the treatments were compared with the least significant difference (LSD) test at p ≤ 0.05 level.

Lettuce yield and growth parameters

All plants treated with biostimulants exhibited higher yields than those subjected to salt stress. The control group yielded the highest leaf production at 18.11 kg m ‒2 . Under 50 mM salt stress conditions, bacterial and vermicompost biostimulants showed comparable results to the control plants within the same statistical group. The addition of vermicompost into the saline condition resulted in a total yield increase of 75% from 10.23 kg m ‒2 to 17.92 kg m ‒2 , while PGPR supplementation yielded similarly 17.90 kg m ‒2 . Fulvic acid yielded a total of 15.48 kg m ‒2 , amino acid resulted in 13.37 kg m ‒2 , AMF addition resulted in 13.66 kg m ‒2 , and chitosan addition resulted in 13.62 kg m ‒2 (Fig.  2 ). Yield increase rates according to salinity conditions were 51%, 31%, 34%, and 33%, respectively.

The yield of hydroponically grown lettuce under 50 mM saline water supplemented with biostimulants. There is no significant difference between means with the same letter in the same color histogram section

In terms of the lettuce weight, all biostimulant supplements significantly enhanced lettuce weight compared to that under saline conditions (230 g). However, control (407.7 g), PGPR (403.5 g), and vermicompost (403.6 g) treatments were found to belong to the same statistical group regarding lettuce weight (Table  2 ). According to the plant growth data, biostimulants applied to lettuce plants induced significant changes in plant height under salt stress. Measurements indicate that all applied biostimulants statistically resulted in taller plant height than salt application alone. All biostimulant applications and controls are grouped in the plant height statistical analysis. Salt + PGPR (45.50 cm), salt + vermicompost (44.65 cm), salt + chitosan (43.30 cm), and salt + fulvic acid (41.40 cm) treatments resulted in better plant width compared to control (40.80 cm) plants. The salt treatment produced the most petite plant circumference, with a value of 65.20 cm, and statistically, the lowest value was observed in the salt treatment alone. Salt + vermicompost was the most effective treatment regarding plant circumference, with a value of 76.55 cm. All biostimulant treatments resulted in more leaves than the control (33.75 leaf) and salt treatment (23.12 leaf) groups. The highest number of leaves was observed in the salt + vermicompost treatment (41.50 leaves), which produced more leaves than the control group. Control plants exhibited the largest leaf area (5340 cm 2 per plant), while the lowest leaf area was observed in the salt treatment group (2946 cm 2 per plant). Among the biostimulants, the salt + vermicompost treatment had a leaf area of 4748 cm 2 per plant, and bacterial treatments had a leaf area of 4703 cm 2 per plant, making them the most successful treatments with leaf areas closest to the control plants. As anticipated, control plants exhibited the most prominent stem diameter (17.41 mm). Among the biostimulant treatments, only the salt + vermicompost application (16.93 mm) fell within the same group as the control plants. All other biostimulant treatments yielded higher results than the salt stress condition (11.43 mm).

Lettuce quality properties

Lettuce head firmness was analyzed, revealing an increase in firmness due to salt application. Salt + biostimulants generally increased firmness, except for chitosan application (Table  3 ). Firmness decreased in the control group (2.38 kg cm 2 ). The highest firmness was observed in the salt + AMF treatment (2.73 kg cm 2 ), and all biostimulants were within the same statistical group as the salt treatment (2.51 kg cm 2 ). The highest percentage of dry matter was calculated in the salt treatment (5.11%), followed by salt + fulvic acid (4.96%) and salt + PGPR (4.77%), which were in the same group as the salt treatment and higher than the control. Dry matter in the remaining treatments was in the same statistical group as the control (4.18%). Salt application has been shown to increase nitrate content in lettuce leaves, while Fulvic acid, PGPR, chitosan, and vermicompost applications have significantly decreased nitrate by 68%, 11%, 9% and 12%, respectively. The highest chlorophyll content was observed in the salt + PGPR application (34.97). All biostimulant treatments produced higher chlorophyll than both the control and salt treatments. The chlorophyll content of salt-treated plants (31.66) and control plants (30.51) fell within the same statistical group. The lowest Hue value recorded was 106.36 in the salt treatment, indicating a color closest to yellow on the scale. Treatments supplemented with biostimulants exhibited higher Hue values compared to the salt treatment, and these biostimulant-treated samples fell within the same statistical group as the control. Consequently, it was observed that treatments other than salt exhibited hues closer to green than those of the control group.

Lettuce antioxidant properties

Plants subjected to salt stress produced higher levels of total phenolic compounds than the control group. However, plants treated with biostimulants exhibited an even higher accumulation of phenolic substances than the control group and those treated solely with salt. Specifically, treatments containing salt + vermicompost, salt + PGPR, and salt + fulvic acid were characterized by the highest total phenolic content (Table  4 ). Total flavonoids were not higher than salt. Salt, salt + amino acid, and salt + PGPR treatments exhibited higher total flavonoid levels. Salt + vermicompost followed them in fourth place. On the other hand, the flavonoid level of salt + fulvic acid was determined to be the lowest. Regarding vitamin C content, the highest level was recorded in the salt treatment (19.34 mg100g FW ‒1 ), whereas the lowest vitamin C content was determined in the control group (15.21 mg100g FW ‒1 ). According to the statistical analysis, the closest result to the salt treatment was obtained from the salt stress + vermicompost treatment (18.96 mg100g FW ‒1 ). It was indicated that the plants treated with biostimulants formed an intermediate value between the control group and the salt treatment.

Macro and micro mineral element concentrations of lettuce

Macro mineral element concentrations were consistently maintained within the nutrient reference ranges established for lettuce plants outlined [ 48 ] (Table  5 ). However, amino acids and PGPR applications contained higher nitrogen levels than salt and control treatments. On the other hand, the nitrogen concentrations of fulvic acid, chitosan, and vermicompost were found to be lower than those of the salt application. However, all nitrogen concentrations in the trial remained within the reference range of 2–4% for lettuce plants. The plants did not suffer from nitrogen deficiency. The phosphorus concentration was highest in the control and lowest in the salt application. Biostimulant applications contained higher phosphorus levels compared to the salt application. The potassium concentration was highest in the control and lowest in the salt application. The biostimulant applications significantly increased the potassium content in lettuce leaves compared to salt treatment. The K content was highest in the salt + vermicompost treatment. A similar situation was observed for Ca and Mg, where biostimulant applications were found to increase the Ca and Mg concentration under salinity conditions.

In terms of micronutrient content (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) in lettuce leaves, it was observed that biostimulants increased the concentrations of micronutrients compared to salt stress. However, the PGPR application notably surpassed even the control in all micronutrients, exhibiting the highest concentrations (Table  6 ). All the biostimulant applications have significantly reduced Na content by between 75 and 233%. A significant reduction in Na was observed with PGPR and vermicompost applications, while the fulvic acid treatment noted the most minor decrease (Fig.  3 ).

Effects of biostimulants on leaf Na concentration of hydroponically grown lettuce under 50 mM salinity water by the biostimulant supplements. There is no significant difference between means with the same letter in the same color histogram section

Stomatal conductance, RWC and membrane injury

In lettuce leaves grown hydroponically, 50 mM NaCl salinity caused a decrease in stomatal conductance by 205% compared to the control. However, biostimulant applications significantly ameliorated this adverse effect of salt stress. Accordingly, biostimulants increased stomatal conductance by 58% to 189%. Among the biostimulants the highest increase rate was recorded in the chitosan application (Table  7 ). RWC used as an indicator of leaf water status, decreased by 22% in plants under salt stress. RWC, which decreased under saline conditions, increased by 9% to 108% with biostimulant applications. The highest increase rate was recorded in the amino acid biostimulant application. The injury rate of biomembranes due to salt stress was 39% compared to control. Biostimulant applications played a positive role in reducing this damage by 14% to 58%. The most effective treatments were PGPR and vermicompost, with 58%, while fulvic acid was the least effective.

Lipid peroxidation, antioxidant enzyme activities, and proline content

Cellular damage was estimated by measuring lipid peroxidation in terms of MDA content. Significant membrane damage was observed under salt conditions (with a 29% increase) compared to control. However, the treatment with biostimulants showed lower MDA values, resulting in statistically significant cellular protection compared to salt-stressed plants. Remarkably, plants treated with PGPR and vermicompost demonstrated the lowest MDA content in the presence of salt stress, with decreases of 41.5% and 42.2%, respectively (Fig.  4 ). Figure  5 shows that salt stress also increased the contents of osmoprotectants such as proline by 16.13% compared to control. Additionally, biostimulants maximizedthe proline contents in the lettuce leaves under salt stress. The highest increase in proline content (0.44) was observed in plants treated with PGPR under salinity imposition. The most effective treatments were PGPR and vermicompost, which increased proline contents by 22.2% and 19.4%, respectively, compared to the salt treatment.

Effects of biostimulants on lipid peroxidation of lettuce grown hydroponically under 50 mM NaCl saline water

Effects of biostimulants on proline content of lettuce grown hydroponically under 50 mM NaCl saline water

In lettuce, under 50 mM salt conditions, SOD (157.37 U min ‒1  mg ‒1 FW), CAT (414.12 μmol min ‒1  mg ‒1 FW), GR (30.31 μmol min ‒1  mg ‒1 FW), and APX (9.67 μmol min ‒1  mg ‒1 FW) enzyme activities increased by 98%, 181%, 19%, and 3%, respectively, compared to control plants (Fig.  6 ). Under salt stress, the activity of the SOD enzyme in plants treated with biostimulants was lower than in plants that were not stressed, but it increased by 43% when plants were exposed to PGPR. In this study, they were using biostimulants allowed for an increase of 233%, 98%, and 120% in CAT, GR, and APX enzyme activities compared to salt-treated plants. When biostimulants were evaluated among themselves, the highest increase in these enzyme activities was determined in PGPR and vermicompost applications (433% and 502%, 151% and 180%, and 736% and 412% increase).

Effects of biostimulants on antioxidant enzyme activities of hydroponically grown lettuce under 50 mM NaCl saline water

In response to salt stress, plants develop defense mechanisms such as ion homeostasis, osmotic adjustment, and enhancement of antioxidant defense systems. However, prolonged stress may overwhelm these mechanisms [ 23 ]. As a novel strategy,exogenously applied biostimulants protect plants from adverse conditions, promoting sustainable agricultural production. Scientists, growers, and the fertilizer industry have already adopted this strategy. Numerous fertilizer companies and start-ups are striving to develop biostimulant products to alleviate the adverse impacts of abiotic stresses, such as drought and salinity. This study assessed the effects of various biostimulants on hydroponically grown lettuce plants under 50 mM salt stress. Consistent with our initial hypotheses, the agronomic and physiological results demonstrated that biostimulants can effectively alleviate the adverse impacts of saline water on hydroponic culture. Below, we discuss plants’ physiological mechanisms to tolerate salt stress conditions and how biostimulants enhance this tolerance.

The elevated levels of NaCl in irrigation water can lead to several detrimental effects, including [ 11 , 62 ] 1) Reduced water uptake and leaf turgor due to osmotic stress, 2) Toxicity of Na and Cl ions within various plant tissues, 3) Potential nutritional imbalances. It is well-documented in the literature that lettuce growth and yield are hampered by salt stress [ 32 , 63 ]. As observed in our study, salt stress induces various morphological and physiological changes, thereby restricting lettuce growth, yield, and quality. The biostimulant applications alleviated the detrimental effects of salt on plant weight, height, diameter, circumference, leaf number, firmness, leaf area, and yield. Plants treated with biostimulants exhibited enhanced growth, stomatal conductance, relative water content, antioxidants, proline as osmoprotectant, and photosynthetic pigments compared to plants grown under saline conditions. The biostimulants used here mitigated the salt-induced damage by reducing the accumulation of Na and maintaining ions.Using biostimulants is an effective strategy for mitigating the adverse effects of salinity stress on plant health. Biostimulants enhance plant vitality through various mechanisms, including hormonal stimulation, siderophore synthesis, exopolysaccharide secretion, osmoprotectant accumulation, ion exchange, and activating antioxidant enzymes—homeostasis, and increasing the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, APX, CAT, GR).

Using biostimulants is an effective strategy for mitigating the adverse effects of salinity stress on plant health. Biostimulants enhance plant vitality through various mechanisms, including hormonal stimulation, siderophore synthesis, exopolysaccharide secretion, osmoprotectant accumulation, ion exchange, and activating antioxidant enzymes [ 25 , 27 ].

Regulatory effects of biostimulants on stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content, and water status about plant growth and yield of lettuce under salt stress

In response to salinity-induced water stress (osmotic stress), plants generate ABA, which primarily regulates plant water balance by initiating stomatal closure and decreasing transpiration and water uptake [ 64 ]. It has been reported that plants close their stomata under salinity stress to minimize water loss through transpiration and limit the uptake of Na and Cl ions through the roots by xylem flux [ 14 ]. However, this adjustment leads to a decline in intercellular CO 2 concentration and carbon assimilation, resulting in diminished photosynthetic rates and restricted growth [ 27 , 65 ]. In our study, plants supplemented with biostimulants exhibited higher stomatal conductance (58–189%) than salt-stressed plants (Table  6 ). Under salt stress, a reduction in chlorophyll content has been observed, attributed to the increased activity of the enzyme chlorophyllase [ 66 ]. Therefore, our results showed that lettuce plants treated with biostimulants exhibited increased photosynthetic pigment-chlorophyll (4–10%), mineral nutrient uptake (15–109%), and better water status (RWC) (9–107%) to maintain photosynthesis, thereby preventing restriction on plant growth and yield. According to the study, lettuce yield decreased by 44% under 50 mM salinity. When biostimulants were added under saline conditions, lettuce yield increased by 30% to 75% (Fig.  1 ). The highest increase in lettuce yield under saline conditions was observed with PGPR and vermicompost applications. The presence of biostimulants significantly mitigated the inhibition of lettuce plant growth caused by salt stress. The biostimulants have increased significantly plant growth parameters such as weight (%33–75), height (4.5–11%), diameter (6–11%), circumference (3–17%), number of leaves (55–75), stem diameter (31–48%, (leaf area (61–80%) (Table  2 ) [ 10 ]. Moncada et al. [ 27 ] reported that incorporating a bacterial biostimulant into the nutrient solution of floating-grown lettuce effectively alleviated the impact of 20 mM salt stress. Remarkably, nearly all morphological, physiological, and yield parameters assessed in the plants subjected to salt stress and treated with the bacterial biostimulant were similar to or even surpassed those of control plants. Consequently, the detrimental effects of salinity were wholly overcome. Parihar et al. [ 67 ] demonstrated that the inoculation of arbuscular AMF alleviated the adverse impacts of salinity on lettuce plants. This was attributed to increased nutrient uptake, antioxidant and enzyme activities, stomatal conductance, RWC, proline accumulation, and reduced cellular electrolyte leakage. MDA ultimately enhanced biomass production, chlorophyll synthesis, yield, and growth characteristics.

The observed % decrease in relative water content (RWC) by 22% under salt stress compared to the control in this study suggests that the plants were experiencing osmotic stress [ 10 ]. The biostimulants positively influenced plant-water relations. The biostimulants increased RCW by 9–107% (Table  7 ) [ 68 ].

Enhancing effects of biostimulants on minerals nutrients under salt stress

Salt-affected plants accumulate excessive Na+ and Cl− ions, which are absorbed more quickly than essential ions. This leads to ionic toxicity andincreases the disruption of nutrient balance by interaction with Na and Cl ions, disrupting the uptake and transportation of importantions such as N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, B, and Mo [ 14 ]. The ability of plants to tolerate salt largely depends on managing toxic Na accumulation and its distribution within plant parts [ 69 ]. The higher Na causes Ca and K uptake restriction, distorting cell functioning, such as photosynthetic capacity, antioxidant enzyme activities, protein biosynthesis, and hormone metabolism, thereby reducing plant growth and yield [ 70 ]. Sustaining nutrient equilibrium and regulating the Na/K and Na/Ca ratios are paramount for plant growth and survival in saline environments [ 71 ]. In our study, salt-stressed lettuce plants exhibited elevated Na levels. They diminishedK, Ca, and Mg levels, indicating a disturbance in ion homeostasis and subsequent reduction in plant growth and yield (Table  4 ). However, supplementation with biostimulants led to increased concentrations of macro nutrients P (4–97%), K (36–109%), Ca (15–56%) and Mg (23–54%) and micro nutrients Fe (18–150%), Mn (5.5.-185%), Zn (66–222%), Cu (53–620%) while decreasing Na (41–70%) levels (Table  5 and 6 and Fig.  3 ).

For hydroponically grown lettuce plants, applying biostimulants enhances the availability and uptake of essential nutrients, facilitating their incorporation into the chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway. The high levels of chlorophyll and mineral nutrients promote increased rates of photosynthesis, evaporative transpiration, intercellular CO 2 concentration, and chlorophyll content, ultimately resulting in an elevated net assimilation rate [ 72 ].

The application of biostimulants mitigated the Lettuce plant water status, which increased osmotic adjustment due to elevated levels of mineral osmolytes such as K, Ca, Mg, P, and organic-osmolyte-proline. Generally, synthesis and accumulation of cellular compatible solutes, commonly known as osmolytes or osmoprotectants, help plants overcome osmotic stress, termed osmotic adjustment [ 73 ].Osmoprotectants encompass a variety of inorganic ions such as K, Ca, and Mg and organic solutes such as aminoacids, sugars, and carbonhydrates that reduce the osmotic potential by increasing their concentrations, thereby enhancing cellular water retention during water stress [ 74 ]. In this study, biostimulants regulated osmotic adjustment by enhancing the uptake and accumulation of mineral elements under salt stress. Similarly, the production of organic osmolytes, such as proline, has also been promoted by biostimulants. Minerals and proline acted as osmotic protectants. Cell turgor maintenance is crucial as it directly influences stomatal arrangement, affecting photosynthetic capacity [ 73 ]. The following mechanisms can explain the maintenance of cell turgor pressure under biostimulant application: (i) enhanced water uptake, (ii) increased accumulation of osmolytes, (iii) improved nutrient uptake, (iv) strengthened cell walls, and (v) activation of stress-responsive pathways involving water and ion transport, osmolyte synthesis, and antioxidative defense. These combined effects help plants sustain turgor pressure under salt stress, preventing cell water loss [ 72 , 73 ].

Benazzouk et al. [ 75 ] demonstrated that applying vermicompost to salt-treated tomato plants helps maintain their net photosynthesis, limits Na translocation from roots to shoots, and enhances osmotic adjustment primarily through proline synthesis, accumulation of various nutrients N, P, K, Ca, Mg, which may contribute to salt resistance. Beykkhormizi et al. [ 68 ] cultivated bean plants under 20–80 mM NaCl stress and applied vermicompost to alleviate salt-induced damage. Applying vermicompost significantly increased the K and Ca concentrations in leaf and root tissues while reducing Na uptake under saline conditions.

Biofertilizers enhance osmoprotectant and oxidative defense system in lettuce under salinity

Numerous plant species synthesize organic compatible solutes in salt stress, including amino acids such as proline and glycine betaine [ 73 ]. The buildup of these substances creates the osmotic potential required for water uptake while maintaining cellular metabolism [ 14 ]. Proline, a low molecular weight water-soluble amino acid, is recognized as one of the primary osmoregulators/osmoprotectants responsible for regulating plant salinity toleranceto maintain cellular–water relations through its accumulation. Proline plays a crucial role in osmotic adjustment and offers protective functions in salt-treated plants, including scavenging free radicals and safeguarding intracellular structures against NaCl-induced oxidative stress [ 14 ]. Our results indicate that biostimulants enhanced the proline content in lettuce plants by up to 22% under salt stress conditions (Fig.  5 ), facilitating better cellular osmotic adjustment. Biostimulants induce proline accumulation in tissues subjected to osmotic stress such as salinity, promoting osmotic homeostasis and combating oxidative stress [ 76 ]. Al Huqail1 et al. [ 72 ] reported that in response to salt stress, proline, and soluble sugars act as compatible solutes that reduce the water potential of the plant, thereby establishing a gradient favorable for water uptake and restoring cellular turgor. Additionally, proline functions as an antioxidant, signaling molecule, and protective agent, safeguarding biomolecules from the damaging effects of salt-induced dehydration.

Under salt stress, plants initiate a response by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), which serve as signaling molecules while also causing damage to root and shoot tissues by disrupting enzyme function and cell wall integrity [ 12 ]. The ROS can also cause damage to DNA, lipids, and proteins. Simultaneously, ROS induces chlorophyll breakdown and membrane lipid peroxidation, decreasing membrane fluidity and selectivity [ 14 , 16 ]. To defend against oxidative stress, plants require an effective antioxidant system that includes non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants. When applied exogenously through priming, irrigation, soil addition, or foliar spraying, biostimulants can reduce ROS-induced oxidative damage under salt stress. They enhance salt tolerance by strengthening the antioxidant defense mechanism and minimizing oxidative damage at the cellular level [ 77 ].

Biostimulants are thought to influence ROS homeostasis by preventing metals from auto-oxidizing, reducing available electrons for ROS production, and enhancing antioxidant activity to scavenge ROS. Their exogenous use is being explored to develop plant salt tolerance [ 78 ]. Results of this study showed that biostimulants efficiently activate enzymatic antioxidant systems and reduce the harmful effects of salinity; nevertheless, PGPR and vermicompost treatment were more effective than the other treatments. In this study, the supplementation with biostimulants resulted in increased activities of APX (16–187%), CAT (17–283%), and GR (16–78%) enzymes in salt-stressed lettuce plants (Fig.  6 ). SOD activity increased by only 10% with fulvic acid. The findings of this investigation were consistent with the results reported by [ 78 , 79 , 80 ]. Enhanced enzyme activity has been documented to enhance the growth of stressed plants by protecting chloroplasts and other organelle structures where vital biological processes occur [ 64 ]. Rakkammal et al. [ 81 ] reported that biostimulated lettuce plants under salt stress exhibited significantly higher activity of guaiacol peroxidase (GPX) and catalase (CAT) compared to non-biostimulated plants, highlighting the importance of these enzymes in the removal of hydrogen peroxide. These studies similarly observed notable variations in antioxidant enzyme activity after administering biostimulant therapy to plants experiencing salt stress. Biostimulant treatments enhanced the concentrations of antioxidant metabolites and enzyme activity in chloroplasts under salt stress conditions, which corresponded to the biostimulant’s ability to decrease the levels of MDA in these cellular structures [ 82 ].

Lipid peroxidation destroys the integrity of cell membranes, resulting in cell death over time. MDA, a biomarker of cellular toxicity, results from lipid peroxidation under oxidative stress conditions [ 83 ]. Our study observed an elevation (29%) in MDA content under salt stress conditions (Fig.  4 ). As indicated in our research, the application of biostimulants considerably lowered MDA content by 26–42%. The most effective reduction was with vermicompost, which might affect the metabolism and be responsible for the increase in photosynthesis [ 84 ]. The administration of the biostimulants significantly reduced salt-induced oxidative stress, as evidenced by decreased MDA levels. This finding indicates that biostimulants contain antioxidant compounds that act as ROS scavengers against salt-induced H2O2, thereby protecting and stabilizing the cellular membranes of lettuce leaves, maintaining their fluidity, and reducing MDA levels [ 72 ]. It is believed that the positive effects of biostimulants are attributable to their antioxidant properties, which could prevent lipid peroxidation in cell membranes during environmental stress [ 10 , 85 , 86 ]. Zuzunaga-Rosas et al. [ 87 ] reported that applying a complex mixture of amino acids and oligopeptides significantly reduced MDA levels in lettuce plants subjected to salt treatments ranging from 50 to 150 mM NaCl. This finding confirms the role of biostimulants as protective agents against oxidative damage. Adequate stress tolerance can be achieved by detoxifying reactive ROS, primarily facilitated by enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants [ 88 , 89 , 90 ]. These antioxidants enhance plant survival under stressful conditions by protecting them from oxidative damage [ 14 ]. In our study, total phenols, one of the antioxidants, has been increased by 4–18% by the biostimulants.

In this study, fulvic acid, PGPR, chitosan, and vermicompost applications significantly decreased the nitrate of lettuce under saline conditions, which was 462–519 mg kg −1 FW (Table  3 ) [ 22 , 48 , 54 ]. Nitrate accumulation in lettuce can exhibit significant variability depending on the variety and the conditions under which it is cultivated. Research indicates that nitrate levels in curly lettuce have been recorded within a broad range, from 16 to 3400 mg kg −1 FW, with an average of 1601 mg kg −1 FW [ 91 ]. In our investigation, nitrate concentrations remained well below the thresholds deemed harmful to human health. Notably, the European Commission (EC Reg. No. 1258/2011) set the commercialization threshold for protected-grown lettuce cultivated under cover from October to March, is established at 5000 mg kg − 1 FW, a limit that our study did not exceed.

The efficacy of PGPR in improving crop resilience against salinity may stem from diverse mechanisms. These mechanisms include alterations in phytohormone levels, reinforcement of antioxidant defenses, an increase of osmolyte synthesis, and activation of ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate) deaminase activity [ 27 , 92 ]. Ethylene levels elevate in plants experiencing salt stress, adversely impacting photosynthesis and stomatal conductance [ 93 ]. Certain Bacillus spp. possess the capacity to regulate ethylene production in roots via the enzyme ACC-deaminase [ 94 ], offering a potential avenue for mitigating the adverse effects of salt stress on plant physiology. Benazzouk et al. [ 75 ], reported that vermicompost ameliorated the adverse effects of salinity due to its abundant nutrients, plant hormones such as cytokinin and gibberellic acid, auxin for better plant growh under salt stress. Gibberellic acid reduced electrolyte leakage and significantly improved cell membrane stability [ 68 ].

In agricultural crop production, the use of high-quality water is increasingly restricted. In vegetable cultivation, particularly in greenhouse and soilless farming, the use of good-quality clean water is of paramount importance. However, the scarcity of water resources often requires the use of saline groundwater for agricultural irrigation. This study demonstrates that the hydroponic cultivation of lettuce, a salt-sensitive vegetable, in the case of poor-quality saline water necessitates significant reliance on biostimulants as a crucial solution. It has been shown that plants can effectively cope with saline conditions through biostimulants without adversely affecting yield and crop quality. Specifically, PGPR (1.0 ml L −1 ), vermicompost (2 ml L ‒1 ) and fulvic acid (40 mg L ‒1 ) biostimulants have emerged as prominent solutions in saline water conditions, making them recommendable for hydroponic lettuce producers. This study demonstrates that biostimulants can substantially enhance the sustainable production of hydroponic lettuce by increasing plant tolerance to salt stress, improving nutrient uptake, and boosting crop yield and quality. The biostimulants are affordable, environmentally friendly, and green treatment for mitigating the detrimental consequences of salt stress. It is anticipated that hydroponic farmers will regularly use biostimulant products in the near future. However, more research is needed on biostimulant properties, concentrations, and combinations for hydroponically grown plants.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Giménez A, Fernández JA, Pascual JA, Ros M, Saez-Tovar J, Martinez-Sabater E, Gruda NS, Egea-Gilabert C. Promising composts as growing media for the production of baby leaf lettuce in a floating system. Agronomy. 2020;10:1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101540 .

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Ullah A, Bano A, Khan N. Climate change and salinity effects on crops and chemical communication between plants and plant growth-promoting microorganisms under stress. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021;5:618092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.618092 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Bisbis MB, Gruda NS, Blanke MM. Securing horticulture in a changing climate—a mini review. Horticulturae. 2019;5(3):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5030056 .

Kizilgeci F, Yildirim M, Islam MS, Ratnasekera D, Iqbal MA, Sabagh AE. Normalized difference vegetation index and chlorophyll content for precision nitrogen management in durum wheat cultivars under semi-arid conditions. Sustainability. 2021;13(7):3725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073725 .

Bisbis M, Gruda N, Blanke M. Adapting to climate change with greenhouse technology. Acta Hortic. 2018;1227:107–14. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1227.13 .

Sadak MS, Dawood MG, El-Awadi MES. Changes in growth, photosynthetic pigments and antioxidant system of Hordeum vulgare plant grown under salinity stress via signal molecules application. Vegetos. 2024:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-024-00879-3 .

FAOSTAT. Database collection of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2015. http://www.fao.org/faostat/ .

Sadak MS, Dawood MG. biofertilizer role in alleviating the deleterious effects of salinity on wheat growth and productivity. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2023;75:1207–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00783-3 .

Bhanja SN, Mukherjee A, Rodell M. Groundwater storage variations in India. In: Groundwater of South Asia. 2018. p. 49–59.

Peña Calzada K, Olivera Viciedo D, Habermann E, Calero Hurtado A, Lupino Gratão P, De Mello PR, Rodríguez JC. Exogenous application of amino acids mitigates the deleterious effects of salt stress on soybean plants. Agronomy. 2022;12(9):2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092014 .

Minhas PS, Ramos TB, Ben-Gal A, Pereira LS. Coping with salinity in irrigated agriculture: crop evapotranspiration and water management issues. Agric Water Manag. 2020;227:105832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105832 .

Miller GA, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz SU, Mittler RO. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(4):453–67.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Sadak MS, Hanafy RS, Elkady FMAM, Mogazy AM, Abdelhamid MT. Exogenous calcium reinforces photosynthetic pigment content and osmolyte, enzymatic, and non-enzymatic antioxidants abundance and alleviates salt stress in bread wheat. Plants. 2023;12:1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071532 .

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Hualpa-Ramirez E, Carrasco-Lozano EC, Madrid-Espinoza J, Tejos R, Ruiz-Lara S, Stange C, Norambuena L. Stress salinity in plants: new strategies to cope with in the foreseeable scenario. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024;208:108507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108507 .

Sadak MS. Physiological role of arbuscular mycorrhizae and vitamin b 1 on productivity and physio-biochemical traits of white lupine ( lupinus termis l.) under salt stress. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2023;75:1885–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00855-y .

Qadir M, Wichelns D, Raschid-Sally L, McCornick PG, Drechsel P, Bahri A, Minhas PS. The challenges of wastewater irrigation in developing countries. Agric Water Manag. 2010;97(4):561–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.11.004 .

Sadak MS, Sekara A, Al-ashkar I, Habib-ur-Rahman M, Skalicky M, Brestic M, Kumar A, Sabagh AE, Abdelhamid MT. Exogenous aspartic acid alleviates salt stress induced decline in growth by enhancing antioxidants and compatible solutes while reducing reactive oxygen species in wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:987641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.987641 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Gruda NS. Increasing sustainability of growing media constituents and stand-alone substrates in soilless culture systems. Agronomy. 2019;9(6):298. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060298 .

Gruda NS. Advances in soilless culture and growing media in today’s horticulture—an editorial. Agronomy. 2022;12(11):2773. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112773 .

Bonasia A, Lazzizera C, Elia A, Conversa G. Nutritional, biophysical and physiological characteristics of wild rocket genotypes as affected by soilless cultivation system, salinity level of nutrient solution and growing period. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:246365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00300 .

Gruda N, Savvas D, Youssuf R, Colla G. Impacts of genetic material and current technologies on product quality of selected greenhouse vegetables–a review. Eur J Hortic Sci. 2018;83(5):319–28. https://doi.org/10.17660/eJHS.2018/83.5.510.17660/eJHS.2018/83.5.5 .

Conversa G, Bonasia A, Lazzizera C, La Rotonda P, Elia A. Reduction of nitrate content in baby-leaf lettuce and cichorium endivia through the soilless cultivation system, electrical conductivity and management of nutrient solution. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:645671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.645671 .

Rady MM, Salama MM, Kuşvuran S, Kuşvuran A, Ahmed AF, Ali EF, Mahmoud AE. Exploring the role of novel biostimulators in suppressing oxidative stress and reinforcing the antioxidant defense systems in Cucurbita pepo plants exposed to cadmium and lead toxicity. Agronomy. 2023;13(7):1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071916 .

Dasgan HY, Yilmaz M, Dere S, Ikiz B, Gruda NS. Bio-fertilizers reduced the need for mineral fertilizers in soilless-grown capia pepper. Horticulturae. 2023;9:188. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020188 .

Bulgari R, Franzoni G, Ferrante A. Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy. 2019;9(6):306. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060306 .

Rouphael Y, Colla G. Biostimulants in agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:511937. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00040 .

Moncada A, Vetrano F, Miceli A. Alleviation of salt stress by plant growth-promoting bacteria in hydroponic leaf lettuce. Agronomy. 2020;10(10):1523. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101523 .

Dasgan HY, Temtek T. Impact of biofertilizers on plant growth, physiological and quality traits of lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. Longifolia ) grown under salinity stress. Intechopen; 2023. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108710 .

Gill S, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(12):909–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 .

Abd El-Azeem SA, Elwan MW, Sung JK, Ok YS. Alleviation of salt stress in eggplant ( Solanum melongena L.) by plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2012;43(9):1303–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2012.666305 .

Santos ADA, Silveira JAGD, Bonifacio A, Rodrigues AC, Figueiredo MDVB. Antioxidant response of cowpea co-inoculated with plant growth-promoting bacteria under salt stress. Braz J Microbiol. 2018;49:513–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.12.003 .

Tammam AA, Rabei Abdel MoezShehata M, Pessarakli M, El-Aggan WH. Vermicompost and its role in alleviation of salt stress in plants–I. Impact of vermicompost on growth and nutrient uptake of salt-stressed plants. J Plant Nutr. 2023;46(7):1446–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2022.2072741 .

El-Tohamy WA, El-Abagy HM, El-Greadly NHM, Gruda N. Hormonal changes, growth and yield of tomato plants in response to chemical and bio-fertilization application in sandy soils. J Appl Bot Food Qual. 2012;82(2):179–82.

Google Scholar  

Baum C, El-Tohamy W, Gruda N. Increasing the productivity and product quality of vegetable crops using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a review. Sci Hortic. 2015;187:131–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.03.002 .

Sadak MS. Biochemical responses of white termis to pyridoxine and mycorrhizae treatment under salinity stress. Egypt J Chem. 2022;65(10):429–39. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJCHEM.2022.118032.5319 .

Badr MA, El-Tohamy WA, Abou-Hussein SD, Gruda NS. Deficit irrigation and arbuscular mycorrhiza as a water-saving strategy for eggplant production. Horticulturae. 2020;6(3):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6030045 .

Borde M, Dudhane M, Kulkarni M. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in salinity tolerance and growth response in plants under salt stress conditions. In: Mycorrhiza-eco-physiology, secondary metabolites, nanomaterials. 2017. p. 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57849-1_5 .

Zhang P, Li X, Dong J. Dose-dependent application of straw-derived fulvic acid on yield and quality of tomato plants grown in a greenhouse. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:736613. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.736613 .

Bakhoum GSh, Sadak MS, Tawfik MM. Chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle effect on growth, productivity and some biochemical aspects of Lupinus termis L plant under drought conditions. Egypt J Chem. 2022;65(5):537–49. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem202197832.4563 .

Iber BT, Kasan NA, Torsabo D, Omuwa JW. A review of various sources of chitin and chitosan in nature. J Renew Mater. 2022;10(4):1097. https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2022.018142 .

Bakry AB, Sabra DM, Younis ASM, Sadak MS. Impact of calcium carbonate and chitosan as signal molecule on modulating the negative effects of drought stress on peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.). Egypt J Chem. 2024;67(8):1–12.

Sun W, Shahrajabian MH, Petropoulos SA, Shahrajabian N. Developing sustainable agriculture systems in medicinal and aromatic plant production by using chitosan and chitin-based biostimulants. Plants. 2023;12(13):2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132469 .

Shi M, Gu J, Wu H, Rauf A, Emran TB, Khan Z, Suleria HA. Phytochemicals, nutrition, metabolism, bioavailability, and health benefits in lettuce—a comprehensive review. Antioxidants. 2022;11(6):1158. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11061158 .

Martínez-Sánchez A, Luna MC, Selma MV, Tudela JA, Abad J, Gil MI. Baby-leaf and multi-leaf of green and red lettuces are suitable raw materials for the fresh-cut industry. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2012;63(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.07.010 .

Dasgan HY, Yilmaz D, Zikaria K, Ikiz B, Gruda NS. Enhancing the yield, quality and antioxidant content of lettuce through innovative and eco-friendly biofertilizer practices in hydroponics. Horticulturae. 2023;9(12):1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121274 .

Xu C, Mou B. Evaluation of lettuce genotypes for salinity tolerance. HortScience. 2015;50(10):1441–6. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.50.10.1441 .

Sardar H, Khalid Z, Ahsan M, Naz S, Nawaz A, Ahmad R, Abou Fayssal S. Enhancement of salinity stress tolerance in lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) via foliar application of nitric oxide. Plants. 2023;12(5):1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12051115 .

Ikiz B, Dasgan HY, Gruda NS. Utilizing the power of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on reducing mineral fertilizer, improved yield, and nutritional quality of Batavia lettuce in a floating culture. Sci Rep. 2024;14:1616. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51818-w .

Spanos GA, Wrolstad RE. Influence of processing and storage on the phenolic composition of Thompson seedless grape juice. J Agric Food Chem. 1990;38(7):1565–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00097a030 .

Quettier-Deleu C, Gressier B, Vasseur J, Dine T, Brunet C, Luyckx M, Trotin F. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of buckwheat ( Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) hulls and flour. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;72(1–2):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00196-3 .

Elgailani IEH, Elkareem MAMG, Noh E, Adam O, Alghamdi A. Comparison of two methods for the determination of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) in some fruits. Am J Chem. 2017;2(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.20448/812.2.1.1.7 .

Dasgan HY, Kacmaz S, Arpaci BB, İkiz B, Gruda NS. Biofertilizers improve the leaf quality of hydroponically grown baby spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.). Agronomy. 2023;13(2):575. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020575 .

Cataldo DA, Maroon M, Schrader LE, Youngs VL. Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1975;6(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627509366547 .

Dasgan HY, Aldiyab A, Elgudayem F, Ikiz B, Gruda NS. Effect of biofertilizers on leaf yield, nitrate amount, mineral content and antioxidants of basil ( Ocimum basilicum L.) in a floating culture. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):20917. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24799-x .

Kusvuran S, Dasgan HY. Drought induced physiological and biochemical responses in Solanum lycopersicum genotypes differing to tolerance. Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus. 2017;16(6):19–27. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2017.6.2 .

Dere S, Kusvuran S, Dasgan HY. Does drought increase the antioxidant nutrient capacity of tomatoes? Int J Food Sci Technol. 2022;57(10):6633–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16008 .

Akhoundnejad Y, Baran S. Boosting drought resistance in pepper ( Capsicum annuum L.) with the aid of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and key phytohormones. HortScience. 2023;58(11):1358–67. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI17370-23 .

Heath RL, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968;125(1):189–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1 .

Kusvuran S, Yilmaz UD. Ameliorative role of salicylic acid in the growth, nutrient content, and antioxidative responses of salt-stressed lettuce. Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus. 2023;22(1):75–85. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2023.4603 .

Magné C, Larher F. High sugar content of extracts interferes with colorimetric determination of amino acids and free proline. Anal Biochem. 1992;200(1):115–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(92)90285-F .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Dasgan HY, Kusvuran S, Abak K, Leport L, Larher F, Bouchereau A. The relationship between citrulline accumulation and salt tolerance during the vegetative growth of melon ( Cucumis melo L.). Plant Soil Environ. 2009;55(2):51–7. https://doi.org/10.17221/316-PSE .

Alfosea-Simón M, Zavala-Gonzalez EA, Camara-Zapata JM, Martínez-Nicolás JJ, Simón I, Simón-Grao S, García-Sánchez F. Effect of foliar application of amino acids on the salinity tolerance of tomato plants cultivated under hydroponic system. Sci Hortic. 2020;272:109509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109509 .

Kurunc A. Effects of water and salinity stresses on growth, yield, and water use of iceberg lettuce. J Sci Food Agric. 2021;101(13):5688–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11223 .

Osakabe Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K, Tran LSP. ABA control of plant macroelement membrane transport systems in response to water deficit and high salinity. New Phytol. 2014;202(1):35–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12613 .

Hnilickova H, Kraus K, Vachova P, Hnilicka F. Salinity stress affects photosynthesis, malondialdehyde formation, and proline content in Portulaca oleracea L. Plants. 2021;10(5):845. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050845 .

Yadav SP, Bharadwaj R, Nayak H, Mahto R, Singh RK, Prasad SK. Impact of salt stress on growth, productivity and physicochemical properties of plants: a review. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(2):1793–8.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Parihar M, Rakshit A, Rana K, Tiwari G, Jatav SS. The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation in mitigating salt stress of pea ( Pisum Sativum L.). Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2020;51(11):1545–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.178491 .

Beykkhormizi A, Abrishamchi P, Ganjeali A, Parsa M. Effect of vermicompost on some morphological, physiological and biochemical traits of bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under salinity stress. J Plant Nutr. 2016;39(6):883–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2015.1109104 .

Fardus J, Hossain MS, Fujita M. Modulation of the antioxidant defense system by exogenous L-glutamic acid application enhances salt tolerance in lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.). Biomolecules. 2021;11(4):587. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11040587 .

Parveen, Anwar-Ul-Haq M, Aziz T, Aziz O, Maqsood L. Potassium induces carbohydrates accumulation by enhancing morpho-physiological and biochemical attributes in soybean under salinity. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2021;67(7):946–59.

Breś W, Kleiber T, Markiewicz B, Mieloszyk E, Mieloch M. The effect of NaCl stress on the response of lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.). Agronomy. 2022;12(2):244. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020244 .

Al-Huqail AA, Aref NMA, Khan F, et al. Azolla filiculoides extract improved salt tolerance in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is associated with prompting osmostasis, antioxidant potential and stress-interrelated genes. Sci Rep. 2024;14:11100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61155-7 .

Ozturk M, Turkyilmaz Unal B, García-Caparrós P, Khursheed A, Gul A, Hasanuzzama M. Osmoregulation and its actions during the drought stress in plants. Physiol Plant. 2021;172(2):1321–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13297 .

Fang Y, Xiong. General mechanisms of drought response andtheir application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(4):673–89.

Benazzouk S, Dobrev PI, Djazouli ZE, Motyka V, Lutts S. Positive impact of vermicompost leachate on salt stress resistance in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) at the seedling stage: a phytohormonal approach. Plant Soil. 2020;446:145–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04361-x .

Cristofano F, El-Nakhel C, Colla G, Cardarelli M, Pii Y, Lucini L, Rouphael Y. Modulation of morpho-physiological and metabolic profiles of lettuce subjected to salt stress and treated with two vegetal-derived biostimulants. Plants. 2023;12(4):709. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040709 .

Hasanuzzaman M, Sinthi F, Alam S, Sultana A, Rummana S, Khatun A. Perspective Chapter: Enhancing plant resilience to salinity induced oxidative stress – role of exogenous elicitors. IntechOpen. 2024. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.115035 .

Ait-El-Mokhtar M, Baslam M, Ben-Laouane R, Anli M, Boutasknit A, Mitsui T, Wahbi S, Meddich A. Alleviation of detrimental effects of salt stress on date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.) by the application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or compost. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020;4:131.

Hasanuzzaman M, Parvin K, Bardhan K, Nahar K, Anee TI, Masud AA, Fotopoulos V. Biostimulants for the regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolism in plants under abiotic stress. Cells. 2021;10(10):2537.

Gedeon S, Ioannou A, Balestrini R, Fotopoulos V, Antoniou C. Application of biostimulants in tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum ) to enhance plant growth and salt stress tolerance. Plants. 2022;11(22):3082.

Rakkammal K, Maharajan T, Ceasar SA, Ramesh M. Biostimulants and their role in improving plant growth under drought and salinity. Cereal Res Commun. 2023;51(1):61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-022-00299-6 .

Atero-Calvo S, Magro F, Masetti G, Navarro-León E, Blasco B, Ruiz JM. Salinity stress mitigation by radicular and foliar humic substances application in lettuce plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2024:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-024-01151-z .

Singh V, et al. Differential expression of salt-responsive genes to salinity stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive rice ( Oryza sativa L.) at seedling stage. Protoplasma. 2018;255:1667–81.

Diao M, et al. Selenium promotes the growth and photosynthesis of tomato seedlings under salt stress by enhancing chloroplast antioxidant defense system. J Plant Growth Regul. 2014;33:671–82.

Volpe V, et al. The association with two different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differently affects water stress tolerance in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:412387.

Turan M, et al. Effect of biostimulants on yield and quality of cherry tomatoes grown in fertile and stressed soils. HortScience. 2021;56(4):414–23.

Zuzunaga-Rosas J, Calone R, Mircea DM, Shakya R, Ibáñez-Asensio S, Boscaiu M, et al. Mitigation of salt stress in lettuce by a biostimulant that protects the root absorption zone and improves biochemical responses. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1341714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1341714 .

Alshammari WB, Alshammery K, Lotfi S, Altamimi H, Alshammari A, Al-Harbi NA, et al. Improvement of morphophysiological and anatomical attributes of plants under abiotic stress conditions using plant growth-promoting bacteria and safety treatments. PeerJ. 2024;12:e17286. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17286 .

Gruda NS, Dong J, Li X. From salinity to nutrient-rich vegetables: strategies for quality enhancement in protected cultivation. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2024;45(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2024.2351678 .

Murtaza G, Usman M, Iqbal J, Gruda NS. The impact of biochar addition on morpho-physiological characteristics, yield, and water use efficiency of tomato plants under drought and salinity stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24:356. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05058-9 .

Alexander J, Benford D, Cockburn A, Cravedi JP, Dogliotti E, Domenico AD, Schlatter J. Nitrate in vegetables Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food chain. EFSA J. 2008;689:1–79.

Paul D, Lade H. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria to improve crop growth in saline soils: a review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2014;2014(34):737–52.

Bharti N, Barnawal D. Amelioration of salinity stress by PGPR: ACC deaminase and ROS scavenging enzymes activity. In: PGPR amelioration in sustainable agriculture. Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815879-1.00005-7 .

Zafar-ul-Hye M, Danish S, Abbas M, Ahmad M, Munir TM. ACC deaminase producing PGPR Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Agrobacterium fabrum along with biochar improve wheat productivity under drought stress. Agronomy. 2019;9(7):343. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070343 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Research Foundation Office of the Cukurova University (BAP).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the Cukurova University Research Foundation (BAP) under projects of FBA-2021-13452 and FDK-2021-13802.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cukurova, Adana, 01330, Türkiye

Boran İkiz, Hayriye Yildiz Dasgan & Sibel Balik

Food and Agriculture Vocational School, Cankiri Karatekin University, Çankırı, 18100, Türkiye

Sebnem Kusvuran

Institute of Plant Sciences and Resource Conservation, Division of Horticultural Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Nazim S. Gruda

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Material preparation, data collection and analysis were carried out BI, SB, SK. The initial draft of the manuscript was authored by BI and HYF. HYD and NSG then reviewed and revised the manuscript. Resources and founding acquisition were from HYD and NGS. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hayriye Yildiz Dasgan or Nazim S. Gruda .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

We state that the methods used throughout the experiment were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

İkiz, B., Dasgan, H.Y., Balik, S. et al. The use of biostimulants as a key to sustainable hydroponic lettuce farming under saline water stress. BMC Plant Biol 24 , 808 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05520-8

Download citation

Received : 14 March 2024

Accepted : 14 August 2024

Published : 28 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05520-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Lactuca sativa L. var . crispa
• NaCl stress
• Coping with stress
• Soilless culture

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

• General enquiries: [email protected]