For reporting animal research and peer-reviewers of animal research studies.
Scientists developed the guidelines, originally published in PLOS Biology, in consultation with the scientific community as part of a National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3R).
More information, including the current list of endorsements by scientific journals, funding bodies, universities, and learned societies is on the ARRIVE .
Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun [cited 2018 Apr 13];29;8(6):e1000412. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2893951/ doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412. PubMed PMID: 20613859; PubMed Central PMCID: .
Research ethics committees use this guideline to review and monitor randomized clinical trials.
ASSERT’s 18-item checklist includes some elements of to ensure fulfillment of the requirements for scientific validity.
Taken from https://www.assert-statement.org/: (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) initiative.”
Evidence-based, minimum recommendations for case reports. The CARE guidelines provide early signs of what may work for patients.
Common data elements are standardized terms for the collection and exchange of data. CDEs are metadata; they describe the type of data collected, not the data itself. An example of metadata is the question presented on a form, "Patient Name," whereas an example of data would be "Jane Smith."
This portal provides access to NIH-supported CDE initiatives and other resources for investigators developing data collection protocols.
Standards supporting the "acquisition, exchange, submission and archive of clinical research data and metadata."
Used to report "economic evaluations of health interventions."
Developed by members of the journal editors’ subgroup of the Bioresource Research Impact Factor (BRIF) for citing bioresources, such as biological samples, data, and databases.
Forum for editors of peer-reviewed journals to discuss issues related to the integrity of the scientific record. Asks editors to report, record, and initiate investigations into ethical problems in the publication process. All Elsevier journals are COPE members.
A "32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups."
Authority on scientific communication issues.
Remain aware of trends in traditional or electronic scientific publishing.
is the official journal of the European Association of Science Editors (EASE).
Reporting guidelines developers, medical journal editors and peer reviewers, research funding bodies, and other partners work to improve the quality of research.
"A curated, informative and educational resource on data and metadata standards, inter-related to databases and data policies."
68-page guidelines includes the and the Helsinki Declaration.
Guidelines to standardize reports of surgically-based Phase 1 and Phase 2 neuro-oncology trials.
A checklist format summarizes the guidelines.
Guidelines for the results of clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies.
BioMedCentral & BMJ journals ask authors of industry-sponsored studies, or of papers in industry-sponsored supplements, to follow GPP.
(To download a PDF of GPP 2022 from the Annals of Internal Medicine website, if you do not have a journal subscription.)
DeTora LM, Toroser D, Sykes A, et al. .
Guidelines to produce scientific and technical reports and writing/distributing grey literature.
Lists in alphabetical order. Contains publishing guidelines for some journals. Indicates which journals follow CONSORT and/or other guidelines.
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (also called the Vancouver Style)
The aim is to improve the quality and credibility of scientific peer review and publication and to help advance the efficiency, effectiveness, and equitability of the dissemination of biomedical information throughout the world.
To promote best practices in the nursing literature.
"a general purpose framework with which to collect and communicate complex metadata (i.e. sample characteristics, technologies used, type of measurements made) from 'omics-based' experiments employing a combination of technologies."
The MIAME guideline is in Appendix B of Applications of Toxicogenomic Technologies to Predictive Toxicology and Risk Assessment (2007) at .
Describes the basic data needed to enable the unambiguous interpretation of the results and to possibly replicate the experiment.
Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC, Gaasterland T, Glenisson P, Holstege FC, Kim IF, Markowitz V, Matese JC, Parkinson H, Robinson A, Sarkans U, Schulze-Kremer S, Stewart J, Taylor R, Vilo J, Vingron M. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 2001 Dec [cited 2018 Apr 13];29(4):365-71. Available from: PubMed PMID: .
Knudsen TB, Daston GP; Teratology Society. MIAME guidelines. Reprod Toxicol. 2005 Jan-Feb [cited 2018 Apr 13];19(3):263. PubMed PMID: .
Portal of almost 40 checklists can use when reporting biological and biomedical science research.
To report the meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology.
A 22-item checklist showing items to include when reporting an outbreak or intervention study of a nosocomial organism. Endorsed by professional special interest groups and societies, including the Association of Medical Microbiologists (AMM), British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) & the Infection Control Nurses' Association (ICNA) Research and Development Group.
Group that aims to improve the design of studies, their presentation, interpretation of results and translation into practice.
NIH held a joint workshop in June 2014 with the Nature Publishing Group and Science on the issue of reproducibility and rigor of research findings, with journal editors representing over 30 basic/preclinical science journals in which NIH-funded investigators have most often published.
The workshop focused on the common opportunities in the scientific publishing arena to enhance rigor and further support research that is reproducible, robust, and transparent.
Journal editors at that workshop came to consensus on a set of principles to facilitate these goals, which .
The is to help authors improve the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It has “focused on randomized trials, but PRISMA can also be used as a basis for reporting systematic reviews of other types of research, particularly evaluations of interventions. PRISMA may also be useful for critical appraisal of published systematic reviews, although it is not a quality assessment instrument to gauge the quality of a systematic review.”
Checklist that describes the preferred way to present the abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of a report of a meta-analysis.
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999 Nov 27[cited 2018 Apr 13];354(9193):1896-900. PubMed PMID: .
Eight-item checklist to use by authors and editors when publishing reports of homeopathic clinical trials.
Evidence-based minimum set of items for trials reporting production, health, and food-safety outcomes. (22-item checklist)
Guidelines for reporting of tumor marker studies.
McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM; Statistics Subcommittee of NCI-EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics. REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Nov [cited 2018 Apr 13];100(2):229-35. Epub 2006 Aug 24. PubMed PMID: .
"Reporting practice guidelines in health care"
How to report sex and gender information in a study’s design, data analyses, results, and interpretation of findings.
Recommendations for standardizing and reporting of metabolic analyses.
Lindon JC, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Keun HC, Craig A, Pearce JT, Bruce SJ, Hardy N, Sansone SA, Antti H, Jonsson P, Daykin C, Navarange M, Beger RD, Verheij ER, Amberg A, Baunsgaard D, Cantor GH, Lehman-McKeeman L, Earll M, Wold S, Johansson E, Haselden JN, Kramer K, Thomas C, Lindberg J, Schuppe-Koistinen I, Wilson ID, Reily MD, Robertson DG, Senn H, Krotzky A, Kochhar S, Powell J, van der Ouderaa F, Plumb R, Schaefer H, Spraul M; Standard Metabolic Reporting Structures working group. Summary recommendations for standardization and reporting of metabolic analyses. Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Jul [cited 2018 Apr 13];23(7):833-8. PubMed PMID: .
The SPIRIT 2013 Statement is a 33-item checklist that recommend a minimum set of data to include in a clinical trial protocol.
The SQUIRE Guidelines help authors write usable articles about quality improvement in healthcare so that results are findable and widely distributed.
How to report qualitative research.
Aims to improve the accuracy and completeness of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy, to allow readers to assess the potential for bias in the study (internal validity) and to evaluate its generalizability. Checklist contains 34-items.
Used to report health informatics evaluation studies.
To promote reporting of genetic association studies.
For more information, see the STROBE guidelines.
Designed as a supplement to CONSORT, which has led to improved reporting of trial design and conduct in general. Current plans are to revise STRICTA in collaboration with the CONSORT Group, such that STRICTA becomes an "official" extension to CONSORT.
Aims to establish a of items to include in articles reporting observational research.
in their Instructions for Authors.
Description of structured abstracts and how MEDLINE formats them.
"Reporting of studies that develop a prediction model or evaluate its performance."
Last Reviewed: April 14, 2023
Our content is reader-supported. Things you buy through links on our site may earn us a commission
Never miss out on well-researched articles in your field of interest with our weekly newsletter.
Research insights unveiled: analyzing and reporting findings.
© Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, Ph.D., Authenticity Consulting, LLC . A Field Guide to Nonprofit Program Design, Marketing, and Evaluation , Field Guide to Consulting and Organizational Development with Nonprofits , and Field Guide to Consulting and Organizational Development .
Analyzing and interpreting information, reporting results, who should carry out the research, contents of a research report — an example, some pitfalls to avoid.
Also, consider Related Library Topics
In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to Analyzing Research Results. Scan down the blog’s page to see various posts. Also, see the section “Recent Blog Posts” in the sidebar of the blog or click on “Next” near the bottom of a post in the blog.
Analyzing quantitative and qualitative data is often the topic of advanced research and evaluation methods courses. However, there are certain basics that can help to make sense of reams of data.
When analyzing data (whether from questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, or whatever), always start with a review of your research goals, i.e., the reason you undertook the research in the first place. This will help you organize your data and focus your analysis.
For example, if you want to improve a program by identifying its strengths and weaknesses, you can organize data into program strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions to improve the program. If you wanted to fully understand how your program works, you could organize data in the chronological order in which customers or clients go through your program. If you are conducting a performance improvement study, you can categorize data according to each measure associated with each overall performance result, e.g., employee learning, productivity, and results.
(for information other than commentary, e.g., ratings, rankings, yes’s, no’s, etc.):
(respondents’ verbal answers in interviews, focus groups, or written commentary on questionnaires):
Also, consider Analyzing Data and Communicating Results
Ideally, the organization’s management decides what the research goals should be. Then a research expert helps the organization to determine what the research methods should be, and how the resulting data will be analyzed and reported back to the organization.
If an organization can afford any outside help at all, it should be for identifying the appropriate research methods and how the data can be collected. The organization might find a less expensive resource to apply the methods, e.g., conduct interviews, send out and analyze results of questionnaires, etc.
If no outside help can be obtained, the organization can still learn a great deal by applying the methods and analyzing the results themselves. However, there is a strong chance that data about the strengths and weaknesses of a product, service, or program will not be interpreted fairly if the data are analyzed by the people responsible for ensuring the product, service, or program is a good one.
These people will be “policing” themselves. This caution is not to fault these people, but rather to recognize the strong biases inherent in trying to objectively look at and publicly (at least within the organization) report about their work. Therefore, if at all possible, have someone other than those responsible for the product, service, or program to look at and determine research results.
Ensure your research plan is documented so that you can regularly and efficiently carry out your research activities. In your plan, record enough information so that someone outside of the organization can understand what you’re researching and how. For example, consider the following format:
To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below. Each of the related topics includes free, online resources.
Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.
If you’re not playing slots with crypto, you’re doing it wrong. Bitcoin slots have higher payout rates, bigger jackpots, and higher-quality graphics… Need we go on? In this guide, we’ve highlighted some of the best crypto and Bitcoin slots available today, with most of the highest-payout ones available to play at Ignition Casino. However, variety …
Placing a sports bet these days is quick and painless – thanks to the best sports betting sites that make it possible. Case in point: Bovada. This online sportsbook sets the bar really high with its comprehensive betting market coverage, competitive odds, awesome bonuses, and fast payouts. That’s just one out of ten options, though. …
Slots and roulette are fun, but they’re pure games of luck. If you want the challenge of playing something that takes actual skill, you need to join one of the best online blackjack sites. In this guide, our team of experts has found and reviewed the top 10 blackjack websites. It all starts with Ignition …
Small business loans provide funding for business owners to run and grow their companies. These loans can be obtained from traditional banks, credit unions, and online lenders. Usually, the funds are given as a lump-sum payment and repaid monthly unless the lender specifies otherwise. In this guide, we’ve reviewed the top banks for small-business loans, …
High-traffic rooms, millions in GTDs, and anonymous tables? You’ll find all of these at the best online poker sites – and there’s no need to test each one to find the best! All you have to do is pull up a seat so we can deal you in because we have the inside scoop on …
Running a successful Etsy business demands diligent financial management, and selecting the right bank account plays a crucial role in this process. Whether you’re just launching your shop or aiming to enhance your current setup, finding the optimal bank account for your Etsy business can streamline transactions, control expenses, and boost profits. This guide will …
Simply Business is an online insurance brokerage that connects small businesses with over 15 top business insurance providers. It specializes in serving businesses with five or fewer employees, including startups. Licensed to offer insurance in all 50 states, Simply Business provides easy access to policy documents after purchase. It stands out as one of the …
American Business Insurance Services (ABIS) stands out in the industry, offering a variety of insurance solutions that cater to the unique needs of different businesses. This blog delves deep into ABIS, exploring their services, gauging customer satisfaction, and assessing their overall performance in the insurance market. >> Get Your American Business Insurance Quote Now! >> …
Running an e-commerce store can be incredibly rewarding. The opportunity to reach customers with fantastic products and generate a healthy profit is undeniably enticing. However, as a business owner juggling a lengthy to-do list, selecting the right bank account could be more exciting, but it can significantly impact your business operations. For Shopify store owners …
Finding the right bank for your Amazon FBA business is essential for smooth financial operations and boosting profits. You need a bank that caters specifically to e-commerce, with efficient transaction processing, low fees, strong online banking, and top-notch customer support. Look for features that help manage cash flow, handle foreign currency, and integrate seamlessly with …
Finding the right insurance for your business can be challenging among the numerous carriers available. While navigating through insurance options can be cumbersome, it remains a crucial step in the early stages of any business. Securing appropriate coverage from a reliable company is essential for your success as a business owner. State Farm stands out …
If you’re searching for a business insurance company to protect you from unexpected events, you’re in the right place. Although Allstate is perhaps best known for its consumer auto insurance, it’s also one of the top ten providers of commercial auto insurance in the U.S., according to the Insurance Information Institute. This review covers all …
American Express National Bank (Member FDIC) is well-known for its credit cards, but its Business Checking account is equally impressive. This account features low fees, earns interest, and includes Amex’s renowned customer service. Check out this American Express Business Checking review to see if it’s a good fit for your small business. >> Explore American …
Whether you’re a solo entrepreneur or leading a team of employees, a robust business checking account is essential for your small-business financial plan. Citibank, one of the largest financial institutions in the U.S., provides a comprehensive suite of business banking products, including various business checking accounts. This review delves into Citibank’s business checking options, detailing …
As businesses embrace globalization, suppliers and customers are no longer confined to domestic markets. Sourcing from international vendors or serving global buyers has become commonplace. It would be advantageous to have a solution that simplifies sending and receiving global payments. Many such solutions are available today, and a Wise Business account is a notable option. …
Lab reports bridge the gap between classroom theory and laboratory practice. Writing a solid lab report demonstrates your understanding of the course material to your professor and shows your ability to apply these concepts in a practical setting. Let’s talk about how to write a lab report efficiently!
A lab report is a detailed playbook that guides you through your experiments in the lab. You don’t just do experiments: you write them up so that readers can see and understand how and why you did it and the results and implications of experimenting. The fundamental goal of lab report writing is to show that you can think critically, apply theories in practice, and effectively communicate your results. Lab reports are essential in Chemistry and Biology and are also required in fields like Sociology, Engineering, Nursing, and Forensic Studies. For example:
Each field uses the lab report to force students to apply theory to practice, develop skills outside the lab, and engage in learning and professional growth. The UK writing service is a reliable solution if you have any challenges writing a lab report. It provides expert assistance to guide you through writing complexities, ensuring your reports comply with academic standards.
The length of the report on lab work depends on the complexity of the experiment and the course requirements. However, most lab reports, including figures and graphs, are usually 2 to 10 pages long. The required report length is usually specified in the assignment, as there are no strict limits for this type of work.
A lab report must be clear and concise, written logically, using the past tense and third person, and include all the data and findings. A professional lab report writer can help you enhance the quality of your report by providing a lab report template, making it easier for you to communicate your research effectively and meet academic standards.
A lab report should be written formally and objectively, avoiding personal pronouns and always aiming to communicate clearly and precisely. For this type of scientific work, it is better to use passive voice to shift the focus from the researcher to the action or the research subject. For example, " The solution was heated " rather than " We heated the solution. "
Do not add irrelevant details, personal opinions, or speculative statements to a lab report. Ensure the report discusses only factual and supported observations and stays focused on the experiment and its results.
A proper lab report structure is essential to format it neatly and ensure every part communicates a specific aspect of your experiment. A well-organised lab report can enhance the reception of your scientific investigation by clearly presenting your methods and demonstrating rigorous methodology. Let’s look at each lab report section in detail to understand its purpose and importance.
1. Title Page: Your lab report cover page, front, or title page must present the first impression. The lab report title page has the leading information: you should describe the experimental topic accurately and concisely. This page will have all the contributors to the report (e.g., group members and instructors) and the date when the experiment took place.
2. Abstract: A lab report abstract summarises the whole report in an independent synopsis around 150-200 words. It briefly touches on what the experiment aimed to test, the methodology, the most significant findings, and the main conclusion. Abstracts are helpful because other researchers and students can quickly understand the work’s relevant context, determining whether or not the full report requires a thorough reading. Example:
This experiment investigated the effect of sunlight exposure on the growth of basil plants. It measured the changes in the height and number of leaves per basil plant grown under four different lighting conditions for 14 days. The results suggested that plants exposed to sunlight for at least six hours a day had grown 50 per cent larger than those exposed to less light.
3. Introduction: A lab report introduction explains the background information and sets up the experiment. It describes the scientific theory or principle being tested, lists the specific goals or hypotheses to be confirmed, and defines the experiment’s importance and relevance to the field. With professional report writing help , you can learn how to write lab report introductions that effectively communicate the necessary context. Expert guidance enables you to structure your thoughts coherently, refining your scientific narrative and enhancing the overall quality of your lab report.
4. Methods and Materials (Equipment): This section describes all the materials, tools, and procedures used in the experiment. It should include the precise chemical concentrations, brand models of the instruments, and a detailed description of the set-up that should allow the experiment to be done exactly as before by others. It is another pillar of the scientific method. Transparency is essential for the research process. It serves as a control for checks and validation by the broader scientific community so that results can be trusted and used as a basis for future research. Here’s a lab report example of the Methods and Materials section. For example:
We had four basil plants, a ruler, a light meter, and four environments: full sun, partial shade, indoors with artificial light, and complete darkness, in which we measured how each plant grew every two days.
5. Experimental Procedure: Next to it, in the Experimental Procedure section, comes a day-by-day account of what was done, a chronological record of every action and condition that occurred, from the initial measurement to the final result, all in language that is as detailed as possible. This way, if another researcher wants to repeat the experiment, they can do so under identical conditions. The section of a laboratory experiment report is crucial for verifying scientific findings, troubleshooting issues, and refining experiments through peer review.
6. Results: The Results section of a lab report is carefully structured and presented objectively, using the data collected during the experiment. The lab report format of this section usually includes tables, charts, or graphs to visually condense information. It is a crucial element, as everything that follows is an analysis, discussion, and conclusion based on the empirical findings of this section, which substantiates the report and identifies the work as scientific.
7. Discussion: The Discussion section analyses how the results relate to the original hypothesis and the broader field of research. Here, you interpret the data, assessing how the findings align with or challenge existing knowledge. This section should address any unexpected results, their potential implications, and possible reasons for their occurrence. The lab report discussion extends the impact of the findings, considering their practical or theoretical significance, connecting them to broader scientific concepts, and suggesting areas for further research.
8. Conclusion: The lab report conclusion states the experiment's results, repeating how they work with the hypothesis and discussing general implications. It should summarise the research's accomplishments, critical successes, and limitations shortly. It also generally includes discussing what could be studied next and mentioning how future research could build on the present experiment. This part of the report brings a sense of closure to the study, leaving the reader with a clear understanding of what was done and why this matters to the field. Look at the example:
The experiment results show that the hypothesis that plants exposed to more sunlight will grow more than others is supported. The basil plants exposed to full sunlight grew more than those in the other conditions. More research can be done to find out how different light spectrums may affect plant growth.
9. References: The References section is a crucial element of the report, as it lists all sources the experiment was based on and which informed the report's writing. By accurately citing their sources, readers can follow the origin of ideas or findings introduced in the report, assess the basis and limits of the reporting, and access the sources for further study. The appendix lab report section should be placed after the References section and include supplementary material that isn’t essential to the main text of the report.
Learning how to write a lab report isn’t just an integral part of your studies – it has a lasting impact on how your scientific investigation is received. If you learn how to write a university lab report, you’ll demonstrate that you grasp the rules of scientific research. It also showcases a valuable skill: your ability to communicate effectively. Getting this skill right can impact your grades and future academic and workplace career prospects.
The more you enhance your ability to write concise, clear, and well-organised lab reports, the better you'll be for success in any job, whether in research, industry, or any field requiring precise and clear communication.
Writers are verified and tested to comply with quality standards.
Work is completed in time and delivered before deadline.
Wide range of subjects and topics of any difficulty covered.
Read testimonials to learn why customers trust us.
See how it works from order placement to delivery.
Client id #: 000229
You managed to please my supervisor on the first try! Whoa, I've been working with him for over a year and never turned in a paper without having to rewrite it at least once, lol I wonder if he thinks something's wrong with me now.
Client id #: 000154
Your attention to details cannot but makes me happy. Your professional writer followed every single instruction I gave and met the deadline. The text itself is full of sophisticated lexis and well-structured. I was on cloud nine when I looked through it. And my professor is satisfied as well. Million thanks!
Client id #: 000234
I contacted their call-center to specify the possible custom deadline dates prior to making an order decision and it felt like they hadn't even considered a possibility of going beyond the standard urgency. I didn't even want an additional discount for the extended time, just want to make sure I'll have enough time for editing if necessary. Made an order for standard 14 days, we'll see.
Client id #: 000098
I have no idea how you managed to do this research paper so quickly and professionally. But the result is magnificent. Well-structured, brilliantly written and with all the elements I asked for. I am already filling out my next order from you.
Aug 15, 2024 | Law & Crime , Media , Press Releases
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Clay Higgins (R-LA), a member of the Task Force on the Attempted Assassination of Donald J. Trump, released his preliminary investigative report, candidly discussing some of his objective findings following his “boots on the ground” trip to Butler, PA on August 4th, 5th and 6th.
The preliminary investigative report was submitted to Task Force Chairman Mike Kelly (R-PA) on August 12, 2024. The document was intended to foster discussion amongst Task Force members. It has been embargoed for several days pending authorization to release from the Task Force chain of command.
“As I have said, every question will be answered, every theory explored, and every doubt erased. The American people deserve the full truth on the attempted assassination of President Trump,” said Congressman Higgins. “Our investigative efforts are moving forward in good faith. The release of my preliminary investigative report is reflective of my desire to deliver transparency and reassurance to the American people.”
The preliminary report details some of Congressman Higgins’ findings thus far. However, it is not exhaustive, nor final.
Notable observations include:
Read Congressman Higgins’ preliminary investigative report here.
Signup to receive our Email Newsletters
Aug 1, 2024
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Clay Higgins (R-LA) announced today that FEMA is awarding an additional $2,991,177.90...
Jul 29, 2024
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Clay Higgins (R-LA) will serve on the bipartisan House Task Force charged with...
Jul 24, 2024
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Clay Higgins (R-LA) announced today that three airports in Louisiana’s 3rd District...
Ufc 305 results: bonus winners, highlights and reaction.
PERTH, AUSTRALIA - AUGUST 18: (R-L) Dricus Du Plessis of South Africa punches Israel Adesanya of ... [+] Nigeria in the UFC middleweight championship fight during the UFC 305 event at RAC Arena on August 18, 2024 in Perth, Australia. (Photo by Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC)
Dricus du Plessis successfully defended his UFC middleweight championship on Saturday night in the main event of UFC 305 in Perth, Australia.
In a back-and-forth battle with Israel Adesanya, the champion ultimately dug deep and scored a win via fourth-round submission to settle one of the most bitter feuds in UFC history.
Here is a look at the finish:
Adesanya had several moments during the fight. His shots to the body, jabs, and some well-placed uppercuts appeared to take a toll on du Plessis.
However, the heavy-handed champion appeared to make a more significant impact when he landed, and in the second round, his wrestling helped secure two takedowns. Adesanya had his best round in the fourth, seemingly battering the champion with combinations.
Still, a burst from du Plessis resulted in a hard left hand that momentarily disoriented the challenger. A series of right hands from du Plessis forced Adesanya to give up his back, and the champion secured the rear-naked choke that forced the submission.
Despite the bitter nature of the feud, Adesanya and du Plessis showed each other high levels of respect in the post-fight interviews. Adesanya made his intentions to continue his career known, but it's unclear who he'll fight next.
To close out the co-main event, Kara-France destroyed Erceg with a destructive overhand left that dropped his opponent. Erceg got to his feet, but another straight right hand ended the fight.
Here is the finish:
Prates is a problem. He became the first man to KO Jingliang, and he did it with a vicious left hook that led to the walk-off finish.
Take a look:
This one ended with controversy, though there shouldn’t have been any.
Tafa verbally submitted when he screamed out loud from the pain of an ankle lock. After losing the actual fight, Tafa wanted to brawl after the official decision was made.
Jenkins decimated Burns’ legs with kicks and finished the fight with relentless ground and pound.
It seems safe to say that the referee may have jumped in a little too late, as Nicoll was out, and there is no way to know how long he was unconscious.
What’s next for the UFC?
Episode 2 of Season 8 of Dana White Contender Series is Aug. 20, and on Aug. 23, Road to the UFC: Season 3 and on Aug. 24, UFC Fight Night: Cannonier vs. Borralho takes over next weekend’s MMA scene.
One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.
In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service. We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.
Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:
User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:
So, how can you be a power user?
Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.
The Swing State Project is a collaboration between The Cook Political Report and two pollsters, BSG and GS Strategy Group. Below are the toplines from the August 2024 poll. In total, 2,867 likely voters across seven swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) completed the survey.
In the seven states combined, Vice President Kamala Harris leads former President Donald Trump in a head-to-head matchup 48% to 47%.
View the crosstabs (CPR subscribers only).
Subscribe today.
Our subscribers have first access to individual race pages for each House, Senate and Governors race, which will include race ratings (each race is rated on a seven-point scale) and a narrative analysis pertaining to that race.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Reporting Research Results in APA Style | Tips & Examples. Published on December 21, 2020 by Pritha Bhandari.Revised on January 17, 2024. The results section of a quantitative research paper is where you summarize your data and report the findings of any relevant statistical analyses.. The APA manual provides rigorous guidelines for what to report in quantitative research papers in the fields ...
Research Results. Research results refer to the findings and conclusions derived from a systematic investigation or study conducted to answer a specific question or hypothesis. These results are typically presented in a written report or paper and can include various forms of data such as numerical data, qualitative data, statistics, charts, graphs, and visual aids.
Reporting quantitative research results. If you conducted quantitative research, you'll likely be working with the results of some sort of statistical analysis.. Your results section should report the results of any statistical tests you used to compare groups or assess relationships between variables.It should also state whether or not each hypothesis was supported.
For most research papers in the social and behavioral sciences, there are two possible ways of organizing the results. Both approaches are appropriate in how you report your findings, but use only one approach. Present a synopsis of the results followed by an explanation of key findings. This approach can be used to highlight important findings.
The results section of a research paper tells the reader what you found, while the discussion section tells the reader what your findings mean. The results section should present the facts in an academic and unbiased manner, avoiding any attempt at analyzing or interpreting the data. Think of the results section as setting the stage for the ...
Reporting Statistics in APA Style | Guidelines & Examples. Published on April 1, 2021 by Pritha Bhandari.Revised on January 17, 2024. The APA Publication Manual is commonly used for reporting research results in the social and natural sciences. This article walks you through APA Style standards for reporting statistics in academic writing.
The "Results section" is the third most important anatomical structure of IMRAD (Introduction, Method and Material, Result, And Discussion) frameworks, the almost universally accepted framework in many journals in the late nineteenth century. 3 Before using a structured IMRAD format, research findings in scientific papers were presented in ...
An APA-style research report begins with a ... This is where you would report the results of any manipulation checks. The results section should then tackle the primary research questions, one at a time. Again, there should be a clear organization. One approach would be to answer the most general questions and then proceed to answer more ...
1. Context. The "results section" is the heart of the paper, around which the other sections are organized ().Research is about results and the reader comes to the paper to discover the results ().In this section, authors contribute to the development of scientific literature by providing novel, hitherto unknown knowledge ().In addition to the results, this section contains data and ...
explain your reporting decisions to reviewers or editors. There are many places in the reporting standards where we indicate that flexibility should be honored. In this book, I describe why a given standard might not hold for all studies, and you may wish to draw on these explanations in not only the writing process but the review process as well.
Developing a well-written research paper is an important step in completing a scientific study. This paper is where the principle investigator and co-authors report the purpose, methods, findings, and conclusions of the study. A key element of writing a research paper is to clearly and objectively report the study's findings in the Results section.
Written Presentation of Results. Once you've gone through the process of doing communication research - using a quantitative, qualitative, or critical/rhetorical methodological approach - the final step is to communicate it.. The major style manuals (the APA Manual, the MLA Handbook, and Turabian) are very helpful in documenting the structure of writing a study, and are highly recommended ...
Chris A. Mack. SPIE. 2018. Present the results of the paper, in logical order, using tables and graphs as necessary. Explain the results and show how they help to answer the research questions posed in the Introduction. Evidence does not explain itself; the results must be presented and then explained. Avoid: presenting results that are never ...
p values. There are two ways to report p values. One way is to use the alpha level (the a priori criterion for the probablility of falsely rejecting your null hypothesis), which is typically .05 or .01. Example: F(1, 24) = 44.4, p < .01. You may also report the exact p value (the a posteriori probability that the result that you obtained, or ...
in IR institutional research circles is that research results can be accurate, timely, and audience friendly but not all three. In the haste of preparation, reports can suffer from inadequate ...
4. Provide a summary of the literature relating to the topic and what gaps there may be. Rationale for study. 5. Identify the rationale for the study. The rationale for the use of qualitative methods can be noted here or in the methods section. Objective. 6. Clearly articulate the objective of the study.
Abstract. This guide for writers of research reports consists of practical suggestions for writing a report that is clear, concise, readable, and understandable. It includes suggestions for terminology and notation and for writing each section of the report—introduction, method, results, and discussion. Much of the guide consists of ...
Results. Reporting of qualitative research results should identify the main analytic findings. Often, these findings involve interpretation and contextualization, which represent a departure from the tradition in quantitative studies of objectively reporting results. The presentation of results often varies with the specific qualitative ...
The purpose of a research report is to communicate the results of a research study to a specific audience, such as peers in the same field, stakeholders, or the general public. The report provides a detailed description of the research methods, findings, and conclusions. Some common purposes of a research report include:
Reporting quantitative results (8 minute read) Content warning: examples in this chapter contain a brief discussion of violence against women. 16.1 Additional resources for quantitative data analysis. ... Below, I'm going to take you through the key elements of a quantitative research report. This overview is pretty general and conceptual ...
What is the purpose of the Results section in an empirical research paper? The Results (also sometimes called Findings) section in an empirical research paper describes what the ... Bem writes, "The general rule in reporting your findings is to give the forest first and then the trees. This is true of the results section as a whole: Begin ...
PRISMA provides a list of items to consider when reporting results.. Study selection: Give numbers of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, & included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally with a flow diagram. Study characteristics: For each study, present characteristics for which data were extracted (e.g., study size, PICOs, follow-up period) & provide the ...
This chart lists the major biomedical research reporting guidelines that provide advice for reporting research methods and findings. ... Guidelines for the results of clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. BioMedCentral & BMJ journals ask authors of industry-sponsored studies, or of papers in industry-sponsored supplements, to ...
Tabulate the information, i.e., add up the number of ratings, rankings, yes's, and no's for each question. For ratings and rankings, consider computing a mean, or average, for each question. For example, "For question #1, the average ranking was 2.4". This is more meaningful than indicating, e.g., how many respondents ranked 1, 2, or 3.
The lab report discussion extends the impact of the findings, considering their practical or theoretical significance, connecting them to broader scientific concepts, and suggesting areas for further research. 8. Conclusion: The lab report conclusion states the experiment's results, repeating how they work with the hypothesis and discussing ...
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Congressman Clay Higgins (R-LA), a member of the Task Force on the Attempted Assassination of Donald J. Trump, released his preliminary investigative report, candidly discussing some of his objective findings following his "boots on the ground" trip to Butler, PA on August 4th, 5th and 6th. The preliminary investigative report was submitted
Executive Summary. ADL has measured antisemitic attitudes among Americans since the early 1960s. Building on this historic work and furthering it to ensure greater accuracy, ADL, the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago (NORC) and the One8 Foundation embarked on a year-long process to study the research literature on bias and antisemitism, convene academic and communal ...
The research team successfully returned a contaminated building back to its regular use through efficient sampling methods and effective decontamination technologies. These results will be available in a report which demonstrates CWA recovery capabilities, lessons learned, and identifies additional questions. On this page: Test Bed;
UFC 305 Results: Fighter Goes Viral With 'Outrageous' Head Knot Aug 17, 2024, 08:00pm EDT Today's 'Wordle' #1156 Hints, Clues And Answer For Sunday, August 18th
The Swing State Project is a collaboration between The Cook Political Report and two pollsters, BSG and GS Strategy Group. Below are the toplines from the August 2024 poll. In total, 2,867 likely voters across seven swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) completed the survey.In the seven states combined, Vice President Kamala Harris leads ...